TSTP Solution File: MGT066-1 by Etableau---0.67

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : MGT066-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:10:46 EDT 2022

% Result   : Satisfiable 0.09s 0.30s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.09  % Problem  : MGT066-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.07/0.09  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.09/0.28  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.28  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.28  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.28  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.28  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.28  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.28  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.09/0.28  % DateTime : Thu Jun  9 07:43:07 EDT 2022
% 0.09/0.28  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.30  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.09/0.30  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SA
% 0.09/0.30  # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHP.
% 0.09/0.30  #
% 0.09/0.30  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.09/0.30  # Number of axioms: 11 Number of unprocessed: 11
% 0.09/0.30  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.09/0.30  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.09/0.30  # Hello from C++
% 0.09/0.30  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.09/0.30  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.09/0.30  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.09/0.30  # 11 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.09/0.30  # No conjectures after preprocessing.  Attempting to resurrect them from ax_archive.
% 0.09/0.30  # No conjectures.
% 0.09/0.30  # There are 11 start rule candidates:
% 0.09/0.30  # Found 2 unit axioms.
% 0.09/0.30  # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.09/0.30  # 11 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.09/0.30  # 9 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.09/0.30  # 2 unit axiom clauses
% 0.09/0.30  
% 0.09/0.30  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.09/0.30  # Creating equality axioms
% 0.09/0.30  # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.09/0.30  # 20821 Satisfiable branch
% 0.09/0.30  # Satisfiable branch found.
% 0.09/0.30  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.09/0.30  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.09/0.30  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.09/0.30  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.09/0.30  # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.09/0.30  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.09/0.30  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.09/0.30  # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.09/0.30  # Creating equality axioms
% 0.09/0.30  # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.09/0.30  # 20824 Satisfiable branch
% 0.09/0.30  # SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.30  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.30  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.09/0.30  
% 0.09/0.30  # End clausification derivation
% 0.09/0.30  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.09/0.30  cnf(i_0_14, plain, (smaller_or_equal(X1,X1))).
% 0.09/0.30  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (greater_or_equal(X1,X1))).
% 0.09/0.30  cnf(i_0_18, plain, (greater(X1,X2)|~smaller(X2,X1))).
% 0.09/0.30  cnf(i_0_20, plain, (~greater(X1,X2)|~greater(X2,X1))).
% 0.09/0.30  cnf(i_0_13, plain, (smaller_or_equal(X1,X2)|~smaller(X1,X2))).
% 0.09/0.30  cnf(i_0_22, plain, (X1=X2|greater(X1,X2)|smaller(X1,X2))).
% 0.09/0.30  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (smaller(X1,X2)|~greater(X2,X1))).
% 0.09/0.30  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (greater_or_equal(X1,X2)|~greater(X1,X2))).
% 0.09/0.30  cnf(i_0_12, plain, (X1=X2|smaller(X1,X2)|~smaller_or_equal(X1,X2))).
% 0.09/0.30  cnf(i_0_15, plain, (X1=X2|greater(X1,X2)|~greater_or_equal(X1,X2))).
% 0.09/0.30  cnf(i_0_21, plain, (greater(X1,X2)|~greater(X3,X2)|~greater(X1,X3))).
% 0.09/0.30  cnf(i_0_134, plain, (X4=X4)).
% 0.09/0.30  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.09/0.30  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.09/0.30  # Found 7 steps
% 0.09/0.30  cnf(i_0_134, plain, (X3=X3), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.09/0.30  cnf(i_0_166, plain, (X3=X3), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_139])).
% 0.09/0.30  cnf(i_0_467, plain, ($false), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_134])).
% 0.09/0.30  cnf(i_0_465, plain, (smaller(X3,X3)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_18])).
% 0.09/0.30  cnf(i_0_469, plain, (greater(X3,X3)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_20])).
% 0.09/0.30  cnf(i_0_472, plain, (~greater(X3,X3)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_469])).
% 0.09/0.30  cnf(i_0_468, plain, (~smaller(X3,X3)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_19])).
% 0.09/0.30  # End printing tableau
% 0.09/0.30  # SZS output end
% 0.09/0.30  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.09/0.30  # Creating equality axioms
% 0.09/0.30  # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.09/0.30  # 20825 Satisfiable branch
% 0.09/0.31  # Creating equality axioms
% 0.09/0.31  # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.09/0.31  # 20820 Satisfiable branch
% 0.09/0.31  # Satisfiable branch found.
% 0.09/0.31  # Child (20821) has found a proof.
% 0.09/0.31  
% 0.09/0.31  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.09/0.31  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.09/0.31  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.09/0.31  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.09/0.31  # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.09/0.31  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.09/0.31  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.09/0.31  # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.09/0.31  # Proof search is over...
% 0.09/0.31  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------