TSTP Solution File: MSC002-1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : MSC002-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:59:27 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.43s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   20 (   5 unt;   3 nHn;  20 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   45 (   0 equ;  27 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   9 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    at(something,here,now),
    file('MSC002-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    ~ held(u,let_go(v)),
    file('MSC002-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    ( ~ at(u,here,v)
    | red(u) ),
    file('MSC002-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    ( ~ at(u,v,w)
    | at(u,v,let_go(w)) ),
    file('MSC002-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    ( ~ at(u,v,w)
    | at(u,v,pick_up(w)) ),
    file('MSC002-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(8,axiom,
    ( ~ at(u,v,w)
    | grabbed(u,pick_up(go(v,let_go(w)))) ),
    file('MSC002-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(9,axiom,
    ( ~ red(u)
    | ~ put(u,there,v)
    | answer(v) ),
    file('MSC002-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(10,axiom,
    ( ~ grabbed(u,v)
    | ~ at(u,w,v)
    | put(u,x,go(x,v)) ),
    file('MSC002-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(11,axiom,
    ( ~ at(u,v,w)
    | held(u,w)
    | at(u,v,go(x,w)) ),
    file('MSC002-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(14,axiom,
    ~ answer(u),
    file('MSC002-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(15,plain,
    ( ~ red(u)
    | ~ put(u,there,v) ),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[9,14]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:9.2,14.0')] ).

cnf(43,plain,
    ( ~ at(u,v,w)
    | ~ grabbed(u,pick_up(w))
    | put(u,x,go(x,pick_up(w))) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[7,10]),
    [iquote('0:Res:7.1,10.1')] ).

cnf(52,plain,
    ( ~ at(u,v,w)
    | ~ grabbed(u,pick_up(go(x,w)))
    | held(u,w)
    | put(u,y,go(y,pick_up(go(x,w)))) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[11,43]),
    [iquote('0:Res:11.2,43.0')] ).

cnf(105,plain,
    ( ~ at(u,v,w)
    | ~ at(u,x,let_go(w))
    | held(u,let_go(w))
    | put(u,y,go(y,pick_up(go(v,let_go(w))))) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[8,52]),
    [iquote('0:Res:8.1,52.1')] ).

cnf(106,plain,
    ( ~ at(u,v,w)
    | ~ at(u,x,let_go(w))
    | put(u,y,go(y,pick_up(go(v,let_go(w))))) ),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[105,4]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:105.2,4.0')] ).

cnf(124,plain,
    ( ~ at(u,v,w)
    | ~ at(u,x,w)
    | put(u,y,go(y,pick_up(go(x,let_go(w))))) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[6,106]),
    [iquote('0:Res:6.1,106.1')] ).

cnf(125,plain,
    ( ~ at(u,v,w)
    | put(u,x,go(x,pick_up(go(v,let_go(w))))) ),
    inference(con,[status(thm)],[124]),
    [iquote('0:Con:124.0')] ).

cnf(126,plain,
    ( ~ red(u)
    | ~ at(u,v,w) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[125,15]),
    [iquote('0:Res:125.1,15.1')] ).

cnf(127,plain,
    ~ at(u,here,v),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[5,126]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:5.1,126.0')] ).

cnf(128,plain,
    $false,
    inference(unc,[status(thm)],[127,1]),
    [iquote('0:UnC:127.0,1.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : MSC002-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Fri Jul  1 15:11:13 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.43  
% 0.19/0.43  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.19/0.43  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.19/0.43  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.43  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.19/0.43  SPASS derived 106 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 117 clauses.
% 0.19/0.43  SPASS allocated 75777 KBytes.
% 0.19/0.43  SPASS spent	0:00:00.08 on the problem.
% 0.19/0.43  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.19/0.43  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.19/0.43  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.19/0.43  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.19/0.43  		0:00:00.01 for the reduction.
% 0.19/0.43  
% 0.19/0.43  
% 0.19/0.43  Here is a proof with depth 5, length 20 :
% 0.19/0.43  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.43  Formulae used in the proof : something_is_here_now cant_hold_and_let_go everything_is_red situation_let_go situation_pick_up can_grab_if_previously_let_go answer_if_red_and_put_there can_put_somewhere_if_grab_and_go_there thing_either_held_or_went_there prove_there_is_an_answer_situation
% 0.19/0.43  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------