%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : MSC019+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:59:59 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.41s 0.60s
% Output   : Refutation 0.41s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : MSC019+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.11/0.33  % DateTime : Fri Jul  1 15:47:07 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.41/0.60  
% 0.41/0.60  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.41/0.60  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.41/0.60  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.41/0.60  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.41/0.60  SPASS derived 108 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 709 clauses.
% 0.41/0.60  SPASS allocated 85945 KBytes.
% 0.41/0.60  SPASS spent	0:00:00.26 on the problem.
% 0.41/0.60  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.41/0.60  		0:00:00.08 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.41/0.60  		0:00:00.02 for inferences.
% 0.41/0.60  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.41/0.60  		0:00:00.05 for the reduction.
% 0.41/0.60  
% 0.41/0.60  
% 0.41/0.60  Here is a proof with depth 1, length 8 :
% 0.41/0.60  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.41/0.60  23[0:Inp] ||  -> s_contains(s_g019,s_g419)*l.
% 0.41/0.60  75[0:Inp] ||  -> s_contains(s_g013,s_MX)*l.
% 0.41/0.60  452[0:Inp] ||  -> s_contains(s_g419,s_g013)*r.
% 0.41/0.60  601[0:Inp] || s_contains(s_g019,s_MX)*l+ -> .
% 0.41/0.60  604[0:Inp] || s_contains(u,v)* s_contains(v,w)* -> s_contains(u,w)*.
% 0.41/0.60  697[0:OCh:604.1,604.0,75.0,452.0] ||  -> s_contains(s_g419,s_MX)*l.
% 0.41/0.60  707[0:NCh:604.2,604.0,601.0,23.0] || s_contains(s_g419,s_MX)*l -> .
% 0.41/0.60  713[0:MRR:707.0,697.0] ||  -> .
% 0.41/0.60  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.41/0.60  Formulae used in the proof : kb22 kb74 kb451 mexico_in_america_1 axiom1
% 0.41/0.60  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------