%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ePrincess---1.0
% Problem  : MGT063+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:07:15 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 37.16s 11.79s
% Output   : Proof 66.91s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : MGT063+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s
% 0.11/0.33  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.11/0.33  % DateTime : Thu Jun  9 09:21:06 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.58/0.59          ____       _                          
% 0.58/0.59    ___  / __ \_____(_)___  ________  __________
% 0.58/0.59   / _ \/ /_/ / ___/ / __ \/ ___/ _ \/ ___/ ___/
% 0.58/0.59  /  __/ ____/ /  / / / / / /__/  __(__  |__  ) 
% 0.58/0.59  \___/_/   /_/  /_/_/ /_/\___/\___/____/____/  
% 0.58/0.59  
% 0.58/0.59  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic
% 0.58/0.59  (ePrincess v.1.0)
% 0.58/0.59  
% 0.58/0.59  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2015
% 0.58/0.59  (c) Peter Backeman, 2014-2015
% 0.58/0.59  (contributions by Angelo Brillout, Peter Baumgartner)
% 0.58/0.59  Free software under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL).
% 0.58/0.59  Bug reports to peter@backeman.se
% 0.58/0.59  
% 0.58/0.59  For more information, visit http://user.uu.se/~petba168/breu/
% 0.58/0.59  
% 0.58/0.59  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.68/0.64  Prover 0: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 1.78/0.93  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.39/1.19  Prover 0: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 2.39/1.22  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.79/2.27  Prover 0: gave up
% 6.79/2.27  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 7.16/2.30  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 7.53/2.40  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 14.09/4.01  Prover 1: gave up
% 14.09/4.01  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 14.37/4.04  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 14.89/4.14  Prover 2: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 14.89/4.15  Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 22.39/5.93  Prover 3: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 22.42/5.97  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 22.75/6.01  Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 22.75/6.02  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 25.25/6.76  Prover 3: gave up
% 25.25/6.76  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=complete
% 25.25/6.78  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 25.47/6.85  Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 25.71/6.85  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 28.74/7.68  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 28.74/7.71  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 29.08/7.79  Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 37.16/11.78  Prover 5: proved (4100ms)
% 37.16/11.79  Prover 2: stopped
% 37.16/11.79  Prover 4: stopped
% 37.16/11.79  
% 37.16/11.79  No countermodel exists, formula is valid
% 37.16/11.79  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 37.16/11.79  
% 37.16/11.79  Generating proof ... found it (size 1359)
% 65.13/26.91  
% 65.13/26.91  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 65.13/26.91  Assumed formulas after preprocessing and simplification: 
% 65.13/26.91  | (0)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (dissimilar(v4, v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (dissimilar(v4, v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (hazard_of_mortality(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (hazard_of_mortality(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (positional_advantage(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (positional_advantage(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (is_aligned(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (is_aligned(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (has_immunity(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (has_immunity(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (age(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (age(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (greater(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (greater(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (greater_or_equal(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (greater_or_equal(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (smaller(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (smaller(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (smaller_or_equal(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (smaller_or_equal(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (robust_position(v2) = v1) |  ~ (robust_position(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (organization(v2) = v1) |  ~ (organization(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (has_endowment(v2) = v1) |  ~ (has_endowment(v2) = v0)) &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (greater(high, mod2) = 0 & greater(high, mod1) = 0 & greater(mod2, mod1) = 0 & greater(mod2, low) = 0 & greater(mod1, low) = 0 & greater(low, very_low) = 0 & greater(tau, zero) = v1 & greater(sigma, zero) = v0 & smaller(sigma, tau) = v2 &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] : ( ~ (is_aligned(v3, v5) = v7) |  ~ (is_aligned(v3, v4) = v6) |  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (dissimilar(v3, v4, v5) = v9 & organization(v3) = v8 & ( ~ (v8 = 0) | v9 = 0)) | (( ~ (v7 = 0) | v6 = 0) & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v7 = 0))) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] : ( ~ (is_aligned(v3, v5) = v7) |  ~ (is_aligned(v3, v4) = v6) |  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (dissimilar(v3, v4, v5) = v8 & organization(v3) = v9 & ( ~ (v8 = 0) | (v9 = 0 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v6 = 0)) & (v7 = 0 | v6 = 0))))) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : (v6 = 0 |  ~ (dissimilar(v3, v4, v5) = v6) |  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (is_aligned(v3, v5) = v9 & is_aligned(v3, v4) = v8 & organization(v3) = v7 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) | (( ~ (v9 = 0) | v8 = 0) & ( ~ (v8 = 0) | v9 = 0))))) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : (v6 = 0 |  ~ (greater(v4, v5) = 0) |  ~ (greater(v3, v5) = v6) |  ? [v7] : ( ~ (v7 = 0) & greater(v3, v4) = v7)) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : (v6 = 0 |  ~ (greater(v3, v5) = v6) |  ~ (greater(v3, v4) = 0) |  ? [v7] : ( ~ (v7 = 0) & greater(v4, v5) = v7)) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : ( ~ (dissimilar(v3, v4, v5) = v6) |  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : (organization(v3) = v7 & age(v3, v5) = v9 & age(v3, v4) = v8 & greater(v9, sigma) = v10 & ( ~ (v8 = zero) |  ~ (v7 = 0) | (( ~ (v10 = 0) | v6 = 0) & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v10 = 0))))) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : ( ~ (age(v3, v5) = v6) |  ~ (age(v3, v4) = zero) |  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (dissimilar(v3, v4, v5) = v9 & organization(v3) = v7 & greater(v6, sigma) = v8 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) | (( ~ (v9 = 0) | v8 = 0) & ( ~ (v8 = 0) | v9 = 0))))) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = v3 |  ~ (greater(v3, v4) = v5) | smaller(v3, v4) = 0) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = v3 |  ~ (greater(v3, v4) = v5) |  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = 0) & greater_or_equal(v3, v4) = v6)) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = v3 |  ~ (smaller(v3, v4) = v5) | greater(v3, v4) = 0) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = v3 |  ~ (smaller(v3, v4) = v5) |  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = 0) & smaller_or_equal(v3, v4) = v6)) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 |  ~ (is_aligned(v3, v4) = v5) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (organization(v3) = v6 & age(v3, v4) = v7 & ( ~ (v7 = zero) |  ~ (v6 = 0)))) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 |  ~ (greater(v4, v3) = v5) |  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = 0) & smaller(v3, v4) = v6)) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 |  ~ (greater_or_equal(v3, v4) = v5) | ( ~ (v4 = v3) &  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = 0) & greater(v3, v4) = v6))) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 |  ~ (smaller(v3, v4) = v5) |  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = 0) & greater(v4, v3) = v6)) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 |  ~ (smaller_or_equal(v3, v4) = v5) | ( ~ (v4 = v3) &  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = 0) & smaller(v3, v4) = v6))) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (hazard_of_mortality(v3, v4) = v5) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (positional_advantage(v3, v4) = v9 & is_aligned(v3, v4) = v8 & organization(v3) = v6 & has_immunity(v3, v4) = v7 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | (( ~ (v7 = 0) | v5 = very_low) & (v7 = 0 | (( ~ (v9 = 0) | (( ~ (v8 = 0) | v5 = low) & (v8 = 0 | v5 = mod1))) & ( ~ (v8 = 0) | v9 = 0 | v5 = mod2) & (v9 = 0 | v8 = 0 | v5 = high))))))) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (positional_advantage(v3, v4) = v5) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (hazard_of_mortality(v3, v4) = v8 & is_aligned(v3, v4) = v9 & organization(v3) = v6 & has_immunity(v3, v4) = v7 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | (( ~ (v7 = 0) | v8 = very_low) & (v7 = 0 | (( ~ (v9 = 0) | v8 = mod2 | v5 = 0) & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | (( ~ (v9 = 0) | v8 = low) & (v9 = 0 | v8 = mod1))) & (v9 = 0 | v8 = high | v5 = 0))))))) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (is_aligned(v3, v4) = v5) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (hazard_of_mortality(v3, v4) = v8 & positional_advantage(v3, v4) = v9 & organization(v3) = v6 & has_immunity(v3, v4) = v7 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | (( ~ (v7 = 0) | v8 = very_low) & (v7 = 0 | (( ~ (v9 = 0) | (( ~ (v5 = 0) | v8 = low) & (v8 = mod1 | v5 = 0))) & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v9 = 0 | v8 = mod2) & (v9 = 0 | v8 = high | v5 = 0))))))) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (dissimilar(v3, v4, v5) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (is_aligned(v3, v5) = v7 & is_aligned(v3, v4) = v6 & organization(v3) = 0 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v6 = 0)) & (v7 = 0 | v6 = 0))) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (has_immunity(v3, v4) = v5) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (hazard_of_mortality(v3, v4) = v7 & positional_advantage(v3, v4) = v9 & is_aligned(v3, v4) = v8 & organization(v3) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | (( ~ (v5 = 0) | v7 = very_low) & (v5 = 0 | (( ~ (v9 = 0) | (( ~ (v8 = 0) | v7 = low) & (v8 = 0 | v7 = mod1))) & ( ~ (v8 = 0) | v9 = 0 | v7 = mod2) & (v9 = 0 | v8 = 0 | v7 = high))))))) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (greater(v4, v5) = 0) |  ~ (greater(v3, v4) = 0) | greater(v3, v5) = 0) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (greater(v3, v4) = v5) | greater_or_equal(v3, v4) = 0 | ( ~ (v5 = 0) &  ~ (v4 = v3))) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (smaller(v3, v4) = v5) | smaller_or_equal(v3, v4) = 0 | ( ~ (v5 = 0) &  ~ (v4 = v3))) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = v3 |  ~ (greater_or_equal(v3, v4) = 0) | greater(v3, v4) = 0) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = v3 |  ~ (smaller_or_equal(v3, v4) = 0) | smaller(v3, v4) = 0) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (robust_position(v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (positional_advantage(v3, v5) = v8 & age(v3, v5) = v6 & greater(v6, tau) = v9 & smaller_or_equal(v6, tau) = v7 & ((v9 = 0 &  ~ (v8 = 0)) | (v8 = 0 & v7 = 0)))) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (has_endowment(v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] : (organization(v3) = v5 &  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : (has_immunity(v3, v6) = v9 & age(v3, v6) = v7 & greater(v7, eta) = v10 & smaller_or_equal(v7, eta) = v8 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | (v10 = 0 & v9 = 0) | (v8 = 0 &  ~ (v9 = 0)))))) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (organization(v3) = v4) | has_endowment(v3) = 0 |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (has_immunity(v3, v5) = v8 & age(v3, v5) = v6 & greater(v6, eta) = v9 & smaller_or_equal(v6, eta) = v7 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) | (v9 = 0 & v8 = 0) | (v7 = 0 &  ~ (v8 = 0))))) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (organization(v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & has_endowment(v3) = v5) | (v4 = 0 &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : (v6 = 0 |  ~ (has_immunity(v3, v5) = v6) |  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : ( ~ (v8 = 0) & age(v3, v5) = v7 & smaller_or_equal(v7, eta) = v8)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : ( ~ (age(v3, v5) = v6) |  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (has_immunity(v3, v5) = v8 & greater(v6, eta) = v7 & ( ~ (v8 = 0) |  ~ (v7 = 0)))) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : ( ~ (age(v3, v5) = v6) |  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (has_immunity(v3, v5) = v8 & smaller_or_equal(v6, eta) = v7 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) | v8 = 0))) &  ! [v5] : ( ~ (has_immunity(v3, v5) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : ( ~ (v7 = 0) & age(v3, v5) = v6 & greater(v6, eta) = v7)))) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (has_immunity(v3, v4) = 0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (organization(v3) = v5 & has_endowment(v3) = v6 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v6 = 0))) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (age(v3, v4) = zero) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (is_aligned(v3, v4) = v6 & organization(v3) = v5 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v6 = 0))) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (greater(v4, v3) = 0) | smaller(v3, v4) = 0) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (greater(v4, v3) = 0) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & greater(v3, v4) = v5)) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (greater(v3, v4) = 0) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & greater(v4, v3) = v5)) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (smaller(v3, v4) = 0) | greater(v4, v3) = 0) &  ! [v3] : ( ~ (robust_position(v3) = 0) | ( ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 |  ~ (positional_advantage(v3, v4) = v5) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : ( ~ (v7 = 0) & age(v3, v4) = v6 & greater(v6, tau) = v7)) &  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (age(v3, v4) = v5) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (positional_advantage(v3, v4) = v7 & greater(v5, tau) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v7 = 0))) &  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (age(v3, v4) = v5) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (positional_advantage(v3, v4) = v7 & smaller_or_equal(v5, tau) = v6 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v6 = 0)))) &  ! [v4] : ( ~ (positional_advantage(v3, v4) = 0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = 0) & age(v3, v4) = v5 & smaller_or_equal(v5, tau) = v6)))) &  ! [v3] : ( ~ (has_endowment(v3) = 0) | (organization(v3) = 0 &  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 |  ~ (has_immunity(v3, v4) = v5) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : ( ~ (v7 = 0) & age(v3, v4) = v6 & smaller_or_equal(v6, eta) = v7)) &  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (age(v3, v4) = v5) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (has_immunity(v3, v4) = v7 & greater(v5, eta) = v6 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v6 = 0)))) &  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (age(v3, v4) = v5) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (has_immunity(v3, v4) = v7 & smaller_or_equal(v5, eta) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v7 = 0))) &  ! [v4] : ( ~ (has_immunity(v3, v4) = 0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = 0) & age(v3, v4) = v5 & greater(v5, eta) = v6)))) &  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] :  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] :  ? [v16] :  ? [v17] : (v2 = 0 & v1 = 0 & v0 = 0 &  ~ (v8 = 0) & hazard_of_mortality(v3, v7) = v12 & hazard_of_mortality(v3, v6) = v15 & hazard_of_mortality(v3, v5) = v13 & hazard_of_mortality(v3, v4) = v17 & robust_position(v3) = 0 & organization(v3) = 0 & has_endowment(v3) = v8 & age(v3, v7) = v11 & age(v3, v6) = v10 & age(v3, v5) = v9 & age(v3, v4) = zero & greater(v11, tau) = 0 & greater(v10, sigma) = 0 & smaller(v13, v15) = v16 & smaller(v12, v13) = v14 & smaller_or_equal(v10, tau) = 0 & smaller_or_equal(v9, sigma) = 0 & ( ~ (v17 = v13) |  ~ (v16 = 0) |  ~ (v14 = 0))))
% 65.24/26.97  | Applying alpha-rule on (0) yields:
% 65.24/26.97  | (1)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (hazard_of_mortality(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (hazard_of_mortality(v3, v2) = v0))
% 65.24/26.97  | (2)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (positional_advantage(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (positional_advantage(v3, v2) = v0))
% 65.24/26.97  | (3)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (has_immunity(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (has_immunity(v3, v2) = v0))
% 65.24/26.97  | (4)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (greater(high, mod2) = 0 & greater(high, mod1) = 0 & greater(mod2, mod1) = 0 & greater(mod2, low) = 0 & greater(mod1, low) = 0 & greater(low, very_low) = 0 & greater(tau, zero) = v1 & greater(sigma, zero) = v0 & smaller(sigma, tau) = v2 &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] : ( ~ (is_aligned(v3, v5) = v7) |  ~ (is_aligned(v3, v4) = v6) |  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (dissimilar(v3, v4, v5) = v9 & organization(v3) = v8 & ( ~ (v8 = 0) | v9 = 0)) | (( ~ (v7 = 0) | v6 = 0) & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v7 = 0))) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] : ( ~ (is_aligned(v3, v5) = v7) |  ~ (is_aligned(v3, v4) = v6) |  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (dissimilar(v3, v4, v5) = v8 & organization(v3) = v9 & ( ~ (v8 = 0) | (v9 = 0 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v6 = 0)) & (v7 = 0 | v6 = 0))))) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : (v6 = 0 |  ~ (dissimilar(v3, v4, v5) = v6) |  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (is_aligned(v3, v5) = v9 & is_aligned(v3, v4) = v8 & organization(v3) = v7 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) | (( ~ (v9 = 0) | v8 = 0) & ( ~ (v8 = 0) | v9 = 0))))) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : (v6 = 0 |  ~ (greater(v4, v5) = 0) |  ~ (greater(v3, v5) = v6) |  ? [v7] : ( ~ (v7 = 0) & greater(v3, v4) = v7)) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : (v6 = 0 |  ~ (greater(v3, v5) = v6) |  ~ (greater(v3, v4) = 0) |  ? [v7] : ( ~ (v7 = 0) & greater(v4, v5) = v7)) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : ( ~ (dissimilar(v3, v4, v5) = v6) |  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : (organization(v3) = v7 & age(v3, v5) = v9 & age(v3, v4) = v8 & greater(v9, sigma) = v10 & ( ~ (v8 = zero) |  ~ (v7 = 0) | (( ~ (v10 = 0) | v6 = 0) & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v10 = 0))))) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : ( ~ (age(v3, v5) = v6) |  ~ (age(v3, v4) = zero) |  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (dissimilar(v3, v4, v5) = v9 & organization(v3) = v7 & greater(v6, sigma) = v8 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) | (( ~ (v9 = 0) | v8 = 0) & ( ~ (v8 = 0) | v9 = 0))))) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = v3 |  ~ (greater(v3, v4) = v5) | smaller(v3, v4) = 0) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = v3 |  ~ (greater(v3, v4) = v5) |  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = 0) & greater_or_equal(v3, v4) = v6)) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = v3 |  ~ (smaller(v3, v4) = v5) | greater(v3, v4) = 0) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = v3 |  ~ (smaller(v3, v4) = v5) |  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = 0) & smaller_or_equal(v3, v4) = v6)) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 |  ~ (is_aligned(v3, v4) = v5) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (organization(v3) = v6 & age(v3, v4) = v7 & ( ~ (v7 = zero) |  ~ (v6 = 0)))) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 |  ~ (greater(v4, v3) = v5) |  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = 0) & smaller(v3, v4) = v6)) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 |  ~ (greater_or_equal(v3, v4) = v5) | ( ~ (v4 = v3) &  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = 0) & greater(v3, v4) = v6))) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 |  ~ (smaller(v3, v4) = v5) |  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = 0) & greater(v4, v3) = v6)) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 |  ~ (smaller_or_equal(v3, v4) = v5) | ( ~ (v4 = v3) &  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = 0) & smaller(v3, v4) = v6))) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (hazard_of_mortality(v3, v4) = v5) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (positional_advantage(v3, v4) = v9 & is_aligned(v3, v4) = v8 & organization(v3) = v6 & has_immunity(v3, v4) = v7 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | (( ~ (v7 = 0) | v5 = very_low) & (v7 = 0 | (( ~ (v9 = 0) | (( ~ (v8 = 0) | v5 = low) & (v8 = 0 | v5 = mod1))) & ( ~ (v8 = 0) | v9 = 0 | v5 = mod2) & (v9 = 0 | v8 = 0 | v5 = high))))))) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (positional_advantage(v3, v4) = v5) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (hazard_of_mortality(v3, v4) = v8 & is_aligned(v3, v4) = v9 & organization(v3) = v6 & has_immunity(v3, v4) = v7 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | (( ~ (v7 = 0) | v8 = very_low) & (v7 = 0 | (( ~ (v9 = 0) | v8 = mod2 | v5 = 0) & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | (( ~ (v9 = 0) | v8 = low) & (v9 = 0 | v8 = mod1))) & (v9 = 0 | v8 = high | v5 = 0))))))) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (is_aligned(v3, v4) = v5) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (hazard_of_mortality(v3, v4) = v8 & positional_advantage(v3, v4) = v9 & organization(v3) = v6 & has_immunity(v3, v4) = v7 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | (( ~ (v7 = 0) | v8 = very_low) & (v7 = 0 | (( ~ (v9 = 0) | (( ~ (v5 = 0) | v8 = low) & (v8 = mod1 | v5 = 0))) & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v9 = 0 | v8 = mod2) & (v9 = 0 | v8 = high | v5 = 0))))))) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (dissimilar(v3, v4, v5) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (is_aligned(v3, v5) = v7 & is_aligned(v3, v4) = v6 & organization(v3) = 0 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v6 = 0)) & (v7 = 0 | v6 = 0))) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (has_immunity(v3, v4) = v5) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (hazard_of_mortality(v3, v4) = v7 & positional_advantage(v3, v4) = v9 & is_aligned(v3, v4) = v8 & organization(v3) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | (( ~ (v5 = 0) | v7 = very_low) & (v5 = 0 | (( ~ (v9 = 0) | (( ~ (v8 = 0) | v7 = low) & (v8 = 0 | v7 = mod1))) & ( ~ (v8 = 0) | v9 = 0 | v7 = mod2) & (v9 = 0 | v8 = 0 | v7 = high))))))) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (greater(v4, v5) = 0) |  ~ (greater(v3, v4) = 0) | greater(v3, v5) = 0) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (greater(v3, v4) = v5) | greater_or_equal(v3, v4) = 0 | ( ~ (v5 = 0) &  ~ (v4 = v3))) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (smaller(v3, v4) = v5) | smaller_or_equal(v3, v4) = 0 | ( ~ (v5 = 0) &  ~ (v4 = v3))) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = v3 |  ~ (greater_or_equal(v3, v4) = 0) | greater(v3, v4) = 0) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = v3 |  ~ (smaller_or_equal(v3, v4) = 0) | smaller(v3, v4) = 0) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (robust_position(v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (positional_advantage(v3, v5) = v8 & age(v3, v5) = v6 & greater(v6, tau) = v9 & smaller_or_equal(v6, tau) = v7 & ((v9 = 0 &  ~ (v8 = 0)) | (v8 = 0 & v7 = 0)))) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (has_endowment(v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] : (organization(v3) = v5 &  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : (has_immunity(v3, v6) = v9 & age(v3, v6) = v7 & greater(v7, eta) = v10 & smaller_or_equal(v7, eta) = v8 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | (v10 = 0 & v9 = 0) | (v8 = 0 &  ~ (v9 = 0)))))) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (organization(v3) = v4) | has_endowment(v3) = 0 |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (has_immunity(v3, v5) = v8 & age(v3, v5) = v6 & greater(v6, eta) = v9 & smaller_or_equal(v6, eta) = v7 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) | (v9 = 0 & v8 = 0) | (v7 = 0 &  ~ (v8 = 0))))) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (organization(v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & has_endowment(v3) = v5) | (v4 = 0 &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : (v6 = 0 |  ~ (has_immunity(v3, v5) = v6) |  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : ( ~ (v8 = 0) & age(v3, v5) = v7 & smaller_or_equal(v7, eta) = v8)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : ( ~ (age(v3, v5) = v6) |  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (has_immunity(v3, v5) = v8 & greater(v6, eta) = v7 & ( ~ (v8 = 0) |  ~ (v7 = 0)))) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : ( ~ (age(v3, v5) = v6) |  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (has_immunity(v3, v5) = v8 & smaller_or_equal(v6, eta) = v7 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) | v8 = 0))) &  ! [v5] : ( ~ (has_immunity(v3, v5) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : ( ~ (v7 = 0) & age(v3, v5) = v6 & greater(v6, eta) = v7)))) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (has_immunity(v3, v4) = 0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (organization(v3) = v5 & has_endowment(v3) = v6 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v6 = 0))) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (age(v3, v4) = zero) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (is_aligned(v3, v4) = v6 & organization(v3) = v5 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v6 = 0))) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (greater(v4, v3) = 0) | smaller(v3, v4) = 0) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (greater(v4, v3) = 0) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & greater(v3, v4) = v5)) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (greater(v3, v4) = 0) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & greater(v4, v3) = v5)) &  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (smaller(v3, v4) = 0) | greater(v4, v3) = 0) &  ! [v3] : ( ~ (robust_position(v3) = 0) | ( ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 |  ~ (positional_advantage(v3, v4) = v5) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : ( ~ (v7 = 0) & age(v3, v4) = v6 & greater(v6, tau) = v7)) &  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (age(v3, v4) = v5) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (positional_advantage(v3, v4) = v7 & greater(v5, tau) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v7 = 0))) &  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (age(v3, v4) = v5) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (positional_advantage(v3, v4) = v7 & smaller_or_equal(v5, tau) = v6 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v6 = 0)))) &  ! [v4] : ( ~ (positional_advantage(v3, v4) = 0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = 0) & age(v3, v4) = v5 & smaller_or_equal(v5, tau) = v6)))) &  ! [v3] : ( ~ (has_endowment(v3) = 0) | (organization(v3) = 0 &  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 |  ~ (has_immunity(v3, v4) = v5) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : ( ~ (v7 = 0) & age(v3, v4) = v6 & smaller_or_equal(v6, eta) = v7)) &  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (age(v3, v4) = v5) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (has_immunity(v3, v4) = v7 & greater(v5, eta) = v6 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v6 = 0)))) &  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (age(v3, v4) = v5) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (has_immunity(v3, v4) = v7 & smaller_or_equal(v5, eta) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v7 = 0))) &  ! [v4] : ( ~ (has_immunity(v3, v4) = 0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = 0) & age(v3, v4) = v5 & greater(v5, eta) = v6)))) &  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] :  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] :  ? [v16] :  ? [v17] : (v2 = 0 & v1 = 0 & v0 = 0 &  ~ (v8 = 0) & hazard_of_mortality(v3, v7) = v12 & hazard_of_mortality(v3, v6) = v15 & hazard_of_mortality(v3, v5) = v13 & hazard_of_mortality(v3, v4) = v17 & robust_position(v3) = 0 & organization(v3) = 0 & has_endowment(v3) = v8 & age(v3, v7) = v11 & age(v3, v6) = v10 & age(v3, v5) = v9 & age(v3, v4) = zero & greater(v11, tau) = 0 & greater(v10, sigma) = 0 & smaller(v13, v15) = v16 & smaller(v12, v13) = v14 & smaller_or_equal(v10, tau) = 0 & smaller_or_equal(v9, sigma) = 0 & ( ~ (v17 = v13) |  ~ (v16 = 0) |  ~ (v14 = 0))))
% 65.24/27.00  | (5)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (greater(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (greater(v3, v2) = v0))
% 65.24/27.00  | (6)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (smaller_or_equal(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (smaller_or_equal(v3, v2) = v0))
% 65.24/27.00  | (7)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (robust_position(v2) = v1) |  ~ (robust_position(v2) = v0))
% 65.24/27.00  | (8)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (organization(v2) = v1) |  ~ (organization(v2) = v0))
% 65.24/27.00  | (9)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (is_aligned(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (is_aligned(v3, v2) = v0))
% 65.24/27.00  | (10)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (age(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (age(v3, v2) = v0))
% 65.24/27.00  | (11)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (smaller(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (smaller(v3, v2) = v0))
