TSTP Solution File: MGT063-1 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : MGT063-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:10:45 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 10.57s 1.69s
% Output : CNFRefutation 10.57s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : MGT063-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jun 9 12:07:27 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.37 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.37 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2m
% 0.19/0.37 # and selection function SelectCQArNTNpEqFirst.
% 0.19/0.37 #
% 0.19/0.37 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.37 # Number of axioms: 54 Number of unprocessed: 52
% 0.19/0.37 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.19/0.37 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.19/0.37 # Hello from C++
% 0.19/0.37 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.19/0.37 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.19/0.37 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.19/0.37 # 52 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.19/0.37 # Creating start rules for all 12 conjectures.
% 0.19/0.37 # There are 12 start rule candidates:
% 0.19/0.37 # Found 19 unit axioms.
% 0.19/0.37 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.19/0.37 # 12 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.19/0.37 # 33 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.19/0.37 # 19 unit axiom clauses
% 0.19/0.37
% 0.19/0.37 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 9.50/1.62 # Creating equality axioms
% 9.50/1.62 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 10.57/1.69 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 10.57/1.69 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 10.57/1.69 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 10.57/1.69 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 10.57/1.69 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 10.57/1.69 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 10.57/1.69 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 10.57/1.69 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 10.57/1.69 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 10.57/1.69 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 10.57/1.69 # Begin clausification derivation
% 10.57/1.69
% 10.57/1.69 # End clausification derivation
% 10.57/1.69 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_105, negated_conjecture, (organization(sk3))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_106, negated_conjecture, (robust_position(sk3))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_108, negated_conjecture, (age(sk3,sk4)=zero)).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_111, negated_conjecture, (smaller(sigma,tau))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_109, negated_conjecture, (greater(sigma,zero))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_110, negated_conjecture, (greater(tau,zero))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_101, plain, (greater(low,very_low))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_112, negated_conjecture, (smaller_or_equal(age(sk3,sk5),sigma))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_114, negated_conjecture, (smaller_or_equal(age(sk3,sk6),tau))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_113, negated_conjecture, (greater(age(sk3,sk6),sigma))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_115, negated_conjecture, (greater(age(sk3,sk7),tau))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_100, plain, (greater(mod1,low))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_103, plain, (greater(mod2,low))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_61, plain, (smaller_or_equal(X1,X1))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_104, plain, (greater(mod2,mod1))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_99, plain, (greater(high,mod1))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_102, plain, (greater(high,mod2))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_64, plain, (greater_or_equal(X1,X1))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_107, negated_conjecture, (~has_endowment(sk3))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_70, plain, (organization(X1)|~has_endowment(X1))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_67, plain, (~greater(X1,X2)|~greater(X2,X1))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_78, plain, (organization(X1)|~dissimilar(X1,X2,X3))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_60, plain, (smaller_or_equal(X1,X2)|~smaller(X1,X2))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_65, plain, (greater(X1,X2)|~smaller(X2,X1))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_116, negated_conjecture, (hazard_of_mortality(sk3,sk4)!