TSTP Solution File: MGT064-1 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : MGT064-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:25:43 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.36s 2.57s
% Output : Refutation 2.36s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 12
% Number of leaves : 30
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 65 ( 37 unt; 12 nHn; 62 RR)
% Number of literals : 118 ( 22 equ; 56 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 12 ( 10 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 11 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 42 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(definition_smaller_or_equal_1,axiom,
( ~ smaller_or_equal(X,Y)
| smaller(X,Y)
| X = Y ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT001-0.ax',definition_smaller_or_equal_1) ).
cnf(definition_smaller_or_equal_2,axiom,
( ~ smaller(X,Y)
| smaller_or_equal(X,Y) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT001-0.ax',definition_smaller_or_equal_2) ).
cnf(definition_smaller_7,axiom,
( ~ smaller(X,Y)
| greater(Y,X) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT001-0.ax',definition_smaller_7) ).
cnf(definition_smaller_8,axiom,
( ~ greater(X,Y)
| smaller(Y,X) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT001-0.ax',definition_smaller_8) ).
cnf(meaning_postulate_greater_strict_9,axiom,
( ~ greater(X,Y)
| ~ greater(Y,X) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT001-0.ax',meaning_postulate_greater_strict_9) ).
cnf(meaning_postulate_greater_transitive_10,axiom,
( ~ greater(X,Y)
| ~ greater(Y,Z)
| greater(X,Z) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT001-0.ax',meaning_postulate_greater_transitive_10) ).
cnf(assumption_1_46,axiom,
( ~ organization(X)
| has_endowment(X)
| ~ has_immunity(X,Y) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_1_46) ).
cnf(definition_2_49,axiom,
( ~ dissimilar(X,Y,Z)
| ~ is_aligned(X,Y)
| ~ is_aligned(X,Z) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',definition_2_49) ).
cnf(definition_2_51,axiom,
( ~ organization(X)
| ~ is_aligned(X,Y)
| is_aligned(X,Z)
| dissimilar(X,Y,Z) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',definition_2_51) ).
cnf(assumption_13_54,axiom,
( ~ organization(X)
| age(X,Y) != zero
| is_aligned(X,Y) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_13_54) ).
cnf(assumption_15_55,axiom,
( ~ organization(X)
| age(X,Y) != zero
| ~ greater(age(X,Z),sigma)
| dissimilar(X,Y,Z) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_15_55) ).
cnf(assumption_15_56,axiom,
( ~ organization(X)
| age(X,Y) != zero
| ~ dissimilar(X,Y,Z)
| greater(age(X,Z),sigma) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_15_56) ).
cnf(definition_4_57,axiom,
( ~ robust_position(X)
| ~ smaller_or_equal(age(X,Y),tau)
| ~ positional_advantage(X,Y) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',definition_4_57) ).
cnf(definition_4_58,axiom,
( ~ robust_position(X)
| ~ greater(age(X,Y),tau)
| positional_advantage(X,Y) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',definition_4_58) ).
cnf(assumption_17_64,axiom,
( ~ organization(X)
| has_immunity(X,Y)
| ~ is_aligned(X,Y)
| ~ positional_advantage(X,Y)
| hazard_of_mortality(X,Y) = low ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_17_64) ).
cnf(assumption_17_65,axiom,
( ~ organization(X)
| has_immunity(X,Y)
| is_aligned(X,Y)
| ~ positional_advantage(X,Y)
| hazard_of_mortality(X,Y) = mod1 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_17_65) ).
cnf(assumption_17_66,axiom,
( ~ organization(X)
| has_immunity(X,Y)
| ~ is_aligned(X,Y)
| positional_advantage(X,Y)
| hazard_of_mortality(X,Y) = mod2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_17_66) ).
cnf(assumption_18b_69,axiom,
greater(mod1,low),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_18b_69) ).
cnf(assumption_19_73,axiom,
greater(mod2,mod1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_19_73) ).
cnf(theorem_10_74,negated_conjecture,
organization(sk3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',theorem_10_74) ).