% 65.24/27.00  | (12)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (dissimilar(v4, v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (dissimilar(v4, v3, v2) = v0))
% 65.24/27.00  | (13)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (has_endowment(v2) = v1) |  ~ (has_endowment(v2) = v0))
% 65.24/27.00  | (14)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (greater_or_equal(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (greater_or_equal(v3, v2) = v0))
% 65.24/27.00  |
% 65.24/27.00  | Instantiating (4) with all_1_0_0, all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2 yields:
% 65.24/27.00  | (15) greater(high, mod2) = 0 & greater(high, mod1) = 0 & greater(mod2, mod1) = 0 & greater(mod2, low) = 0 & greater(mod1, low) = 0 & greater(low, very_low) = 0 & greater(tau, zero) = all_1_1_1 & greater(sigma, zero) = all_1_2_2 & smaller(sigma, tau) = all_1_0_0 &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (is_aligned(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (is_aligned(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (dissimilar(v0, v1, v2) = v6 & organization(v0) = v5 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v6 = 0)) | (( ~ (v4 = 0) | v3 = 0) & ( ~ (v3 = 0) | v4 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (is_aligned(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (is_aligned(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (dissimilar(v0, v1, v2) = v5 & organization(v0) = v6 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0)) & (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (dissimilar(v0, v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (is_aligned(v0, v2) = v6 & is_aligned(v0, v1) = v5 & organization(v0) = v4 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) | (( ~ (v6 = 0) | v5 = 0) & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v6 = 0))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (greater(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ (greater(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & greater(v0, v1) = v4)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (greater(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (greater(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & greater(v1, v2) = v4)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (dissimilar(v0, v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (organization(v0) = v4 & age(v0, v2) = v6 & age(v0, v1) = v5 & greater(v6, sigma) = v7 & ( ~ (v5 = zero) |  ~ (v4 = 0) | (( ~ (v7 = 0) | v3 = 0) & ( ~ (v3 = 0) | v7 = 0))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (age(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (age(v0, v1) = zero) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (dissimilar(v0, v1, v2) = v6 & organization(v0) = v4 & greater(v3, sigma) = v5 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) | (( ~ (v6 = 0) | v5 = 0) & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v6 = 0))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 | v1 = v0 |  ~ (greater(v0, v1) = v2) | smaller(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 | v1 = v0 |  ~ (greater(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & greater_or_equal(v0, v1) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 | v1 = v0 |  ~ (smaller(v0, v1) = v2) | greater(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 | v1 = v0 |  ~ (smaller(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & smaller_or_equal(v0, v1) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (is_aligned(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (organization(v0) = v3 & age(v0, v1) = v4 & ( ~ (v4 = zero) |  ~ (v3 = 0)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (greater(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & smaller(v0, v1) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (greater_or_equal(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v1 = v0) &  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & greater(v0, v1) = v3))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (smaller(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & greater(v1, v0) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (smaller_or_equal(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v1 = v0) &  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & smaller(v0, v1) = v3))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (hazard_of_mortality(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (positional_advantage(v0, v1) = v6 & is_aligned(v0, v1) = v5 & organization(v0) = v3 & has_immunity(v0, v1) = v4 & ( ~ (v3 = 0) | (( ~ (v4 = 0) | v2 = very_low) & (v4 = 0 | (( ~ (v6 = 0) | (( ~ (v5 = 0) | v2 = low) & (v5 = 0 | v2 = mod1))) & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v6 = 0 | v2 = mod2) & (v6 = 0 | v5 = 0 | v2 = high))))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (positional_advantage(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (hazard_of_mortality(v0, v1) = v5 & is_aligned(v0, v1) = v6 & organization(v0) = v3 & has_immunity(v0, v1) = v4 & ( ~ (v3 = 0) | (( ~ (v4 = 0) | v5 = very_low) & (v4 = 0 | (( ~ (v6 = 0) | v5 = mod2 | v2 = 0) & ( ~ (v2 = 0) | (( ~ (v6 = 0) | v5 = low) & (v6 = 0 | v5 = mod1))) & (v6 = 0 | v5 = high | v2 = 0))))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (is_aligned(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (hazard_of_mortality(v0, v1) = v5 & positional_advantage(v0, v1) = v6 & organization(v0) = v3 & has_immunity(v0, v1) = v4 & ( ~ (v3 = 0) | (( ~ (v4 = 0) | v5 = very_low) & (v4 = 0 | (( ~ (v6 = 0) | (( ~ (v2 = 0) | v5 = low) & (v5 = mod1 | v2 = 0))) & ( ~ (v2 = 0) | v6 = 0 | v5 = mod2) & (v6 = 0 | v5 = high | v2 = 0))))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (dissimilar(v0, v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (is_aligned(v0, v2) = v4 & is_aligned(v0, v1) = v3 & organization(v0) = 0 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0)) & (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (has_immunity(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (hazard_of_mortality(v0, v1) = v4 & positional_advantage(v0, v1) = v6 & is_aligned(v0, v1) = v5 & organization(v0) = v3 & ( ~ (v3 = 0) | (( ~ (v2 = 0) | v4 = very_low) & (v2 = 0 | (( ~ (v6 = 0) | (( ~ (v5 = 0) | v4 = low) & (v5 = 0 | v4 = mod1))) & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v6 = 0 | v4 = mod2) & (v6 = 0 | v5 = 0 | v4 = high))))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (greater(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ (greater(v0, v1) = 0) | greater(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (greater(v0, v1) = v2) | greater_or_equal(v0, v1) = 0 | ( ~ (v2 = 0) &  ~ (v1 = v0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (smaller(v0, v1) = v2) | smaller_or_equal(v0, v1) = 0 | ( ~ (v2 = 0) &  ~ (v1 = v0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (greater_or_equal(v0, v1) = 0) | greater(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (smaller_or_equal(v0, v1) = 0) | smaller(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (robust_position(v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (positional_advantage(v0, v2) = v5 & age(v0, v2) = v3 & greater(v3, tau) = v6 & smaller_or_equal(v3, tau) = v4 & ((v6 = 0 &  ~ (v5 = 0)) | (v5 = 0 & v4 = 0)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (has_endowment(v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] : (organization(v0) = v2 &  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (has_immunity(v0, v3) = v6 & age(v0, v3) = v4 & greater(v4, eta) = v7 & smaller_or_equal(v4, eta) = v5 & ( ~ (v2 = 0) | (v7 = 0 & v6 = 0) | (v5 = 0 &  ~ (v6 = 0)))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (organization(v0) = v1) | has_endowment(v0) = 0 |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (has_immunity(v0, v2) = v5 & age(v0, v2) = v3 & greater(v3, eta) = v6 & smaller_or_equal(v3, eta) = v4 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & v5 = 0) | (v4 = 0 &  ~ (v5 = 0))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (organization(v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & has_endowment(v0) = v2) | (v1 = 0 &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (has_immunity(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & age(v0, v2) = v4 & smaller_or_equal(v4, eta) = v5)) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (age(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : (has_immunity(v0, v2) = v5 & greater(v3, eta) = v4 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) |  ~ (v4 = 0)))) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (age(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : (has_immunity(v0, v2) = v5 & smaller_or_equal(v3, eta) = v4 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) | v5 = 0))) &  ! [v2] : ( ~ (has_immunity(v0, v2) = 0) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & age(v0, v2) = v3 & greater(v3, eta) = v4)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (has_immunity(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (organization(v0) = v2 & has_endowment(v0) = v3 & ( ~ (v2 = 0) | v3 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (age(v0, v1) = zero) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (is_aligned(v0, v1) = v3 & organization(v0) = v2 & ( ~ (v2 = 0) | v3 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (greater(v1, v0) = 0) | smaller(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (greater(v1, v0) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & greater(v0, v1) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (greater(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & greater(v1, v0) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (smaller(v0, v1) = 0) | greater(v1, v0) = 0) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ (robust_position(v0) = 0) | ( ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (positional_advantage(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & age(v0, v1) = v3 & greater(v3, tau) = v4)) &  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (age(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (positional_advantage(v0, v1) = v4 & greater(v2, tau) = v3 & ( ~ (v3 = 0) | v4 = 0))) &  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (age(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (positional_advantage(v0, v1) = v4 & smaller_or_equal(v2, tau) = v3 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0)))) &  ! [v1] : ( ~ (positional_advantage(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & age(v0, v1) = v2 & smaller_or_equal(v2, tau) = v3)))) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ (has_endowment(v0) = 0) | (organization(v0) = 0 &  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (has_immunity(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & age(v0, v1) = v3 & smaller_or_equal(v3, eta) = v4)) &  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (age(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (has_immunity(v0, v1) = v4 & greater(v2, eta) = v3 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0)))) &  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (age(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (has_immunity(v0, v1) = v4 & smaller_or_equal(v2, eta) = v3 & ( ~ (v3 = 0) | v4 = 0))) &  ! [v1] : ( ~ (has_immunity(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & age(v0, v1) = v2 & greater(v2, eta) = v3)))) &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] :  ? [v14] : (all_1_0_0 = 0 & all_1_1_1 = 0 & all_1_2_2 = 0 &  ~ (v5 = 0) & hazard_of_mortality(v0, v4) = v9 & hazard_of_mortality(v0, v3) = v12 & hazard_of_mortality(v0, v2) = v10 & hazard_of_mortality(v0, v1) = v14 & robust_position(v0) = 0 & organization(v0) = 0 & has_endowment(v0) = v5 & age(v0, v4) = v8 & age(v0, v3) = v7 & age(v0, v2) = v6 & age(v0, v1) = zero & greater(v8, tau) = 0 & greater(v7, sigma) = 0 & smaller(v10, v12) = v13 & smaller(v9, v10) = v11 & smaller_or_equal(v7, tau) = 0 & smaller_or_equal(v6, sigma) = 0 & ( ~ (v14 = v10) |  ~ (v13 = 0) |  ~ (v11 = 0)))
% 65.24/27.02  |
% 65.24/27.02  | Applying alpha-rule on (15) yields:
% 65.24/27.02  | (16)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (dissimilar(v0, v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (is_aligned(v0, v2) = v4 & is_aligned(v0, v1) = v3 & organization(v0) = 0 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0)) & (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0)))
% 65.24/27.02  | (17) greater(mod1, low) = 0
% 65.24/27.02  | (18)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (smaller(v0, v1) = 0) | greater(v1, v0) = 0)
% 65.24/27.02  | (19)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (greater(v1, v0) = 0) | smaller(v0, v1) = 0)
% 65.24/27.02  | (20)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 | v1 = v0 |  ~ (smaller(v0, v1) = v2) | greater(v0, v1) = 0)
% 65.24/27.02  | (21)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 | v1 = v0 |  ~ (greater(v0, v1) = v2) | smaller(v0, v1) = 0)
% 65.24/27.02  | (22) greater(tau, zero) = all_1_1_1
% 65.24/27.02  | (23) smaller(sigma, tau) = all_1_0_0
% 65.24/27.02  | (24)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (greater(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (greater(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & greater(v1, v2) = v4))
% 65.24/27.02  | (25)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (is_aligned(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (hazard_of_mortality(v0, v1) = v5 & positional_advantage(v0, v1) = v6 & organization(v0) = v3 & has_immunity(v0, v1) = v4 & ( ~ (v3 = 0) | (( ~ (v4 = 0) | v5 = very_low) & (v4 = 0 | (( ~ (v6 = 0) | (( ~ (v2 = 0) | v5 = low) & (v5 = mod1 | v2 = 0))) & ( ~ (v2 = 0) | v6 = 0 | v5 = mod2) & (v6 = 0 | v5 = high | v2 = 0)))))))
% 65.24/27.02  | (26)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (is_aligned(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (organization(v0) = v3 & age(v0, v1) = v4 & ( ~ (v4 = zero) |  ~ (v3 = 0))))
% 65.24/27.02  | (27)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (smaller(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & greater(v1, v0) = v3))
% 65.24/27.02  | (28)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (is_aligned(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (is_aligned(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (dissimilar(v0, v1, v2) = v6 & organization(v0) = v5 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v6 = 0)) | (( ~ (v4 = 0) | v3 = 0) & ( ~ (v3 = 0) | v4 = 0)))
% 65.24/27.02  | (29)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 | v1 = v0 |  ~ (smaller(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & smaller_or_equal(v0, v1) = v3))
% 65.24/27.02  | (30)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (has_endowment(v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] : (organization(v0) = v2 &  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (has_immunity(v0, v3) = v6 & age(v0, v3) = v4 & greater(v4, eta) = v7 & smaller_or_equal(v4, eta) = v5 & ( ~ (v2 = 0) | (v7 = 0 & v6 = 0) | (v5 = 0 &  ~ (v6 = 0))))))
% 65.24/27.02  | (31)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (greater(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & smaller(v0, v1) = v3))
% 65.24/27.02  | (32) greater(mod2, low) = 0
% 65.24/27.02  | (33)  ! [v0] : ( ~ (has_endowment(v0) = 0) | (organization(v0) = 0 &  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (has_immunity(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & age(v0, v1) = v3 & smaller_or_equal(v3, eta) = v4)) &  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (age(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (has_immunity(v0, v1) = v4 & greater(v2, eta) = v3 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0)))) &  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (age(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (has_immunity(v0, v1) = v4 & smaller_or_equal(v2, eta) = v3 & ( ~ (v3 = 0) | v4 = 0))) &  ! [v1] : ( ~ (has_immunity(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & age(v0, v1) = v2 & greater(v2, eta) = v3))))
% 65.72/27.03  | (34)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (positional_advantage(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (hazard_of_mortality(v0, v1) = v5 & is_aligned(v0, v1) = v6 & organization(v0) = v3 & has_immunity(v0, v1) = v4 & ( ~ (v3 = 0) | (( ~ (v4 = 0) | v5 = very_low) & (v4 = 0 | (( ~ (v6 = 0) | v5 = mod2 | v2 = 0) & ( ~ (v2 = 0) | (( ~ (v6 = 0) | v5 = low) & (v6 = 0 | v5 = mod1))) & (v6 = 0 | v5 = high | v2 = 0)))))))
% 65.72/27.03  | (35)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (smaller(v0, v1) = v2) | smaller_or_equal(v0, v1) = 0 | ( ~ (v2 = 0) &  ~ (v1 = v0)))
% 65.72/27.03  | (36)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (greater_or_equal(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v1 = v0) &  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & greater(v0, v1) = v3)))
% 65.72/27.03  | (37) greater(high, mod1) = 0
% 65.72/27.03  | (38)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (is_aligned(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (is_aligned(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (dissimilar(v0, v1, v2) = v5 & organization(v0) = v6 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0)) & (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0)))))
% 65.72/27.03  | (39)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (organization(v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & has_endowment(v0) = v2) | (v1 = 0 &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (has_immunity(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & age(v0, v2) = v4 & smaller_or_equal(v4, eta) = v5)) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (age(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : (has_immunity(v0, v2) = v5 & greater(v3, eta) = v4 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) |  ~ (v4 = 0)))) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (age(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : (has_immunity(v0, v2) = v5 & smaller_or_equal(v3, eta) = v4 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) | v5 = 0))) &  ! [v2] : ( ~ (has_immunity(v0, v2) = 0) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & age(v0, v2) = v3 & greater(v3, eta) = v4))))
% 65.72/27.03  | (40)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (greater_or_equal(v0, v1) = 0) | greater(v0, v1) = 0)
% 65.72/27.03  | (41)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (dissimilar(v0, v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (is_aligned(v0, v2) = v6 & is_aligned(v0, v1) = v5 & organization(v0) = v4 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) | (( ~ (v6 = 0) | v5 = 0) & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v6 = 0)))))
% 65.72/27.03  | (42)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (smaller_or_equal(v0, v1) = 0) | smaller(v0, v1) = 0)
% 65.72/27.03  | (43)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (robust_position(v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (positional_advantage(v0, v2) = v5 & age(v0, v2) = v3 & greater(v3, tau) = v6 & smaller_or_equal(v3, tau) = v4 & ((v6 = 0 &  ~ (v5 = 0)) | (v5 = 0 & v4 = 0))))
% 65.72/27.03  | (44) greater(sigma, zero) = all_1_2_2
% 65.72/27.03  | (45)  ! [v0] : ( ~ (robust_position(v0) = 0) | ( ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (positional_advantage(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & age(v0, v1) = v3 & greater(v3, tau) = v4)) &  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (age(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (positional_advantage(v0, v1) = v4 & greater(v2, tau) = v3 & ( ~ (v3 = 0) | v4 = 0))) &  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (age(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (positional_advantage(v0, v1) = v4 & smaller_or_equal(v2, tau) = v3 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0)))) &  ! [v1] : ( ~ (positional_advantage(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & age(v0, v1) = v2 & smaller_or_equal(v2, tau) = v3))))
% 65.72/27.03  | (46)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (greater(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & greater(v1, v0) = v2))
% 65.72/27.03  | (47)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] :  ? [v14] : (all_1_0_0 = 0 & all_1_1_1 = 0 & all_1_2_2 = 0 &  ~ (v5 = 0) & hazard_of_mortality(v0, v4) = v9 & hazard_of_mortality(v0, v3) = v12 & hazard_of_mortality(v0, v2) = v10 & hazard_of_mortality(v0, v1) = v14 & robust_position(v0) = 0 & organization(v0) = 0 & has_endowment(v0) = v5 & age(v0, v4) = v8 & age(v0, v3) = v7 & age(v0, v2) = v6 & age(v0, v1) = zero & greater(v8, tau) = 0 & greater(v7, sigma) = 0 & smaller(v10, v12) = v13 & smaller(v9, v10) = v11 & smaller_or_equal(v7, tau) = 0 & smaller_or_equal(v6, sigma) = 0 & ( ~ (v14 = v10) |  ~ (v13 = 0) |  ~ (v11 = 0)))
% 65.72/27.03  | (48)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (hazard_of_mortality(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (positional_advantage(v0, v1) = v6 & is_aligned(v0, v1) = v5 & organization(v0) = v3 & has_immunity(v0, v1) = v4 & ( ~ (v3 = 0) | (( ~ (v4 = 0) | v2 = very_low) & (v4 = 0 | (( ~ (v6 = 0) | (( ~ (v5 = 0) | v2 = low) & (v5 = 0 | v2 = mod1))) & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v6 = 0 | v2 = mod2) & (v6 = 0 | v5 = 0 | v2 = high)))))))
% 65.72/27.04  | (49) greater(high, mod2) = 0
% 65.72/27.04  | (50)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (greater(v0, v1) = v2) | greater_or_equal(v0, v1) = 0 | ( ~ (v2 = 0) &  ~ (v1 = v0)))
% 65.72/27.04  | (51)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (has_immunity(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (hazard_of_mortality(v0, v1) = v4 & positional_advantage(v0, v1) = v6 & is_aligned(v0, v1) = v5 & organization(v0) = v3 & ( ~ (v3 = 0) | (( ~ (v2 = 0) | v4 = very_low) & (v2 = 0 | (( ~ (v6 = 0) | (( ~ (v5 = 0) | v4 = low) & (v5 = 0 | v4 = mod1))) & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v6 = 0 | v4 = mod2) & (v6 = 0 | v5 = 0 | v4 = high)))))))
% 65.72/27.04  | (52) greater(low, very_low) = 0
% 65.72/27.04  | (53)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (dissimilar(v0, v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (organization(v0) = v4 & age(v0, v2) = v6 & age(v0, v1) = v5 & greater(v6, sigma) = v7 & ( ~ (v5 = zero) |  ~ (v4 = 0) | (( ~ (v7 = 0) | v3 = 0) & ( ~ (v3 = 0) | v7 = 0)))))
% 65.72/27.04  | (54)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (organization(v0) = v1) | has_endowment(v0) = 0 |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (has_immunity(v0, v2) = v5 & age(v0, v2) = v3 & greater(v3, eta) = v6 & smaller_or_equal(v3, eta) = v4 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & v5 = 0) | (v4 = 0 &  ~ (v5 = 0)))))
% 65.72/27.04  | (55)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (age(v0, v1) = zero) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (is_aligned(v0, v1) = v3 & organization(v0) = v2 & ( ~ (v2 = 0) | v3 = 0)))
% 65.72/27.04  | (56)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (age(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (age(v0, v1) = zero) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (dissimilar(v0, v1, v2) = v6 & organization(v0) = v4 & greater(v3, sigma) = v5 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) | (( ~ (v6 = 0) | v5 = 0) & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v6 = 0)))))
% 65.72/27.04  | (57)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (smaller_or_equal(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v1 = v0) &  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & smaller(v0, v1) = v3)))
% 65.72/27.04  | (58)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (greater(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ (greater(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & greater(v0, v1) = v4))
% 65.72/27.04  | (59)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (has_immunity(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (organization(v0) = v2 & has_endowment(v0) = v3 & ( ~ (v2 = 0) | v3 = 0)))
% 65.72/27.04  | (60)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 | v1 = v0 |  ~ (greater(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & greater_or_equal(v0, v1) = v3))
% 65.72/27.04  | (61)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (greater(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ (greater(v0, v1) = 0) | greater(v0, v2) = 0)
% 65.72/27.04  | (62)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (greater(v1, v0) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & greater(v0, v1) = v2))
% 65.72/27.04  | (63) greater(mod2, mod1) = 0
% 65.72/27.04  |
% 65.72/27.04  | Instantiating (47) with all_4_0_3, all_4_1_4, all_4_2_5, all_4_3_6, all_4_4_7, all_4_5_8, all_4_6_9, all_4_7_10, all_4_8_11, all_4_9_12, all_4_10_13, all_4_11_14, all_4_12_15, all_4_13_16, all_4_14_17 yields:
% 65.72/27.04  | (64) all_1_0_0 = 0 & all_1_1_1 = 0 & all_1_2_2 = 0 &  ~ (all_4_9_12 = 0) & hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_4_5_8 & hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_4_2_5 & hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_4_4_7 & hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_4_0_3 & robust_position(all_4_14_17) = 0 & organization(all_4_14_17) = 0 & has_endowment(all_4_14_17) = all_4_9_12 & age(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_4_6_9 & age(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_4_7_10 & age(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_4_8_11 & age(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = zero & greater(all_4_6_9, tau) = 0 & greater(all_4_7_10, sigma) = 0 & smaller(all_4_4_7, all_4_2_5) = all_4_1_4 & smaller(all_4_5_8, all_4_4_7) = all_4_3_6 & smaller_or_equal(all_4_7_10, tau) = 0 & smaller_or_equal(all_4_8_11, sigma) = 0 & ( ~ (all_4_0_3 = all_4_4_7) |  ~ (all_4_1_4 = 0) |  ~ (all_4_3_6 = 0))
% 65.72/27.04  |
% 65.72/27.04  | Applying alpha-rule on (64) yields:
% 65.72/27.04  | (65) smaller_or_equal(all_4_7_10, tau) = 0
% 65.72/27.04  | (66) age(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = zero
% 65.72/27.04  | (67) has_endowment(all_4_14_17) = all_4_9_12
% 65.72/27.04  | (68)  ~ (all_4_9_12 = 0)
% 65.72/27.04  | (69) age(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_4_6_9
% 65.72/27.04  | (70) age(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_4_8_11
% 65.72/27.04  | (71) hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_4_4_7
% 65.72/27.04  | (72) smaller(all_4_5_8, all_4_4_7) = all_4_3_6
% 65.72/27.04  | (73) hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_4_0_3
% 65.72/27.04  | (74) hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_4_2_5
% 65.72/27.04  | (75) all_1_1_1 = 0
% 65.72/27.04  | (76) greater(all_4_7_10, sigma) = 0
% 65.72/27.04  | (77) organization(all_4_14_17) = 0
% 65.72/27.04  | (78) hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_4_5_8
% 65.72/27.04  | (79) smaller_or_equal(all_4_8_11, sigma) = 0
% 65.72/27.04  | (80) all_1_2_2 = 0
% 65.72/27.04  | (81) all_1_0_0 = 0
% 65.72/27.04  | (82)  ~ (all_4_0_3 = all_4_4_7) |  ~ (all_4_1_4 = 0) |  ~ (all_4_3_6 = 0)
% 65.72/27.04  | (83) robust_position(all_4_14_17) = 0
% 65.72/27.04  | (84) age(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_4_7_10
% 65.72/27.04  | (85) greater(all_4_6_9, tau) = 0
% 65.72/27.04  | (86) smaller(all_4_4_7, all_4_2_5) = all_4_1_4
% 65.72/27.04  |
% 65.72/27.04  | From (75) and (22) follows:
% 65.72/27.05  | (87) greater(tau, zero) = 0
% 65.72/27.05  |
% 65.72/27.05  | From (81) and (23) follows:
% 65.72/27.05  | (88) smaller(sigma, tau) = 0
% 65.72/27.05  |
% 65.72/27.05  | Instantiating formula (1) with all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15, all_4_4_7, all_4_5_8 and discharging atoms hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_4_4_7, yields:
% 65.72/27.05  | (89) all_4_4_7 = all_4_5_8 |  ~ (hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_4_5_8)
% 65.72/27.05  |
% 65.72/27.05  | Instantiating formula (1) with all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15, all_4_4_7, all_4_2_5 and discharging atoms hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_4_4_7, yields:
% 65.72/27.05  | (90) all_4_2_5 = all_4_4_7 |  ~ (hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_4_2_5)
% 65.72/27.05  |
% 65.72/27.05  | Instantiating formula (48) with all_4_5_8, all_4_10_13, all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_4_5_8, yields:
% 65.72/27.05  | (91)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = v3 & is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = v2 & organization(all_4_14_17) = v0 & has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (( ~ (v1 = 0) | all_4_5_8 = very_low) & (v1 = 0 | (( ~ (v3 = 0) | (( ~ (v2 = 0) | all_4_5_8 = low) & (v2 = 0 | all_4_5_8 = mod1))) & ( ~ (v2 = 0) | v3 = 0 | all_4_5_8 = mod2) & (v3 = 0 | v2 = 0 | all_4_5_8 = high))))))
% 65.72/27.05  |
% 65.72/27.05  | Instantiating formula (48) with all_4_2_5, all_4_11_14, all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_4_2_5, yields:
% 65.72/27.05  | (92)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = v3 & is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = v2 & organization(all_4_14_17) = v0 & has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (( ~ (v1 = 0) | all_4_2_5 = very_low) & (v1 = 0 | (( ~ (v3 = 0) | (( ~ (v2 = 0) | all_4_2_5 = low) & (v2 = 0 | all_4_2_5 = mod1))) & ( ~ (v2 = 0) | v3 = 0 | all_4_2_5 = mod2) & (v3 = 0 | v2 = 0 | all_4_2_5 = high))))))
% 65.72/27.05  |
% 65.72/27.05  | Instantiating formula (48) with all_4_4_7, all_4_12_15, all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_4_4_7, yields:
% 65.72/27.05  | (93)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = v3 & is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = v2 & organization(all_4_14_17) = v0 & has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (( ~ (v1 = 0) | all_4_4_7 = very_low) & (v1 = 0 | (( ~ (v3 = 0) | (( ~ (v2 = 0) | all_4_4_7 = low) & (v2 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = mod1))) & ( ~ (v2 = 0) | v3 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = mod2) & (v3 = 0 | v2 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = high))))))
% 65.72/27.05  |
% 65.72/27.05  | Instantiating formula (48) with all_4_0_3, all_4_13_16, all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_4_0_3, yields:
% 65.72/27.05  | (94)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = v3 & is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = v2 & organization(all_4_14_17) = v0 & has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (( ~ (v1 = 0) | all_4_0_3 = very_low) & (v1 = 0 | (( ~ (v3 = 0) | (( ~ (v2 = 0) | all_4_0_3 = low) & (v2 = 0 | all_4_0_3 = mod1))) & ( ~ (v2 = 0) | v3 = 0 | all_4_0_3 = mod2) & (v3 = 0 | v2 = 0 | all_4_0_3 = high))))))
% 65.72/27.05  |
% 65.72/27.05  | Instantiating formula (45) with all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms robust_position(all_4_14_17) = 0, yields:
