TSTP Solution File: MSC014-10 by Etableau---0.67

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : MSC014-10 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:43:17 EDT 2022

% Result   : Satisfiable 0.19s 0.42s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : MSC014-10 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Fri Jul  1 15:58:03 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.36  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.36  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.12/0.36  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.12/0.36  #
% 0.12/0.36  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.12/0.36  # Number of axioms: 12 Number of unprocessed: 12
% 0.12/0.36  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.12/0.36  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.12/0.36  # Hello from C++
% 0.12/0.36  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.12/0.36  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.12/0.36  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.12/0.36  # 12 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.12/0.36  # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 0.12/0.36  # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 0.12/0.36  # Found 12 unit axioms.
% 0.12/0.36  # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.12/0.36  # 0 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.12/0.36  # 12 unit axiom clauses
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.12/0.36  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 0.12/0.36  # Creating equality axioms
% 0.12/0.36  # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.12/0.36  # Returning from population with 33 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.12/0.36  # We now have 33 tableaux to operate on
% 0.19/0.42  # 29590 Satisfiable branch
% 0.19/0.42  # 29592 Satisfiable branch
% 0.19/0.42  # 29593 Satisfiable branch
% 0.19/0.42  # 29591 Satisfiable branch
% 0.19/0.42  # 29594 Satisfiable branch
% 0.19/0.42  # Satisfiable branch found.
% 0.19/0.42  # 29595 Satisfiable branch
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.19/0.42  # SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.42  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.42  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  # End clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.42  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_15, plain, (equalish(n0,n0)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (equalish(n1,n1)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_22, plain, (ifeq(equalish(n0,n1),true,a,b)=b)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_23, plain, (ifeq(equalish(n1,n0),true,a,b)=b)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_13, plain, (ifeq2(X1,X1,X2,X3)=X2)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_14, plain, (ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3)=X2)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_18, plain, (ifeq2(f(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),true,ifeq2(f(X6,X7,X8,X9,X5),true,equalish(X9,X4),true),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (ifeq2(f(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),true,ifeq2(f(X6,X7,X8,X9,X5),true,equalish(X8,X3),true),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_20, plain, (ifeq2(f(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),true,ifeq2(f(X6,X7,X8,X9,X5),true,equalish(X7,X2),true),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_21, plain, (ifeq2(f(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),true,ifeq2(f(X6,X7,X8,X9,X5),true,equalish(X6,X1),true),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (ifeq2(equalish(X1,X1),true,ifeq2(equalish(X2,X2),true,ifeq2(equalish(X3,X3),true,ifeq2(equalish(X4,X4),true,f(X4,X3,X2,X1,sK1_exists_f_Z(X4,X3,X2,X1)),true),true),true),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_24, negated_conjecture, (a!=b)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_26, plain, (X10=X10)).
% 0.19/0.42  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.19/0.42  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.19/0.42  # Found 10 steps
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_15, plain, (equalish(n0,n0)=true), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_35, plain, (equalish(n0,n0)=true), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_34])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_74, plain, (equalish(n0,n0)!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_75, plain, (equalish(n0,n0)!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_76, plain, (equalish(n0,n0)!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_77, plain, (equalish(n0,n0)!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_73, plain, (f(equalish(n0,n0),equalish(n0,n0),equalish(n0,n0),equalish(n0,n0),equalish(n0,n0))=f(true,true,true,true,true)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_30])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_201, plain, (equalish(n0,n0)!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_202, plain, (equalish(n0,n0)!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_203, plain, (equalish(n0,n0)!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.19/0.42  # End printing tableau
% 0.19/0.42  # SZS output end
% 0.19/0.42  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.19/0.42  # Satisfiable branch found.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.19/0.42  # SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.42  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.42  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  # End clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.42  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_15, plain, (equalish(n0,n0)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (equalish(n1,n1)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_22, plain, (ifeq(equalish(n0,n1),true,a,b)=b)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_23, plain, (ifeq(equalish(n1,n0),true,a,b)=b)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_13, plain, (ifeq2(X1,X1,X2,X3)=X2)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_14, plain, (ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3)=X2)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_18, plain, (ifeq2(f(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),true,ifeq2(f(X6,X7,X8,X9,X5),true,equalish(X9,X4),true),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (ifeq2(f(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),true,ifeq2(f(X6,X7,X8,X9,X5),true,equalish(X8,X3),true),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_20, plain, (ifeq2(f(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),true,ifeq2(f(X6,X7,X8,X9,X5),true,equalish(X7,X2),true),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_21, plain, (ifeq2(f(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),true,ifeq2(f(X6,X7,X8,X9,X5),true,equalish(X6,X1),true),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (ifeq2(equalish(X1,X1),true,ifeq2(equalish(X2,X2),true,ifeq2(equalish(X3,X3),true,ifeq2(equalish(X4,X4),true,f(X4,X3,X2,X1,sK1_exists_f_Z(X4,X3,X2,X1)),true),true),true),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_24, negated_conjecture, (a!=b)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_26, plain, (X10=X10)).
