TSTP Solution File: NLP080-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : NLP080-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art05.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 02:22:13 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.04s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP12705/NLP/NLP080-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 289] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 642] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1504] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2905] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4796] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 6687] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 8578] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 10469] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 12360] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 14251] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 16142] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 18033] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 19924] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 21815] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 23706] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 25597] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 27488] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 29379] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 31310] [nf = 16] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 33241] [nf = 32] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 35172] [nf = 48] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 37103] [nf = 64] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 39034] [nf = 80] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 40965] [nf = 96] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 42896] [nf = 112] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 44827] [nf = 128] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 46758] [nf = 144] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 48689] [nf = 160] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 50620] [nf = 176] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 52551] [nf = 192] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 52840] [nf = 192] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 53193] [nf = 192] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 54056] [nf = 192] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 55614] [nf = 206] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 58826] [nf = 276] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 71100] [nf = 1298] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 100882] [nf = 3272] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 201260] [nf = 11418] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 567850] [nf = 78364] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 1367069] [nf = 198199] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 15 secs [n
% r = 4454086] [nf = 635713] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 33 secs [nr = 8136137] [nf = 776551] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 120 secs [nr = 31269307] [nf = 1578806] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 80133371
% resolvents: 76259077 factors: 3874294
% Number of unit clauses generated: 0
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 2
% Total = 2
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [2] = 12635 [3] = 249840 [4] = 4794777 [5] = 14878452 [6] = 30316029 [7] = 16205712
% [8] = 5771150 [9] = 7569347 [10] = 312341 [11] = 22416 [18] = 384 [19] = 288
% Average size of a generated clause: 7.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] ssSkC0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] actual_world_1 (+)2 (-)0
% [2] cannon_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] cry_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] event_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] fire_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] group_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] male_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] man_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] nonreflexive_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] present_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] revenge_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] scream_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] shot_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] six_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] agent_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] from_loc_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] member_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] of_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] patient_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] ssSkP0_4 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)2 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 2
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 465729803
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 2097270262
% Number of successful unifications: 80133371
% Number of unification failures: 10504805
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 1427781709
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 2278727568
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 43
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 1
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 3
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 2
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 1.50
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 73
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 90638176
% ConstructUnitClause() = 0
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 267111
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 302 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------