% 65.72/27.05  | (95)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & age(all_4_14_17, v0) = v2 & greater(v2, tau) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (age(all_4_14_17, v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, v0) = v3 & greater(v1, tau) = v2 & ( ~ (v2 = 0) | v3 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (age(all_4_14_17, v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, v0) = v3 & smaller_or_equal(v1, tau) = v2 & ( ~ (v3 = 0) |  ~ (v2 = 0)))) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ (positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, v0) = 0) |  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & age(all_4_14_17, v0) = v1 & smaller_or_equal(v1, tau) = v2))
% 65.72/27.05  |
% 65.72/27.05  | Applying alpha-rule on (95) yields:
% 65.72/27.05  | (96)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & age(all_4_14_17, v0) = v2 & greater(v2, tau) = v3))
% 65.72/27.05  | (97)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (age(all_4_14_17, v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, v0) = v3 & greater(v1, tau) = v2 & ( ~ (v2 = 0) | v3 = 0)))
% 65.72/27.05  | (98)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (age(all_4_14_17, v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, v0) = v3 & smaller_or_equal(v1, tau) = v2 & ( ~ (v3 = 0) |  ~ (v2 = 0))))
% 65.72/27.05  | (99)  ! [v0] : ( ~ (positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, v0) = 0) |  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & age(all_4_14_17, v0) = v1 & smaller_or_equal(v1, tau) = v2))
% 65.72/27.05  |
% 65.72/27.05  | Instantiating formula (54) with 0, all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = 0, yields:
% 65.72/27.05  | (100) has_endowment(all_4_14_17) = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (has_immunity(all_4_14_17, v0) = v3 & age(all_4_14_17, v0) = v1 & greater(v1, eta) = v4 & smaller_or_equal(v1, eta) = v2 & ((v4 = 0 & v3 = 0) | (v2 = 0 &  ~ (v3 = 0))))
% 65.72/27.05  |
% 65.72/27.05  | Instantiating formula (30) with all_4_9_12, all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms has_endowment(all_4_14_17) = all_4_9_12, yields:
% 65.72/27.05  | (101) all_4_9_12 = 0 |  ? [v0] : (organization(all_4_14_17) = v0 &  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : (has_immunity(all_4_14_17, v1) = v4 & age(all_4_14_17, v1) = v2 & greater(v2, eta) = v5 & smaller_or_equal(v2, eta) = v3 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v4 = 0) | (v3 = 0 &  ~ (v4 = 0)))))
% 65.72/27.06  |
% 65.72/27.06  | Instantiating formula (56) with zero, all_4_13_16, all_4_13_16, all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms age(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = zero, yields:
% 65.72/27.06  | (102)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_4_13_16) = v2 & organization(all_4_14_17) = v0 & greater(zero, sigma) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (( ~ (v2 = 0) | v1 = 0) & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = 0))))
% 65.72/27.06  |
% 65.72/27.06  | Instantiating formula (56) with all_4_6_9, all_4_10_13, all_4_13_16, all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms age(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_4_6_9, age(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = zero, yields:
% 65.72/27.06  | (103)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_4_10_13) = v2 & organization(all_4_14_17) = v0 & greater(all_4_6_9, sigma) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (( ~ (v2 = 0) | v1 = 0) & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = 0))))
% 65.72/27.06  |
% 65.72/27.06  | Instantiating formula (56) with all_4_7_10, all_4_11_14, all_4_13_16, all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms age(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_4_7_10, age(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = zero, yields:
% 65.72/27.06  | (104)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_4_11_14) = v2 & organization(all_4_14_17) = v0 & greater(all_4_7_10, sigma) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (( ~ (v2 = 0) | v1 = 0) & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = 0))))
% 65.72/27.06  |
% 65.72/27.06  | Instantiating formula (56) with all_4_8_11, all_4_12_15, all_4_13_16, all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms age(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_4_8_11, age(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = zero, yields:
% 65.72/27.06  | (105)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_4_12_15) = v2 & organization(all_4_14_17) = v0 & greater(all_4_8_11, sigma) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (( ~ (v2 = 0) | v1 = 0) & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = 0))))
% 65.72/27.06  |
% 65.72/27.06  | Instantiating formula (55) with all_4_13_16, all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms age(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = zero, yields:
% 65.72/27.06  | (106)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = v1 & organization(all_4_14_17) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 65.72/27.06  |
% 65.72/27.06  | Instantiating formula (61) with sigma, tau, all_4_6_9 and discharging atoms greater(all_4_6_9, tau) = 0, yields:
% 65.72/27.06  | (107)  ~ (greater(tau, sigma) = 0) | greater(all_4_6_9, sigma) = 0
% 65.72/27.06  |
% 65.72/27.06  | Instantiating formula (61) with tau, sigma, all_4_7_10 and discharging atoms greater(all_4_7_10, sigma) = 0, yields:
% 65.72/27.06  | (108)  ~ (greater(sigma, tau) = 0) | greater(all_4_7_10, tau) = 0
% 65.72/27.06  |
% 65.72/27.06  | Instantiating formula (62) with high, mod1 and discharging atoms greater(high, mod1) = 0, yields:
% 65.72/27.06  | (109)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater(mod1, high) = v0)
% 65.72/27.06  |
% 65.72/27.06  | Instantiating formula (62) with mod2, mod1 and discharging atoms greater(mod2, mod1) = 0, yields:
% 65.72/27.06  | (110)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater(mod1, mod2) = v0)
% 65.72/27.06  |
% 65.72/27.06  | Instantiating formula (61) with low, mod1, high and discharging atoms greater(high, mod1) = 0, greater(mod1, low) = 0, yields:
% 65.72/27.06  | (111) greater(high, low) = 0
% 65.72/27.06  |
% 65.72/27.06  | Instantiating formula (61) with very_low, low, high and discharging atoms greater(low, very_low) = 0, yields:
% 65.72/27.06  | (112)  ~ (greater(high, low) = 0) | greater(high, very_low) = 0
% 65.72/27.06  |
% 65.72/27.06  | Instantiating formula (19) with tau, zero and discharging atoms greater(tau, zero) = 0, yields:
% 65.72/27.06  | (113) smaller(zero, tau) = 0
% 65.72/27.06  |
% 65.72/27.06  | Instantiating formula (62) with tau, zero and discharging atoms greater(tau, zero) = 0, yields:
% 65.72/27.06  | (114)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater(zero, tau) = v0)
% 65.72/27.06  |
% 65.72/27.06  | Instantiating formula (18) with all_4_2_5, all_4_4_7 yields:
% 65.72/27.06  | (115)  ~ (smaller(all_4_4_7, all_4_2_5) = 0) | greater(all_4_2_5, all_4_4_7) = 0
% 65.72/27.06  |
% 65.72/27.06  | Instantiating formula (27) with all_4_1_4, all_4_2_5, all_4_4_7 and discharging atoms smaller(all_4_4_7, all_4_2_5) = all_4_1_4, yields:
% 65.72/27.06  | (116) all_4_1_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater(all_4_2_5, all_4_4_7) = v0)
% 65.72/27.06  |
% 65.72/27.06  | Instantiating formula (18) with all_4_4_7, all_4_5_8 yields:
% 65.72/27.06  | (117)  ~ (smaller(all_4_5_8, all_4_4_7) = 0) | greater(all_4_4_7, all_4_5_8) = 0
% 65.72/27.06  |
% 65.72/27.06  | Instantiating formula (20) with all_4_3_6, all_4_4_7, all_4_5_8 and discharging atoms smaller(all_4_5_8, all_4_4_7) = all_4_3_6, yields:
% 65.72/27.06  | (118) all_4_3_6 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = all_4_5_8 | greater(all_4_5_8, all_4_4_7) = 0
% 65.72/27.06  |
% 65.72/27.06  | Instantiating formula (29) with all_4_3_6, all_4_4_7, all_4_5_8 and discharging atoms smaller(all_4_5_8, all_4_4_7) = all_4_3_6, yields:
% 65.72/27.06  | (119) all_4_3_6 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = all_4_5_8 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & smaller_or_equal(all_4_5_8, all_4_4_7) = v0)
% 65.72/27.06  |
% 65.72/27.06  | Instantiating formula (27) with all_4_3_6, all_4_4_7, all_4_5_8 and discharging atoms smaller(all_4_5_8, all_4_4_7) = all_4_3_6, yields:
% 65.72/27.06  | (120) all_4_3_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater(all_4_4_7, all_4_5_8) = v0)
% 65.72/27.07  |
% 65.72/27.07  | Instantiating formula (18) with tau, sigma and discharging atoms smaller(sigma, tau) = 0, yields:
% 65.72/27.07  | (121) greater(tau, sigma) = 0
% 65.72/27.07  |
% 65.72/27.07  | Instantiating formula (35) with 0, tau, sigma and discharging atoms smaller(sigma, tau) = 0, yields:
% 65.72/27.07  | (122) smaller_or_equal(sigma, tau) = 0
% 65.72/27.07  |
% 65.72/27.07  | Instantiating formula (42) with sigma, all_4_8_11 and discharging atoms smaller_or_equal(all_4_8_11, sigma) = 0, yields:
% 65.72/27.07  | (123) all_4_8_11 = sigma | smaller(all_4_8_11, sigma) = 0
% 65.72/27.07  |
% 65.72/27.07  | Instantiating formula (97) with all_4_6_9, all_4_10_13 and discharging atoms age(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_4_6_9, yields:
% 65.72/27.07  | (124)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = v1 & greater(all_4_6_9, tau) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 65.72/27.07  |
% 65.72/27.07  | Instantiating formula (98) with all_4_6_9, all_4_10_13 and discharging atoms age(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_4_6_9, yields:
% 65.72/27.07  | (125)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = v1 & smaller_or_equal(all_4_6_9, tau) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 65.72/27.07  |
% 65.72/27.07  | Instantiating formula (97) with all_4_7_10, all_4_11_14 and discharging atoms age(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_4_7_10, yields:
% 65.72/27.07  | (126)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = v1 & greater(all_4_7_10, tau) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 65.72/27.07  |
% 65.72/27.07  | Instantiating formula (98) with all_4_7_10, all_4_11_14 and discharging atoms age(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_4_7_10, yields:
% 65.72/27.07  | (127)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = v1 & smaller_or_equal(all_4_7_10, tau) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 65.72/27.07  |
% 65.72/27.07  | Instantiating formula (97) with all_4_8_11, all_4_12_15 and discharging atoms age(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_4_8_11, yields:
% 65.72/27.07  | (128)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = v1 & greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 65.72/27.07  |
% 65.72/27.07  | Instantiating formula (98) with all_4_8_11, all_4_12_15 and discharging atoms age(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_4_8_11, yields:
% 65.72/27.07  | (129)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = v1 & smaller_or_equal(all_4_8_11, tau) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 65.72/27.07  |
% 65.72/27.07  | Instantiating formula (97) with zero, all_4_13_16 and discharging atoms age(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = zero, yields:
% 65.72/27.07  | (130)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = v1 & greater(zero, tau) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 65.72/27.07  |
% 65.72/27.07  | Instantiating formula (98) with zero, all_4_13_16 and discharging atoms age(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = zero, yields:
% 65.72/27.07  | (131)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = v1 & smaller_or_equal(zero, tau) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 65.72/27.07  |
% 65.72/27.07  | Instantiating (114) with all_13_0_18 yields:
% 65.72/27.07  | (132)  ~ (all_13_0_18 = 0) & greater(zero, tau) = all_13_0_18
% 65.72/27.07  |
% 65.72/27.07  | Applying alpha-rule on (132) yields:
% 65.72/27.07  | (133)  ~ (all_13_0_18 = 0)
% 65.72/27.07  | (134) greater(zero, tau) = all_13_0_18
% 65.72/27.07  |
% 65.72/27.07  | Instantiating (103) with all_15_0_19, all_15_1_20, all_15_2_21 yields:
% 65.72/27.07  | (135) dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_4_10_13) = all_15_0_19 & organization(all_4_14_17) = all_15_2_21 & greater(all_4_6_9, sigma) = all_15_1_20 & ( ~ (all_15_2_21 = 0) | (( ~ (all_15_0_19 = 0) | all_15_1_20 = 0) & ( ~ (all_15_1_20 = 0) | all_15_0_19 = 0)))
% 65.72/27.07  |
% 65.72/27.07  | Applying alpha-rule on (135) yields:
% 65.72/27.07  | (136) dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_4_10_13) = all_15_0_19
% 65.72/27.07  | (137) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_15_2_21
% 65.72/27.07  | (138) greater(all_4_6_9, sigma) = all_15_1_20
% 65.72/27.07  | (139)  ~ (all_15_2_21 = 0) | (( ~ (all_15_0_19 = 0) | all_15_1_20 = 0) & ( ~ (all_15_1_20 = 0) | all_15_0_19 = 0))
% 65.72/27.07  |
% 65.72/27.07  | Instantiating (94) with all_17_0_22, all_17_1_23, all_17_2_24, all_17_3_25 yields:
% 65.72/27.07  | (140) positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_17_0_22 & is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_17_1_23 & organization(all_4_14_17) = all_17_3_25 & has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_17_2_24 & ( ~ (all_17_3_25 = 0) | (( ~ (all_17_2_24 = 0) | all_4_0_3 = very_low) & (all_17_2_24 = 0 | (( ~ (all_17_0_22 = 0) | (( ~ (all_17_1_23 = 0) | all_4_0_3 = low) & (all_17_1_23 = 0 | all_4_0_3 = mod1))) & ( ~ (all_17_1_23 = 0) | all_17_0_22 = 0 | all_4_0_3 = mod2) & (all_17_0_22 = 0 | all_17_1_23 = 0 | all_4_0_3 = high)))))
% 65.72/27.07  |
% 65.72/27.07  | Applying alpha-rule on (140) yields:
% 65.72/27.07  | (141) is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_17_1_23
% 65.72/27.07  | (142) positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_17_0_22
% 65.72/27.07  | (143)  ~ (all_17_3_25 = 0) | (( ~ (all_17_2_24 = 0) | all_4_0_3 = very_low) & (all_17_2_24 = 0 | (( ~ (all_17_0_22 = 0) | (( ~ (all_17_1_23 = 0) | all_4_0_3 = low) & (all_17_1_23 = 0 | all_4_0_3 = mod1))) & ( ~ (all_17_1_23 = 0) | all_17_0_22 = 0 | all_4_0_3 = mod2) & (all_17_0_22 = 0 | all_17_1_23 = 0 | all_4_0_3 = high))))
% 65.72/27.07  | (144) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_17_3_25
% 65.72/27.07  | (145) has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_17_2_24
% 65.72/27.07  |
% 65.72/27.07  | Instantiating (92) with all_19_0_26, all_19_1_27, all_19_2_28, all_19_3_29 yields:
% 65.72/27.07  | (146) positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_19_0_26 & is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_19_1_27 & organization(all_4_14_17) = all_19_3_29 & has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_19_2_28 & ( ~ (all_19_3_29 = 0) | (( ~ (all_19_2_28 = 0) | all_4_2_5 = very_low) & (all_19_2_28 = 0 | (( ~ (all_19_0_26 = 0) | (( ~ (all_19_1_27 = 0) | all_4_2_5 = low) & (all_19_1_27 = 0 | all_4_2_5 = mod1))) & ( ~ (all_19_1_27 = 0) | all_19_0_26 = 0 | all_4_2_5 = mod2) & (all_19_0_26 = 0 | all_19_1_27 = 0 | all_4_2_5 = high)))))
% 65.72/27.07  |
% 65.72/27.07  | Applying alpha-rule on (146) yields:
% 65.72/27.07  | (147) positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_19_0_26
% 65.72/27.07  | (148)  ~ (all_19_3_29 = 0) | (( ~ (all_19_2_28 = 0) | all_4_2_5 = very_low) & (all_19_2_28 = 0 | (( ~ (all_19_0_26 = 0) | (( ~ (all_19_1_27 = 0) | all_4_2_5 = low) & (all_19_1_27 = 0 | all_4_2_5 = mod1))) & ( ~ (all_19_1_27 = 0) | all_19_0_26 = 0 | all_4_2_5 = mod2) & (all_19_0_26 = 0 | all_19_1_27 = 0 | all_4_2_5 = high))))
% 65.72/27.07  | (149) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_19_3_29
% 65.72/27.07  | (150) has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_19_2_28
% 65.72/27.07  | (151) is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_19_1_27
% 65.72/27.07  |
% 65.72/27.07  | Instantiating (91) with all_21_0_30, all_21_1_31, all_21_2_32, all_21_3_33 yields:
% 65.72/27.07  | (152) positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_21_0_30 & is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_21_1_31 & organization(all_4_14_17) = all_21_3_33 & has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_21_2_32 & ( ~ (all_21_3_33 = 0) | (( ~ (all_21_2_32 = 0) | all_4_5_8 = very_low) & (all_21_2_32 = 0 | (( ~ (all_21_0_30 = 0) | (( ~ (all_21_1_31 = 0) | all_4_5_8 = low) & (all_21_1_31 = 0 | all_4_5_8 = mod1))) & ( ~ (all_21_1_31 = 0) | all_21_0_30 = 0 | all_4_5_8 = mod2) & (all_21_0_30 = 0 | all_21_1_31 = 0 | all_4_5_8 = high)))))
% 65.72/27.07  |
% 65.72/27.07  | Applying alpha-rule on (152) yields:
% 65.72/27.07  | (153)  ~ (all_21_3_33 = 0) | (( ~ (all_21_2_32 = 0) | all_4_5_8 = very_low) & (all_21_2_32 = 0 | (( ~ (all_21_0_30 = 0) | (( ~ (all_21_1_31 = 0) | all_4_5_8 = low) & (all_21_1_31 = 0 | all_4_5_8 = mod1))) & ( ~ (all_21_1_31 = 0) | all_21_0_30 = 0 | all_4_5_8 = mod2) & (all_21_0_30 = 0 | all_21_1_31 = 0 | all_4_5_8 = high))))
% 65.72/27.08  | (154) positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_21_0_30
% 65.72/27.08  | (155) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_21_3_33
% 65.72/27.08  | (156) has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_21_2_32
% 65.72/27.08  | (157) is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_21_1_31
% 65.72/27.08  |
% 65.72/27.08  | Instantiating (102) with all_23_0_34, all_23_1_35, all_23_2_36 yields:
% 65.72/27.08  | (158) dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_4_13_16) = all_23_0_34 & organization(all_4_14_17) = all_23_2_36 & greater(zero, sigma) = all_23_1_35 & ( ~ (all_23_2_36 = 0) | (( ~ (all_23_0_34 = 0) | all_23_1_35 = 0) & ( ~ (all_23_1_35 = 0) | all_23_0_34 = 0)))
% 65.72/27.08  |
% 65.72/27.08  | Applying alpha-rule on (158) yields:
% 65.72/27.08  | (159) dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_4_13_16) = all_23_0_34
% 65.72/27.08  | (160) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_23_2_36
% 65.72/27.08  | (161) greater(zero, sigma) = all_23_1_35
% 65.72/27.08  | (162)  ~ (all_23_2_36 = 0) | (( ~ (all_23_0_34 = 0) | all_23_1_35 = 0) & ( ~ (all_23_1_35 = 0) | all_23_0_34 = 0))
% 65.72/27.08  |
% 65.72/27.08  | Instantiating (93) with all_25_0_37, all_25_1_38, all_25_2_39, all_25_3_40 yields:
% 65.72/27.08  | (163) positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_25_0_37 & is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_25_1_38 & organization(all_4_14_17) = all_25_3_40 & has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_25_2_39 & ( ~ (all_25_3_40 = 0) | (( ~ (all_25_2_39 = 0) | all_4_4_7 = very_low) & (all_25_2_39 = 0 | (( ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0) | (( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_4_4_7 = low) & (all_25_1_38 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = mod1))) & ( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_25_0_37 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = mod2) & (all_25_0_37 = 0 | all_25_1_38 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = high)))))
% 65.72/27.08  |
% 65.72/27.08  | Applying alpha-rule on (163) yields:
% 65.72/27.08  | (164) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_25_3_40
% 65.72/27.08  | (165)  ~ (all_25_3_40 = 0) | (( ~ (all_25_2_39 = 0) | all_4_4_7 = very_low) & (all_25_2_39 = 0 | (( ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0) | (( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_4_4_7 = low) & (all_25_1_38 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = mod1))) & ( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_25_0_37 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = mod2) & (all_25_0_37 = 0 | all_25_1_38 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = high))))
% 65.72/27.08  | (166) positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_25_0_37
% 65.72/27.08  | (167) has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_25_2_39
% 65.72/27.08  | (168) is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_25_1_38
% 65.72/27.08  |
% 65.72/27.08  | Instantiating (110) with all_29_0_42 yields:
% 65.72/27.08  | (169)  ~ (all_29_0_42 = 0) & greater(mod1, mod2) = all_29_0_42
% 65.72/27.08  |
% 65.72/27.08  | Applying alpha-rule on (169) yields:
% 65.72/27.08  | (170)  ~ (all_29_0_42 = 0)
% 65.72/27.08  | (171) greater(mod1, mod2) = all_29_0_42
% 65.72/27.08  |
% 65.72/27.08  | Instantiating (105) with all_33_0_44, all_33_1_45, all_33_2_46 yields:
% 65.72/27.08  | (172) dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_4_12_15) = all_33_0_44 & organization(all_4_14_17) = all_33_2_46 & greater(all_4_8_11, sigma) = all_33_1_45 & ( ~ (all_33_2_46 = 0) | (( ~ (all_33_0_44 = 0) | all_33_1_45 = 0) & ( ~ (all_33_1_45 = 0) | all_33_0_44 = 0)))
% 65.72/27.08  |
% 65.72/27.08  | Applying alpha-rule on (172) yields:
% 65.72/27.08  | (173) dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_4_12_15) = all_33_0_44
% 65.72/27.08  | (174) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_33_2_46
% 65.72/27.08  | (175) greater(all_4_8_11, sigma) = all_33_1_45
% 65.72/27.08  | (176)  ~ (all_33_2_46 = 0) | (( ~ (all_33_0_44 = 0) | all_33_1_45 = 0) & ( ~ (all_33_1_45 = 0) | all_33_0_44 = 0))
% 65.72/27.08  |
% 65.72/27.08  | Instantiating (104) with all_37_0_48, all_37_1_49, all_37_2_50 yields:
% 65.72/27.08  | (177) dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_4_11_14) = all_37_0_48 & organization(all_4_14_17) = all_37_2_50 & greater(all_4_7_10, sigma) = all_37_1_49 & ( ~ (all_37_2_50 = 0) | (( ~ (all_37_0_48 = 0) | all_37_1_49 = 0) & ( ~ (all_37_1_49 = 0) | all_37_0_48 = 0)))
% 65.72/27.08  |
% 65.72/27.08  | Applying alpha-rule on (177) yields:
% 65.72/27.08  | (178) dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_4_11_14) = all_37_0_48
% 65.72/27.08  | (179) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_37_2_50
% 65.72/27.08  | (180) greater(all_4_7_10, sigma) = all_37_1_49
% 65.72/27.08  | (181)  ~ (all_37_2_50 = 0) | (( ~ (all_37_0_48 = 0) | all_37_1_49 = 0) & ( ~ (all_37_1_49 = 0) | all_37_0_48 = 0))
% 65.72/27.08  |
% 65.72/27.08  | Instantiating (106) with all_45_0_54, all_45_1_55 yields:
% 65.72/27.08  | (182) is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_45_0_54 & organization(all_4_14_17) = all_45_1_55 & ( ~ (all_45_1_55 = 0) | all_45_0_54 = 0)
% 65.72/27.08  |
% 65.72/27.08  | Applying alpha-rule on (182) yields:
% 65.72/27.08  | (183) is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_45_0_54
% 65.72/27.08  | (184) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_45_1_55
% 65.72/27.08  | (185)  ~ (all_45_1_55 = 0) | all_45_0_54 = 0
% 65.72/27.08  |
% 65.72/27.08  | Instantiating (109) with all_47_0_56 yields:
% 65.72/27.08  | (186)  ~ (all_47_0_56 = 0) & greater(mod1, high) = all_47_0_56
% 65.72/27.08  |
% 65.72/27.08  | Applying alpha-rule on (186) yields:
% 65.72/27.08  | (187)  ~ (all_47_0_56 = 0)
% 65.72/27.08  | (188) greater(mod1, high) = all_47_0_56
% 65.72/27.08  |
% 65.72/27.08  | Instantiating (131) with all_51_0_58, all_51_1_59 yields:
% 65.72/27.08  | (189) positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_51_0_58 & smaller_or_equal(zero, tau) = all_51_1_59 & ( ~ (all_51_0_58 = 0) |  ~ (all_51_1_59 = 0))
% 65.72/27.08  |
% 65.72/27.08  | Applying alpha-rule on (189) yields:
% 65.72/27.08  | (190) positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_51_0_58
% 65.72/27.08  | (191) smaller_or_equal(zero, tau) = all_51_1_59
% 65.72/27.08  | (192)  ~ (all_51_0_58 = 0) |  ~ (all_51_1_59 = 0)
% 65.72/27.08  |
% 65.72/27.08  | Instantiating (130) with all_53_0_60, all_53_1_61 yields:
% 65.72/27.08  | (193) positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_53_0_60 & greater(zero, tau) = all_53_1_61 & ( ~ (all_53_1_61 = 0) | all_53_0_60 = 0)
% 65.72/27.08  |
% 65.72/27.08  | Applying alpha-rule on (193) yields:
% 65.72/27.08  | (194) positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_53_0_60
% 65.72/27.08  | (195) greater(zero, tau) = all_53_1_61
% 65.72/27.08  | (196)  ~ (all_53_1_61 = 0) | all_53_0_60 = 0
% 65.72/27.08  |
% 65.72/27.08  | Instantiating (127) with all_55_0_62, all_55_1_63 yields:
% 65.72/27.08  | (197) positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_55_0_62 & smaller_or_equal(all_4_7_10, tau) = all_55_1_63 & ( ~ (all_55_0_62 = 0) |  ~ (all_55_1_63 = 0))
% 65.72/27.08  |
% 65.72/27.08  | Applying alpha-rule on (197) yields:
% 65.72/27.08  | (198) positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_55_0_62
% 65.72/27.08  | (199) smaller_or_equal(all_4_7_10, tau) = all_55_1_63
% 65.72/27.08  | (200)  ~ (all_55_0_62 = 0) |  ~ (all_55_1_63 = 0)
% 65.72/27.08  |
% 65.72/27.08  | Instantiating (126) with all_57_0_64, all_57_1_65 yields:
% 65.72/27.08  | (201) positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_57_0_64 & greater(all_4_7_10, tau) = all_57_1_65 & ( ~ (all_57_1_65 = 0) | all_57_0_64 = 0)
% 65.72/27.08  |
% 65.72/27.08  | Applying alpha-rule on (201) yields:
% 65.72/27.08  | (202) positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_57_0_64
% 65.72/27.08  | (203) greater(all_4_7_10, tau) = all_57_1_65
% 65.72/27.08  | (204)  ~ (all_57_1_65 = 0) | all_57_0_64 = 0
% 65.72/27.08  |
% 65.72/27.08  | Instantiating (129) with all_59_0_66, all_59_1_67 yields:
% 65.72/27.08  | (205) positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_59_0_66 & smaller_or_equal(all_4_8_11, tau) = all_59_1_67 & ( ~ (all_59_0_66 = 0) |  ~ (all_59_1_67 = 0))
% 65.72/27.08  |
% 65.72/27.08  | Applying alpha-rule on (205) yields:
% 65.72/27.08  | (206) positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_59_0_66
% 65.72/27.09  | (207) smaller_or_equal(all_4_8_11, tau) = all_59_1_67
% 65.72/27.09  | (208)  ~ (all_59_0_66 = 0) |  ~ (all_59_1_67 = 0)
% 65.72/27.09  |
% 65.72/27.09  | Instantiating (128) with all_61_0_68, all_61_1_69 yields:
% 65.72/27.09  | (209) positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_61_0_68 & greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = all_61_1_69 & ( ~ (all_61_1_69 = 0) | all_61_0_68 = 0)
% 65.72/27.09  |
% 65.72/27.09  | Applying alpha-rule on (209) yields:
% 65.72/27.09  | (210) positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_61_0_68
% 65.72/27.09  | (211) greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = all_61_1_69
% 65.72/27.09  | (212)  ~ (all_61_1_69 = 0) | all_61_0_68 = 0
% 65.72/27.09  |
% 65.72/27.09  | Instantiating (125) with all_63_0_70, all_63_1_71 yields:
% 65.72/27.09  | (213) positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_63_0_70 & smaller_or_equal(all_4_6_9, tau) = all_63_1_71 & ( ~ (all_63_0_70 = 0) |  ~ (all_63_1_71 = 0))
% 65.72/27.09  |
% 65.72/27.09  | Applying alpha-rule on (213) yields:
% 65.72/27.09  | (214) positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_63_0_70
% 65.72/27.09  | (215) smaller_or_equal(all_4_6_9, tau) = all_63_1_71
% 65.72/27.09  | (216)  ~ (all_63_0_70 = 0) |  ~ (all_63_1_71 = 0)
% 65.72/27.09  |
% 65.72/27.09  | Instantiating (124) with all_65_0_72, all_65_1_73 yields:
% 65.72/27.09  | (217) positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_65_0_72 & greater(all_4_6_9, tau) = all_65_1_73 & ( ~ (all_65_1_73 = 0) | all_65_0_72 = 0)
% 65.72/27.09  |
% 65.72/27.09  | Applying alpha-rule on (217) yields:
% 65.72/27.09  | (218) positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_65_0_72
% 65.72/27.09  | (219) greater(all_4_6_9, tau) = all_65_1_73
% 65.72/27.09  | (220)  ~ (all_65_1_73 = 0) | all_65_0_72 = 0
% 65.72/27.09  |
% 65.72/27.09  +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (107), into two cases.
% 65.72/27.09  |-Branch one:
% 65.72/27.09  | (221)  ~ (greater(tau, sigma) = 0)
% 65.72/27.09  |
% 65.72/27.09  	| Using (121) and (221) yields:
% 65.72/27.09  	| (222) $false
% 65.72/27.09  	|
% 65.72/27.09  	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 65.72/27.09  |-Branch two:
% 65.72/27.09  | (121) greater(tau, sigma) = 0
% 65.72/27.09  | (224) greater(all_4_6_9, sigma) = 0
% 65.72/27.09  |
% 65.72/27.09  	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (112), into two cases.
% 65.72/27.09  	|-Branch one:
% 65.72/27.09  	| (225)  ~ (greater(high, low) = 0)
% 65.72/27.09  	|
% 65.72/27.09  		| Using (111) and (225) yields:
% 65.72/27.09  		| (222) $false
% 65.72/27.09  		|
% 65.72/27.09  		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 65.72/27.09  	|-Branch two:
% 65.72/27.09  	| (111) greater(high, low) = 0
% 65.72/27.09  	| (228) greater(high, very_low) = 0
% 65.72/27.09  	|
% 65.72/27.09  		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (100), into two cases.
% 65.72/27.09  		|-Branch one:
% 65.72/27.09  		| (229) has_endowment(all_4_14_17) = 0
% 65.72/27.09  		|
% 65.72/27.09  			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (101), into two cases.
% 65.72/27.09  			|-Branch one:
% 65.72/27.09  			| (230) all_4_9_12 = 0
% 65.72/27.09  			|
% 65.72/27.09  				| Equations (230) can reduce 68 to:
% 65.72/27.09  				| (231) $false
% 65.72/27.09  				|
% 65.72/27.09  				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 65.72/27.09  			|-Branch two:
% 65.72/27.09  			| (68)  ~ (all_4_9_12 = 0)
% 65.72/27.09  			| (233)  ? [v0] : (organization(all_4_14_17) = v0 &  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : (has_immunity(all_4_14_17, v1) = v4 & age(all_4_14_17, v1) = v2 & greater(v2, eta) = v5 & smaller_or_equal(v2, eta) = v3 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v4 = 0) | (v3 = 0 &  ~ (v4 = 0)))))
% 65.72/27.09  			|
% 65.72/27.09  				| Instantiating formula (13) with all_4_14_17, 0, all_4_9_12 and discharging atoms has_endowment(all_4_14_17) = all_4_9_12, has_endowment(all_4_14_17) = 0, yields:
% 65.72/27.09  				| (230) all_4_9_12 = 0
% 65.72/27.09  				|
% 65.72/27.09  				| Equations (230) can reduce 68 to:
% 65.72/27.09  				| (231) $false
% 65.72/27.09  				|
% 65.72/27.09  				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 65.72/27.09  		|-Branch two:
% 65.72/27.09  		| (236)  ~ (has_endowment(all_4_14_17) = 0)
% 65.72/27.09  		| (237)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (has_immunity(all_4_14_17, v0) = v3 & age(all_4_14_17, v0) = v1 & greater(v1, eta) = v4 & smaller_or_equal(v1, eta) = v2 & ((v4 = 0 & v3 = 0) | (v2 = 0 &  ~ (v3 = 0))))
% 65.72/27.09  		|
% 65.72/27.09  			| Instantiating (237) with all_86_0_80, all_86_1_81, all_86_2_82, all_86_3_83, all_86_4_84 yields:
% 65.72/27.09  			| (238) has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_86_4_84) = all_86_1_81 & age(all_4_14_17, all_86_4_84) = all_86_3_83 & greater(all_86_3_83, eta) = all_86_0_80 & smaller_or_equal(all_86_3_83, eta) = all_86_2_82 & ((all_86_0_80 = 0 & all_86_1_81 = 0) | (all_86_2_82 = 0 &  ~ (all_86_1_81 = 0)))
% 65.72/27.09  			|
% 65.72/27.09  			| Applying alpha-rule on (238) yields:
% 65.72/27.09  			| (239) smaller_or_equal(all_86_3_83, eta) = all_86_2_82
% 65.72/27.09  			| (240) (all_86_0_80 = 0 & all_86_1_81 = 0) | (all_86_2_82 = 0 &  ~ (all_86_1_81 = 0))
% 65.72/27.09  			| (241) has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_86_4_84) = all_86_1_81
% 65.72/27.09  			| (242) greater(all_86_3_83, eta) = all_86_0_80
% 65.72/27.09  			| (243) age(all_4_14_17, all_86_4_84) = all_86_3_83
% 65.72/27.09  			|
% 65.72/27.09  			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (101), into two cases.
