TSTP Solution File: MSC013+1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : MSC013+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:37:34 EDT 2023
% Result : CounterSatisfiable 0.20s 0.50s
% Output : Saturation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_6)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( equalish(X1,X2)
| ~ f(X1,X3,X4,X5,X6,X7)
| ~ f(X2,X8,X9,X10,X11,X7) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( f(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,esk1_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5))
| ~ equalish(X1,X1)
| ~ equalish(X2,X2)
| ~ equalish(X3,X3)
| ~ equalish(X4,X4)
| ~ equalish(X5,X5) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( equalish(X1,X2)
| ~ f(X3,X1,X4,X5,X6,X7)
| ~ f(X8,X2,X9,X10,X11,X7) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( equalish(X1,X2)
| ~ f(X3,X4,X1,X5,X6,X7)
| ~ f(X8,X9,X2,X10,X11,X7) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( equalish(X1,X2)
| ~ f(X3,X4,X5,X1,X6,X7)
| ~ f(X8,X9,X10,X2,X11,X7) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( equalish(X1,X2)
| ~ f(X3,X4,X5,X6,X1,X7)
| ~ f(X8,X9,X10,X11,X2,X7) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
~ goal,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( equalish(X1,X2)
| ~ f(X1,X3,X4,X5,X6,esk1_5(X2,X7,X8,X9,X10))
| ~ equalish(X10,X10)
| ~ equalish(X9,X9)
| ~ equalish(X8,X8)
| ~ equalish(X7,X7)
| ~ equalish(X2,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( equalish(X1,X2)
| ~ f(X3,X1,X4,X5,X6,esk1_5(X7,X2,X8,X9,X10))
| ~ equalish(X10,X10)
| ~ equalish(X9,X9)
| ~ equalish(X8,X8)
| ~ equalish(X2,X2)
| ~ equalish(X7,X7) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_12]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( equalish(X1,X2)
| ~ f(X3,X4,X1,X5,X6,esk1_5(X7,X8,X2,X9,X10))
| ~ equalish(X10,X10)
| ~ equalish(X9,X9)
| ~ equalish(X2,X2)
| ~ equalish(X8,X8)
| ~ equalish(X7,X7) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_12]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( equalish(X1,X2)
| ~ f(X3,X4,X5,X1,X6,esk1_5(X7,X8,X9,X2,X10))
| ~ equalish(X10,X10)
| ~ equalish(X2,X2)
| ~ equalish(X9,X9)
| ~ equalish(X8,X8)
| ~ equalish(X7,X7) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_12]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( equalish(X1,X2)
| ~ f(X3,X4,X5,X6,X1,esk1_5(X7,X8,X9,X10,X2))
| ~ equalish(X2,X2)
| ~ equalish(X10,X10)
| ~ equalish(X9,X9)
| ~ equalish(X8,X8)
| ~ equalish(X7,X7) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_12]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
~ equalish(n1,n0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
~ equalish(n0,n1),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_18]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
equalish(n1,n1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[n0_and_n1_reflexive]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
equalish(n0,n0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[n0_and_n1_reflexive]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13 % Problem : MSC013+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.12/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 11:21:23 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.49 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.S4Yi1krJWK/E---3.1_31531.p
% 0.20/0.50 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # sh5l with pid 31612 completed with status 1
% 0.20/0.50 # Result found by sh5l
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.20/0.50 # Search class: FHUNF-FFSF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 31619 completed with status 1
% 0.20/0.50 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.20/0.50 # Search class: FHUNF-FFSF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.50
% 0.20/0.50 # No proof found!
% 0.20/0.50 # SZS status CounterSatisfiable
% 0.20/0.50 # SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.50 # Parsed axioms : 6
% 0.20/0.50 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Initial clauses : 11
% 0.20/0.50 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Initial clauses in saturation : 11
% 0.20/0.50 # Processed clauses : 27
% 0.20/0.50 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # ...remaining for further processing : 27
% 0.20/0.50 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Generated clauses : 10
% 0.20/0.50 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 5
% 0.20/0.50 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Paramodulations : 10
% 0.20/0.50 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # NegExts : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of processed clauses : 16
% 0.20/0.50 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.20/0.50 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.20/0.50 # Non-unit-clauses : 11
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.50 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of archived clauses : 11
% 0.20/0.50 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 65
% 0.20/0.50 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 60
% 0.20/0.50 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.20/0.50 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Termbank termtop insertions : 900
% 0.20/0.50
% 0.20/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.50 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1760 pages
% 0.20/0.50
% 0.20/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.50 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1680 pages
% 0.20/0.50 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.20/0.51 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------