TSTP Solution File: NLP055+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : NLP055+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:50:08 EDT 2023

% Result   : CounterSatisfiable 5.98s 2.51s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : NLP055+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 13:00:37 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 5.98/2.51  
% 5.98/2.51  % SZS status CounterSatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.98/2.51  
% 5.98/2.51  Inference rules
% 5.98/2.51  ----------------------
% 5.98/2.51  #Ref     : 0
% 5.98/2.51  #Sup     : 94
% 5.98/2.51  #Fact    : 0
% 5.98/2.51  #Define  : 0
% 5.98/2.51  #Split   : 1
% 5.98/2.51  #Chain   : 0
% 5.98/2.51  #Close   : 0
% 5.98/2.51  
% 5.98/2.51  Ordering : KBO
% 5.98/2.51  
% 5.98/2.51  Simplification rules
% 5.98/2.51  ----------------------
% 5.98/2.51  #Subsume      : 8
% 5.98/2.51  #Demod        : 12
% 5.98/2.51  #Tautology    : 9
% 5.98/2.51  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 5.98/2.51  #BackRed      : 0
% 5.98/2.51  
% 5.98/2.51  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 5.98/2.51  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 5.98/2.51  
% 5.98/2.51  Timing (in seconds)
% 5.98/2.51  ----------------------
% 5.98/2.51  Preprocessing        : 0.75
% 5.98/2.51  Parsing              : 0.35
% 5.98/2.51  CNF conversion       : 0.08
% 5.98/2.51  Main loop            : 0.68
% 5.98/2.51  Inferencing          : 0.27
% 5.98/2.51  Reduction            : 0.17
% 5.98/2.51  Demodulation         : 0.11
% 5.98/2.51  BG Simplification    : 0.05
% 5.98/2.51  Subsumption          : 0.14
% 5.98/2.51  Abstraction          : 0.03
% 5.98/2.51  MUC search           : 0.00
% 5.98/2.51  Cooper               : 0.00
% 5.98/2.52  Total                : 1.45
% 5.98/2.52  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 5.98/2.52  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 5.98/2.52  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 5.98/2.52  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------