% 65.72/27.09  			|-Branch one:
% 65.72/27.09  			| (230) all_4_9_12 = 0
% 65.72/27.09  			|
% 65.72/27.09  				| Equations (230) can reduce 68 to:
% 65.72/27.09  				| (231) $false
% 65.72/27.09  				|
% 65.72/27.09  				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 65.72/27.09  			|-Branch two:
% 65.72/27.09  			| (68)  ~ (all_4_9_12 = 0)
% 65.72/27.09  			| (233)  ? [v0] : (organization(all_4_14_17) = v0 &  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : (has_immunity(all_4_14_17, v1) = v4 & age(all_4_14_17, v1) = v2 & greater(v2, eta) = v5 & smaller_or_equal(v2, eta) = v3 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v4 = 0) | (v3 = 0 &  ~ (v4 = 0)))))
% 65.72/27.09  			|
% 65.72/27.09  				| Instantiating (233) with all_91_0_85 yields:
% 65.72/27.09  				| (248) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_91_0_85 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (has_immunity(all_4_14_17, v0) = v3 & age(all_4_14_17, v0) = v1 & greater(v1, eta) = v4 & smaller_or_equal(v1, eta) = v2 & ( ~ (all_91_0_85 = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0) | (v2 = 0 &  ~ (v3 = 0))))
% 65.72/27.09  				|
% 65.72/27.09  				| Applying alpha-rule on (248) yields:
% 65.72/27.09  				| (249) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_91_0_85
% 65.72/27.09  				| (250)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (has_immunity(all_4_14_17, v0) = v3 & age(all_4_14_17, v0) = v1 & greater(v1, eta) = v4 & smaller_or_equal(v1, eta) = v2 & ( ~ (all_91_0_85 = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0) | (v2 = 0 &  ~ (v3 = 0))))
% 65.72/27.09  				|
% 65.72/27.09  				| Instantiating (250) with all_93_0_86, all_93_1_87, all_93_2_88, all_93_3_89, all_93_4_90 yields:
% 65.72/27.09  				| (251) has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_93_4_90) = all_93_1_87 & age(all_4_14_17, all_93_4_90) = all_93_3_89 & greater(all_93_3_89, eta) = all_93_0_86 & smaller_or_equal(all_93_3_89, eta) = all_93_2_88 & ( ~ (all_91_0_85 = 0) | (all_93_0_86 = 0 & all_93_1_87 = 0) | (all_93_2_88 = 0 &  ~ (all_93_1_87 = 0)))
% 65.72/27.09  				|
% 65.72/27.09  				| Applying alpha-rule on (251) yields:
% 65.72/27.09  				| (252) age(all_4_14_17, all_93_4_90) = all_93_3_89
% 65.72/27.09  				| (253) smaller_or_equal(all_93_3_89, eta) = all_93_2_88
% 65.72/27.09  				| (254)  ~ (all_91_0_85 = 0) | (all_93_0_86 = 0 & all_93_1_87 = 0) | (all_93_2_88 = 0 &  ~ (all_93_1_87 = 0))
% 65.72/27.09  				| (255) greater(all_93_3_89, eta) = all_93_0_86
% 65.72/27.09  				| (256) has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_93_4_90) = all_93_1_87
% 65.72/27.09  				|
% 65.72/27.09  				| Instantiating formula (2) with all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13, all_63_0_70, all_65_0_72 and discharging atoms positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_65_0_72, positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_63_0_70, yields:
% 65.72/27.09  				| (257) all_65_0_72 = all_63_0_70
% 65.72/27.09  				|
% 65.72/27.09  				| Instantiating formula (2) with all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13, all_21_0_30, all_65_0_72 and discharging atoms positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_65_0_72, positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_21_0_30, yields:
% 65.72/27.09  				| (258) all_65_0_72 = all_21_0_30
% 65.72/27.09  				|
% 65.72/27.09  				| Instantiating formula (2) with all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14, all_55_0_62, all_57_0_64 and discharging atoms positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_57_0_64, positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_55_0_62, yields:
% 65.72/27.09  				| (259) all_57_0_64 = all_55_0_62
% 65.72/27.09  				|
% 65.72/27.09  				| Instantiating formula (2) with all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14, all_19_0_26, all_57_0_64 and discharging atoms positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_57_0_64, positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_19_0_26, yields:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (260) all_57_0_64 = all_19_0_26
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Instantiating formula (2) with all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15, all_59_0_66, all_61_0_68 and discharging atoms positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_61_0_68, positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_59_0_66, yields:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (261) all_61_0_68 = all_59_0_66
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Instantiating formula (2) with all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15, all_25_0_37, all_61_0_68 and discharging atoms positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_61_0_68, positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_25_0_37, yields:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (262) all_61_0_68 = all_25_0_37
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Instantiating formula (2) with all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_51_0_58, all_53_0_60 and discharging atoms positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_53_0_60, positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_51_0_58, yields:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (263) all_53_0_60 = all_51_0_58
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Instantiating formula (2) with all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_17_0_22, all_53_0_60 and discharging atoms positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_53_0_60, positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_17_0_22, yields:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (264) all_53_0_60 = all_17_0_22
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Instantiating formula (9) with all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_17_1_23, all_45_0_54 and discharging atoms is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_45_0_54, is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_17_1_23, yields:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (265) all_45_0_54 = all_17_1_23
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_45_1_55, all_91_0_85 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_91_0_85, organization(all_4_14_17) = all_45_1_55, yields:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (266) all_91_0_85 = all_45_1_55
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_37_2_50, all_45_1_55 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_45_1_55, organization(all_4_14_17) = all_37_2_50, yields:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (267) all_45_1_55 = all_37_2_50
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_33_2_46, all_91_0_85 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_91_0_85, organization(all_4_14_17) = all_33_2_46, yields:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (268) all_91_0_85 = all_33_2_46
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_25_3_40, 0 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_25_3_40, organization(all_4_14_17) = 0, yields:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (269) all_25_3_40 = 0
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_25_3_40, all_37_2_50 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_37_2_50, organization(all_4_14_17) = all_25_3_40, yields:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (270) all_37_2_50 = all_25_3_40
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_23_2_36, all_37_2_50 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_37_2_50, organization(all_4_14_17) = all_23_2_36, yields:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (271) all_37_2_50 = all_23_2_36
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_21_3_33, all_37_2_50 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_37_2_50, organization(all_4_14_17) = all_21_3_33, yields:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (272) all_37_2_50 = all_21_3_33
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_19_3_29, all_21_3_33 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_21_3_33, organization(all_4_14_17) = all_19_3_29, yields:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (273) all_21_3_33 = all_19_3_29
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_17_3_25, all_19_3_29 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_19_3_29, organization(all_4_14_17) = all_17_3_25, yields:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (274) all_19_3_29 = all_17_3_25
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_15_2_21, all_19_3_29 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_19_3_29, organization(all_4_14_17) = all_15_2_21, yields:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (275) all_19_3_29 = all_15_2_21
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Instantiating formula (5) with all_4_6_9, tau, all_65_1_73, 0 and discharging atoms greater(all_4_6_9, tau) = all_65_1_73, greater(all_4_6_9, tau) = 0, yields:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (276) all_65_1_73 = 0
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Instantiating formula (5) with all_4_6_9, sigma, all_15_1_20, 0 and discharging atoms greater(all_4_6_9, sigma) = all_15_1_20, greater(all_4_6_9, sigma) = 0, yields:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (277) all_15_1_20 = 0
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Instantiating formula (5) with all_4_7_10, tau, all_57_1_65, 0 and discharging atoms greater(all_4_7_10, tau) = all_57_1_65, yields:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (278) all_57_1_65 = 0 |  ~ (greater(all_4_7_10, tau) = 0)
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Instantiating formula (5) with all_4_7_10, sigma, all_37_1_49, 0 and discharging atoms greater(all_4_7_10, sigma) = all_37_1_49, greater(all_4_7_10, sigma) = 0, yields:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (279) all_37_1_49 = 0
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Instantiating formula (5) with all_4_8_11, tau, all_61_1_69, 0 and discharging atoms greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = all_61_1_69, yields:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (280) all_61_1_69 = 0 |  ~ (greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0)
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Instantiating formula (5) with all_4_8_11, tau, all_61_1_69, all_65_1_73 and discharging atoms greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = all_61_1_69, yields:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (281) all_65_1_73 = all_61_1_69 |  ~ (greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = all_65_1_73)
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Instantiating formula (5) with all_4_8_11, sigma, all_33_1_45, all_37_1_49 and discharging atoms greater(all_4_8_11, sigma) = all_33_1_45, yields:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (282) all_37_1_49 = all_33_1_45 |  ~ (greater(all_4_8_11, sigma) = all_37_1_49)
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Instantiating formula (5) with zero, tau, all_13_0_18, all_53_1_61 and discharging atoms greater(zero, tau) = all_53_1_61, greater(zero, tau) = all_13_0_18, yields:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (283) all_53_1_61 = all_13_0_18
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Instantiating formula (6) with all_4_7_10, tau, all_55_1_63, 0 and discharging atoms smaller_or_equal(all_4_7_10, tau) = all_55_1_63, smaller_or_equal(all_4_7_10, tau) = 0, yields:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (284) all_55_1_63 = 0
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Instantiating formula (6) with all_4_8_11, tau, all_59_1_67, all_55_1_63 and discharging atoms smaller_or_equal(all_4_8_11, tau) = all_59_1_67, yields:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (285) all_59_1_67 = all_55_1_63 |  ~ (smaller_or_equal(all_4_8_11, tau) = all_55_1_63)
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Instantiating formula (6) with sigma, tau, 0, all_59_1_67 and discharging atoms smaller_or_equal(sigma, tau) = 0, yields:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (286) all_59_1_67 = 0 |  ~ (smaller_or_equal(sigma, tau) = all_59_1_67)
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Instantiating formula (6) with zero, tau, all_51_1_59, 0 and discharging atoms smaller_or_equal(zero, tau) = all_51_1_59, yields:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (287) all_51_1_59 = 0 |  ~ (smaller_or_equal(zero, tau) = 0)
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Combining equations (266,268) yields a new equation:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (288) all_45_1_55 = all_33_2_46
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Simplifying 288 yields:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (289) all_45_1_55 = all_33_2_46
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Combining equations (258,257) yields a new equation:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (290) all_63_0_70 = all_21_0_30
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Combining equations (262,261) yields a new equation:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (291) all_59_0_66 = all_25_0_37
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Combining equations (260,259) yields a new equation:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (292) all_55_0_62 = all_19_0_26
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Combining equations (263,264) yields a new equation:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (293) all_51_0_58 = all_17_0_22
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Simplifying 293 yields:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (294) all_51_0_58 = all_17_0_22
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Combining equations (267,289) yields a new equation:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (295) all_37_2_50 = all_33_2_46
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Simplifying 295 yields:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (296) all_37_2_50 = all_33_2_46
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Combining equations (270,296) yields a new equation:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (297) all_33_2_46 = all_25_3_40
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Combining equations (271,296) yields a new equation:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (298) all_33_2_46 = all_23_2_36
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Combining equations (272,296) yields a new equation:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (299) all_33_2_46 = all_21_3_33
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Combining equations (297,298) yields a new equation:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (300) all_25_3_40 = all_23_2_36
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Simplifying 300 yields:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (301) all_25_3_40 = all_23_2_36
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Combining equations (299,298) yields a new equation:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (302) all_23_2_36 = all_21_3_33
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Combining equations (301,269) yields a new equation:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (303) all_23_2_36 = 0
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Simplifying 303 yields:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (304) all_23_2_36 = 0
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Combining equations (302,304) yields a new equation:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (305) all_21_3_33 = 0
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Simplifying 305 yields:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (306) all_21_3_33 = 0
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Combining equations (273,306) yields a new equation:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (307) all_19_3_29 = 0
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Simplifying 307 yields:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (308) all_19_3_29 = 0
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Combining equations (275,274) yields a new equation:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (309) all_17_3_25 = all_15_2_21
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Combining equations (308,274) yields a new equation:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (310) all_17_3_25 = 0
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Combining equations (309,310) yields a new equation:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (311) all_15_2_21 = 0
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Simplifying 311 yields:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (312) all_15_2_21 = 0
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Combining equations (304,298) yields a new equation:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (313) all_33_2_46 = 0
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Combining equations (313,296) yields a new equation:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (314) all_37_2_50 = 0
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Combining equations (313,289) yields a new equation:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (315) all_45_1_55 = 0
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Combining equations (292,259) yields a new equation:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (260) all_57_0_64 = all_19_0_26
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Combining equations (291,261) yields a new equation:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (262) all_61_0_68 = all_25_0_37
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| Combining equations (290,257) yields a new equation:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (258) all_65_0_72 = all_21_0_30
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.10  				| From (290) and (214) follows:
% 65.72/27.10  				| (154) positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_21_0_30
% 65.72/27.10  				|
% 65.72/27.11  				| From (292) and (198) follows:
% 66.11/27.11  				| (147) positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_19_0_26
% 66.11/27.11  				|
% 66.11/27.11  				| From (291) and (206) follows:
% 66.11/27.11  				| (166) positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_25_0_37
% 66.11/27.11  				|
% 66.11/27.11  				| From (294) and (190) follows:
% 66.11/27.11  				| (142) positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_17_0_22
% 66.11/27.11  				|
% 66.11/27.11  				| From (265) and (183) follows:
% 66.11/27.11  				| (141) is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_17_1_23
% 66.11/27.11  				|
% 66.11/27.11  				| From (276) and (219) follows:
% 66.11/27.11  				| (85) greater(all_4_6_9, tau) = 0
% 66.11/27.11  				|
% 66.11/27.11  				| From (283) and (195) follows:
% 66.11/27.11  				| (134) greater(zero, tau) = all_13_0_18
% 66.11/27.11  				|
% 66.11/27.11  				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (220), into two cases.
% 66.11/27.11  				|-Branch one:
% 66.11/27.11  				| (326)  ~ (all_65_1_73 = 0)
% 66.11/27.11  				|
% 66.11/27.11  					| Equations (276) can reduce 326 to:
% 66.11/27.11  					| (231) $false
% 66.11/27.11  					|
% 66.11/27.11  					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.11/27.11  				|-Branch two:
% 66.11/27.11  				| (276) all_65_1_73 = 0
% 66.11/27.11  				| (329) all_65_0_72 = 0
% 66.11/27.11  				|
% 66.11/27.11  					| Combining equations (329,258) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.11  					| (330) all_21_0_30 = 0
% 66.11/27.11  					|
% 66.11/27.11  					| From (330) and (154) follows:
% 66.11/27.11  					| (331) positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = 0
% 66.11/27.11  					|
% 66.11/27.11  					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (200), into two cases.
% 66.11/27.11  					|-Branch one:
% 66.11/27.11  					| (332)  ~ (all_55_0_62 = 0)
% 66.11/27.11  					|
% 66.11/27.11  						| Equations (292) can reduce 332 to:
% 66.11/27.11  						| (333)  ~ (all_19_0_26 = 0)
% 66.11/27.11  						|
% 66.11/27.11  						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (181), into two cases.
% 66.11/27.11  						|-Branch one:
% 66.11/27.11  						| (334)  ~ (all_37_2_50 = 0)
% 66.11/27.11  						|
% 66.11/27.11  							| Equations (314) can reduce 334 to:
% 66.11/27.11  							| (231) $false
% 66.11/27.11  							|
% 66.11/27.11  							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.11/27.11  						|-Branch two:
% 66.11/27.11  						| (314) all_37_2_50 = 0
% 66.11/27.11  						| (337) ( ~ (all_37_0_48 = 0) | all_37_1_49 = 0) & ( ~ (all_37_1_49 = 0) | all_37_0_48 = 0)
% 66.11/27.11  						|
% 66.11/27.11  							| Applying alpha-rule on (337) yields:
% 66.11/27.11  							| (338)  ~ (all_37_0_48 = 0) | all_37_1_49 = 0
% 66.11/27.11  							| (339)  ~ (all_37_1_49 = 0) | all_37_0_48 = 0
% 66.11/27.11  							|
% 66.11/27.11  							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (185), into two cases.
% 66.11/27.11  							|-Branch one:
% 66.11/27.11  							| (340)  ~ (all_45_1_55 = 0)
% 66.11/27.11  							|
% 66.11/27.11  								| Equations (315) can reduce 340 to:
% 66.11/27.11  								| (231) $false
% 66.11/27.11  								|
% 66.11/27.11  								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.11/27.11  							|-Branch two:
% 66.11/27.11  							| (315) all_45_1_55 = 0
% 66.11/27.11  							| (343) all_45_0_54 = 0
% 66.11/27.11  							|
% 66.11/27.11  								| Combining equations (343,265) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.11  								| (344) all_17_1_23 = 0
% 66.11/27.11  								|
% 66.11/27.11  								| From (344) and (141) follows:
% 66.11/27.11  								| (345) is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = 0
% 66.11/27.11  								|
% 66.11/27.11  								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (204), into two cases.
% 66.11/27.11  								|-Branch one:
% 66.11/27.11  								| (346)  ~ (all_57_1_65 = 0)
% 66.11/27.11  								|
% 66.11/27.11  									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (108), into two cases.
% 66.11/27.11  									|-Branch one:
% 66.11/27.11  									| (347)  ~ (greater(sigma, tau) = 0)
% 66.11/27.11  									|
% 66.11/27.11  										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (339), into two cases.
% 66.11/27.11  										|-Branch one:
% 66.11/27.11  										| (348)  ~ (all_37_1_49 = 0)
% 66.11/27.11  										|
% 66.11/27.11  											| Equations (279) can reduce 348 to:
% 66.11/27.11  											| (231) $false
% 66.11/27.11  											|
% 66.11/27.11  											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.11/27.11  										|-Branch two:
% 66.11/27.11  										| (279) all_37_1_49 = 0
% 66.11/27.11  										| (351) all_37_0_48 = 0
% 66.11/27.11  										|
% 66.11/27.11  											| From (351) and (178) follows:
% 66.11/27.11  											| (352) dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_4_11_14) = 0
% 66.11/27.11  											|
% 66.11/27.11  											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (139), into two cases.
% 66.11/27.11  											|-Branch one:
% 66.11/27.11  											| (353)  ~ (all_15_2_21 = 0)
% 66.11/27.11  											|
% 66.11/27.11  												| Equations (312) can reduce 353 to:
% 66.11/27.11  												| (231) $false
% 66.11/27.11  												|
% 66.11/27.11  												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.11/27.11  											|-Branch two:
% 66.11/27.11  											| (312) all_15_2_21 = 0
% 66.11/27.11  											| (356) ( ~ (all_15_0_19 = 0) | all_15_1_20 = 0) & ( ~ (all_15_1_20 = 0) | all_15_0_19 = 0)
% 66.11/27.11  											|
% 66.11/27.11  												| Applying alpha-rule on (356) yields:
% 66.11/27.11  												| (357)  ~ (all_15_0_19 = 0) | all_15_1_20 = 0
% 66.11/27.11  												| (358)  ~ (all_15_1_20 = 0) | all_15_0_19 = 0
% 66.11/27.11  												|
% 66.11/27.11  												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (358), into two cases.
% 66.11/27.11  												|-Branch one:
% 66.11/27.11  												| (359)  ~ (all_15_1_20 = 0)
% 66.11/27.11  												|
% 66.11/27.11  													| Equations (277) can reduce 359 to:
% 66.11/27.11  													| (231) $false
% 66.11/27.11  													|
% 66.11/27.11  													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.11/27.11  												|-Branch two:
% 66.11/27.11  												| (277) all_15_1_20 = 0
% 66.11/27.11  												| (362) all_15_0_19 = 0
% 66.11/27.11  												|
% 66.11/27.11  													| From (362) and (136) follows:
% 66.11/27.11  													| (363) dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_4_10_13) = 0
% 66.11/27.11  													|
% 66.11/27.11  													| Instantiating formula (34) with 0, all_4_10_13, all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = 0, yields:
% 66.11/27.11  													| (364)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = v2 & is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = v3 & organization(all_4_14_17) = v0 & has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = very_low) & (v1 = 0 | (( ~ (v3 = 0) | v2 = low) & (v3 = 0 | v2 = mod1))))))
% 66.11/27.11  													|
% 66.11/27.11  													| Instantiating formula (34) with all_19_0_26, all_4_11_14, all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_19_0_26, yields:
% 66.11/27.11  													| (365)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = v2 & is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = v3 & organization(all_4_14_17) = v0 & has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = very_low) & (v1 = 0 | (( ~ (v3 = 0) | v2 = mod2 | all_19_0_26 = 0) & ( ~ (all_19_0_26 = 0) | (( ~ (v3 = 0) | v2 = low) & (v3 = 0 | v2 = mod1))) & (v3 = 0 | v2 = high | all_19_0_26 = 0))))))
% 66.11/27.11  													|
% 66.11/27.11  													| Instantiating formula (34) with all_25_0_37, all_4_12_15, all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_25_0_37, yields:
% 66.11/27.11  													| (366)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = v2 & is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = v3 & organization(all_4_14_17) = v0 & has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = very_low) & (v1 = 0 | (( ~ (v3 = 0) | v2 = mod2 | all_25_0_37 = 0) & ( ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0) | (( ~ (v3 = 0) | v2 = low) & (v3 = 0 | v2 = mod1))) & (v3 = 0 | v2 = high | all_25_0_37 = 0))))))
% 66.11/27.11  													|
% 66.11/27.11  													| Instantiating formula (34) with all_17_0_22, all_4_13_16, all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_17_0_22, yields:
% 66.11/27.11  													| (367)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = v2 & is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = v3 & organization(all_4_14_17) = v0 & has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = very_low) & (v1 = 0 | (( ~ (v3 = 0) | v2 = mod2 | all_17_0_22 = 0) & ( ~ (all_17_0_22 = 0) | (( ~ (v3 = 0) | v2 = low) & (v3 = 0 | v2 = mod1))) & (v3 = 0 | v2 = high | all_17_0_22 = 0))))))
% 66.11/27.11  													|
% 66.11/27.11  													| Instantiating formula (38) with all_21_1_31, all_21_1_31, all_4_10_13, all_4_10_13, all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_21_1_31, yields:
% 66.11/27.11  													| (368)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13, all_4_10_13) = v0 & organization(all_4_14_17) = v1)
% 66.11/27.11  													|
% 66.11/27.11  													| Instantiating formula (26) with all_21_1_31, all_4_10_13, all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_21_1_31, yields:
% 66.11/27.11  													| (369) all_21_1_31 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (organization(all_4_14_17) = v0 & age(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = zero) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 66.11/27.11  													|
% 66.11/27.11  													| Instantiating formula (25) with all_21_1_31, all_4_10_13, all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_21_1_31, yields:
% 66.11/27.11  													| (370)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = v2 & positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = v3 & organization(all_4_14_17) = v0 & has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = very_low) & (v1 = 0 | (( ~ (v3 = 0) | (( ~ (all_21_1_31 = 0) | v2 = low) & (v2 = mod1 | all_21_1_31 = 0))) & ( ~ (all_21_1_31 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = mod2) & (v3 = 0 | v2 = high | all_21_1_31 = 0))))))
% 66.11/27.11  													|
% 66.11/27.11  													| Instantiating formula (38) with all_19_1_27, all_21_1_31, all_4_11_14, all_4_10_13, all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_21_1_31, is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_19_1_27, yields:
% 66.11/27.11  													| (371)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13, all_4_11_14) = v0 & organization(all_4_14_17) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (v1 = 0 & ( ~ (all_21_1_31 = 0) |  ~ (all_19_1_27 = 0)) & (all_21_1_31 = 0 | all_19_1_27 = 0))))
% 66.11/27.11  													|
% 66.11/27.11  													| Instantiating formula (38) with all_21_1_31, all_19_1_27, all_4_10_13, all_4_11_14, all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_21_1_31, is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_19_1_27, yields:
% 66.11/27.11  													| (372)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14, all_4_10_13) = v0 & organization(all_4_14_17) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (v1 = 0 & ( ~ (all_21_1_31 = 0) |  ~ (all_19_1_27 = 0)) & (all_21_1_31 = 0 | all_19_1_27 = 0))))
% 66.11/27.11  													|
% 66.11/27.11  													| Instantiating formula (38) with all_19_1_27, all_19_1_27, all_4_11_14, all_4_11_14, all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_19_1_27, yields:
% 66.11/27.11  													| (373)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14, all_4_11_14) = v0 & organization(all_4_14_17) = v1)
% 66.11/27.12  													|
% 66.11/27.12  													| Instantiating formula (26) with all_19_1_27, all_4_11_14, all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_19_1_27, yields:
% 66.11/27.12  													| (374) all_19_1_27 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (organization(all_4_14_17) = v0 & age(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = zero) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 66.11/27.12  													|
% 66.11/27.12  													| Instantiating formula (25) with all_19_1_27, all_4_11_14, all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_19_1_27, yields:
% 66.11/27.12  													| (375)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = v2 & positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = v3 & organization(all_4_14_17) = v0 & has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = very_low) & (v1 = 0 | (( ~ (v3 = 0) | (( ~ (all_19_1_27 = 0) | v2 = low) & (v2 = mod1 | all_19_1_27 = 0))) & ( ~ (all_19_1_27 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = mod2) & (v3 = 0 | v2 = high | all_19_1_27 = 0))))))
% 66.11/27.12  													|
% 66.11/27.12  													| Instantiating formula (38) with all_25_1_38, all_21_1_31, all_4_12_15, all_4_10_13, all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_21_1_31, is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_25_1_38, yields:
% 66.11/27.12  													| (376)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13, all_4_12_15) = v0 & organization(all_4_14_17) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (v1 = 0 & ( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) |  ~ (all_21_1_31 = 0)) & (all_25_1_38 = 0 | all_21_1_31 = 0))))
% 66.11/27.12  													|
% 66.11/27.12  													| Instantiating formula (38) with all_21_1_31, all_25_1_38, all_4_10_13, all_4_12_15, all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_21_1_31, is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_25_1_38, yields:
% 66.11/27.12  													| (377)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15, all_4_10_13) = v0 & organization(all_4_14_17) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (v1 = 0 & ( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) |  ~ (all_21_1_31 = 0)) & (all_25_1_38 = 0 | all_21_1_31 = 0))))