% 0.19/0.42  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.19/0.42  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.19/0.42  # Found 10 steps
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_15, plain, (equalish(n0,n0)=true), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_35, plain, (equalish(n0,n0)=true), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_34])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_74, plain, (equalish(n0,n0)!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_75, plain, (equalish(n0,n0)!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_77, plain, (equalish(n0,n0)!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_78, plain, (equalish(n0,n0)!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_73, plain, (f(equalish(n0,n0),equalish(n0,n0),equalish(n0,n0),equalish(n0,n0),equalish(n0,n0))=f(true,true,true,true,true)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_30])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_201, plain, (equalish(n0,n0)!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_202, plain, (equalish(n0,n0)!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_203, plain, (equalish(n0,n0)!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.19/0.42  # End printing tableau
% 0.19/0.42  # SZS output end
% 0.19/0.42  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.19/0.42  # Satisfiable branch found.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.19/0.42  # Satisfiable branch found.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.19/0.42  # SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.42  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.42  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  # End clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.42  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_15, plain, (equalish(n0,n0)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (equalish(n1,n1)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_22, plain, (ifeq(equalish(n0,n1),true,a,b)=b)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_23, plain, (ifeq(equalish(n1,n0),true,a,b)=b)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_13, plain, (ifeq2(X1,X1,X2,X3)=X2)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_14, plain, (ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3)=X2)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_18, plain, (ifeq2(f(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),true,ifeq2(f(X6,X7,X8,X9,X5),true,equalish(X9,X4),true),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (ifeq2(f(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),true,ifeq2(f(X6,X7,X8,X9,X5),true,equalish(X8,X3),true),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_20, plain, (ifeq2(f(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),true,ifeq2(f(X6,X7,X8,X9,X5),true,equalish(X7,X2),true),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_21, plain, (ifeq2(f(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),true,ifeq2(f(X6,X7,X8,X9,X5),true,equalish(X6,X1),true),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (ifeq2(equalish(X1,X1),true,ifeq2(equalish(X2,X2),true,ifeq2(equalish(X3,X3),true,ifeq2(equalish(X4,X4),true,f(X4,X3,X2,X1,sK1_exists_f_Z(X4,X3,X2,X1)),true),true),true),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_24, negated_conjecture, (a!=b)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_26, plain, (X10=X10)).
% 0.19/0.42  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.19/0.42  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.19/0.42  # Found 10 steps
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_15, plain, (equalish(n0,n0)=true), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_35, plain, (equalish(n0,n0)=true), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_34])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_74, plain, (equalish(n0,n0)!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_75, plain, (equalish(n0,n0)!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_76, plain, (equalish(n0,n0)!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_78, plain, (equalish(n0,n0)!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_73, plain, (f(equalish(n0,n0),equalish(n0,n0),equalish(n0,n0),equalish(n0,n0),equalish(n0,n0))=f(true,true,true,true,true)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_30])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_201, plain, (equalish(n0,n0)!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_202, plain, (equalish(n0,n0)!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_203, plain, (equalish(n0,n0)!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.19/0.42  # End printing tableau
% 0.19/0.42  # SZS output end
% 0.19/0.42  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.19/0.42  # SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.42  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.42  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  # End clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.42  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_15, plain, (equalish(n0,n0)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (equalish(n1,n1)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_22, plain, (ifeq(equalish(n0,n1),true,a,b)=b)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_23, plain, (ifeq(equalish(n1,n0),true,a,b)=b)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_13, plain, (ifeq2(X1,X1,X2,X3)=X2)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_14, plain, (ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3)=X2)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_18, plain, (ifeq2(f(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),true,ifeq2(f(X6,X7,X8,X9,X5),true,equalish(X9,X4),true),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (ifeq2(f(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),true,ifeq2(f(X6,X7,X8,X9,X5),true,equalish(X8,X3),true),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_20, plain, (ifeq2(f(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),true,ifeq2(f(X6,X7,X8,X9,X5),true,equalish(X7,X2),true),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_21, plain, (ifeq2(f(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),true,ifeq2(f(X6,X7,X8,X9,X5),true,equalish(X6,X1),true),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (ifeq2(equalish(X1,X1),true,ifeq2(equalish(X2,X2),true,ifeq2(equalish(X3,X3),true,ifeq2(equalish(X4,X4),true,f(X4,X3,X2,X1,sK1_exists_f_Z(X4,X3,X2,X1)),true),true),true),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_24, negated_conjecture, (a!=b)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_26, plain, (X10=X10)).