=hazard_of_mortality(sk3,sk5)|~smaller(hazard_of_mortality(sk3,sk5),hazard_of_mortality(sk3,sk6))|~smaller(hazard_of_mortality(sk3,sk7),hazard_of_mortality(sk3,sk5)))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_69, plain, (X1=X2|greater(X1,X2)|smaller(X1,X2))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_66, plain, (smaller(X1,X2)|~greater(X2,X1))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_80, plain, (~is_aligned(X1,X2)|~is_aligned(X1,X3)|~dissimilar(X1,X3,X2))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_63, plain, (greater_or_equal(X1,X2)|~greater(X1,X2))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_77, plain, (has_endowment(X1)|~has_immunity(X1,X2)|~organization(X1))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_72, plain, (~has_immunity(X1,X2)|~has_endowment(X1)|~greater(age(X1,X2),eta))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_59, plain, (X1=X2|smaller(X1,X2)|~smaller_or_equal(X1,X2))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_88, plain, (~positional_advantage(X1,X2)|~robust_position(X1)|~smaller_or_equal(age(X1,X2),tau))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_94, plain, (hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2)=very_low|~has_immunity(X1,X2)|~organization(X1))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_85, plain, (is_aligned(X1,X2)|age(X1,X2)!=zero|~organization(X1))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_71, plain, (has_immunity(X1,X2)|~has_endowment(X1)|~smaller_or_equal(age(X1,X2),eta))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_62, plain, (X1=X2|greater(X1,X2)|~greater_or_equal(X1,X2))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_89, plain, (positional_advantage(X1,X2)|~robust_position(X1)|~greater(age(X1,X2),tau))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_79, plain, (is_aligned(X1,X2)|is_aligned(X1,X3)|~dissimilar(X1,X2,X3))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_68, plain, (greater(X1,X2)|~greater(X3,X2)|~greater(X1,X3))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_83, plain, (is_aligned(X1,X2)|dissimilar(X1,X2,X3)|~is_aligned(X1,X3)|~organization(X1))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_82, plain, (is_aligned(X1,X2)|dissimilar(X1,X3,X2)|~is_aligned(X1,X3)|~organization(X1))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_92, plain, (positional_advantage(X1,sk2(X1))|robust_position(X1)|greater(age(X1,sk2(X1)),tau))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_87, plain, (greater(age(X1,X2),sigma)|age(X1,X3)!=zero|~dissimilar(X1,X3,X2))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_91, plain, (robust_position(X1)|smaller_or_equal(age(X1,sk2(X1)),tau)|~positional_advantage(X1,sk2(X1)))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_90, plain, (robust_position(X1)|greater(age(X1,sk2(X1)),tau)|smaller_or_equal(age(X1,sk2(X1)),tau))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_86, plain, (dissimilar(X1,X2,X3)|age(X1,X2)!=zero|~organization(X1)|~greater(age(X1,X3),sigma))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_98, plain, (hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2)=high|positional_advantage(X1,X2)|is_aligned(X1,X2)|has_immunity(X1,X2)|~organization(X1))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_95, plain, (hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2)=low|has_immunity(X1,X2)|~positional_advantage(X1,X2)|~is_aligned(X1,X2)|~organization(X1))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_96, plain, (hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2)=mod1|is_aligned(X1,X2)|has_immunity(X1,X2)|~positional_advantage(X1,X2)|~organization(X1))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_97, plain, (hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2)=mod2|positional_advantage(X1,X2)|has_immunity(X1,X2)|~is_aligned(X1,X2)|~organization(X1))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_74, plain, (has_endowment(X1)|smaller_or_equal(age(X1,sk1(X1)),eta)|~organization(X1))).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_368, plain, (X4=X4)).
% 10.57/1.69 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 10.57/1.69 # Begin printing tableau
% 10.57/1.69 # Found 8 steps
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_368, plain, (age(sk3,sk4)=age(sk3,sk4)), inference(start_rule)).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_509, plain, (age(sk3,sk4)=age(sk3,sk4)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_372])).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_622, plain, (age(sk3,sk4)!=zero), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_108])).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_623, plain, (~smaller_or_equal(age(sk3,sk4),age(sk3,sk4))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_61])).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_620, plain, (smaller_or_equal(age(sk3,sk4),zero)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_372])).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_783, plain, (age(sk3,sk4)!=zero), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_108])).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_784, plain, (zero!=age(sk3,sk4)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_108])).
% 10.57/1.69 cnf(i_0_782, plain, (smaller_or_equal(zero,age(sk3,sk4))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_782, ...])).
% 10.57/1.69 # End printing tableau
% 10.57/1.69 # SZS output end
% 10.57/1.69 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 10.57/1.69 # Child (31465) has found a proof.
% 10.57/1.69
% 10.57/1.69 # Proof search is over...
% 10.57/1.69 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------