TSTP Solution File: NLP048-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : NLP048-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art07.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 02:12:25 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.06s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP7605/NLP/NLP048-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .............................................. done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 225] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 506] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1176] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2261] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3718] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 5175] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 6632] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 8089] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 9546] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 11003] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 12460] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 13917] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 15374] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 16831] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 18288] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 19745] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 21210] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 22675] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 24140] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 25605] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 27070] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 28535] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 30000] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 31465] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 32930] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 34395] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 35860] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 37325] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 38790] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 40255] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 40480] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 40761] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 41432] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 42640] [nf = 12] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 45098] [nf = 72] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 53698] [nf = 852] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 74430] [nf = 2352] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 141434] [nf = 8472] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 366670] [nf = 53454] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 835644] [nf = 124698] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 1632974] [nf = 142956] [nu = 0] [ut
% = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 16 secs [nr = 3951196] [nf = 311919] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 51 secs [nr = 12079770] [nf = 769689] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 218 secs [nr = 53012714] [nf = 2681484] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 69976704
% resolvents: 66748759 factors: 3227945
% Number of unit clauses generated: 0
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 2
% Total = 2
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [2] = 9900 [3] = 203194 [4] = 5002485 [5] = 17039540 [6] = 25054663 [7] = 11260210
% [8] = 7388788 [9] = 3261105 [10] = 673935 [11] = 82328 [12] = 336 [13] = 108
% [17] = 112
% Average size of a generated clause: 7.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] ssSkC0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] actual_world_1 (+)2 (-)0
% [2] cost_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] dollar_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] event_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] five_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] forename_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] group_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] mia_forename_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] nonhuman_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] nonreflexive_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] order_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] past_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] present_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] shake_beverage_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] woman_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] agent_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] member_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] of_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] patient_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] ssSkP0_3 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)2 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 2
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 306041011
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 1522995477
% Number of successful unifications: 69976704
% Number of unification failures: 9277153
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 1850055506
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 3043930386
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 33
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 1
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 3
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 2
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 1.50
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 71
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 79253857
% ConstructUnitClause() = 0
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 233256
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------