TSTP Solution File: MSC019+1 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : MSC019+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:40:41 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.18s 0.53s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   12 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   19 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   14 (   7   ~;   5   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (   0 sgn;   6   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(axiom1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( s_contains(X1,X2)
        & s_contains(X2,X3) )
     => s_contains(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.LyCsqDzcNd/E---3.1_20247.p',axiom1) ).

fof(mexico_in_america_1,conjecture,
    s_contains(s_g019,s_MX),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.LyCsqDzcNd/E---3.1_20247.p',mexico_in_america_1) ).

fof(kb74,axiom,
    s_contains(s_g013,s_MX),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.LyCsqDzcNd/E---3.1_20247.p',kb74) ).

fof(kb18,axiom,
    s_contains(s_g019,s_g013),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.LyCsqDzcNd/E---3.1_20247.p',kb18) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ~ s_contains(X4,X5)
      | ~ s_contains(X5,X6)
      | s_contains(X4,X6) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom1])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s_contains(s_g019,s_MX),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[mexico_in_america_1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( s_contains(X1,X3)
    | ~ s_contains(X1,X2)
    | ~ s_contains(X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    s_contains(s_g013,s_MX),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb74]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s_contains(s_g019,s_MX),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( s_contains(X1,s_MX)
    | ~ s_contains(X1,s_g013) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    s_contains(s_g019,s_g013),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb18]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem    : MSC019+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 11:15:00 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.18/0.49  Running first-order model finding
% 0.18/0.49  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.LyCsqDzcNd/E---3.1_20247.p
% 0.18/0.53  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.18/0.53  # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.53  # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.18/0.53  # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.18/0.53  # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.18/0.53  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.53  # new_bool_3 with pid 20326 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.53  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.18/0.53  # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.53  # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.18/0.53  # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.18/0.53  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.18/0.53  # Search class: FHUNF-FFSM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.53  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.18/0.53  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 361s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.53  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 61s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.53  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 20329 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.53  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.18/0.53  # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.53  # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.18/0.53  # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.18/0.53  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.18/0.53  # Search class: FHUNF-FFSM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.53  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.18/0.53  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 361s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.53  # Preprocessing time       : 0.003 s
% 0.18/0.53  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.18/0.53  
% 0.18/0.53  # Proof found!
% 0.18/0.53  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.53  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.53  # Parsed axioms                        : 604
% 0.18/0.53  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 544
% 0.18/0.53  # Initial clauses                      : 60
% 0.18/0.53  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.18/0.53  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 60
% 0.18/0.53  # Processed clauses                    : 122
% 0.18/0.53  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.18/0.53  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.18/0.53  # ...remaining for further processing  : 122
% 0.18/0.53  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.18/0.53  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.18/0.53  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.18/0.53  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.18/0.53  # Generated clauses                    : 59
% 0.18/0.53  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 28
% 0.18/0.53  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.18/0.53  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.18/0.53  # Paramodulations                      : 59
% 0.18/0.53  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.18/0.53  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.18/0.53  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.18/0.53  # Total rewrite steps                  : 29
% 0.18/0.53  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.18/0.53  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.18/0.53  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.18/0.53  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.18/0.53  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.18/0.53  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.18/0.53  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.18/0.53  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.18/0.53  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.18/0.53  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.18/0.53  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.18/0.53  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.18/0.53  # Current number of processed clauses  : 62
% 0.18/0.53  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 56
% 0.18/0.53  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.18/0.53  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.18/0.53  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 5
% 0.18/0.53  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 26
% 0.18/0.53  # ...number of literals in the above   : 52
% 0.18/0.53  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.18/0.53  # Current number of archived clauses   : 60
% 0.18/0.53  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 8
% 0.18/0.53  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8
% 0.18/0.53  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.18/0.53  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.18/0.53  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.18/0.53  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.18/0.53  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.18/0.53  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.18/0.53  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.18/0.53  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 3770
% 0.18/0.53  
% 0.18/0.53  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.53  # User time                : 0.006 s
% 0.18/0.53  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.18/0.53  # Total time               : 0.012 s
% 0.18/0.53  # Maximum resident set size: 2672 pages
% 0.18/0.53  
% 0.18/0.53  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.53  # User time                : 0.012 s
% 0.18/0.53  # System time              : 0.015 s
% 0.18/0.53  # Total time               : 0.026 s
% 0.18/0.53  # Maximum resident set size: 2024 pages
% 0.18/0.53  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------