% 66.11/27.12  													|
% 66.11/27.12  													| Instantiating formula (38) with all_25_1_38, all_19_1_27, all_4_12_15, all_4_11_14, all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_19_1_27, is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_25_1_38, yields:
% 66.11/27.12  													| (378)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14, all_4_12_15) = v0 & organization(all_4_14_17) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (v1 = 0 & ( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) |  ~ (all_19_1_27 = 0)) & (all_25_1_38 = 0 | all_19_1_27 = 0))))
% 66.11/27.12  													|
% 66.11/27.12  													| Instantiating formula (38) with all_19_1_27, all_25_1_38, all_4_11_14, all_4_12_15, all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_19_1_27, is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_25_1_38, yields:
% 66.11/27.12  													| (379)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15, all_4_11_14) = v0 & organization(all_4_14_17) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (v1 = 0 & ( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) |  ~ (all_19_1_27 = 0)) & (all_25_1_38 = 0 | all_19_1_27 = 0))))
% 66.11/27.12  													|
% 66.11/27.12  													| Instantiating formula (38) with all_25_1_38, all_25_1_38, all_4_12_15, all_4_12_15, all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_25_1_38, yields:
% 66.11/27.12  													| (380)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15, all_4_12_15) = v0 & organization(all_4_14_17) = v1)
% 66.11/27.12  													|
% 66.11/27.12  													| Instantiating formula (25) with all_25_1_38, all_4_12_15, all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_25_1_38, yields:
% 66.11/27.12  													| (381)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = v2 & positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = v3 & organization(all_4_14_17) = v0 & has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = very_low) & (v1 = 0 | (( ~ (v3 = 0) | (( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | v2 = low) & (v2 = mod1 | all_25_1_38 = 0))) & ( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = mod2) & (v3 = 0 | v2 = high | all_25_1_38 = 0))))))
% 66.11/27.12  													|
% 66.11/27.12  													| Instantiating formula (28) with 0, all_21_1_31, all_4_13_16, all_4_10_13, all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_21_1_31, is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = 0, yields:
% 66.11/27.12  													| (382) all_21_1_31 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13, all_4_13_16) = v1 & organization(all_4_14_17) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 66.11/27.12  													|
% 66.11/27.12  													| Instantiating formula (38) with 0, all_21_1_31, all_4_13_16, all_4_10_13, all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_21_1_31, is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = 0, yields:
% 66.11/27.12  													| (383)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13, all_4_13_16) = v0 & organization(all_4_14_17) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (v1 = 0 &  ~ (all_21_1_31 = 0))))
% 66.11/27.12  													|
% 66.11/27.12  													| Instantiating formula (38) with all_21_1_31, 0, all_4_10_13, all_4_13_16, all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_21_1_31, is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = 0, yields:
% 66.11/27.12  													| (384)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_4_10_13) = v0 & organization(all_4_14_17) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (v1 = 0 &  ~ (all_21_1_31 = 0))))
% 66.11/27.12  													|
% 66.11/27.12  													| Instantiating formula (28) with 0, all_19_1_27, all_4_13_16, all_4_11_14, all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_19_1_27, is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = 0, yields:
% 66.11/27.12  													| (385) all_19_1_27 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14, all_4_13_16) = v1 & organization(all_4_14_17) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 66.11/27.12  													|
% 66.11/27.12  													| Instantiating formula (38) with 0, all_19_1_27, all_4_13_16, all_4_11_14, all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_19_1_27, is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = 0, yields:
% 66.11/27.12  													| (386)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14, all_4_13_16) = v0 & organization(all_4_14_17) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (v1 = 0 &  ~ (all_19_1_27 = 0))))
% 66.11/27.12  													|
% 66.11/27.12  													| Instantiating formula (38) with all_19_1_27, 0, all_4_11_14, all_4_13_16, all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_19_1_27, is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = 0, yields:
% 66.11/27.12  													| (387)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_4_11_14) = v0 & organization(all_4_14_17) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (v1 = 0 &  ~ (all_19_1_27 = 0))))
% 66.11/27.12  													|
% 66.11/27.12  													| Instantiating formula (28) with all_25_1_38, 0, all_4_12_15, all_4_13_16, all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_25_1_38, is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = 0, yields:
% 66.11/27.12  													| (388) all_25_1_38 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_4_12_15) = v1 & organization(all_4_14_17) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 66.11/27.12  													|
% 66.11/27.12  													| Instantiating formula (38) with 0, all_25_1_38, all_4_13_16, all_4_12_15, all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_25_1_38, is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = 0, yields:
% 66.11/27.12  													| (389)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15, all_4_13_16) = v0 & organization(all_4_14_17) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (v1 = 0 &  ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0))))
% 66.11/27.12  													|
% 66.11/27.12  													| Instantiating formula (38) with all_25_1_38, 0, all_4_12_15, all_4_13_16, all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_25_1_38, is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = 0, yields:
% 66.11/27.12  													| (390)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_4_12_15) = v0 & organization(all_4_14_17) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (v1 = 0 &  ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0))))
% 66.11/27.12  													|
% 66.11/27.12  													| Instantiating formula (25) with 0, all_4_13_16, all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = 0, yields:
% 66.11/27.12  													| (391)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = v2 & positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = v3 & organization(all_4_14_17) = v0 & has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = very_low) & (v1 = 0 | (( ~ (v3 = 0) | v2 = low) & (v3 = 0 | v2 = mod2))))))
% 66.11/27.12  													|
% 66.11/27.12  													| Instantiating formula (16) with all_4_10_13, all_4_13_16, all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_4_10_13) = 0, yields:
% 66.11/27.12  													| (392)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = v1 & is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = v0 & organization(all_4_14_17) = 0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)) & (v1 = 0 | v0 = 0))
% 66.11/27.12  													|
% 66.11/27.12  													| Instantiating formula (16) with all_4_11_14, all_4_13_16, all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_4_11_14) = 0, yields:
% 66.11/27.12  													| (393)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = v1 & is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = v0 & organization(all_4_14_17) = 0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)) & (v1 = 0 | v0 = 0))
% 66.11/27.12  													|
% 66.11/27.12  													| Instantiating formula (53) with all_33_0_44, all_4_12_15, all_4_13_16, all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_4_12_15) = all_33_0_44, yields:
% 66.11/27.12  													| (394)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (organization(all_4_14_17) = v0 & age(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = v2 & age(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = v1 & greater(v2, sigma) = v3 & ( ~ (v1 = zero) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | (( ~ (v3 = 0) | all_33_0_44 = 0) & ( ~ (all_33_0_44 = 0) | v3 = 0))))
% 66.11/27.12  													|
% 66.11/27.12  													| Instantiating formula (51) with all_93_1_87, all_93_4_90, all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_93_4_90) = all_93_1_87, yields:
% 66.11/27.12  													| (395)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_93_4_90) = v1 & positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_93_4_90) = v3 & is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_93_4_90) = v2 & organization(all_4_14_17) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (( ~ (all_93_1_87 = 0) | v1 = very_low) & (all_93_1_87 = 0 | (( ~ (v3 = 0) | (( ~ (v2 = 0) | v1 = low) & (v2 = 0 | v1 = mod1))) & ( ~ (v2 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v1 = mod2) & (v3 = 0 | v2 = 0 | v1 = high))))))
% 66.11/27.12  													|
% 66.11/27.12  													| Instantiating formula (51) with all_86_1_81, all_86_4_84, all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_86_4_84) = all_86_1_81, yields:
% 66.11/27.12  													| (396)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_86_4_84) = v1 & positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_86_4_84) = v3 & is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_86_4_84) = v2 & organization(all_4_14_17) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (( ~ (all_86_1_81 = 0) | v1 = very_low) & (all_86_1_81 = 0 | (( ~ (v3 = 0) | (( ~ (v2 = 0) | v1 = low) & (v2 = 0 | v1 = mod1))) & ( ~ (v2 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v1 = mod2) & (v3 = 0 | v2 = 0 | v1 = high))))))
% 66.11/27.12  													|
% 66.11/27.12  													| Instantiating formula (59) with all_4_10_13, all_4_14_17 yields:
% 66.11/27.12  													| (397)  ~ (has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (organization(all_4_14_17) = v0 & has_endowment(all_4_14_17) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 66.11/27.12  													|
% 66.11/27.12  													| Instantiating formula (51) with all_21_2_32, all_4_10_13, all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_21_2_32, yields:
% 66.11/27.12  													| (398)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = v1 & positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = v3 & is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = v2 & organization(all_4_14_17) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (( ~ (all_21_2_32 = 0) | v1 = very_low) & (all_21_2_32 = 0 | (( ~ (v3 = 0) | (( ~ (v2 = 0) | v1 = low) & (v2 = 0 | v1 = mod1))) & ( ~ (v2 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v1 = mod2) & (v3 = 0 | v2 = 0 | v1 = high))))))
% 66.11/27.13  													|
% 66.11/27.13  													| Instantiating formula (59) with all_4_11_14, all_4_14_17 yields:
% 66.11/27.13  													| (399)  ~ (has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (organization(all_4_14_17) = v0 & has_endowment(all_4_14_17) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 66.11/27.13  													|
% 66.11/27.13  													| Instantiating formula (51) with all_19_2_28, all_4_11_14, all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_19_2_28, yields:
% 66.11/27.13  													| (400)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = v1 & positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = v3 & is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = v2 & organization(all_4_14_17) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (( ~ (all_19_2_28 = 0) | v1 = very_low) & (all_19_2_28 = 0 | (( ~ (v3 = 0) | (( ~ (v2 = 0) | v1 = low) & (v2 = 0 | v1 = mod1))) & ( ~ (v2 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v1 = mod2) & (v3 = 0 | v2 = 0 | v1 = high))))))
% 66.11/27.13  													|
% 66.11/27.13  													| Instantiating formula (59) with all_4_12_15, all_4_14_17 yields:
% 66.11/27.13  													| (401)  ~ (has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (organization(all_4_14_17) = v0 & has_endowment(all_4_14_17) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 66.11/27.13  													|
% 66.11/27.13  													| Instantiating formula (51) with all_25_2_39, all_4_12_15, all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_25_2_39, yields:
% 66.11/27.13  													| (402)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = v1 & positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = v3 & is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = v2 & organization(all_4_14_17) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (( ~ (all_25_2_39 = 0) | v1 = very_low) & (all_25_2_39 = 0 | (( ~ (v3 = 0) | (( ~ (v2 = 0) | v1 = low) & (v2 = 0 | v1 = mod1))) & ( ~ (v2 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v1 = mod2) & (v3 = 0 | v2 = 0 | v1 = high))))))
% 66.11/27.13  													|
% 66.11/27.13  													| Instantiating formula (59) with all_4_13_16, all_4_14_17 yields:
% 66.11/27.13  													| (403)  ~ (has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (organization(all_4_14_17) = v0 & has_endowment(all_4_14_17) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 66.11/27.13  													|
% 66.11/27.13  													| Instantiating formula (51) with all_17_2_24, all_4_13_16, all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_17_2_24, yields:
% 66.11/27.13  													| (404)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = v1 & positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = v3 & is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = v2 & organization(all_4_14_17) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (( ~ (all_17_2_24 = 0) | v1 = very_low) & (all_17_2_24 = 0 | (( ~ (v3 = 0) | (( ~ (v2 = 0) | v1 = low) & (v2 = 0 | v1 = mod1))) & ( ~ (v2 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v1 = mod2) & (v3 = 0 | v2 = 0 | v1 = high))))))
% 66.11/27.13  													|
% 66.11/27.13  													| Instantiating formula (56) with all_93_3_89, all_93_4_90, all_4_13_16, all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms age(all_4_14_17, all_93_4_90) = all_93_3_89, age(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = zero, yields:
% 66.11/27.13  													| (405)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_93_4_90) = v2 & organization(all_4_14_17) = v0 & greater(all_93_3_89, sigma) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (( ~ (v2 = 0) | v1 = 0) & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = 0))))
% 66.11/27.13  													|
% 66.11/27.13  													| Instantiating formula (56) with all_86_3_83, all_86_4_84, all_4_13_16, all_4_14_17 and discharging atoms age(all_4_14_17, all_86_4_84) = all_86_3_83, age(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = zero, yields:
% 66.11/27.13  													| (406)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_86_4_84) = v2 & organization(all_4_14_17) = v0 & greater(all_86_3_83, sigma) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (( ~ (v2 = 0) | v1 = 0) & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = 0))))
% 66.11/27.13  													|
% 66.11/27.13  													| Instantiating formula (58) with all_61_1_69, tau, all_4_6_9, all_4_8_11 and discharging atoms greater(all_4_6_9, tau) = 0, greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = all_61_1_69, yields:
% 66.11/27.13  													| (407) all_61_1_69 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater(all_4_8_11, all_4_6_9) = v0)
% 66.11/27.13  													|
% 66.11/27.13  													| Instantiating formula (58) with all_57_1_65, tau, all_4_8_11, all_4_7_10 and discharging atoms greater(all_4_7_10, tau) = all_57_1_65, yields:
% 66.11/27.13  													| (408) all_57_1_65 = 0 |  ~ (greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0) |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater(all_4_7_10, all_4_8_11) = v0)
% 66.11/27.13  													|
% 66.11/27.13  													| Instantiating formula (19) with all_4_8_11, tau yields:
% 66.11/27.13  													| (409)  ~ (greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0) | smaller(tau, all_4_8_11) = 0
% 66.11/27.13  													|
% 66.11/27.13  													| Instantiating formula (62) with all_4_8_11, tau yields:
% 66.11/27.13  													| (410)  ~ (greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0) |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater(tau, all_4_8_11) = v0)
% 66.11/27.13  													|
% 66.11/27.13  													| Instantiating formula (21) with all_61_1_69, tau, all_4_8_11 and discharging atoms greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = all_61_1_69, yields:
% 66.11/27.13  													| (411) all_61_1_69 = 0 | all_4_8_11 = tau | smaller(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0
% 66.11/27.13  													|
% 66.11/27.13  													| Instantiating formula (60) with all_61_1_69, tau, all_4_8_11 and discharging atoms greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = all_61_1_69, yields:
% 66.11/27.13  													| (412) all_61_1_69 = 0 | all_4_8_11 = tau |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater_or_equal(all_4_8_11, tau) = v0)
% 66.11/27.13  													|
% 66.11/27.13  													| Instantiating formula (31) with all_61_1_69, all_4_8_11, tau and discharging atoms greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = all_61_1_69, yields:
% 66.11/27.13  													| (413) all_61_1_69 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & smaller(tau, all_4_8_11) = v0)
% 66.11/27.13  													|
% 66.11/27.13  													| Instantiating formula (24) with all_33_1_45, sigma, tau, all_4_8_11 and discharging atoms greater(all_4_8_11, sigma) = all_33_1_45, yields:
% 66.11/27.13  													| (414) all_33_1_45 = 0 |  ~ (greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0) |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater(tau, sigma) = v0)
% 66.11/27.13  													|
% 66.11/27.13  													| Instantiating formula (19) with all_4_8_11, sigma yields:
% 66.11/27.13  													| (415)  ~ (greater(all_4_8_11, sigma) = 0) | smaller(sigma, all_4_8_11) = 0
% 66.11/27.13  													|
% 66.11/27.13  													| Instantiating formula (62) with all_4_8_11, sigma yields:
% 66.11/27.13  													| (416)  ~ (greater(all_4_8_11, sigma) = 0) |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater(sigma, all_4_8_11) = v0)
% 66.11/27.13  													|
% 66.11/27.13  													| Instantiating formula (31) with all_47_0_56, mod1, high and discharging atoms greater(mod1, high) = all_47_0_56, yields:
% 66.11/27.13  													| (417) all_47_0_56 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & smaller(high, mod1) = v0)
% 66.11/27.13  													|
% 66.11/27.13  													| Instantiating formula (60) with all_29_0_42, mod2, mod1 and discharging atoms greater(mod1, mod2) = all_29_0_42, yields:
% 66.11/27.13  													| (418) all_29_0_42 = 0 | mod2 = mod1 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater_or_equal(mod1, mod2) = v0)
% 66.11/27.13  													|
% 66.11/27.13  													| Instantiating formula (31) with all_29_0_42, mod1, mod2 and discharging atoms greater(mod1, mod2) = all_29_0_42, yields:
% 66.11/27.13  													| (419) all_29_0_42 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & smaller(mod2, mod1) = v0)
% 66.11/27.13  													|
% 66.11/27.13  													| Instantiating formula (58) with all_33_1_45, sigma, tau, all_4_8_11 and discharging atoms greater(all_4_8_11, sigma) = all_33_1_45, greater(tau, sigma) = 0, yields:
% 66.11/27.13  													| (420) all_33_1_45 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = v0)
% 66.11/27.13  													|
% 66.11/27.13  													| Instantiating formula (62) with tau, sigma and discharging atoms greater(tau, sigma) = 0, yields:
% 66.11/27.13  													| (421)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater(sigma, tau) = v0)
% 66.11/27.13  													|
% 66.11/27.13  													| Instantiating formula (58) with all_13_0_18, tau, all_4_8_11, zero and discharging atoms greater(zero, tau) = all_13_0_18, yields:
% 66.11/27.13  													| (422) all_13_0_18 = 0 |  ~ (greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0) |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater(zero, all_4_8_11) = v0)
% 66.11/27.13  													|
% 66.11/27.13  													| Instantiating formula (35) with 0, tau, zero and discharging atoms smaller(zero, tau) = 0, yields:
% 66.11/27.13  													| (423) smaller_or_equal(zero, tau) = 0
% 66.11/27.13  													|
% 66.11/27.13  													| Instantiating formula (57) with all_59_1_67, tau, all_4_8_11 and discharging atoms smaller_or_equal(all_4_8_11, tau) = all_59_1_67, yields:
% 66.11/27.13  													| (424) all_59_1_67 = 0 | ( ~ (all_4_8_11 = tau) &  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & smaller(all_4_8_11, tau) = v0))
% 66.11/27.13  													|
% 66.11/27.13  													| Instantiating (421) with all_157_0_91 yields:
% 66.11/27.13  													| (425)  ~ (all_157_0_91 = 0) & greater(sigma, tau) = all_157_0_91
% 66.11/27.13  													|
% 66.11/27.13  													| Applying alpha-rule on (425) yields:
% 66.11/27.13  													| (426)  ~ (all_157_0_91 = 0)
% 66.11/27.13  													| (427) greater(sigma, tau) = all_157_0_91
% 66.11/27.13  													|
% 66.11/27.13  													| Instantiating (406) with all_171_0_99, all_171_1_100, all_171_2_101 yields:
% 66.11/27.13  													| (428) dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_86_4_84) = all_171_0_99 & organization(all_4_14_17) = all_171_2_101 & greater(all_86_3_83, sigma) = all_171_1_100 & ( ~ (all_171_2_101 = 0) | (( ~ (all_171_0_99 = 0) | all_171_1_100 = 0) & ( ~ (all_171_1_100 = 0) | all_171_0_99 = 0)))
% 66.11/27.13  													|
% 66.11/27.13  													| Applying alpha-rule on (428) yields:
% 66.11/27.13  													| (429) dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_86_4_84) = all_171_0_99
% 66.11/27.13  													| (430) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_171_2_101
% 66.11/27.13  													| (431) greater(all_86_3_83, sigma) = all_171_1_100
% 66.11/27.13  													| (432)  ~ (all_171_2_101 = 0) | (( ~ (all_171_0_99 = 0) | all_171_1_100 = 0) & ( ~ (all_171_1_100 = 0) | all_171_0_99 = 0))
% 66.11/27.13  													|
% 66.11/27.13  													| Instantiating (405) with all_179_0_107, all_179_1_108, all_179_2_109 yields:
% 66.11/27.13  													| (433) dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_93_4_90) = all_179_0_107 & organization(all_4_14_17) = all_179_2_109 & greater(all_93_3_89, sigma) = all_179_1_108 & ( ~ (all_179_2_109 = 0) | (( ~ (all_179_0_107 = 0) | all_179_1_108 = 0) & ( ~ (all_179_1_108 = 0) | all_179_0_107 = 0)))
% 66.11/27.13  													|
% 66.11/27.13  													| Applying alpha-rule on (433) yields:
% 66.11/27.13  													| (434) dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_93_4_90) = all_179_0_107
% 66.11/27.13  													| (435) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_179_2_109
% 66.11/27.13  													| (436) greater(all_93_3_89, sigma) = all_179_1_108
% 66.11/27.13  													| (437)  ~ (all_179_2_109 = 0) | (( ~ (all_179_0_107 = 0) | all_179_1_108 = 0) & ( ~ (all_179_1_108 = 0) | all_179_0_107 = 0))
% 66.11/27.13  													|
% 66.11/27.13  													| Instantiating (404) with all_181_0_110, all_181_1_111, all_181_2_112, all_181_3_113 yields:
% 66.11/27.13  													| (438) hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_181_2_112 & positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_181_0_110 & is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_181_1_111 & organization(all_4_14_17) = all_181_3_113 & ( ~ (all_181_3_113 = 0) | (( ~ (all_17_2_24 = 0) | all_181_2_112 = very_low) & (all_17_2_24 = 0 | (( ~ (all_181_0_110 = 0) | (( ~ (all_181_1_111 = 0) | all_181_2_112 = low) & (all_181_1_111 = 0 | all_181_2_112 = mod1))) & ( ~ (all_181_1_111 = 0) | all_181_0_110 = 0 | all_181_2_112 = mod2) & (all_181_0_110 = 0 | all_181_1_111 = 0 | all_181_2_112 = high)))))
% 66.11/27.14  													|
% 66.11/27.14  													| Applying alpha-rule on (438) yields:
% 66.11/27.14  													| (439)  ~ (all_181_3_113 = 0) | (( ~ (all_17_2_24 = 0) | all_181_2_112 = very_low) & (all_17_2_24 = 0 | (( ~ (all_181_0_110 = 0) | (( ~ (all_181_1_111 = 0) | all_181_2_112 = low) & (all_181_1_111 = 0 | all_181_2_112 = mod1))) & ( ~ (all_181_1_111 = 0) | all_181_0_110 = 0 | all_181_2_112 = mod2) & (all_181_0_110 = 0 | all_181_1_111 = 0 | all_181_2_112 = high))))
% 66.11/27.14  													| (440) hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_181_2_112
% 66.11/27.14  													| (441) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_181_3_113
% 66.11/27.14  													| (442) positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_181_0_110
% 66.11/27.14  													| (443) is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_181_1_111
% 66.11/27.14  													|
% 66.11/27.14  													| Instantiating (402) with all_187_0_117, all_187_1_118, all_187_2_119, all_187_3_120 yields:
% 66.11/27.14  													| (444) hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_187_2_119 & positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_187_0_117 & is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_187_1_118 & organization(all_4_14_17) = all_187_3_120 & ( ~ (all_187_3_120 = 0) | (( ~ (all_25_2_39 = 0) | all_187_2_119 = very_low) & (all_25_2_39 = 0 | (( ~ (all_187_0_117 = 0) | (( ~ (all_187_1_118 = 0) | all_187_2_119 = low) & (all_187_1_118 = 0 | all_187_2_119 = mod1))) & ( ~ (all_187_1_118 = 0) | all_187_0_117 = 0 | all_187_2_119 = mod2) & (all_187_0_117 = 0 | all_187_1_118 = 0 | all_187_2_119 = high)))))
% 66.11/27.14  													|
% 66.11/27.14  													| Applying alpha-rule on (444) yields:
% 66.11/27.14  													| (445) hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_187_2_119
% 66.11/27.14  													| (446) positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_187_0_117
% 66.11/27.14  													| (447)  ~ (all_187_3_120 = 0) | (( ~ (all_25_2_39 = 0) | all_187_2_119 = very_low) & (all_25_2_39 = 0 | (( ~ (all_187_0_117 = 0) | (( ~ (all_187_1_118 = 0) | all_187_2_119 = low) & (all_187_1_118 = 0 | all_187_2_119 = mod1))) & ( ~ (all_187_1_118 = 0) | all_187_0_117 = 0 | all_187_2_119 = mod2) & (all_187_0_117 = 0 | all_187_1_118 = 0 | all_187_2_119 = high))))
% 66.11/27.14  													| (448) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_187_3_120
% 66.11/27.14  													| (449) is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_187_1_118
% 66.11/27.14  													|
% 66.11/27.14  													| Instantiating (400) with all_189_0_121, all_189_1_122, all_189_2_123, all_189_3_124 yields:
% 66.11/27.14  													| (450) hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_189_2_123 & positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_189_0_121 & is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_189_1_122 & organization(all_4_14_17) = all_189_3_124 & ( ~ (all_189_3_124 = 0) | (( ~ (all_19_2_28 = 0) | all_189_2_123 = very_low) & (all_19_2_28 = 0 | (( ~ (all_189_0_121 = 0) | (( ~ (all_189_1_122 = 0) | all_189_2_123 = low) & (all_189_1_122 = 0 | all_189_2_123 = mod1))) & ( ~ (all_189_1_122 = 0) | all_189_0_121 = 0 | all_189_2_123 = mod2) & (all_189_0_121 = 0 | all_189_1_122 = 0 | all_189_2_123 = high)))))
% 66.11/27.14  													|
% 66.11/27.14  													| Applying alpha-rule on (450) yields:
% 66.11/27.14  													| (451) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_189_3_124
% 66.11/27.14  													| (452) is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_189_1_122
% 66.11/27.14  													| (453) hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_189_2_123
% 66.11/27.14  													| (454) positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_189_0_121
% 66.11/27.14  													| (455)  ~ (all_189_3_124 = 0) | (( ~ (all_19_2_28 = 0) | all_189_2_123 = very_low) & (all_19_2_28 = 0 | (( ~ (all_189_0_121 = 0) | (( ~ (all_189_1_122 = 0) | all_189_2_123 = low) & (all_189_1_122 = 0 | all_189_2_123 = mod1))) & ( ~ (all_189_1_122 = 0) | all_189_0_121 = 0 | all_189_2_123 = mod2) & (all_189_0_121 = 0 | all_189_1_122 = 0 | all_189_2_123 = high))))
% 66.11/27.14  													|
% 66.11/27.14  													| Instantiating (395) with all_191_0_125, all_191_1_126, all_191_2_127, all_191_3_128 yields:
% 66.11/27.14  													| (456) hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_93_4_90) = all_191_2_127 & positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_93_4_90) = all_191_0_125 & is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_93_4_90) = all_191_1_126 & organization(all_4_14_17) = all_191_3_128 & ( ~ (all_191_3_128 = 0) | (( ~ (all_93_1_87 = 0) | all_191_2_127 = very_low) & (all_93_1_87 = 0 | (( ~ (all_191_0_125 = 0) | (( ~ (all_191_1_126 = 0) | all_191_2_127 = low) & (all_191_1_126 = 0 | all_191_2_127 = mod1))) & ( ~ (all_191_1_126 = 0) | all_191_0_125 = 0 | all_191_2_127 = mod2) & (all_191_0_125 = 0 | all_191_1_126 = 0 | all_191_2_127 = high)))))
% 66.11/27.14  													|
% 66.11/27.14  													| Applying alpha-rule on (456) yields:
% 66.11/27.14  													| (457) hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_93_4_90) = all_191_2_127
% 66.11/27.14  													| (458) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_191_3_128
% 66.11/27.14  													| (459) positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_93_4_90) = all_191_0_125
% 66.11/27.14  													| (460) is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_93_4_90) = all_191_1_126
% 66.11/27.14  													| (461)  ~ (all_191_3_128 = 0) | (( ~ (all_93_1_87 = 0) | all_191_2_127 = very_low) & (all_93_1_87 = 0 | (( ~ (all_191_0_125 = 0) | (( ~ (all_191_1_126 = 0) | all_191_2_127 = low) & (all_191_1_126 = 0 | all_191_2_127 = mod1))) & ( ~ (all_191_1_126 = 0) | all_191_0_125 = 0 | all_191_2_127 = mod2) & (all_191_0_125 = 0 | all_191_1_126 = 0 | all_191_2_127 = high))))
% 66.11/27.14  													|
% 66.11/27.14  													| Instantiating (394) with all_193_0_129, all_193_1_130, all_193_2_131, all_193_3_132 yields:
% 66.11/27.14  													| (462) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_193_3_132 & age(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_193_1_130 & age(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_193_2_131 & greater(all_193_1_130, sigma) = all_193_0_129 & ( ~ (all_193_2_131 = zero) |  ~ (all_193_3_132 = 0) | (( ~ (all_193_0_129 = 0) | all_33_0_44 = 0) & ( ~ (all_33_0_44 = 0) | all_193_0_129 = 0)))
% 66.11/27.14  													|
% 66.11/27.14  													| Applying alpha-rule on (462) yields:
% 66.11/27.14  													| (463) greater(all_193_1_130, sigma) = all_193_0_129
% 66.11/27.14  													| (464) age(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_193_2_131
% 66.11/27.14  													| (465)  ~ (all_193_2_131 = zero) |  ~ (all_193_3_132 = 0) | (( ~ (all_193_0_129 = 0) | all_33_0_44 = 0) & ( ~ (all_33_0_44 = 0) | all_193_0_129 = 0))
% 66.11/27.14  													| (466) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_193_3_132
% 66.11/27.14  													| (467) age(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_193_1_130
% 66.11/27.14  													|
% 66.11/27.14  													| Instantiating (393) with all_195_0_133, all_195_1_134 yields:
% 66.11/27.14  													| (468) is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_195_0_133 & is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_195_1_134 & organization(all_4_14_17) = 0 & ( ~ (all_195_0_133 = 0) |  ~ (all_195_1_134 = 0)) & (all_195_0_133 = 0 | all_195_1_134 = 0)
% 66.11/27.14  													|
% 66.11/27.14  													| Applying alpha-rule on (468) yields:
% 66.11/27.14  													| (469)  ~ (all_195_0_133 = 0) |  ~ (all_195_1_134 = 0)
% 66.11/27.14  													| (77) organization(all_4_14_17) = 0
