TSTP Solution File: MSC002-2 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : MSC002-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 09:20:41 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.50s 0.62s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.50s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.12 % Problem : MSC002-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.05/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.10/0.32 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Aug 24 13:34:51 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.57 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.50/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.62 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.50/0.62 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.50/0.62 % Transform :cnf
% 0.50/0.62 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.50/0.62 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.50/0.62
% 0.50/0.62 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.50/0.62 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.50/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.62 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.62 % File : MSC002-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.50/0.62 % Domain : Miscellaneous
% 0.50/0.62 % Problem : A Blind Hand Problem
% 0.50/0.62 % Version : Especial.
% 0.50/0.62 % Theorem formulation : Without hand movement.
% 0.50/0.62 % English :
% 0.50/0.62
% 0.50/0.62 % Refs : [Pop70] Popplestone (1970), Freddy, Things and Sets
% 0.50/0.62 % : [MRS72] Michie et al. (1972), G-deduction
% 0.50/0.62 % Source : [TPTP]
% 0.50/0.62 % Names :
% 0.50/0.62
% 0.50/0.62 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.50/0.62 % Rating : 0.00 v7.1.0, 0.17 v7.0.0, 0.12 v6.3.0, 0.14 v6.2.0, 0.11 v6.1.0, 0.14 v5.5.0, 0.12 v5.4.0, 0.10 v5.1.0, 0.09 v5.0.0, 0.00 v2.0.0
% 0.50/0.62 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 10 ( 3 unt; 1 nHn; 8 RR)
% 0.50/0.62 % Number of literals : 20 ( 0 equ; 11 neg)
% 0.50/0.62 % Maximal clause size : 3 ( 2 avg)
% 0.50/0.62 % Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% 0.50/0.62 % Number of predicates : 6 ( 6 usr; 0 prp; 1-3 aty)
% 0.50/0.62 % Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.50/0.62 % Number of variables : 24 ( 6 sgn)
% 0.50/0.62 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_NHN
% 0.50/0.62
% 0.50/0.62 % Comments : Clauses about hand movement have been removed.
% 0.50/0.62 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.62 cnf(something_is_here_now,axiom,
% 0.50/0.62 at(something,here,now) ).
% 0.50/0.62
% 0.50/0.62 cnf(cant_hold_and_let_go,axiom,
% 0.50/0.62 ~ held(Thing,let_go(Situation)) ).
% 0.50/0.62
% 0.50/0.62 cnf(everything_is_red,axiom,
% 0.50/0.62 ( ~ at(Thing,here,Situation)
% 0.50/0.62 | red(Thing) ) ).
% 0.50/0.62
% 0.50/0.62 cnf(situation_let_go,axiom,
% 0.50/0.62 ( ~ at(Thing,Place,Situation)
% 0.50/0.62 | at(Thing,Place,let_go(Situation)) ) ).
% 0.50/0.62
% 0.50/0.62 cnf(situation_pick_up,axiom,
% 0.50/0.62 ( ~ at(Thing,Place,Situation)
% 0.50/0.62 | at(Thing,Place,pick_up(Situation)) ) ).
% 0.50/0.62
% 0.50/0.62 cnf(can_grab_if_previously_let_go,axiom,
% 0.50/0.62 ( ~ at(Thing,Place,Situation)
% 0.50/0.62 | grabbed(Thing,pick_up(go(Place,let_go(Situation)))) ) ).
% 0.50/0.62
% 0.50/0.62 cnf(answer_if_red_and_put_there,axiom,
% 0.50/0.62 ( ~ red(Thing)
% 0.50/0.62 | ~ put(Thing,there,Situation)
% 0.50/0.62 | answer(Situation) ) ).
% 0.50/0.62
% 0.50/0.62 cnf(can_put_somewhere_if_grab_and_go_there,axiom,
% 0.50/0.62 ( ~ at(Thing,Place,Situation)
% 0.50/0.62 | ~ grabbed(Thing,Situation)
% 0.50/0.62 | put(Thing,Another_place,go(Another_place,Situation)) ) ).
% 0.50/0.62
% 0.50/0.62 cnf(thing_either_held_or_went_there,axiom,
% 0.50/0.62 ( held(Thing,Situation)
% 0.50/0.62 | ~ at(Thing,Place,Situation)
% 0.50/0.62 | at(Thing,Place,go(Another_place,Situation)) ) ).
% 0.50/0.62
% 0.50/0.62 cnf(prove_there_is_an_answer_situation,negated_conjecture,
% 0.50/0.62 ~ answer(Situation) ).
% 0.50/0.62
% 0.50/0.62 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.62 % Proof found
% 0.50/0.62 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.50/0.62 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.50/0.62 %ClaNum:10(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.50/0.62 %VarNum:46(SingletonVarNum:24)
% 0.50/0.62 %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.50/0.62 %MaxfuncDepth:3
% 0.50/0.62 %SharedTerms:5
% 0.50/0.62 %goalClause: 2
% 0.50/0.62 %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.50/0.62 [1]P1(a1,a2,a4)
% 0.50/0.62 [2]~P2(x21)
% 0.50/0.62 [3]~P3(x31,f5(x32))
% 0.50/0.62 [4]P5(x41)+~P1(x41,a2,x42)
% 0.50/0.62 [6]~P1(x61,x62,x63)+P1(x61,x62,f5(x63))
% 0.50/0.62 [7]~P1(x71,x72,x73)+P1(x71,x72,f6(x73))
% 0.50/0.62 [9]~P1(x91,x92,x93)+P4(x91,f6(f3(x92,f5(x93))))
% 0.50/0.62 [5]P2(x51)+~P5(x52)+~P6(x52,a7,x51)
% 0.50/0.62 [8]~P1(x81,x83,x82)+P3(x81,x82)+P1(x81,x83,f3(x84,x82))
% 0.50/0.62 [10]~P4(x101,x103)+~P1(x101,x104,x103)+P6(x101,x102,f3(x102,x103))
% 0.50/0.62 %EqnAxiom
% 0.50/0.62
% 0.50/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.62 cnf(19,plain,
% 0.50/0.62 (~P1(a1,x191,f6(f3(a2,f5(a4))))),
% 0.50/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,1,4,7,6,9,5,10])).
% 0.50/0.62 cnf(21,plain,
% 0.50/0.62 (P1(a1,a2,f3(x211,f5(a4)))),
% 0.50/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,1,3,4,7,6,9,5,10,8])).
% 0.50/0.62 cnf(23,plain,
% 0.50/0.62 ($false),
% 0.50/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[19,21,7]),
% 0.50/0.62 ['proof']).
% 0.50/0.62 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.50/0.62 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------