TSTP Solution File: NLP096-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : NLP096-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art07.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 02:24:54 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.03s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP8445/NLP/NLP096-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ...................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 6] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 24] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 57] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 96] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 135] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 174] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 213] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 252] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 291] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 330] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 369] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 408] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 447] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 486] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 569] [nf = 20] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 652] [nf = 40] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 735] [nf = 60] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 818] [nf = 80] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 901] [nf = 100] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 984] [nf = 120] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 1067] [nf = 140] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 1150] [nf = 160] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 1233] [nf = 180] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 1316] [nf = 200] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 1399] [nf = 220] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 1482] [nf = 240] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 1565] [nf = 260] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 1648] [nf = 280] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 1731] [nf = 300] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 1814] [nf = 320] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 1820] [nf = 320] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 1838] [nf = 320] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 1877] [nf = 320] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 1966] [nf = 329] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 2373] [nf = 386] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 3590] [nf = 524] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 6774] [nf = 1604] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 23496] [nf = 5561] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 90718] [nf = 36210] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 432992] [nf = 132467] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 1856103] [nf = 816777] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proo
% f at depth = 12 ...
% t = 25 secs [nr = 9857483] [nf = 3074125] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 111 secs [nr = 44744738] [nf = 17180545] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 160536712
% resolvents: 118170771 factors: 42365941
% Number of unit clauses generated: 0
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 2
% Total = 2
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [2] = 6306 [3] = 2361146 [4] = 11461897 [5] = 21497372 [6] = 28202436 [7] = 36623893
% [8] = 35872754 [9] = 18561668 [10] = 5104087 [11] = 828797 [12] = 15288 [14] = 680
% [15] = 388
% Average size of a generated clause: 7.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] ssSkC0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] actual_world_1 (+)2 (-)0
% [2] coffee_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] customer_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] drink_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] event_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] human_person_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] nonreflexive_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] past_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] restaurant_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] see_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] agent_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] in_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] patient_3 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)2 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 2
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 3314137007
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 127291135
% Number of successful unifications: 160536712
% Number of unification failures: 73120001
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 796579575
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 175647554
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 10
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 1
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 3
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 2
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 1.50
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 62
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 233656713
% ConstructUnitClause() = 0
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 535122
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------