% 66.11/27.14  													| (471) is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_195_1_134
% 66.11/27.14  													| (472) all_195_0_133 = 0 | all_195_1_134 = 0
% 66.11/27.14  													| (473) is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_195_0_133
% 66.11/27.14  													|
% 66.11/27.14  													| Instantiating (392) with all_197_0_135, all_197_1_136 yields:
% 66.11/27.14  													| (474) is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_197_0_135 & is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_197_1_136 & organization(all_4_14_17) = 0 & ( ~ (all_197_0_135 = 0) |  ~ (all_197_1_136 = 0)) & (all_197_0_135 = 0 | all_197_1_136 = 0)
% 66.11/27.14  													|
% 66.11/27.14  													| Applying alpha-rule on (474) yields:
% 66.11/27.14  													| (475) is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_197_0_135
% 66.11/27.14  													| (476) all_197_0_135 = 0 | all_197_1_136 = 0
% 66.11/27.14  													| (477)  ~ (all_197_0_135 = 0) |  ~ (all_197_1_136 = 0)
% 66.11/27.14  													| (77) organization(all_4_14_17) = 0
% 66.11/27.14  													| (479) is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_197_1_136
% 66.11/27.14  													|
% 66.11/27.14  													| Instantiating (398) with all_199_0_137, all_199_1_138, all_199_2_139, all_199_3_140 yields:
% 66.11/27.14  													| (480) hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_199_2_139 & positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_199_0_137 & is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_199_1_138 & organization(all_4_14_17) = all_199_3_140 & ( ~ (all_199_3_140 = 0) | (( ~ (all_21_2_32 = 0) | all_199_2_139 = very_low) & (all_21_2_32 = 0 | (( ~ (all_199_0_137 = 0) | (( ~ (all_199_1_138 = 0) | all_199_2_139 = low) & (all_199_1_138 = 0 | all_199_2_139 = mod1))) & ( ~ (all_199_1_138 = 0) | all_199_0_137 = 0 | all_199_2_139 = mod2) & (all_199_0_137 = 0 | all_199_1_138 = 0 | all_199_2_139 = high)))))
% 66.11/27.14  													|
% 66.11/27.14  													| Applying alpha-rule on (480) yields:
% 66.11/27.14  													| (481) hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_199_2_139
% 66.11/27.14  													| (482) is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_199_1_138
% 66.11/27.14  													| (483) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_199_3_140
% 66.11/27.14  													| (484) positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_199_0_137
% 66.11/27.14  													| (485)  ~ (all_199_3_140 = 0) | (( ~ (all_21_2_32 = 0) | all_199_2_139 = very_low) & (all_21_2_32 = 0 | (( ~ (all_199_0_137 = 0) | (( ~ (all_199_1_138 = 0) | all_199_2_139 = low) & (all_199_1_138 = 0 | all_199_2_139 = mod1))) & ( ~ (all_199_1_138 = 0) | all_199_0_137 = 0 | all_199_2_139 = mod2) & (all_199_0_137 = 0 | all_199_1_138 = 0 | all_199_2_139 = high))))
% 66.11/27.14  													|
% 66.11/27.14  													| Instantiating (396) with all_201_0_141, all_201_1_142, all_201_2_143, all_201_3_144 yields:
% 66.11/27.14  													| (486) hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_86_4_84) = all_201_2_143 & positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_86_4_84) = all_201_0_141 & is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_86_4_84) = all_201_1_142 & organization(all_4_14_17) = all_201_3_144 & ( ~ (all_201_3_144 = 0) | (( ~ (all_86_1_81 = 0) | all_201_2_143 = very_low) & (all_86_1_81 = 0 | (( ~ (all_201_0_141 = 0) | (( ~ (all_201_1_142 = 0) | all_201_2_143 = low) & (all_201_1_142 = 0 | all_201_2_143 = mod1))) & ( ~ (all_201_1_142 = 0) | all_201_0_141 = 0 | all_201_2_143 = mod2) & (all_201_0_141 = 0 | all_201_1_142 = 0 | all_201_2_143 = high)))))
% 66.11/27.14  													|
% 66.11/27.14  													| Applying alpha-rule on (486) yields:
% 66.11/27.14  													| (487)  ~ (all_201_3_144 = 0) | (( ~ (all_86_1_81 = 0) | all_201_2_143 = very_low) & (all_86_1_81 = 0 | (( ~ (all_201_0_141 = 0) | (( ~ (all_201_1_142 = 0) | all_201_2_143 = low) & (all_201_1_142 = 0 | all_201_2_143 = mod1))) & ( ~ (all_201_1_142 = 0) | all_201_0_141 = 0 | all_201_2_143 = mod2) & (all_201_0_141 = 0 | all_201_1_142 = 0 | all_201_2_143 = high))))
% 66.11/27.14  													| (488) positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_86_4_84) = all_201_0_141
% 66.11/27.14  													| (489) is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_86_4_84) = all_201_1_142
% 66.11/27.14  													| (490) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_201_3_144
% 66.11/27.14  													| (491) hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_86_4_84) = all_201_2_143
% 66.11/27.14  													|
% 66.11/27.14  													| Instantiating (391) with all_203_0_145, all_203_1_146, all_203_2_147, all_203_3_148 yields:
% 66.11/27.14  													| (492) hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_203_1_146 & positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_203_0_145 & organization(all_4_14_17) = all_203_3_148 & has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_203_2_147 & ( ~ (all_203_3_148 = 0) | (( ~ (all_203_2_147 = 0) | all_203_1_146 = very_low) & (all_203_2_147 = 0 | (( ~ (all_203_0_145 = 0) | all_203_1_146 = low) & (all_203_0_145 = 0 | all_203_1_146 = mod2)))))
% 66.11/27.14  													|
% 66.11/27.14  													| Applying alpha-rule on (492) yields:
% 66.11/27.14  													| (493)  ~ (all_203_3_148 = 0) | (( ~ (all_203_2_147 = 0) | all_203_1_146 = very_low) & (all_203_2_147 = 0 | (( ~ (all_203_0_145 = 0) | all_203_1_146 = low) & (all_203_0_145 = 0 | all_203_1_146 = mod2))))
% 66.11/27.14  													| (494) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_203_3_148
% 66.11/27.14  													| (495) hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_203_1_146
% 66.11/27.14  													| (496) has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_203_2_147
% 66.11/27.14  													| (497) positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_203_0_145
% 66.11/27.14  													|
% 66.11/27.14  													| Instantiating (390) with all_205_0_149, all_205_1_150 yields:
% 66.11/27.14  													| (498) dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_4_12_15) = all_205_1_150 & organization(all_4_14_17) = all_205_0_149 & ( ~ (all_205_1_150 = 0) | (all_205_0_149 = 0 &  ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0)))
% 66.11/27.14  													|
% 66.11/27.14  													| Applying alpha-rule on (498) yields:
% 66.11/27.14  													| (499) dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_4_12_15) = all_205_1_150
% 66.11/27.14  													| (500) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_205_0_149
% 66.11/27.14  													| (501)  ~ (all_205_1_150 = 0) | (all_205_0_149 = 0 &  ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0))
% 66.11/27.14  													|
% 66.11/27.14  													| Instantiating (383) with all_207_0_151, all_207_1_152 yields:
% 66.11/27.14  													| (502) dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13, all_4_13_16) = all_207_1_152 & organization(all_4_14_17) = all_207_0_151 & ( ~ (all_207_1_152 = 0) | (all_207_0_151 = 0 &  ~ (all_21_1_31 = 0)))
% 66.11/27.14  													|
% 66.11/27.14  													| Applying alpha-rule on (502) yields:
% 66.11/27.14  													| (503) dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13, all_4_13_16) = all_207_1_152
% 66.11/27.15  													| (504) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_207_0_151
% 66.11/27.15  													| (505)  ~ (all_207_1_152 = 0) | (all_207_0_151 = 0 &  ~ (all_21_1_31 = 0))
% 66.11/27.15  													|
% 66.11/27.15  													| Instantiating (381) with all_209_0_153, all_209_1_154, all_209_2_155, all_209_3_156 yields:
% 66.11/27.15  													| (506) hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_209_1_154 & positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_209_0_153 & organization(all_4_14_17) = all_209_3_156 & has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_209_2_155 & ( ~ (all_209_3_156 = 0) | (( ~ (all_209_2_155 = 0) | all_209_1_154 = very_low) & (all_209_2_155 = 0 | (( ~ (all_209_0_153 = 0) | (( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_209_1_154 = low) & (all_209_1_154 = mod1 | all_25_1_38 = 0))) & ( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_209_0_153 = 0 | all_209_1_154 = mod2) & (all_209_0_153 = 0 | all_209_1_154 = high | all_25_1_38 = 0)))))
% 66.11/27.15  													|
% 66.11/27.15  													| Applying alpha-rule on (506) yields:
% 66.11/27.15  													| (507) hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_209_1_154
% 66.11/27.15  													| (508) has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_209_2_155
% 66.11/27.15  													| (509)  ~ (all_209_3_156 = 0) | (( ~ (all_209_2_155 = 0) | all_209_1_154 = very_low) & (all_209_2_155 = 0 | (( ~ (all_209_0_153 = 0) | (( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_209_1_154 = low) & (all_209_1_154 = mod1 | all_25_1_38 = 0))) & ( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_209_0_153 = 0 | all_209_1_154 = mod2) & (all_209_0_153 = 0 | all_209_1_154 = high | all_25_1_38 = 0))))
% 66.11/27.15  													| (510) positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_209_0_153
% 66.11/27.15  													| (511) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_209_3_156
% 66.11/27.15  													|
% 66.11/27.15  													| Instantiating (389) with all_211_0_157, all_211_1_158 yields:
% 66.11/27.15  													| (512) dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15, all_4_13_16) = all_211_1_158 & organization(all_4_14_17) = all_211_0_157 & ( ~ (all_211_1_158 = 0) | (all_211_0_157 = 0 &  ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0)))
% 66.11/27.15  													|
% 66.11/27.15  													| Applying alpha-rule on (512) yields:
% 66.11/27.15  													| (513) dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15, all_4_13_16) = all_211_1_158
% 66.11/27.15  													| (514) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_211_0_157
% 66.11/27.15  													| (515)  ~ (all_211_1_158 = 0) | (all_211_0_157 = 0 &  ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0))
% 66.11/27.15  													|
% 66.11/27.15  													| Instantiating (376) with all_213_0_159, all_213_1_160 yields:
% 66.11/27.15  													| (516) dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13, all_4_12_15) = all_213_1_160 & organization(all_4_14_17) = all_213_0_159 & ( ~ (all_213_1_160 = 0) | (all_213_0_159 = 0 & ( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) |  ~ (all_21_1_31 = 0)) & (all_25_1_38 = 0 | all_21_1_31 = 0)))
% 66.11/27.15  													|
% 66.11/27.15  													| Applying alpha-rule on (516) yields:
% 66.11/27.15  													| (517) dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13, all_4_12_15) = all_213_1_160
% 66.11/27.15  													| (518) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_213_0_159
% 66.11/27.15  													| (519)  ~ (all_213_1_160 = 0) | (all_213_0_159 = 0 & ( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) |  ~ (all_21_1_31 = 0)) & (all_25_1_38 = 0 | all_21_1_31 = 0))
% 66.11/27.15  													|
% 66.11/27.15  													| Instantiating (373) with all_215_0_161, all_215_1_162 yields:
% 66.11/27.15  													| (520)  ~ (all_215_1_162 = 0) & dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14, all_4_11_14) = all_215_1_162 & organization(all_4_14_17) = all_215_0_161
% 66.11/27.15  													|
% 66.11/27.15  													| Applying alpha-rule on (520) yields:
% 66.11/27.15  													| (521)  ~ (all_215_1_162 = 0)
% 66.11/27.15  													| (522) dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14, all_4_11_14) = all_215_1_162
% 66.11/27.15  													| (523) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_215_0_161
% 66.11/27.15  													|
% 66.11/27.15  													| Instantiating (368) with all_217_0_163, all_217_1_164 yields:
% 66.11/27.15  													| (524)  ~ (all_217_1_164 = 0) & dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13, all_4_10_13) = all_217_1_164 & organization(all_4_14_17) = all_217_0_163
% 66.11/27.15  													|
% 66.11/27.15  													| Applying alpha-rule on (524) yields:
% 66.11/27.15  													| (525)  ~ (all_217_1_164 = 0)
% 66.11/27.15  													| (526) dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13, all_4_10_13) = all_217_1_164
% 66.11/27.15  													| (527) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_217_0_163
% 66.11/27.15  													|
% 66.11/27.15  													| Instantiating (366) with all_219_0_165, all_219_1_166, all_219_2_167, all_219_3_168 yields:
% 66.11/27.15  													| (528) hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_219_1_166 & is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_219_0_165 & organization(all_4_14_17) = all_219_3_168 & has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_219_2_167 & ( ~ (all_219_3_168 = 0) | (( ~ (all_219_2_167 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = very_low) & (all_219_2_167 = 0 | (( ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = mod2 | all_25_0_37 = 0) & ( ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0) | (( ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = low) & (all_219_0_165 = 0 | all_219_1_166 = mod1))) & (all_219_0_165 = 0 | all_219_1_166 = high | all_25_0_37 = 0)))))
% 66.11/27.15  													|
% 66.11/27.15  													| Applying alpha-rule on (528) yields:
% 66.11/27.15  													| (529) is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_219_0_165
% 66.11/27.15  													| (530) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_219_3_168
% 66.11/27.15  													| (531)  ~ (all_219_3_168 = 0) | (( ~ (all_219_2_167 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = very_low) & (all_219_2_167 = 0 | (( ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = mod2 | all_25_0_37 = 0) & ( ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0) | (( ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = low) & (all_219_0_165 = 0 | all_219_1_166 = mod1))) & (all_219_0_165 = 0 | all_219_1_166 = high | all_25_0_37 = 0))))
% 66.11/27.15  													| (532) has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_219_2_167
% 66.11/27.15  													| (533) hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_219_1_166
% 66.11/27.15  													|
% 66.11/27.15  													| Instantiating (375) with all_221_0_169, all_221_1_170, all_221_2_171, all_221_3_172 yields:
% 66.11/27.15  													| (534) hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_221_1_170 & positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_221_0_169 & organization(all_4_14_17) = all_221_3_172 & has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_221_2_171 & ( ~ (all_221_3_172 = 0) | (( ~ (all_221_2_171 = 0) | all_221_1_170 = very_low) & (all_221_2_171 = 0 | (( ~ (all_221_0_169 = 0) | (( ~ (all_19_1_27 = 0) | all_221_1_170 = low) & (all_221_1_170 = mod1 | all_19_1_27 = 0))) & ( ~ (all_19_1_27 = 0) | all_221_0_169 = 0 | all_221_1_170 = mod2) & (all_221_0_169 = 0 | all_221_1_170 = high | all_19_1_27 = 0)))))
% 66.11/27.15  													|
% 66.11/27.15  													| Applying alpha-rule on (534) yields:
% 66.11/27.15  													| (535) has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_221_2_171
% 66.11/27.15  													| (536) hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_221_1_170
% 66.11/27.15  													| (537)  ~ (all_221_3_172 = 0) | (( ~ (all_221_2_171 = 0) | all_221_1_170 = very_low) & (all_221_2_171 = 0 | (( ~ (all_221_0_169 = 0) | (( ~ (all_19_1_27 = 0) | all_221_1_170 = low) & (all_221_1_170 = mod1 | all_19_1_27 = 0))) & ( ~ (all_19_1_27 = 0) | all_221_0_169 = 0 | all_221_1_170 = mod2) & (all_221_0_169 = 0 | all_221_1_170 = high | all_19_1_27 = 0))))
% 66.11/27.15  													| (538) positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_221_0_169
% 66.11/27.15  													| (539) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_221_3_172
% 66.11/27.15  													|
% 66.11/27.15  													| Instantiating (387) with all_223_0_173, all_223_1_174 yields:
% 66.11/27.15  													| (540) dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_4_11_14) = all_223_1_174 & organization(all_4_14_17) = all_223_0_173 & ( ~ (all_223_1_174 = 0) | (all_223_0_173 = 0 &  ~ (all_19_1_27 = 0)))
% 66.11/27.15  													|
% 66.11/27.15  													| Applying alpha-rule on (540) yields:
% 66.11/27.15  													| (541) dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_4_11_14) = all_223_1_174
% 66.11/27.15  													| (542) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_223_0_173
% 66.11/27.15  													| (543)  ~ (all_223_1_174 = 0) | (all_223_0_173 = 0 &  ~ (all_19_1_27 = 0))
% 66.11/27.15  													|
% 66.11/27.15  													| Instantiating (384) with all_225_0_175, all_225_1_176 yields:
% 66.11/27.15  													| (544) dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_4_10_13) = all_225_1_176 & organization(all_4_14_17) = all_225_0_175 & ( ~ (all_225_1_176 = 0) | (all_225_0_175 = 0 &  ~ (all_21_1_31 = 0)))
% 66.11/27.15  													|
% 66.11/27.15  													| Applying alpha-rule on (544) yields:
% 66.11/27.15  													| (545) dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_4_10_13) = all_225_1_176
% 66.11/27.15  													| (546) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_225_0_175
% 66.11/27.15  													| (547)  ~ (all_225_1_176 = 0) | (all_225_0_175 = 0 &  ~ (all_21_1_31 = 0))
% 66.11/27.15  													|
% 66.11/27.15  													| Instantiating (380) with all_227_0_177, all_227_1_178 yields:
% 66.11/27.15  													| (548)  ~ (all_227_1_178 = 0) & dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15, all_4_12_15) = all_227_1_178 & organization(all_4_14_17) = all_227_0_177
% 66.11/27.15  													|
% 66.11/27.15  													| Applying alpha-rule on (548) yields:
% 66.11/27.15  													| (549)  ~ (all_227_1_178 = 0)
% 66.11/27.15  													| (550) dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15, all_4_12_15) = all_227_1_178
% 66.11/27.15  													| (551) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_227_0_177
% 66.11/27.15  													|
% 66.11/27.15  													| Instantiating (379) with all_229_0_179, all_229_1_180 yields:
% 66.11/27.15  													| (552) dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15, all_4_11_14) = all_229_1_180 & organization(all_4_14_17) = all_229_0_179 & ( ~ (all_229_1_180 = 0) | (all_229_0_179 = 0 & ( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) |  ~ (all_19_1_27 = 0)) & (all_25_1_38 = 0 | all_19_1_27 = 0)))
% 66.11/27.15  													|
% 66.11/27.15  													| Applying alpha-rule on (552) yields:
% 66.11/27.15  													| (553) dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15, all_4_11_14) = all_229_1_180
% 66.11/27.15  													| (554) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_229_0_179
% 66.11/27.15  													| (555)  ~ (all_229_1_180 = 0) | (all_229_0_179 = 0 & ( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) |  ~ (all_19_1_27 = 0)) & (all_25_1_38 = 0 | all_19_1_27 = 0))
% 66.11/27.15  													|
% 66.11/27.15  													| Instantiating (386) with all_231_0_181, all_231_1_182 yields:
% 66.11/27.15  													| (556) dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14, all_4_13_16) = all_231_1_182 & organization(all_4_14_17) = all_231_0_181 & ( ~ (all_231_1_182 = 0) | (all_231_0_181 = 0 &  ~ (all_19_1_27 = 0)))
% 66.11/27.15  													|
% 66.11/27.15  													| Applying alpha-rule on (556) yields:
% 66.11/27.15  													| (557) dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14, all_4_13_16) = all_231_1_182
% 66.11/27.15  													| (558) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_231_0_181
% 66.11/27.15  													| (559)  ~ (all_231_1_182 = 0) | (all_231_0_181 = 0 &  ~ (all_19_1_27 = 0))
% 66.11/27.15  													|
% 66.11/27.15  													| Instantiating (372) with all_233_0_183, all_233_1_184 yields:
% 66.11/27.15  													| (560) dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14, all_4_10_13) = all_233_1_184 & organization(all_4_14_17) = all_233_0_183 & ( ~ (all_233_1_184 = 0) | (all_233_0_183 = 0 & ( ~ (all_21_1_31 = 0) |  ~ (all_19_1_27 = 0)) & (all_21_1_31 = 0 | all_19_1_27 = 0)))
% 66.11/27.15  													|
% 66.11/27.15  													| Applying alpha-rule on (560) yields:
% 66.11/27.15  													| (561) dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14, all_4_10_13) = all_233_1_184
% 66.11/27.15  													| (562) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_233_0_183
% 66.11/27.15  													| (563)  ~ (all_233_1_184 = 0) | (all_233_0_183 = 0 & ( ~ (all_21_1_31 = 0) |  ~ (all_19_1_27 = 0)) & (all_21_1_31 = 0 | all_19_1_27 = 0))
% 66.11/27.15  													|
% 66.11/27.15  													| Instantiating (370) with all_235_0_185, all_235_1_186, all_235_2_187, all_235_3_188 yields:
% 66.11/27.15  													| (564) hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_235_1_186 & positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_235_0_185 & organization(all_4_14_17) = all_235_3_188 & has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_235_2_187 & ( ~ (all_235_3_188 = 0) | (( ~ (all_235_2_187 = 0) | all_235_1_186 = very_low) & (all_235_2_187 = 0 | (( ~ (all_235_0_185 = 0) | (( ~ (all_21_1_31 = 0) | all_235_1_186 = low) & (all_235_1_186 = mod1 | all_21_1_31 = 0))) & ( ~ (all_21_1_31 = 0) | all_235_0_185 = 0 | all_235_1_186 = mod2) & (all_235_0_185 = 0 | all_235_1_186 = high | all_21_1_31 = 0)))))
% 66.11/27.15  													|
% 66.11/27.15  													| Applying alpha-rule on (564) yields:
% 66.11/27.15  													| (565) hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_235_1_186
% 66.11/27.15  													| (566) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_235_3_188
% 66.11/27.15  													| (567) positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_235_0_185
% 66.11/27.15  													| (568)  ~ (all_235_3_188 = 0) | (( ~ (all_235_2_187 = 0) | all_235_1_186 = very_low) & (all_235_2_187 = 0 | (( ~ (all_235_0_185 = 0) | (( ~ (all_21_1_31 = 0) | all_235_1_186 = low) & (all_235_1_186 = mod1 | all_21_1_31 = 0))) & ( ~ (all_21_1_31 = 0) | all_235_0_185 = 0 | all_235_1_186 = mod2) & (all_235_0_185 = 0 | all_235_1_186 = high | all_21_1_31 = 0))))
% 66.11/27.15  													| (569) has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_235_2_187
% 66.11/27.15  													|
% 66.11/27.15  													| Instantiating (378) with all_237_0_189, all_237_1_190 yields:
% 66.11/27.15  													| (570) dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14, all_4_12_15) = all_237_1_190 & organization(all_4_14_17) = all_237_0_189 & ( ~ (all_237_1_190 = 0) | (all_237_0_189 = 0 & ( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) |  ~ (all_19_1_27 = 0)) & (all_25_1_38 = 0 | all_19_1_27 = 0)))
% 66.11/27.15  													|
% 66.11/27.15  													| Applying alpha-rule on (570) yields:
% 66.11/27.15  													| (571) dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14, all_4_12_15) = all_237_1_190
% 66.11/27.15  													| (572) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_237_0_189
% 66.11/27.15  													| (573)  ~ (all_237_1_190 = 0) | (all_237_0_189 = 0 & ( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) |  ~ (all_19_1_27 = 0)) & (all_25_1_38 = 0 | all_19_1_27 = 0))
% 66.11/27.15  													|
% 66.11/27.15  													| Instantiating (377) with all_239_0_191, all_239_1_192 yields:
% 66.11/27.15  													| (574) dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15, all_4_10_13) = all_239_1_192 & organization(all_4_14_17) = all_239_0_191 & ( ~ (all_239_1_192 = 0) | (all_239_0_191 = 0 & ( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) |  ~ (all_21_1_31 = 0)) & (all_25_1_38 = 0 | all_21_1_31 = 0)))
% 66.11/27.15  													|
% 66.11/27.15  													| Applying alpha-rule on (574) yields:
% 66.11/27.15  													| (575) dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15, all_4_10_13) = all_239_1_192
% 66.11/27.15  													| (576) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_239_0_191
% 66.11/27.15  													| (577)  ~ (all_239_1_192 = 0) | (all_239_0_191 = 0 & ( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) |  ~ (all_21_1_31 = 0)) & (all_25_1_38 = 0 | all_21_1_31 = 0))
% 66.11/27.15  													|
% 66.11/27.15  													| Instantiating (371) with all_241_0_193, all_241_1_194 yields:
% 66.11/27.15  													| (578) dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13, all_4_11_14) = all_241_1_194 & organization(all_4_14_17) = all_241_0_193 & ( ~ (all_241_1_194 = 0) | (all_241_0_193 = 0 & ( ~ (all_21_1_31 = 0) |  ~ (all_19_1_27 = 0)) & (all_21_1_31 = 0 | all_19_1_27 = 0)))
% 66.11/27.16  													|
% 66.11/27.16  													| Applying alpha-rule on (578) yields:
% 66.11/27.16  													| (579) dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13, all_4_11_14) = all_241_1_194
% 66.11/27.16  													| (580) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_241_0_193
% 66.11/27.16  													| (581)  ~ (all_241_1_194 = 0) | (all_241_0_193 = 0 & ( ~ (all_21_1_31 = 0) |  ~ (all_19_1_27 = 0)) & (all_21_1_31 = 0 | all_19_1_27 = 0))
% 66.11/27.16  													|
% 66.11/27.16  													| Instantiating (367) with all_243_0_195, all_243_1_196, all_243_2_197, all_243_3_198 yields:
% 66.11/27.16  													| (582) hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_243_1_196 & is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_243_0_195 & organization(all_4_14_17) = all_243_3_198 & has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_243_2_197 & ( ~ (all_243_3_198 = 0) | (( ~ (all_243_2_197 = 0) | all_243_1_196 = very_low) & (all_243_2_197 = 0 | (( ~ (all_243_0_195 = 0) | all_243_1_196 = mod2 | all_17_0_22 = 0) & ( ~ (all_17_0_22 = 0) | (( ~ (all_243_0_195 = 0) | all_243_1_196 = low) & (all_243_0_195 = 0 | all_243_1_196 = mod1))) & (all_243_0_195 = 0 | all_243_1_196 = high | all_17_0_22 = 0)))))
% 66.11/27.16  													|
% 66.11/27.16  													| Applying alpha-rule on (582) yields:
% 66.11/27.16  													| (583)  ~ (all_243_3_198 = 0) | (( ~ (all_243_2_197 = 0) | all_243_1_196 = very_low) & (all_243_2_197 = 0 | (( ~ (all_243_0_195 = 0) | all_243_1_196 = mod2 | all_17_0_22 = 0) & ( ~ (all_17_0_22 = 0) | (( ~ (all_243_0_195 = 0) | all_243_1_196 = low) & (all_243_0_195 = 0 | all_243_1_196 = mod1))) & (all_243_0_195 = 0 | all_243_1_196 = high | all_17_0_22 = 0))))
% 66.11/27.16  													| (584) hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_243_1_196
% 66.11/27.16  													| (585) has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_243_2_197
% 66.11/27.16  													| (586) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_243_3_198
% 66.11/27.16  													| (587) is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_243_0_195
% 66.11/27.16  													|
% 66.11/27.16  													| Instantiating (365) with all_245_0_199, all_245_1_200, all_245_2_201, all_245_3_202 yields:
% 66.11/27.16  													| (588) hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_245_1_200 & is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_245_0_199 & organization(all_4_14_17) = all_245_3_202 & has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_245_2_201 & ( ~ (all_245_3_202 = 0) | (( ~ (all_245_2_201 = 0) | all_245_1_200 = very_low) & (all_245_2_201 = 0 | (( ~ (all_245_0_199 = 0) | all_245_1_200 = mod2 | all_19_0_26 = 0) & ( ~ (all_19_0_26 = 0) | (( ~ (all_245_0_199 = 0) | all_245_1_200 = low) & (all_245_0_199 = 0 | all_245_1_200 = mod1))) & (all_245_0_199 = 0 | all_245_1_200 = high | all_19_0_26 = 0)))))
% 66.11/27.16  													|
% 66.11/27.16  													| Applying alpha-rule on (588) yields:
% 66.11/27.16  													| (589)  ~ (all_245_3_202 = 0) | (( ~ (all_245_2_201 = 0) | all_245_1_200 = very_low) & (all_245_2_201 = 0 | (( ~ (all_245_0_199 = 0) | all_245_1_200 = mod2 | all_19_0_26 = 0) & ( ~ (all_19_0_26 = 0) | (( ~ (all_245_0_199 = 0) | all_245_1_200 = low) & (all_245_0_199 = 0 | all_245_1_200 = mod1))) & (all_245_0_199 = 0 | all_245_1_200 = high | all_19_0_26 = 0))))
% 66.11/27.16  													| (590) is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_245_0_199
% 66.11/27.16  													| (591) has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_245_2_201
% 66.11/27.16  													| (592) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_245_3_202
% 66.11/27.16  													| (593) hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_245_1_200
% 66.11/27.16  													|
% 66.11/27.16  													| Instantiating (364) with all_247_0_203, all_247_1_204, all_247_2_205, all_247_3_206 yields:
% 66.11/27.16  													| (594) hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_247_1_204 & is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_247_0_203 & organization(all_4_14_17) = all_247_3_206 & has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_247_2_205 & ( ~ (all_247_3_206 = 0) | (( ~ (all_247_2_205 = 0) | all_247_1_204 = very_low) & (all_247_2_205 = 0 | (( ~ (all_247_0_203 = 0) | all_247_1_204 = low) & (all_247_0_203 = 0 | all_247_1_204 = mod1)))))
% 66.11/27.16  													|
% 66.11/27.16  													| Applying alpha-rule on (594) yields:
% 66.11/27.16  													| (595) has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_247_2_205
% 66.11/27.16  													| (596) is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_247_0_203
% 66.11/27.16  													| (597) hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_247_1_204
% 66.11/27.16  													| (598)  ~ (all_247_3_206 = 0) | (( ~ (all_247_2_205 = 0) | all_247_1_204 = very_low) & (all_247_2_205 = 0 | (( ~ (all_247_0_203 = 0) | all_247_1_204 = low) & (all_247_0_203 = 0 | all_247_1_204 = mod1))))
% 66.11/27.16  													| (599) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_247_3_206
% 66.11/27.16  													|
% 66.11/27.16  													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (287), into two cases.
% 66.11/27.16  													|-Branch one:
% 66.11/27.16  													| (600)  ~ (smaller_or_equal(zero, tau) = 0)
% 66.11/27.16  													|
% 66.11/27.16  														| Using (423) and (600) yields:
% 66.11/27.16  														| (222) $false
% 66.11/27.16  														|
% 66.11/27.16  														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.11/27.16  													|-Branch two:
% 66.11/27.16  													| (423) smaller_or_equal(zero, tau) = 0
% 66.11/27.16  													| (603) all_51_1_59 = 0
% 66.11/27.16  													|
% 66.11/27.16  														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (192), into two cases.
% 66.11/27.16  														|-Branch one:
% 66.11/27.16  														| (604)  ~ (all_51_0_58 = 0)
% 66.11/27.16  														|
% 66.11/27.16  															| Equations (294) can reduce 604 to:
% 66.11/27.16  															| (605)  ~ (all_17_0_22 = 0)
% 66.11/27.16  															|
% 66.11/27.16  															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (417), into two cases.
% 66.11/27.16  															|-Branch one:
% 66.11/27.16  															| (606) all_47_0_56 = 0
% 66.11/27.16  															|
% 66.11/27.16  																| Equations (606) can reduce 187 to:
% 66.11/27.16  																| (231) $false
% 66.11/27.16  																|
% 66.11/27.16  																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.11/27.16  															|-Branch two:
% 66.11/27.16  															| (187)  ~ (all_47_0_56 = 0)
% 66.11/27.16  															| (609)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & smaller(high, mod1) = v0)
% 66.11/27.16  															|
% 66.11/27.16  																| Instantiating (609) with all_286_0_212 yields:
% 66.11/27.16  																| (610)  ~ (all_286_0_212 = 0) & smaller(high, mod1) = all_286_0_212
% 66.11/27.16  																|
% 66.11/27.16  																| Applying alpha-rule on (610) yields:
% 66.11/27.16  																| (611)  ~ (all_286_0_212 = 0)
% 66.11/27.16  																| (612) smaller(high, mod1) = all_286_0_212
% 66.11/27.16  																|
% 66.11/27.16  																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (419), into two cases.