cnf(theorem_10_75,negated_conjecture,
robust_position(sk3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',theorem_10_75) ).
cnf(theorem_10_76,negated_conjecture,
~ has_endowment(sk3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',theorem_10_76) ).
cnf(theorem_10_77,negated_conjecture,
age(sk3,sk4) = zero,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',theorem_10_77) ).
cnf(theorem_10_79,negated_conjecture,
greater(tau,zero),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',theorem_10_79) ).
cnf(theorem_10_80,negated_conjecture,
greater(sigma,tau),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',theorem_10_80) ).
cnf(theorem_10_81,negated_conjecture,
smaller_or_equal(age(sk3,sk5),tau),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',theorem_10_81) ).
cnf(theorem_10_82,negated_conjecture,
greater(age(sk3,sk6),tau),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',theorem_10_82) ).
cnf(theorem_10_83,negated_conjecture,
smaller_or_equal(age(sk3,sk6),sigma),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',theorem_10_83) ).
cnf(theorem_10_84,negated_conjecture,
greater(age(sk3,sk7),sigma),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',theorem_10_84) ).
cnf(theorem_10_85,negated_conjecture,
( ~ smaller(hazard_of_mortality(sk3,sk6),hazard_of_mortality(sk3,sk7))
| ~ smaller(hazard_of_mortality(sk3,sk7),hazard_of_mortality(sk3,sk5))
| hazard_of_mortality(sk3,sk5) != hazard_of_mortality(sk3,sk4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',theorem_10_85) ).
cnf(70,plain,
smaller(mod1,mod2),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[definition_smaller_8,assumption_19_73]) ).
cnf(71,plain,
smaller(low,mod1),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[definition_smaller_8,assumption_18b_69]) ).
cnf(76,plain,
smaller(zero,tau),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[definition_smaller_8,theorem_10_79]) ).
cnf(90,plain,
~ has_immunity(sk3,X),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[assumption_1_46,theorem_10_74,theorem_10_76]) ).
cnf(92,plain,
( smaller(age(sk3,sk6),sigma)
| age(sk3,sk6) = sigma ),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[definition_smaller_or_equal_1,theorem_10_83]) ).
cnf(98,plain,
greater(age(sk3,sk7),tau),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[meaning_postulate_greater_transitive_10,theorem_10_84,theorem_10_80]) ).
cnf(101,plain,
is_aligned(sk3,sk4),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[assumption_13_54,theorem_10_74,theorem_10_77]) ).
cnf(102,plain,
~ positional_advantage(sk3,sk5),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[definition_4_57,theorem_10_75,theorem_10_81]) ).
cnf(103,plain,
( ~ smaller_or_equal(zero,tau)
| ~ positional_advantage(sk3,sk4) ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[definition_4_57,theorem_10_77,theory(equality)]),theorem_10_75]) ).
cnf(104,plain,
positional_advantage(sk3,sk6),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[definition_4_58,theorem_10_75,theorem_10_82]) ).
cnf(106,plain,
dissimilar(sk3,sk4,sk7),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[assumption_15_55,theorem_10_74,theorem_10_77,theorem_10_84]) ).
cnf(118,plain,
smaller_or_equal(zero,tau),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[definition_smaller_or_equal_2,76]) ).
cnf(119,plain,
~ positional_advantage(sk3,sk4),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[103,118]) ).
cnf(145,plain,
( is_aligned(sk3,X)
| dissimilar(sk3,sk4,X) ),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[definition_2_51,101,theorem_10_74]) ).
cnf(146,plain,
hazard_of_mortality(sk3,sk4) = mod2,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[assumption_17_66,101,theorem_10_74]),119,90]) ).
cnf(147,plain,
( ~ smaller(hazard_of_mortality(sk3,sk6),hazard_of_mortality(sk3,sk7))
| ~ smaller(hazard_of_mortality(sk3,sk7),hazard_of_mortality(sk3,sk5))
| hazard_of_mortality(sk3,sk5) != mod2 ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[theorem_10_85,146,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(148,plain,
~ greater(age(sk3,sk5),tau),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[definition_4_58,102,theorem_10_75]) ).
