TSTP Solution File: NLP013+1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : NLP013+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 05:22:49 EDT 2022

% Result   : Timeout 300.04s 300.23s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : NLP013+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Thu Jun 30 16:42:53 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.56/0.73  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.56/0.73  The process was started by sandbox on n008.cluster.edu,
% 0.56/0.73  Thu Jun 30 16:42:53 2022
% 0.56/0.73  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 10354.
% 0.56/0.73  
% 0.56/0.73  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.56/0.73  set(auto).
% 0.56/0.73     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.56/0.73     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.56/0.73     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.56/0.73     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.56/0.73     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.56/0.73     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.56/0.73     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.56/0.73     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.56/0.73     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.56/0.73     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.56/0.73     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.56/0.73     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.56/0.73     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.56/0.73  clear(print_given).
% 0.56/0.73  
% 0.56/0.73  formula_list(usable).
% 0.56/0.73  
% 0.56/0.73  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=59.
% 0.56/0.73  
% 0.56/0.73  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.56/0.73  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.56/0.73  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.56/0.73  clauses in usable.
% 0.56/0.73  
% 0.56/0.73     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.56/0.73     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.56/0.73     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.56/0.73     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.56/0.73     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.56/0.73     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.56/0.73     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.56/0.73     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.56/0.73     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.56/0.73     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.56/0.73     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.56/0.73     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.56/0.73     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.56/0.73     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.56/0.73     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.56/0.73  
% 0.56/0.73  ------------> process usable:
% 0.56/0.73  119 back subsumes 86.
% 0.56/0.73  119 back subsumes 84.
% 0.56/0.73  119 back subsumes 82.
% 0.56/0.73  119 back subsumes 80.
% 0.56/0.73  119 back subsumes 78.
% 0.56/0.73  119 back subsumes 76.
% 0.56/0.73  119 back subsumes 74.
% 0.56/0.73  119 back subsumes 72.
% 0.56/0.73  119 back subsumes 70.
% 0.56/0.73  119 back subsumes 68.
% 0.56/0.73  119 back subsumes 66.
% 0.56/0.73  119 back subsumes 34.
% 0.56/0.73  119 back subsumes 32.
% 0.56/0.73  119 back subsumes 30.
% 0.56/0.73  119 back subsumes 28.
% 0.56/0.73  119 back subsumes 26.
% 0.56/0.73  119 back subsumes 24.
% 0.56/0.73  119 back subsumes 22.
% 0.56/0.73  119 back subsumes 20.
% 0.56/0.73  119 back subsumes 18.
% 0.56/0.73  119 back subsumes 16.
% 0.56/0.73  119 back subsumes 14.
% 0.56/0.73  119 back subsumes 12.
% 0.56/0.73  119 back subsumes 10.
% 0.56/0.73  119 back subsumes 8.
% 0.56/0.73  119 back subsumes 6.
% 0.56/0.73  119 back subsumes 4.
% 0.56/0.73  119 back subsumes 2.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 178.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 177.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 176.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 175.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 174.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 173.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 172.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 171.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 170.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 169.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 168.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 167.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 166.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 165.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 164.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 163.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 162.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 161.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 160.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 159.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 158.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 157.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 156.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 155.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 154.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 153.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 152.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 151.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 150.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 149.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 148.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 147.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 146.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 145.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 144.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 143.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 142.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 141.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 140.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 139.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 138.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 137.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 136.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 135.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 134.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 133.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 132.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 131.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 130.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 129.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 128.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 127.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 126.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 125.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 124.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 123.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 122.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 121.
% 0.56/0.73  179 back subsumes 120.
% 0.56/0.73  
% 0.56/0.73  ------------> process sos:
% 0.56/0.73    Following clause subsumed by 991 during input processing: 0 [copy,991,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.56/0.73  991 back subsumes 180.
% 0.56/0.73  991 back subsumes 179.
% 0.56/0.73  
% 0.56/0.73  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.70/0.87  
% 0.70/0.87  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.70/0.87  
% 0.70/0.87  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.70/0.87  
% 0.70/0.87  
% 0.70/0.87  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.70/0.87  
% 0.70/0.87  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.70/0.87  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.70/0.87  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.70/0.87  number of clauses in intial UL: 90
% 0.70/0.87  number of clauses initially in problem: 901
% 0.70/0.87  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 9
% 0.70/0.87  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.70/0.87  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.70/0.87  absolute distinct symbol count: 40
% 0.70/0.87     distinct predicate count: 21
% 0.70/0.87     distinct function count: 0
% 0.70/0.87     distinct constant count: 19
% 0.70/0.87  
% 0.70/0.87  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.70/0.87  
% 0.70/0.87  
% 0.70/0.87  
% 0.70/0.87  =========== start of search ===========
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Model 6 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Model 7 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Model 8 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Model 9 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Model 10 [ 1 29 20744 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Model 11 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Model 12 [ 1 28 259 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Model 13 [ 3 10 134 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Model 14 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Model 15 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Model 16 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Model 17 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Model 18 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Model 19 [ 1 38 379 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Model 20 [ 2 19 257 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Model 21 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Model 22 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Model 23 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Model 24 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Model 25 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Model 26 [ 1 34 164084 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Model 27 [ 1 19 241 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Model 28 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Model 29 [ 2 29 10510 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Model 30 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Model 31 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Model 32 [ 1 19 203 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Model 33 [ 1 39 287 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Model 34 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Model 35 [ 1 9 127 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Model 36 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Model 37 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Model 38 [ 1 19 253 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Model 39 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Model 40 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Model 41 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Model 42 [ 1 29 5393 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Model 43 [ 1 19 213 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Model 44 [ 1 70 164416 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Model 45 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Model 46 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Model 47 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Model 48 [ 1 10 158 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Model 49 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Model 50 [ 1 64 92628 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 36.83/37.03  
% 36.83/37.03  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 36.83/37.03  
% 300.04/300.23  Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------