% 66.11/27.16  																|-Branch one:
% 66.11/27.16  																| (613) all_29_0_42 = 0
% 66.11/27.16  																|
% 66.11/27.16  																	| Equations (613) can reduce 170 to:
% 66.11/27.16  																	| (231) $false
% 66.11/27.16  																	|
% 66.11/27.16  																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.11/27.16  																|-Branch two:
% 66.11/27.16  																| (170)  ~ (all_29_0_42 = 0)
% 66.11/27.16  																| (616)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & smaller(mod2, mod1) = v0)
% 66.11/27.16  																|
% 66.11/27.16  																	| Instantiating (616) with all_306_0_216 yields:
% 66.11/27.16  																	| (617)  ~ (all_306_0_216 = 0) & smaller(mod2, mod1) = all_306_0_216
% 66.11/27.16  																	|
% 66.11/27.16  																	| Applying alpha-rule on (617) yields:
% 66.11/27.16  																	| (618)  ~ (all_306_0_216 = 0)
% 66.11/27.16  																	| (619) smaller(mod2, mod1) = all_306_0_216
% 66.11/27.16  																	|
% 66.11/27.16  																	| Instantiating formula (1) with all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13, all_247_1_204, all_4_5_8 and discharging atoms hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_247_1_204, hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_4_5_8, yields:
% 66.11/27.16  																	| (620) all_247_1_204 = all_4_5_8
% 66.11/27.16  																	|
% 66.11/27.16  																	| Instantiating formula (1) with all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13, all_235_1_186, all_247_1_204 and discharging atoms hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_247_1_204, hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_235_1_186, yields:
% 66.11/27.16  																	| (621) all_247_1_204 = all_235_1_186
% 66.11/27.16  																	|
% 66.11/27.16  																	| Instantiating formula (1) with all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13, all_199_2_139, all_247_1_204 and discharging atoms hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_247_1_204, hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_199_2_139, yields:
% 66.11/27.16  																	| (622) all_247_1_204 = all_199_2_139
% 66.11/27.16  																	|
% 66.11/27.16  																	| Instantiating formula (1) with all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14, all_221_1_170, all_4_2_5 and discharging atoms hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_221_1_170, hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_4_2_5, yields:
% 66.11/27.16  																	| (623) all_221_1_170 = all_4_2_5
% 66.11/27.16  																	|
% 66.11/27.16  																	| Instantiating formula (1) with all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14, all_221_1_170, all_245_1_200 and discharging atoms hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_245_1_200, hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_221_1_170, yields:
% 66.11/27.16  																	| (624) all_245_1_200 = all_221_1_170
% 66.11/27.16  																	|
% 66.11/27.16  																	| Instantiating formula (1) with all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14, all_189_2_123, all_245_1_200 and discharging atoms hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_245_1_200, hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_189_2_123, yields:
% 66.11/27.16  																	| (625) all_245_1_200 = all_189_2_123
% 66.11/27.16  																	|
% 66.11/27.16  																	| Instantiating formula (1) with all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15, all_219_1_166, all_4_4_7 and discharging atoms hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_219_1_166, hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_4_4_7, yields:
% 66.11/27.16  																	| (626) all_219_1_166 = all_4_4_7
% 66.11/27.16  																	|
% 66.11/27.16  																	| Instantiating formula (1) with all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15, all_209_1_154, all_219_1_166 and discharging atoms hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_219_1_166, hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_209_1_154, yields:
% 66.11/27.16  																	| (627) all_219_1_166 = all_209_1_154
% 66.11/27.16  																	|
% 66.11/27.16  																	| Instantiating formula (1) with all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15, all_187_2_119, all_219_1_166 and discharging atoms hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_219_1_166, hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_187_2_119, yields:
% 66.11/27.16  																	| (628) all_219_1_166 = all_187_2_119
% 66.11/27.16  																	|
% 66.11/27.16  																	| Instantiating formula (1) with all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_203_1_146, all_4_0_3 and discharging atoms hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_203_1_146, hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_4_0_3, yields:
% 66.11/27.16  																	| (629) all_203_1_146 = all_4_0_3
% 66.11/27.16  																	|
% 66.11/27.16  																	| Instantiating formula (1) with all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_203_1_146, all_243_1_196 and discharging atoms hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_243_1_196, hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_203_1_146, yields:
% 66.11/27.16  																	| (630) all_243_1_196 = all_203_1_146
% 66.11/27.16  																	|
% 66.11/27.16  																	| Instantiating formula (1) with all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_181_2_112, all_243_1_196 and discharging atoms hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_243_1_196, hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_181_2_112, yields:
% 66.11/27.16  																	| (631) all_243_1_196 = all_181_2_112
% 66.11/27.16  																	|
% 66.11/27.16  																	| Instantiating formula (2) with all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13, all_235_0_185, 0 and discharging atoms positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_235_0_185, positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = 0, yields:
% 66.11/27.16  																	| (632) all_235_0_185 = 0
% 66.11/27.16  																	|
% 66.11/27.16  																	| Instantiating formula (2) with all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14, all_221_0_169, all_19_0_26 and discharging atoms positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_221_0_169, positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_19_0_26, yields:
% 66.11/27.16  																	| (633) all_221_0_169 = all_19_0_26
% 66.11/27.16  																	|
% 66.11/27.16  																	| Instantiating formula (2) with all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14, all_189_0_121, all_221_0_169 and discharging atoms positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_221_0_169, positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_189_0_121, yields:
% 66.11/27.16  																	| (634) all_221_0_169 = all_189_0_121
% 66.11/27.16  																	|
% 66.11/27.16  																	| Instantiating formula (2) with all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15, all_209_0_153, all_25_0_37 and discharging atoms positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_209_0_153, positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_25_0_37, yields:
% 66.11/27.16  																	| (635) all_209_0_153 = all_25_0_37
% 66.11/27.16  																	|
% 66.11/27.16  																	| Instantiating formula (2) with all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15, all_187_0_117, all_209_0_153 and discharging atoms positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_209_0_153, positional_advantage(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_187_0_117, yields:
% 66.11/27.16  																	| (636) all_209_0_153 = all_187_0_117
% 66.11/27.16  																	|
% 66.11/27.16  																	| Instantiating formula (9) with all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14, all_245_0_199, all_19_1_27 and discharging atoms is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_245_0_199, is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_19_1_27, yields:
% 66.11/27.16  																	| (637) all_245_0_199 = all_19_1_27
% 66.11/27.16  																	|
% 66.11/27.16  																	| Instantiating formula (9) with all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14, all_195_0_133, all_245_0_199 and discharging atoms is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_245_0_199, is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_195_0_133, yields:
% 66.11/27.16  																	| (638) all_245_0_199 = all_195_0_133
% 66.11/27.16  																	|
% 66.11/27.16  																	| Instantiating formula (9) with all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14, all_189_1_122, all_245_0_199 and discharging atoms is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_245_0_199, is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_189_1_122, yields:
% 66.11/27.16  																	| (639) all_245_0_199 = all_189_1_122
% 66.11/27.16  																	|
% 66.11/27.16  																	| Instantiating formula (9) with all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15, all_219_0_165, all_25_1_38 and discharging atoms is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_219_0_165, is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_25_1_38, yields:
% 66.11/27.16  																	| (640) all_219_0_165 = all_25_1_38
% 66.11/27.16  																	|
% 66.11/27.16  																	| Instantiating formula (9) with all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15, all_187_1_118, all_219_0_165 and discharging atoms is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_219_0_165, is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_187_1_118, yields:
% 66.11/27.16  																	| (641) all_219_0_165 = all_187_1_118
% 66.11/27.16  																	|
% 66.11/27.16  																	| Instantiating formula (9) with all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_197_1_136, all_243_0_195 and discharging atoms is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_243_0_195, is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_197_1_136, yields:
% 66.11/27.16  																	| (642) all_243_0_195 = all_197_1_136
% 66.11/27.16  																	|
% 66.11/27.16  																	| Instantiating formula (9) with all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_195_1_134, 0 and discharging atoms is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_195_1_134, is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = 0, yields:
% 66.11/27.16  																	| (643) all_195_1_134 = 0
% 66.11/27.16  																	|
% 66.11/27.16  																	| Instantiating formula (9) with all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_195_1_134, all_197_1_136 and discharging atoms is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_197_1_136, is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_195_1_134, yields:
% 66.11/27.16  																	| (644) all_197_1_136 = all_195_1_134
% 66.11/27.16  																	|
% 66.11/27.16  																	| Instantiating formula (9) with all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_181_1_111, all_243_0_195 and discharging atoms is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_243_0_195, is_aligned(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_181_1_111, yields:
% 66.11/27.16  																	| (645) all_243_0_195 = all_181_1_111
% 66.11/27.16  																	|
% 66.11/27.16  																	| Instantiating formula (12) with all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_4_10_13, all_225_1_176, 0 and discharging atoms dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_4_10_13) = all_225_1_176, dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_4_10_13) = 0, yields:
% 66.11/27.16  																	| (646) all_225_1_176 = 0
% 66.11/27.16  																	|
% 66.11/27.16  																	| Instantiating formula (12) with all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_4_12_15, all_205_1_150, all_33_0_44 and discharging atoms dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_4_12_15) = all_205_1_150, dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_4_12_15) = all_33_0_44, yields:
% 66.11/27.16  																	| (647) all_205_1_150 = all_33_0_44
% 66.11/27.16  																	|
% 66.11/27.16  																	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_241_0_193, all_243_3_198 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_243_3_198, organization(all_4_14_17) = all_241_0_193, yields:
% 66.11/27.16  																	| (648) all_243_3_198 = all_241_0_193
% 66.11/27.16  																	|
% 66.11/27.16  																	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_233_0_183, all_235_3_188 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_235_3_188, organization(all_4_14_17) = all_233_0_183, yields:
% 66.11/27.16  																	| (649) all_235_3_188 = all_233_0_183
% 66.11/27.16  																	|
% 66.11/27.16  																	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_231_0_181, all_237_0_189 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_237_0_189, organization(all_4_14_17) = all_231_0_181, yields:
% 66.11/27.16  																	| (650) all_237_0_189 = all_231_0_181
% 66.11/27.16  																	|
% 66.11/27.16  																	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_231_0_181, all_233_0_183 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_233_0_183, organization(all_4_14_17) = all_231_0_181, yields:
% 66.11/27.16  																	| (651) all_233_0_183 = all_231_0_181
% 66.11/27.16  																	|
% 66.11/27.16  																	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_229_0_179, all_245_3_202 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_245_3_202, organization(all_4_14_17) = all_229_0_179, yields:
% 66.11/27.16  																	| (652) all_245_3_202 = all_229_0_179
% 66.11/27.16  																	|
% 66.11/27.16  																	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_227_0_177, all_235_3_188 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_235_3_188, organization(all_4_14_17) = all_227_0_177, yields:
% 66.11/27.16  																	| (653) all_235_3_188 = all_227_0_177
% 66.11/27.16  																	|
% 66.11/27.16  																	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_225_0_175, 0 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_225_0_175, organization(all_4_14_17) = 0, yields:
% 66.11/27.16  																	| (654) all_225_0_175 = 0
% 66.11/27.16  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_223_0_173, all_239_0_191 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_239_0_191, organization(all_4_14_17) = all_223_0_173, yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (655) all_239_0_191 = all_223_0_173
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_221_3_172, all_225_0_175 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_225_0_175, organization(all_4_14_17) = all_221_3_172, yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (656) all_225_0_175 = all_221_3_172
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_219_3_168, all_247_3_206 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_247_3_206, organization(all_4_14_17) = all_219_3_168, yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (657) all_247_3_206 = all_219_3_168
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_219_3_168, all_241_0_193 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_241_0_193, organization(all_4_14_17) = all_219_3_168, yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (658) all_241_0_193 = all_219_3_168
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_219_3_168, all_221_3_172 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_221_3_172, organization(all_4_14_17) = all_219_3_168, yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (659) all_221_3_172 = all_219_3_168
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_217_0_163, all_229_0_179 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_229_0_179, organization(all_4_14_17) = all_217_0_163, yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (660) all_229_0_179 = all_217_0_163
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_215_0_161, all_237_0_189 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_237_0_189, organization(all_4_14_17) = all_215_0_161, yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (661) all_237_0_189 = all_215_0_161
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_213_0_159, all_217_0_163 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_217_0_163, organization(all_4_14_17) = all_213_0_159, yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (662) all_217_0_163 = all_213_0_159
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_211_0_157, all_237_0_189 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_237_0_189, organization(all_4_14_17) = all_211_0_157, yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (663) all_237_0_189 = all_211_0_157
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_211_0_157, all_213_0_159 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_213_0_159, organization(all_4_14_17) = all_211_0_157, yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (664) all_213_0_159 = all_211_0_157
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_209_3_156, all_243_3_198 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_243_3_198, organization(all_4_14_17) = all_209_3_156, yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (665) all_243_3_198 = all_209_3_156
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_207_0_151, all_247_3_206 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_247_3_206, organization(all_4_14_17) = all_207_0_151, yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (666) all_247_3_206 = all_207_0_151
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_205_0_149, all_219_3_168 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_219_3_168, organization(all_4_14_17) = all_205_0_149, yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (667) all_219_3_168 = all_205_0_149
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_203_3_148, all_239_0_191 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_239_0_191, organization(all_4_14_17) = all_203_3_148, yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (668) all_239_0_191 = all_203_3_148
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_201_3_144, all_239_0_191 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_239_0_191, organization(all_4_14_17) = all_201_3_144, yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (669) all_239_0_191 = all_201_3_144
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_201_3_144, all_205_0_149 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_205_0_149, organization(all_4_14_17) = all_201_3_144, yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (670) all_205_0_149 = all_201_3_144
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_199_3_140, all_245_3_202 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_245_3_202, organization(all_4_14_17) = all_199_3_140, yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (671) all_245_3_202 = all_199_3_140
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_193_3_132, all_211_0_157 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_211_0_157, organization(all_4_14_17) = all_193_3_132, yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (672) all_211_0_157 = all_193_3_132
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_191_3_128, all_239_0_191 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_239_0_191, organization(all_4_14_17) = all_191_3_128, yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (673) all_239_0_191 = all_191_3_128
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_189_3_124, all_203_3_148 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_203_3_148, organization(all_4_14_17) = all_189_3_124, yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (674) all_203_3_148 = all_189_3_124
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_187_3_120, all_203_3_148 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_203_3_148, organization(all_4_14_17) = all_187_3_120, yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (675) all_203_3_148 = all_187_3_120
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_181_3_113, all_187_3_120 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_187_3_120, organization(all_4_14_17) = all_181_3_113, yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (676) all_187_3_120 = all_181_3_113
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_179_2_109, all_193_3_132 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_193_3_132, organization(all_4_14_17) = all_179_2_109, yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (677) all_193_3_132 = all_179_2_109
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_179_2_109, all_181_3_113 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_181_3_113, organization(all_4_14_17) = all_179_2_109, yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (678) all_181_3_113 = all_179_2_109
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_171_2_101, all_231_0_181 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_231_0_181, organization(all_4_14_17) = all_171_2_101, yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (679) all_231_0_181 = all_171_2_101
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Instantiating formula (3) with all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13, all_247_2_205, all_21_2_32 and discharging atoms has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_247_2_205, has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_21_2_32, yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (680) all_247_2_205 = all_21_2_32
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Instantiating formula (3) with all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13, all_235_2_187, all_247_2_205 and discharging atoms has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_247_2_205, has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_235_2_187, yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (681) all_247_2_205 = all_235_2_187
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Instantiating formula (3) with all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14, all_245_2_201, all_19_2_28 and discharging atoms has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_245_2_201, has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_19_2_28, yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (682) all_245_2_201 = all_19_2_28
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Instantiating formula (3) with all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14, all_221_2_171, all_245_2_201 and discharging atoms has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_245_2_201, has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_221_2_171, yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (683) all_245_2_201 = all_221_2_171
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Instantiating formula (3) with all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15, all_219_2_167, all_25_2_39 and discharging atoms has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_219_2_167, has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_25_2_39, yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (684) all_219_2_167 = all_25_2_39
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Instantiating formula (3) with all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15, all_209_2_155, all_219_2_167 and discharging atoms has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_219_2_167, has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_209_2_155, yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (685) all_219_2_167 = all_209_2_155
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Instantiating formula (3) with all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_243_2_197, all_17_2_24 and discharging atoms has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_243_2_197, has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_17_2_24, yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (686) all_243_2_197 = all_17_2_24
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Instantiating formula (3) with all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_203_2_147, all_243_2_197 and discharging atoms has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_243_2_197, has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_203_2_147, yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (687) all_243_2_197 = all_203_2_147
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Instantiating formula (10) with all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15, all_193_1_130, all_4_8_11 and discharging atoms age(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_193_1_130, age(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_4_8_11, yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (688) all_193_1_130 = all_4_8_11
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Instantiating formula (5) with all_4_8_11, sigma, all_193_0_129, all_33_1_45 and discharging atoms greater(all_4_8_11, sigma) = all_33_1_45, yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (689) all_193_0_129 = all_33_1_45 |  ~ (greater(all_4_8_11, sigma) = all_193_0_129)
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Combining equations (622,621) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (690) all_235_1_186 = all_199_2_139
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Combining equations (620,621) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (691) all_235_1_186 = all_4_5_8
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Combining equations (680,681) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (692) all_235_2_187 = all_21_2_32
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Combining equations (657,666) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (693) all_219_3_168 = all_207_0_151
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Simplifying 693 yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (694) all_219_3_168 = all_207_0_151
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Combining equations (637,638) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (695) all_195_0_133 = all_19_1_27
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Combining equations (639,638) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (696) all_195_0_133 = all_189_1_122
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Combining equations (624,625) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (697) all_221_1_170 = all_189_2_123
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Simplifying 697 yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (698) all_221_1_170 = all_189_2_123
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Combining equations (682,683) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (699) all_221_2_171 = all_19_2_28
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Combining equations (652,671) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (700) all_229_0_179 = all_199_3_140
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Simplifying 700 yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (701) all_229_0_179 = all_199_3_140
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Combining equations (642,645) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (702) all_197_1_136 = all_181_1_111
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Simplifying 702 yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (703) all_197_1_136 = all_181_1_111
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Combining equations (630,631) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (704) all_203_1_146 = all_181_2_112
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Simplifying 704 yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (705) all_203_1_146 = all_181_2_112
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Combining equations (687,686) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (706) all_203_2_147 = all_17_2_24
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Simplifying 706 yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (707) all_203_2_147 = all_17_2_24
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Combining equations (648,665) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (708) all_241_0_193 = all_209_3_156
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Simplifying 708 yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (709) all_241_0_193 = all_209_3_156
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Combining equations (658,709) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (710) all_219_3_168 = all_209_3_156
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Simplifying 710 yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (711) all_219_3_168 = all_209_3_156
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Combining equations (669,655) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (712) all_223_0_173 = all_201_3_144
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Combining equations (673,655) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (713) all_223_0_173 = all_191_3_128
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Combining equations (668,655) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (714) all_223_0_173 = all_203_3_148
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Combining equations (663,661) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (715) all_215_0_161 = all_211_0_157
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Combining equations (650,661) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (716) all_231_0_181 = all_215_0_161
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Simplifying 716 yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (717) all_231_0_181 = all_215_0_161
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Combining equations (691,690) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (718) all_199_2_139 = all_4_5_8
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Combining equations (649,653) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (719) all_233_0_183 = all_227_0_177
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Simplifying 719 yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (720) all_233_0_183 = all_227_0_177
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Combining equations (651,720) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (721) all_231_0_181 = all_227_0_177
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Simplifying 721 yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (722) all_231_0_181 = all_227_0_177
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Combining equations (717,722) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (723) all_227_0_177 = all_215_0_161
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Combining equations (679,722) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (724) all_227_0_177 = all_171_2_101
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Combining equations (660,701) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (725) all_217_0_163 = all_199_3_140
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Simplifying 725 yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (726) all_217_0_163 = all_199_3_140
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Combining equations (723,724) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (727) all_215_0_161 = all_171_2_101
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Simplifying 727 yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (728) all_215_0_161 = all_171_2_101
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Combining equations (656,654) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (729) all_221_3_172 = 0
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Simplifying 729 yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (730) all_221_3_172 = 0
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Combining equations (712,713) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (731) all_201_3_144 = all_191_3_128
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Simplifying 731 yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (732) all_201_3_144 = all_191_3_128
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Combining equations (714,713) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (733) all_203_3_148 = all_191_3_128
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Simplifying 733 yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (734) all_203_3_148 = all_191_3_128
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Combining equations (634,633) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (735) all_189_0_121 = all_19_0_26
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Simplifying 735 yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (736) all_189_0_121 = all_19_0_26
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Combining equations (623,698) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (737) all_189_2_123 = all_4_2_5
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Combining equations (659,730) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (738) all_219_3_168 = 0
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Simplifying 738 yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (739) all_219_3_168 = 0
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Combining equations (640,641) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (740) all_187_1_118 = all_25_1_38
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Combining equations (626,627) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (741) all_209_1_154 = all_4_4_7
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Combining equations (628,627) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (742) all_209_1_154 = all_187_2_119
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Combining equations (684,685) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (743) all_209_2_155 = all_25_2_39
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Combining equations (667,711) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (744) all_209_3_156 = all_205_0_149
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Combining equations (694,711) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (745) all_209_3_156 = all_207_0_151
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Combining equations (739,711) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (746) all_209_3_156 = 0
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Combining equations (662,726) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (747) all_213_0_159 = all_199_3_140
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Simplifying 747 yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (748) all_213_0_159 = all_199_3_140
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Combining equations (715,728) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (749) all_211_0_157 = all_171_2_101
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Simplifying 749 yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (750) all_211_0_157 = all_171_2_101
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Combining equations (664,748) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (751) all_211_0_157 = all_199_3_140
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Simplifying 751 yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (752) all_211_0_157 = all_199_3_140
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Combining equations (672,752) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (753) all_199_3_140 = all_193_3_132
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Combining equations (750,752) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (754) all_199_3_140 = all_171_2_101
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Combining equations (635,636) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (755) all_187_0_117 = all_25_0_37
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Combining equations (742,741) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (756) all_187_2_119 = all_4_4_7
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Simplifying 756 yields:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (757) all_187_2_119 = all_4_4_7
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Combining equations (744,745) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (758) all_207_0_151 = all_205_0_149
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Combining equations (746,745) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (759) all_207_0_151 = 0
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Combining equations (758,759) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.17  																	| (760) all_205_0_149 = 0
% 66.11/27.17  																	|
% 66.11/27.17  																	| Simplifying 760 yields:
% 66.11/27.18  																	| (761) all_205_0_149 = 0
% 66.11/27.18  																	|
% 66.11/27.18  																	| Combining equations (670,761) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.18  																	| (762) all_201_3_144 = 0
% 66.11/27.18  																	|
% 66.11/27.18  																	| Simplifying 762 yields:
% 66.11/27.18  																	| (763) all_201_3_144 = 0
% 66.11/27.18  																	|
% 66.11/27.18  																	| Combining equations (629,705) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.18  																	| (764) all_181_2_112 = all_4_0_3
% 66.11/27.18  																	|
% 66.11/27.18  																	| Combining equations (734,674) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.18  																	| (765) all_191_3_128 = all_189_3_124
% 66.11/27.18  																	|
% 66.11/27.18  																	| Simplifying 765 yields:
% 66.11/27.18  																	| (766) all_191_3_128 = all_189_3_124
% 66.11/27.18  																	|
% 66.11/27.18  																	| Combining equations (675,674) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.18  																	| (767) all_189_3_124 = all_187_3_120
% 66.11/27.18  																	|
% 66.11/27.18  																	| Combining equations (732,763) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.18  																	| (768) all_191_3_128 = 0
% 66.11/27.18  																	|
% 66.11/27.18  																	| Simplifying 768 yields:
% 66.11/27.18  																	| (769) all_191_3_128 = 0
% 66.11/27.18  																	|
% 66.11/27.18  																	| Combining equations (753,754) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.18  																	| (770) all_193_3_132 = all_171_2_101
% 66.11/27.18  																	|
% 66.11/27.18  																	| Simplifying 770 yields:
% 66.11/27.18  																	| (771) all_193_3_132 = all_171_2_101
% 66.11/27.18  																	|
% 66.11/27.18  																	| Combining equations (644,703) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.18  																	| (772) all_195_1_134 = all_181_1_111
% 66.11/27.18  																	|
% 66.11/27.18  																	| Simplifying 772 yields:
% 66.11/27.18  																	| (773) all_195_1_134 = all_181_1_111
% 66.11/27.18  																	|
% 66.11/27.18  																	| Combining equations (696,695) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.18  																	| (774) all_189_1_122 = all_19_1_27
% 66.11/27.18  																	|
% 66.11/27.18  																	| Simplifying 774 yields:
% 66.11/27.18  																	| (775) all_189_1_122 = all_19_1_27
% 66.11/27.18  																	|
% 66.11/27.18  																	| Combining equations (643,773) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.18  																	| (776) all_181_1_111 = 0
% 66.11/27.18  																	|
% 66.11/27.18  																	| Combining equations (677,771) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.18  																	| (777) all_179_2_109 = all_171_2_101
% 66.11/27.18  																	|
% 66.11/27.18  																	| Simplifying 777 yields:
% 66.11/27.18  																	| (778) all_179_2_109 = all_171_2_101
% 66.11/27.18  																	|
% 66.11/27.18  																	| Combining equations (766,769) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.18  																	| (779) all_189_3_124 = 0
% 66.11/27.18  																	|
% 66.11/27.18  																	| Simplifying 779 yields:
% 66.11/27.18  																	| (780) all_189_3_124 = 0
% 66.11/27.18  																	|
% 66.11/27.18  																	| Combining equations (767,780) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.18  																	| (781) all_187_3_120 = 0
% 66.11/27.18  																	|
% 66.11/27.18  																	| Simplifying 781 yields:
% 66.11/27.18  																	| (782) all_187_3_120 = 0
% 66.11/27.18  																	|
% 66.11/27.18  																	| Combining equations (676,782) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.18  																	| (783) all_181_3_113 = 0
% 66.11/27.18  																	|
% 66.11/27.18  																	| Simplifying 783 yields:
% 66.11/27.18  																	| (784) all_181_3_113 = 0
% 66.11/27.18  																	|
% 66.11/27.18  																	| Combining equations (678,784) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.18  																	| (785) all_179_2_109 = 0
% 66.11/27.18  																	|
% 66.11/27.18  																	| Simplifying 785 yields:
% 66.11/27.18  																	| (786) all_179_2_109 = 0
% 66.11/27.18  																	|
% 66.11/27.18  																	| Combining equations (778,786) yields a new equation:
% 66.11/27.18  																	| (787) all_171_2_101 = 0
% 66.11/27.18  																	|
% 66.11/27.18  																	| Simplifying 787 yields:
% 66.43/27.18  																	| (788) all_171_2_101 = 0
% 66.43/27.18  																	|
% 66.43/27.18  																	| Combining equations (776,773) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.18  																	| (643) all_195_1_134 = 0
% 66.43/27.18  																	|
% 66.43/27.18  																	| Combining equations (759,745) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.18  																	| (746) all_209_3_156 = 0
% 66.43/27.18  																	|
% 66.43/27.18  																	| Combining equations (755,636) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.18  																	| (635) all_209_0_153 = all_25_0_37
% 66.43/27.18  																	|
% 66.43/27.18  																	| Combining equations (746,711) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.18  																	| (739) all_219_3_168 = 0
% 66.43/27.18  																	|
% 66.43/27.18  																	| Combining equations (743,685) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.18  																	| (684) all_219_2_167 = all_25_2_39
% 66.43/27.18  																	|
% 66.43/27.18  																	| Combining equations (741,627) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.18  																	| (626) all_219_1_166 = all_4_4_7
% 66.43/27.18  																	|
% 66.43/27.18  																	| Combining equations (740,641) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.18  																	| (640) all_219_0_165 = all_25_1_38
% 66.43/27.18  																	|
% 66.43/27.18  																	| Combining equations (788,724) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.18  																	| (796) all_227_0_177 = 0
% 66.43/27.18  																	|
% 66.43/27.18  																	| Combining equations (796,653) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.18  																	| (797) all_235_3_188 = 0
% 66.43/27.18  																	|
% 66.43/27.18  																	| Combining equations (718,690) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.18  																	| (691) all_235_1_186 = all_4_5_8
% 66.43/27.18  																	|
% 66.43/27.18  																	| Combining equations (746,665) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.18  																	| (799) all_243_3_198 = 0
% 66.43/27.18  																	|
% 66.43/27.18  																	| Combining equations (764,631) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.18  																	| (800) all_243_1_196 = all_4_0_3
% 66.43/27.18  																	|
% 66.43/27.18  																	| Combining equations (776,645) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.18  																	| (801) all_243_0_195 = 0
% 66.43/27.18  																	|
% 66.43/27.18  																	| From (757) and (445) follows:
% 66.43/27.18  																	| (71) hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_4_4_7
% 66.43/27.18  																	|
% 66.43/27.18  																	| From (647) and (499) follows:
% 66.43/27.18  																	| (173) dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_4_12_15) = all_33_0_44
% 66.43/27.18  																	|
% 66.43/27.18  																	| From (788) and (430) follows:
% 66.43/27.18  																	| (77) organization(all_4_14_17) = 0
% 66.43/27.18  																	|
% 66.43/27.18  																	| From (692) and (569) follows:
% 66.43/27.18  																	| (156) has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_21_2_32
% 66.43/27.18  																	|
% 66.43/27.18  																	| From (699) and (535) follows:
% 66.43/27.18  																	| (150) has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_19_2_28
% 66.43/27.18  																	|
% 66.43/27.18  																	| From (743) and (508) follows:
% 66.43/27.18  																	| (167) has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_25_2_39
% 66.43/27.18  																	|
% 66.43/27.18  																	| From (707) and (496) follows:
% 66.43/27.18  																	| (145) has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = all_17_2_24
% 66.43/27.18  																	|
% 66.43/27.18  																	| From (688) and (463) follows:
% 66.43/27.18  																	| (809) greater(all_4_8_11, sigma) = all_193_0_129
% 66.43/27.18  																	|
% 66.43/27.18  																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (469), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.18  																	|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.18  																	| (810)  ~ (all_195_0_133 = 0)
% 66.43/27.18  																	|
% 66.43/27.18  																		| Equations (695) can reduce 810 to:
% 66.43/27.18  																		| (811)  ~ (all_19_1_27 = 0)
% 66.43/27.18  																		|
% 66.43/27.18  																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (689), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.18  																		|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.18  																		| (812)  ~ (greater(all_4_8_11, sigma) = all_193_0_129)
% 66.43/27.18  																		|
% 66.43/27.18  																			| Using (809) and (812) yields:
% 66.43/27.18  																			| (222) $false
% 66.43/27.18  																			|
% 66.43/27.18  																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.18  																		|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.18  																		| (809) greater(all_4_8_11, sigma) = all_193_0_129
% 66.43/27.18  																		| (815) all_193_0_129 = all_33_1_45
% 66.43/27.18  																		|
% 66.43/27.18  																			| From (815) and (809) follows:
% 66.43/27.18  																			| (175) greater(all_4_8_11, sigma) = all_33_1_45
% 66.43/27.18  																			|
% 66.43/27.18  																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (374), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.18  																			|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.18  																			| (817) all_19_1_27 = 0
% 66.43/27.18  																			|
% 66.43/27.18  																				| Equations (817) can reduce 811 to:
% 66.43/27.18  																				| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.18  																				|
% 66.43/27.18  																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.18  																			|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.18  																			| (811)  ~ (all_19_1_27 = 0)
% 66.43/27.18  																			| (820)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (organization(all_4_14_17) = v0 & age(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = zero) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 66.43/27.18  																			|
% 66.43/27.18  																				| Instantiating (820) with all_361_0_222, all_361_1_223 yields:
% 66.43/27.18  																				| (821) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_361_1_223 & age(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_361_0_222 & ( ~ (all_361_0_222 = zero) |  ~ (all_361_1_223 = 0))
% 66.43/27.18  																				|
% 66.43/27.18  																				| Applying alpha-rule on (821) yields:
% 66.43/27.18  																				| (822) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_361_1_223
% 66.43/27.18  																				| (823) age(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = all_361_0_222
% 66.43/27.18  																				| (824)  ~ (all_361_0_222 = zero) |  ~ (all_361_1_223 = 0)
% 66.43/27.18  																				|
% 66.43/27.18  																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (547), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.18  																				|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.18  																				| (825)  ~ (all_225_1_176 = 0)
% 66.43/27.18  																				|
% 66.43/27.18  																					| Equations (646) can reduce 825 to:
% 66.43/27.18  																					| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.18  																					|
% 66.43/27.18  																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.18  																				|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.18  																				| (646) all_225_1_176 = 0
% 66.43/27.18  																				| (828) all_225_0_175 = 0 &  ~ (all_21_1_31 = 0)
% 66.43/27.18  																				|
% 66.43/27.18  																					| Applying alpha-rule on (828) yields:
% 66.43/27.18  																					| (654) all_225_0_175 = 0
% 66.43/27.18  																					| (830)  ~ (all_21_1_31 = 0)
% 66.43/27.18  																					|
% 66.43/27.18  																					| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_361_1_223, 0 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_361_1_223, organization(all_4_14_17) = 0, yields:
% 66.43/27.18  																					| (831) all_361_1_223 = 0
% 66.43/27.18  																					|
% 66.43/27.18  																					| From (831) and (822) follows:
% 66.43/27.18  																					| (77) organization(all_4_14_17) = 0
% 66.43/27.18  																					|
% 66.43/27.18  																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (369), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.18  																					|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.18  																					| (833) all_21_1_31 = 0
% 66.43/27.18  																					|
% 66.43/27.18  																						| Equations (833) can reduce 830 to:
% 66.43/27.18  																						| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.18  																						|
% 66.43/27.18  																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.18  																					|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.18  																					| (830)  ~ (all_21_1_31 = 0)
% 66.43/27.18  																					| (836)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (organization(all_4_14_17) = v0 & age(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = zero) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 66.43/27.18  																					|
% 66.43/27.18  																						| Instantiating (836) with all_387_0_224, all_387_1_225 yields:
% 66.43/27.18  																						| (837) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_387_1_225 & age(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_387_0_224 & ( ~ (all_387_0_224 = zero) |  ~ (all_387_1_225 = 0))
% 66.43/27.18  																						|
% 66.43/27.18  																						| Applying alpha-rule on (837) yields:
% 66.43/27.18  																						| (838) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_387_1_225
% 66.43/27.18  																						| (839) age(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = all_387_0_224
% 66.43/27.18  																						| (840)  ~ (all_387_0_224 = zero) |  ~ (all_387_1_225 = 0)
% 66.43/27.18  																						|
% 66.43/27.18  																						| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_387_1_225, 0 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_387_1_225, organization(all_4_14_17) = 0, yields:
% 66.43/27.18  																						| (841) all_387_1_225 = 0
% 66.43/27.18  																						|
% 66.43/27.18  																						| From (841) and (838) follows:
% 66.43/27.18  																						| (77) organization(all_4_14_17) = 0