% 0.19/0.42  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.19/0.42  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.19/0.42  # Found 10 steps
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_15, plain, (equalish(n0,n0)=true), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_35, plain, (equalish(n0,n0)=true), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_34])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_74, plain, (equalish(n0,n0)!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_76, plain, (equalish(n0,n0)!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_77, plain, (equalish(n0,n0)!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_78, plain, (equalish(n0,n0)!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_73, plain, (f(equalish(n0,n0),equalish(n0,n0),equalish(n0,n0),equalish(n0,n0),equalish(n0,n0))=f(true,true,true,true,true)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_30])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_201, plain, (equalish(n0,n0)!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_202, plain, (equalish(n0,n0)!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_203, plain, (equalish(n0,n0)!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.19/0.42  # End printing tableau
% 0.19/0.42  # SZS output end
% 0.19/0.42  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.19/0.42  # 29597 Satisfiable branch
% 0.19/0.42  # Satisfiable branch found.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.19/0.42  # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.19/0.42  # SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.42  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.42  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  # End clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.42  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_15, plain, (equalish(n0,n0)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (equalish(n1,n1)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_22, plain, (ifeq(equalish(n0,n1),true,a,b)=b)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_23, plain, (ifeq(equalish(n1,n0),true,a,b)=b)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_13, plain, (ifeq2(X1,X1,X2,X3)=X2)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_14, plain, (ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3)=X2)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_18, plain, (ifeq2(f(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),true,ifeq2(f(X6,X7,X8,X9,X5),true,equalish(X9,X4),true),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (ifeq2(f(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),true,ifeq2(f(X6,X7,X8,X9,X5),true,equalish(X8,X3),true),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_20, plain, (ifeq2(f(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),true,ifeq2(f(X6,X7,X8,X9,X5),true,equalish(X7,X2),true),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_21, plain, (ifeq2(f(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),true,ifeq2(f(X6,X7,X8,X9,X5),true,equalish(X6,X1),true),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (ifeq2(equalish(X1,X1),true,ifeq2(equalish(X2,X2),true,ifeq2(equalish(X3,X3),true,ifeq2(equalish(X4,X4),true,f(X4,X3,X2,X1,sK1_exists_f_Z(X4,X3,X2,X1)),true),true),true),true)=true)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_24, negated_conjecture, (a!=b)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_26, plain, (X10=X10)).
% 0.19/0.42  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.19/0.42  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.19/0.42  # Found 10 steps
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_15, plain, (equalish(n0,n0)=true), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_35, plain, (equalish(n0,n0)=true), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_34])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_75, plain, (equalish(n0,n0)!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_76, plain, (equalish(n0,n0)!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_77, plain, (equalish(n0,n0)!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_78, plain, (equalish(n0,n0)!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_73, plain, (f(equalish(n0,n0),equalish(n0,n0),equalish(n0,n0),equalish(n0,n0),equalish(n0,n0))=f(true,true,true,true,true)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_30])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_201, plain, (equalish(n0,n0)!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_202, plain, (equalish(n0,n0)!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.19/0.42  cnf(i_0_203, plain, (equalish(n0,n0)!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.19/0.42  # End printing tableau
% 0.19/0.42  # SZS output end
% 0.19/0.42  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.19/0.42  # 29596 Satisfiable branch
% 0.19/0.42  # Child (29590) has found a proof.
% 0.19/0.42  
% 0.19/0.42  # Proof search is over...
% 0.19/0.42  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------