cnf(151,plain,
~ is_aligned(sk3,sk7),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[definition_2_49,106,101]) ).
cnf(173,plain,
positional_advantage(sk3,sk7),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[definition_4_58,98,theorem_10_75]) ).
cnf(176,plain,
hazard_of_mortality(sk3,sk7) = mod1,
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[assumption_17_65,173,theorem_10_74,90,151]) ).
cnf(177,plain,
( ~ smaller(hazard_of_mortality(sk3,sk6),mod1)
| ~ smaller(mod1,hazard_of_mortality(sk3,sk5))
| hazard_of_mortality(sk3,sk5) != mod2 ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[147,176,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(183,plain,
~ greater(age(sk3,sk5),sigma),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[meaning_postulate_greater_transitive_10,148,theorem_10_80]) ).
cnf(195,plain,
~ dissimilar(sk3,sk4,sk5),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[assumption_15_56,183,theorem_10_74,theorem_10_77]) ).
cnf(197,plain,
is_aligned(sk3,sk5),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[definition_2_51,195,theorem_10_74,101]) ).
cnf(202,plain,
hazard_of_mortality(sk3,sk5) = mod2,
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[assumption_17_66,197,theorem_10_74,90,102]) ).
cnf(203,plain,
~ smaller(hazard_of_mortality(sk3,sk6),mod1),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[177,70,202,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(206,plain,
~ greater(mod1,hazard_of_mortality(sk3,sk6)),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[definition_smaller_8,203]) ).
cnf(215,plain,
( is_aligned(sk3,X)
| greater(age(sk3,X),sigma) ),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[assumption_15_56,145,theorem_10_74,theorem_10_77]) ).
cnf(267,plain,
( greater(age(sk3,sk6),sigma)
| hazard_of_mortality(sk3,sk6) = low ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[assumption_17_64,215,theorem_10_74,104]),90]) ).
cnf(743,plain,
( age(sk3,sk6) = sigma
| greater(sigma,age(sk3,sk6)) ),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[definition_smaller_7,92]) ).
cnf(2174,plain,
( hazard_of_mortality(sk3,sk6) = low
| age(sk3,sk6) = sigma ),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[meaning_postulate_greater_strict_9,267,743]) ).
cnf(2801,plain,
age(sk3,sk6) = sigma,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[206,2174,theory(equality)]),assumption_18b_69]) ).
cnf(2805,plain,
( greater(sigma,sigma)
| hazard_of_mortality(sk3,sk6) = low ),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[267,2801,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(3011,plain,
hazard_of_mortality(sk3,sk6) = low,
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[meaning_postulate_greater_strict_9,2805,2805]) ).
cnf(3013,plain,
$false,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[203,71,3011,theory(equality)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : MGT064-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 9 12:29:20 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46 *
% 0.19/0.46 *
% 0.19/0.46 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.46 *
% 0.19/0.46 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.46 *
% 0.19/0.46 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.46 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.46 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.46 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.46 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.46 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.46 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.46 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.46 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.46 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.46 *
% 0.19/0.46 "."
% 0.19/0.46 *
% 0.19/0.46 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-09T12:29:21
% 0.19/0.46 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n025.cluster.edu at 2022-06-09T12:29:21
% 2.36/2.57
% 2.36/2.57
% 2.36/2.57 #||
% 2.36/2.57 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.36/2.57 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 2.36/2.57 ||#
% 2.36/2.57
% 2.36/2.57 ; Summary of computation:
% 2.36/2.57 ; 21484 formulas have been input or derived (from 1092 formulas).
% 2.36/2.57 ; 3013 (14%) were retained. Of these,
% 2.36/2.57 ; 617 (20%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 2.36/2.57 ; 2396 (80%) are still being kept.
% 2.36/2.57 ;
% 2.36/2.57 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 2.36/2.57 ; 0.010 0% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 2.36/2.57 ; 0.002 0% Assert (58 calls)
% 2.36/2.57 ; 0.225 11% Process new row (20,433 calls)
% 2.36/2.57 ; 0.261 12% Resolution (2,182 calls)
% 2.36/2.57 ; 0.170 8% Paramodulation (1,091 calls)
% 2.36/2.57 ; 0.000 0% Factoring (888 calls)
% 2.36/2.57 ; 0.026 1% Condensing (7,072 calls)
% 2.36/2.57 ; 0.443 21% Forward subsumption (7,072 calls)
% 2.36/2.57 ; 0.050 2% Backward subsumption (2,847 calls)
% 2.36/2.57 ; 0.256 12% Clause clause subsumption (23,367 calls)
% 2.36/2.57 ; 0.373 18% Forward simplification (20,405 calls)
% 2.36/2.57 ; 0.028 1% Backward simplification (3,013 calls)
% 2.36/2.57 ; 0.168 8% Ordering (190,633 calls)
% 2.36/2.57 ; 0.000 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 2.36/2.57 ; 0.000 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 2.36/2.57 ; 0.094 4% Other
% 2.36/2.57 ; 2.106 Total
% 2.36/2.57 ; 2.110 Real time
% 2.36/2.57 ;
% 2.36/2.57 ; Term-hash-array has 496 terms in all.
% 2.36/2.57 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 2,254 entries (2,635 at peak, 2,847 added, 593 deleted).
% 2.36/2.57 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 7,393 nodes (11,163 at peak, 11,547 added, 4,154 deleted).
% 2.36/2.57 ; Retrieved 126,344 possibly forward subsuming rows in 7,072 calls.
% 2.36/2.57 ; Retrieved 4,536 possibly backward subsumed rows in 2,847 calls.
% 2.36/2.57 ; Path-index has 413 entries (488 at peak, 519 added, 106 deleted).
% 2.36/2.57 ; Path-index has 302 nodes (326 at peak, 349 added, 47 deleted).
% 2.36/2.57 ; Trie-index has 413 entries (488 at peak, 519 added, 106 deleted).
% 2.36/2.57 ; Trie-index has 579 nodes (699 at peak, 754 added, 175 deleted).
% 2.36/2.57 ; Retrieved 15,038 generalization terms in 98,206 calls.
% 2.36/2.57 ; Retrieved 184 instance terms in 165 calls.
% 2.36/2.57 ; Retrieved 33,582 unifiable terms in 8,738 calls.
% 2.36/2.57 ;
% 2.36/2.57 ; The agenda of backward simplifiable rows to process has 134 entries:
% 2.36/2.57 ; 134 with value 0
% 2.36/2.57 ; The agenda of rows to process has 67 entries:
% 2.36/2.57 ; 8 with value 16 53 with value 24 4 with value 27
% 2.36/2.57 ; 1 with value 19 1 with value 26
% 2.36/2.57 ; The agenda of rows to give has 1419 entries:
% 2.36/2.57 ; 1 with value (4 10) 67 with value (4 20) 71 with value (4 26)
% 2.36/2.57 ; 1 with value (4 12) 21 with value (4 21) 121 with value (4 27)
% 2.36/2.57 ; 11 with value (4 15) 7 with value (4 22) 27 with value (4 28)
% 2.36/2.57 ; 51 with value (4 16) 278 with value (4 23) 42 with value (4 29)
% 2.36/2.57 ; 22 with value (4 17) 401 with value (4 24) 69 with value (4 30)
% 2.36/2.57 ; 97 with value (4 19) 83 with value (4 25) 49 with value (4 31)
% 2.36/2.57 Evaluation took:
% 2.36/2.57 2.111 seconds of real time
% 2.36/2.57 1.798729 seconds of user run time
% 2.36/2.57 0.312139 seconds of system run time
% 2.36/2.57 [Run times include 0.08 seconds GC run time.]
% 2.36/2.57 0 calls to %EVAL
% 2.36/2.57 0 page faults and
% 2.36/2.57 201,228,624 bytes consed.
% 2.36/2.57 :PROOF-FOUND
% 2.36/2.57 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-09T12:29:23
% 2.36/2.57 :PROOF-FOUND
% 2.36/2.57 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------