% 66.43/27.18  																						|
% 66.43/27.18  																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (403), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.18  																						|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.18  																						| (843)  ~ (has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = 0)
% 66.43/27.18  																						|
% 66.43/27.18  																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (401), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.18  																							|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.18  																							| (844)  ~ (has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = 0)
% 66.43/27.18  																							|
% 66.43/27.18  																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (382), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.18  																								|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.18  																								| (833) all_21_1_31 = 0
% 66.43/27.18  																								|
% 66.43/27.18  																									| Equations (833) can reduce 830 to:
% 66.43/27.18  																									| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.18  																									|
% 66.43/27.18  																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.18  																								|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.18  																								| (830)  ~ (all_21_1_31 = 0)
% 66.43/27.18  																								| (848)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13, all_4_13_16) = v1 & organization(all_4_14_17) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 66.43/27.18  																								|
% 66.43/27.18  																									| Instantiating (848) with all_417_0_226, all_417_1_227 yields:
% 66.43/27.18  																									| (849) dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13, all_4_13_16) = all_417_0_226 & organization(all_4_14_17) = all_417_1_227 & ( ~ (all_417_1_227 = 0) | all_417_0_226 = 0)
% 66.43/27.18  																									|
% 66.43/27.18  																									| Applying alpha-rule on (849) yields:
% 66.43/27.18  																									| (850) dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13, all_4_13_16) = all_417_0_226
% 66.43/27.18  																									| (851) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_417_1_227
% 66.43/27.18  																									| (852)  ~ (all_417_1_227 = 0) | all_417_0_226 = 0
% 66.43/27.18  																									|
% 66.43/27.18  																									| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_417_1_227, 0 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_417_1_227, organization(all_4_14_17) = 0, yields:
% 66.43/27.18  																									| (853) all_417_1_227 = 0
% 66.43/27.18  																									|
% 66.43/27.18  																									| Using (167) and (844) yields:
% 66.43/27.18  																									| (854)  ~ (all_25_2_39 = 0)
% 66.43/27.18  																									|
% 66.43/27.18  																									| Using (145) and (843) yields:
% 66.43/27.18  																									| (855)  ~ (all_17_2_24 = 0)
% 66.43/27.18  																									|
% 66.43/27.18  																									| From (853) and (851) follows:
% 66.43/27.18  																									| (77) organization(all_4_14_17) = 0
% 66.43/27.18  																									|
% 66.43/27.18  																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (583), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.18  																									|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.18  																									| (857)  ~ (all_243_3_198 = 0)
% 66.43/27.18  																									|
% 66.43/27.18  																										| Equations (799) can reduce 857 to:
% 66.43/27.18  																										| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.18  																										|
% 66.43/27.18  																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.18  																									|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.18  																									| (799) all_243_3_198 = 0
% 66.43/27.18  																									| (860) ( ~ (all_243_2_197 = 0) | all_243_1_196 = very_low) & (all_243_2_197 = 0 | (( ~ (all_243_0_195 = 0) | all_243_1_196 = mod2 | all_17_0_22 = 0) & ( ~ (all_17_0_22 = 0) | (( ~ (all_243_0_195 = 0) | all_243_1_196 = low) & (all_243_0_195 = 0 | all_243_1_196 = mod1))) & (all_243_0_195 = 0 | all_243_1_196 = high | all_17_0_22 = 0)))
% 66.43/27.18  																									|
% 66.43/27.18  																										| Applying alpha-rule on (860) yields:
% 66.43/27.18  																										| (861)  ~ (all_243_2_197 = 0) | all_243_1_196 = very_low
% 66.43/27.18  																										| (862) all_243_2_197 = 0 | (( ~ (all_243_0_195 = 0) | all_243_1_196 = mod2 | all_17_0_22 = 0) & ( ~ (all_17_0_22 = 0) | (( ~ (all_243_0_195 = 0) | all_243_1_196 = low) & (all_243_0_195 = 0 | all_243_1_196 = mod1))) & (all_243_0_195 = 0 | all_243_1_196 = high | all_17_0_22 = 0))
% 66.43/27.18  																										|
% 66.43/27.18  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (862), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.18  																										|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.18  																										| (863) all_243_2_197 = 0
% 66.43/27.18  																										|
% 66.43/27.18  																											| Combining equations (863,686) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.18  																											| (864) all_17_2_24 = 0
% 66.43/27.18  																											|
% 66.43/27.18  																											| Equations (864) can reduce 855 to:
% 66.43/27.18  																											| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.18  																											|
% 66.43/27.18  																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.18  																										|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.18  																										| (866)  ~ (all_243_2_197 = 0)
% 66.43/27.18  																										| (867) ( ~ (all_243_0_195 = 0) | all_243_1_196 = mod2 | all_17_0_22 = 0) & ( ~ (all_17_0_22 = 0) | (( ~ (all_243_0_195 = 0) | all_243_1_196 = low) & (all_243_0_195 = 0 | all_243_1_196 = mod1))) & (all_243_0_195 = 0 | all_243_1_196 = high | all_17_0_22 = 0)
% 66.43/27.18  																										|
% 66.43/27.18  																											| Applying alpha-rule on (867) yields:
% 66.43/27.18  																											| (868)  ~ (all_243_0_195 = 0) | all_243_1_196 = mod2 | all_17_0_22 = 0
% 66.43/27.19  																											| (869)  ~ (all_17_0_22 = 0) | (( ~ (all_243_0_195 = 0) | all_243_1_196 = low) & (all_243_0_195 = 0 | all_243_1_196 = mod1))
% 66.43/27.19  																											| (870) all_243_0_195 = 0 | all_243_1_196 = high | all_17_0_22 = 0
% 66.43/27.19  																											|
% 66.43/27.19  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (868), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.19  																											|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.19  																											| (871)  ~ (all_243_0_195 = 0)
% 66.43/27.19  																											|
% 66.43/27.19  																												| Equations (801) can reduce 871 to:
% 66.43/27.19  																												| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.19  																												|
% 66.43/27.19  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.19  																											|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.19  																											| (801) all_243_0_195 = 0
% 66.43/27.19  																											| (874) all_243_1_196 = mod2 | all_17_0_22 = 0
% 66.43/27.19  																											|
% 66.43/27.19  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (385), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.19  																												|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.19  																												| (817) all_19_1_27 = 0
% 66.43/27.19  																												|
% 66.43/27.19  																													| Equations (817) can reduce 811 to:
% 66.43/27.19  																													| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.19  																													|
% 66.43/27.19  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.19  																												|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.19  																												| (811)  ~ (all_19_1_27 = 0)
% 66.43/27.19  																												| (878)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14, all_4_13_16) = v1 & organization(all_4_14_17) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 66.43/27.19  																												|
% 66.43/27.19  																													| Instantiating (878) with all_443_0_228, all_443_1_229 yields:
% 66.43/27.19  																													| (879) dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14, all_4_13_16) = all_443_0_228 & organization(all_4_14_17) = all_443_1_229 & ( ~ (all_443_1_229 = 0) | all_443_0_228 = 0)
% 66.43/27.19  																													|
% 66.43/27.19  																													| Applying alpha-rule on (879) yields:
% 66.43/27.19  																													| (880) dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14, all_4_13_16) = all_443_0_228
% 66.43/27.19  																													| (881) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_443_1_229
% 66.43/27.19  																													| (882)  ~ (all_443_1_229 = 0) | all_443_0_228 = 0
% 66.43/27.19  																													|
% 66.43/27.19  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (874), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.19  																													|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.19  																													| (883) all_17_0_22 = 0
% 66.43/27.19  																													|
% 66.43/27.19  																														| Equations (883) can reduce 605 to:
% 66.43/27.19  																														| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.19  																														|
% 66.43/27.19  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.19  																													|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.19  																													| (605)  ~ (all_17_0_22 = 0)
% 66.43/27.19  																													| (886) all_243_1_196 = mod2
% 66.43/27.19  																													|
% 66.43/27.19  																														| Combining equations (886,800) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.19  																														| (887) all_4_0_3 = mod2
% 66.43/27.19  																														|
% 66.43/27.19  																														| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_443_1_229, 0 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_443_1_229, organization(all_4_14_17) = 0, yields:
% 66.43/27.19  																														| (888) all_443_1_229 = 0
% 66.43/27.19  																														|
% 66.43/27.19  																														| From (888) and (881) follows:
% 66.43/27.19  																														| (77) organization(all_4_14_17) = 0
% 66.43/27.19  																														|
% 66.43/27.19  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (399), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.19  																														|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.19  																														| (890)  ~ (has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = 0)
% 66.43/27.19  																														|
% 66.43/27.19  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (397), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.19  																															|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.19  																															| (891)  ~ (has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = 0)
% 66.43/27.19  																															|
% 66.43/27.19  																																| Using (156) and (891) yields:
% 66.43/27.19  																																| (892)  ~ (all_21_2_32 = 0)
% 66.43/27.19  																																|
% 66.43/27.19  																																| Using (150) and (890) yields:
% 66.43/27.19  																																| (893)  ~ (all_19_2_28 = 0)
% 66.43/27.19  																																|
% 66.43/27.19  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (568), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.19  																																|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.19  																																| (894)  ~ (all_235_3_188 = 0)
% 66.43/27.19  																																|
% 66.43/27.19  																																	| Equations (797) can reduce 894 to:
% 66.43/27.19  																																	| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.19  																																	|
% 66.43/27.19  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.19  																																|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.19  																																| (797) all_235_3_188 = 0
% 66.43/27.19  																																| (897) ( ~ (all_235_2_187 = 0) | all_235_1_186 = very_low) & (all_235_2_187 = 0 | (( ~ (all_235_0_185 = 0) | (( ~ (all_21_1_31 = 0) | all_235_1_186 = low) & (all_235_1_186 = mod1 | all_21_1_31 = 0))) & ( ~ (all_21_1_31 = 0) | all_235_0_185 = 0 | all_235_1_186 = mod2) & (all_235_0_185 = 0 | all_235_1_186 = high | all_21_1_31 = 0)))
% 66.43/27.19  																																|
% 66.43/27.19  																																	| Applying alpha-rule on (897) yields:
% 66.43/27.19  																																	| (898)  ~ (all_235_2_187 = 0) | all_235_1_186 = very_low
% 66.43/27.19  																																	| (899) all_235_2_187 = 0 | (( ~ (all_235_0_185 = 0) | (( ~ (all_21_1_31 = 0) | all_235_1_186 = low) & (all_235_1_186 = mod1 | all_21_1_31 = 0))) & ( ~ (all_21_1_31 = 0) | all_235_0_185 = 0 | all_235_1_186 = mod2) & (all_235_0_185 = 0 | all_235_1_186 = high | all_21_1_31 = 0))
% 66.43/27.19  																																	|
% 66.43/27.19  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (899), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.19  																																	|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.19  																																	| (900) all_235_2_187 = 0
% 66.43/27.19  																																	|
% 66.43/27.19  																																		| Combining equations (900,692) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.19  																																		| (901) all_21_2_32 = 0
% 66.43/27.19  																																		|
% 66.43/27.19  																																		| Equations (901) can reduce 892 to:
% 66.43/27.19  																																		| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.19  																																		|
% 66.43/27.19  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.19  																																	|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.19  																																	| (903)  ~ (all_235_2_187 = 0)
% 66.43/27.19  																																	| (904) ( ~ (all_235_0_185 = 0) | (( ~ (all_21_1_31 = 0) | all_235_1_186 = low) & (all_235_1_186 = mod1 | all_21_1_31 = 0))) & ( ~ (all_21_1_31 = 0) | all_235_0_185 = 0 | all_235_1_186 = mod2) & (all_235_0_185 = 0 | all_235_1_186 = high | all_21_1_31 = 0)
% 66.43/27.19  																																	|
% 66.43/27.19  																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (904) yields:
% 66.43/27.19  																																		| (905)  ~ (all_235_0_185 = 0) | (( ~ (all_21_1_31 = 0) | all_235_1_186 = low) & (all_235_1_186 = mod1 | all_21_1_31 = 0))
% 66.43/27.19  																																		| (906)  ~ (all_21_1_31 = 0) | all_235_0_185 = 0 | all_235_1_186 = mod2
% 66.43/27.19  																																		| (907) all_235_0_185 = 0 | all_235_1_186 = high | all_21_1_31 = 0
% 66.43/27.19  																																		|
% 66.43/27.19  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (905), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.19  																																		|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.19  																																		| (908)  ~ (all_235_0_185 = 0)
% 66.43/27.19  																																		|
% 66.43/27.19  																																			| Equations (632) can reduce 908 to:
% 66.43/27.19  																																			| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.19  																																			|
% 66.43/27.19  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.19  																																		|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.19  																																		| (632) all_235_0_185 = 0
% 66.43/27.19  																																		| (911) ( ~ (all_21_1_31 = 0) | all_235_1_186 = low) & (all_235_1_186 = mod1 | all_21_1_31 = 0)
% 66.43/27.19  																																		|
% 66.43/27.19  																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (911) yields:
% 66.43/27.19  																																			| (912)  ~ (all_21_1_31 = 0) | all_235_1_186 = low
% 66.43/27.19  																																			| (913) all_235_1_186 = mod1 | all_21_1_31 = 0
% 66.43/27.19  																																			|
% 66.43/27.19  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (913), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.19  																																			|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.19  																																			| (833) all_21_1_31 = 0
% 66.43/27.19  																																			|
% 66.43/27.19  																																				| Equations (833) can reduce 830 to:
% 66.43/27.19  																																				| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.19  																																				|
% 66.43/27.19  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.19  																																			|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.19  																																			| (830)  ~ (all_21_1_31 = 0)
% 66.43/27.19  																																			| (917) all_235_1_186 = mod1
% 66.43/27.19  																																			|
% 66.43/27.19  																																				| Combining equations (917,691) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.19  																																				| (918) all_4_5_8 = mod1
% 66.43/27.19  																																				|
% 66.43/27.19  																																				| From (918) and (72) follows:
% 66.43/27.19  																																				| (919) smaller(mod1, all_4_4_7) = all_4_3_6
% 66.43/27.19  																																				|
% 66.43/27.19  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (455), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.19  																																				|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.19  																																				| (920)  ~ (all_189_3_124 = 0)
% 66.43/27.19  																																				|
% 66.43/27.19  																																					| Equations (780) can reduce 920 to:
% 66.43/27.19  																																					| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.19  																																					|
% 66.43/27.19  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.19  																																				|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.19  																																				| (780) all_189_3_124 = 0
% 66.43/27.19  																																				| (923) ( ~ (all_19_2_28 = 0) | all_189_2_123 = very_low) & (all_19_2_28 = 0 | (( ~ (all_189_0_121 = 0) | (( ~ (all_189_1_122 = 0) | all_189_2_123 = low) & (all_189_1_122 = 0 | all_189_2_123 = mod1))) & ( ~ (all_189_1_122 = 0) | all_189_0_121 = 0 | all_189_2_123 = mod2) & (all_189_0_121 = 0 | all_189_1_122 = 0 | all_189_2_123 = high)))
% 66.43/27.19  																																				|
% 66.43/27.19  																																					| Applying alpha-rule on (923) yields:
% 66.43/27.19  																																					| (924)  ~ (all_19_2_28 = 0) | all_189_2_123 = very_low
% 66.43/27.19  																																					| (925) all_19_2_28 = 0 | (( ~ (all_189_0_121 = 0) | (( ~ (all_189_1_122 = 0) | all_189_2_123 = low) & (all_189_1_122 = 0 | all_189_2_123 = mod1))) & ( ~ (all_189_1_122 = 0) | all_189_0_121 = 0 | all_189_2_123 = mod2) & (all_189_0_121 = 0 | all_189_1_122 = 0 | all_189_2_123 = high))
% 66.43/27.19  																																					|
% 66.43/27.19  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (925), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.19  																																					|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.19  																																					| (926) all_19_2_28 = 0
% 66.43/27.19  																																					|
% 66.43/27.19  																																						| Equations (926) can reduce 893 to:
% 66.43/27.19  																																						| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.19  																																						|
% 66.43/27.19  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.19  																																					|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.19  																																					| (893)  ~ (all_19_2_28 = 0)
% 66.43/27.19  																																					| (929) ( ~ (all_189_0_121 = 0) | (( ~ (all_189_1_122 = 0) | all_189_2_123 = low) & (all_189_1_122 = 0 | all_189_2_123 = mod1))) & ( ~ (all_189_1_122 = 0) | all_189_0_121 = 0 | all_189_2_123 = mod2) & (all_189_0_121 = 0 | all_189_1_122 = 0 | all_189_2_123 = high)
% 66.43/27.19  																																					|
% 66.43/27.19  																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (929) yields:
% 66.43/27.19  																																						| (930)  ~ (all_189_0_121 = 0) | (( ~ (all_189_1_122 = 0) | all_189_2_123 = low) & (all_189_1_122 = 0 | all_189_2_123 = mod1))
% 66.43/27.19  																																						| (931)  ~ (all_189_1_122 = 0) | all_189_0_121 = 0 | all_189_2_123 = mod2
% 66.43/27.19  																																						| (932) all_189_0_121 = 0 | all_189_1_122 = 0 | all_189_2_123 = high
% 66.43/27.19  																																						|
% 66.43/27.19  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (932), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.19  																																						|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.19  																																						| (933) all_189_0_121 = 0
% 66.43/27.19  																																						|
% 66.43/27.19  																																							| Combining equations (736,933) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.19  																																							| (934) all_19_0_26 = 0
% 66.43/27.19  																																							|
% 66.43/27.19  																																							| Simplifying 934 yields:
% 66.43/27.19  																																							| (935) all_19_0_26 = 0
% 66.43/27.19  																																							|
% 66.43/27.19  																																							| Equations (935) can reduce 333 to:
% 66.43/27.19  																																							| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.19  																																							|
% 66.43/27.19  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.19  																																						|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.19  																																						| (937)  ~ (all_189_0_121 = 0)
% 66.43/27.19  																																						| (938) all_189_1_122 = 0 | all_189_2_123 = high
% 66.43/27.19  																																						|
% 66.43/27.19  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (938), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.19  																																							|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.19  																																							| (939) all_189_1_122 = 0
% 66.43/27.19  																																							|
% 66.43/27.19  																																								| Combining equations (775,939) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.19  																																								| (940) all_19_1_27 = 0
% 66.43/27.19  																																								|
% 66.43/27.19  																																								| Simplifying 940 yields:
% 66.43/27.19  																																								| (817) all_19_1_27 = 0
% 66.43/27.19  																																								|
% 66.43/27.19  																																								| Equations (817) can reduce 811 to:
% 66.43/27.19  																																								| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.19  																																								|
% 66.43/27.19  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.19  																																							|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.19  																																							| (943)  ~ (all_189_1_122 = 0)
% 66.43/27.19  																																							| (944) all_189_2_123 = high
% 66.43/27.19  																																							|
% 66.43/27.19  																																								| Combining equations (737,944) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.19  																																								| (945) all_4_2_5 = high
% 66.43/27.19  																																								|
% 66.43/27.19  																																								| Simplifying 945 yields:
% 66.43/27.19  																																								| (946) all_4_2_5 = high
% 66.43/27.19  																																								|
% 66.43/27.19  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (117), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.19  																																								|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.19  																																								| (947) greater(all_4_4_7, all_4_5_8) = 0
% 66.43/27.19  																																								|
% 66.43/27.19  																																									| From (918) and (947) follows:
% 66.43/27.19  																																									| (948) greater(all_4_4_7, mod1) = 0
% 66.43/27.19  																																									|
% 66.43/27.19  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (120), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.19  																																									|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.19  																																									| (949) all_4_3_6 = 0
% 66.43/27.19  																																									|
% 66.43/27.19  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (115), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.19  																																										|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.19  																																										| (950) greater(all_4_2_5, all_4_4_7) = 0
% 66.43/27.19  																																										|
% 66.43/27.19  																																											| From (946) and (950) follows:
% 66.43/27.19  																																											| (951) greater(high, all_4_4_7) = 0
% 66.43/27.19  																																											|
% 66.43/27.19  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (116), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.19  																																											|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.19  																																											| (952) all_4_1_4 = 0
% 66.43/27.19  																																											|
% 66.43/27.19  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (82), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.19  																																												|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.19  																																												| (953)  ~ (all_4_1_4 = 0)
% 66.43/27.19  																																												|
% 66.43/27.19  																																													| Equations (952) can reduce 953 to:
% 66.43/27.19  																																													| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.19  																																													|
% 66.43/27.19  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.19  																																												|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.19  																																												| (952) all_4_1_4 = 0
% 66.43/27.19  																																												| (956)  ~ (all_4_0_3 = all_4_4_7) |  ~ (all_4_3_6 = 0)
% 66.43/27.19  																																												|
% 66.43/27.19  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (956), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.19  																																													|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.19  																																													| (957)  ~ (all_4_3_6 = 0)
% 66.43/27.19  																																													|
% 66.43/27.19  																																														| Equations (949) can reduce 957 to:
% 66.43/27.19  																																														| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.19  																																														|
% 66.43/27.19  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.19  																																													|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.19  																																													| (949) all_4_3_6 = 0
% 66.43/27.19  																																													| (960)  ~ (all_4_0_3 = all_4_4_7)
% 66.43/27.19  																																													|
% 66.43/27.19  																																														| Equations (887) can reduce 960 to:
% 66.43/27.19  																																														| (961)  ~ (all_4_4_7 = mod2)
% 66.43/27.19  																																														|
% 66.43/27.19  																																														| Simplifying 961 yields:
% 66.43/27.19  																																														| (962)  ~ (all_4_4_7 = mod2)
% 66.43/27.19  																																														|
% 66.43/27.19  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (90), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.19  																																														|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.19  																																														| (963)  ~ (hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_4_2_5)
% 66.43/27.19  																																														|
% 66.43/27.19  																																															| From (946) and (963) follows:
% 66.43/27.19  																																															| (964)  ~ (hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = high)
% 66.43/27.20  																																															|
% 66.43/27.20  																																															| Using (71) and (964) yields:
% 66.43/27.20  																																															| (965)  ~ (all_4_4_7 = high)
% 66.43/27.20  																																															|
% 66.43/27.20  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (89), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.20  																																															|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.20  																																															| (966)  ~ (hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_4_5_8)
% 66.43/27.20  																																															|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																| From (918) and (966) follows:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																| (967)  ~ (hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = mod1)
% 66.43/27.20  																																																|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																| Using (71) and (967) yields:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																| (968)  ~ (all_4_4_7 = mod1)
% 66.43/27.20  																																																|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																| Instantiating formula (61) with low, mod1, all_4_4_7 and discharging atoms greater(all_4_4_7, mod1) = 0, greater(mod1, low) = 0, yields:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																| (969) greater(all_4_4_7, low) = 0
% 66.43/27.20  																																																|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																| Instantiating formula (62) with all_4_4_7, mod1 and discharging atoms greater(all_4_4_7, mod1) = 0, yields:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																| (970)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater(mod1, all_4_4_7) = v0)
% 66.43/27.20  																																																|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																| Instantiating formula (61) with all_4_4_7, low, mod1 and discharging atoms greater(mod1, low) = 0, yields:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																| (971)  ~ (greater(low, all_4_4_7) = 0) | greater(mod1, all_4_4_7) = 0
% 66.43/27.20  																																																|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																| Instantiating (970) with all_887_0_234 yields:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																| (972)  ~ (all_887_0_234 = 0) & greater(mod1, all_4_4_7) = all_887_0_234
% 66.43/27.20  																																																|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																| Applying alpha-rule on (972) yields:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																| (973)  ~ (all_887_0_234 = 0)
% 66.43/27.20  																																																| (974) greater(mod1, all_4_4_7) = all_887_0_234
% 66.43/27.20  																																																|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (971), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.20  																																																|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																| (975)  ~ (greater(low, all_4_4_7) = 0)
% 66.43/27.20  																																																|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (388), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.20  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																	| (976) all_25_1_38 = 0
% 66.43/27.20  																																																	|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																		| Combining equations (976,640) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																		| (977) all_219_0_165 = 0
% 66.43/27.20  																																																		|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (165), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.20  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																		| (978)  ~ (all_25_3_40 = 0)
% 66.43/27.20  																																																		|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																			| Equations (269) can reduce 978 to:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																			| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.20  																																																			|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.20  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																		| (269) all_25_3_40 = 0
% 66.43/27.20  																																																		| (981) ( ~ (all_25_2_39 = 0) | all_4_4_7 = very_low) & (all_25_2_39 = 0 | (( ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0) | (( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_4_4_7 = low) & (all_25_1_38 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = mod1))) & ( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_25_0_37 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = mod2) & (all_25_0_37 = 0 | all_25_1_38 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = high)))
% 66.43/27.20  																																																		|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (981) yields:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																			| (982)  ~ (all_25_2_39 = 0) | all_4_4_7 = very_low
% 66.43/27.20  																																																			| (983) all_25_2_39 = 0 | (( ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0) | (( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_4_4_7 = low) & (all_25_1_38 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = mod1))) & ( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_25_0_37 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = mod2) & (all_25_0_37 = 0 | all_25_1_38 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = high))
% 66.43/27.20  																																																			|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (983), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.20  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																			| (984) all_25_2_39 = 0
% 66.43/27.20  																																																			|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																				| Equations (984) can reduce 854 to:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																				| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.20  																																																				|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.20  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																			| (854)  ~ (all_25_2_39 = 0)
% 66.43/27.20  																																																			| (987) ( ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0) | (( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_4_4_7 = low) & (all_25_1_38 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = mod1))) & ( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_25_0_37 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = mod2) & (all_25_0_37 = 0 | all_25_1_38 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = high)
% 66.43/27.20  																																																			|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																				| Applying alpha-rule on (987) yields:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																				| (988)  ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0) | (( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_4_4_7 = low) & (all_25_1_38 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = mod1))
% 66.43/27.20  																																																				| (989)  ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_25_0_37 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = mod2
% 66.43/27.20  																																																				| (990) all_25_0_37 = 0 | all_25_1_38 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = high
% 66.43/27.20  																																																				|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (989), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.20  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																				| (991)  ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0)
% 66.43/27.20  																																																				|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																					| Equations (976) can reduce 991 to:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																					| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.20  																																																					|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.20  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																				| (976) all_25_1_38 = 0
% 66.43/27.20  																																																				| (994) all_25_0_37 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = mod2
% 66.43/27.20  																																																				|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (994), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.20  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																					| (995) all_25_0_37 = 0
% 66.43/27.20  																																																					|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (531), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.20  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																						| (996)  ~ (all_219_3_168 = 0)
% 66.43/27.20  																																																						|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																							| Equations (739) can reduce 996 to:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																							| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.20  																																																							|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.20  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																						| (739) all_219_3_168 = 0
% 66.43/27.20  																																																						| (999) ( ~ (all_219_2_167 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = very_low) & (all_219_2_167 = 0 | (( ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = mod2 | all_25_0_37 = 0) & ( ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0) | (( ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = low) & (all_219_0_165 = 0 | all_219_1_166 = mod1))) & (all_219_0_165 = 0 | all_219_1_166 = high | all_25_0_37 = 0)))
% 66.43/27.20  																																																						|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																							| Applying alpha-rule on (999) yields:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																							| (1000)  ~ (all_219_2_167 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = very_low
% 66.43/27.20  																																																							| (1001) all_219_2_167 = 0 | (( ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = mod2 | all_25_0_37 = 0) & ( ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0) | (( ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = low) & (all_219_0_165 = 0 | all_219_1_166 = mod1))) & (all_219_0_165 = 0 | all_219_1_166 = high | all_25_0_37 = 0))
% 66.43/27.20  																																																							|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1001), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.20  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																							| (1002) all_219_2_167 = 0
% 66.43/27.20  																																																							|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																								| Combining equations (684,1002) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																								| (1003) all_25_2_39 = 0
% 66.43/27.20  																																																								|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																								| Simplifying 1003 yields:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																								| (984) all_25_2_39 = 0
% 66.43/27.20  																																																								|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																								| Equations (984) can reduce 854 to:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																								| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.20  																																																								|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.20  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																							| (1006)  ~ (all_219_2_167 = 0)
% 66.43/27.20  																																																							| (1007) ( ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = mod2 | all_25_0_37 = 0) & ( ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0) | (( ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = low) & (all_219_0_165 = 0 | all_219_1_166 = mod1))) & (all_219_0_165 = 0 | all_219_1_166 = high | all_25_0_37 = 0)
% 66.43/27.20  																																																							|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																								| Applying alpha-rule on (1007) yields:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																								| (1008)  ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = mod2 | all_25_0_37 = 0
% 66.43/27.20  																																																								| (1009)  ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0) | (( ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = low) & (all_219_0_165 = 0 | all_219_1_166 = mod1))
% 66.43/27.20  																																																								| (1010) all_219_0_165 = 0 | all_219_1_166 = high | all_25_0_37 = 0
% 66.43/27.20  																																																								|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1009), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.20  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																								| (1011)  ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0)
% 66.43/27.20  																																																								|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																									| Equations (995) can reduce 1011 to:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																									| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.20  																																																									|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.20  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																								| (995) all_25_0_37 = 0
% 66.43/27.20  																																																								| (1014) ( ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = low) & (all_219_0_165 = 0 | all_219_1_166 = mod1)
% 66.43/27.20  																																																								|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																									| Applying alpha-rule on (1014) yields:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																									| (1015)  ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = low
% 66.43/27.20  																																																									| (1016) all_219_0_165 = 0 | all_219_1_166 = mod1
% 66.43/27.20  																																																									|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1015), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.20  																																																									|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																									| (1017)  ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0)
% 66.43/27.20  																																																									|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																										| Equations (977) can reduce 1017 to:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																										| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.20  																																																										|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.20  																																																									|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																									| (977) all_219_0_165 = 0
% 66.43/27.20  																																																									| (1020) all_219_1_166 = low
% 66.43/27.20  																																																									|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																										| Combining equations (626,1020) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																										| (1021) all_4_4_7 = low
% 66.43/27.20  																																																										|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																										| Simplifying 1021 yields:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																										| (1022) all_4_4_7 = low
% 66.43/27.20  																																																										|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																										| From (1022) and (969) follows:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																										| (1023) greater(low, low) = 0
% 66.43/27.20  																																																										|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																										| From (1022) and (975) follows:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																										| (1024)  ~ (greater(low, low) = 0)
% 66.43/27.20  																																																										|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																										| Using (1023) and (1024) yields:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																										| (222) $false
% 66.43/27.20  																																																										|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.20  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																					| (1011)  ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0)
% 66.43/27.20  																																																					| (1027) all_4_4_7 = mod2
% 66.43/27.20  																																																					|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																						| Equations (1027) can reduce 962 to:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																						| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.20  																																																						|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.20  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																	| (991)  ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0)
% 66.43/27.20  																																																	| (1030)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_4_12_15) = v1 & organization(all_4_14_17) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 66.43/27.20  																																																	|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (165), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.20  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																		| (978)  ~ (all_25_3_40 = 0)
% 66.43/27.20  																																																		|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																			| Equations (269) can reduce 978 to:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																			| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.20  																																																			|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.20  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																		| (269) all_25_3_40 = 0
% 66.43/27.20  																																																		| (981) ( ~ (all_25_2_39 = 0) | all_4_4_7 = very_low) & (all_25_2_39 = 0 | (( ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0) | (( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_4_4_7 = low) & (all_25_1_38 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = mod1))) & ( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_25_0_37 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = mod2) & (all_25_0_37 = 0 | all_25_1_38 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = high)))
% 66.43/27.20  																																																		|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (981) yields:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																			| (982)  ~ (all_25_2_39 = 0) | all_4_4_7 = very_low
% 66.43/27.20  																																																			| (983) all_25_2_39 = 0 | (( ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0) | (( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_4_4_7 = low) & (all_25_1_38 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = mod1))) & ( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_25_0_37 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = mod2) & (all_25_0_37 = 0 | all_25_1_38 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = high))
% 66.43/27.20  																																																			|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (531), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.20  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																			| (996)  ~ (all_219_3_168 = 0)
% 66.43/27.20  																																																			|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																				| Equations (739) can reduce 996 to:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																				| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.20  																																																				|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.20  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																			| (739) all_219_3_168 = 0
% 66.43/27.20  																																																			| (999) ( ~ (all_219_2_167 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = very_low) & (all_219_2_167 = 0 | (( ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = mod2 | all_25_0_37 = 0) & ( ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0) | (( ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = low) & (all_219_0_165 = 0 | all_219_1_166 = mod1))) & (all_219_0_165 = 0 | all_219_1_166 = high | all_25_0_37 = 0)))
% 66.43/27.20  																																																			|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																				| Applying alpha-rule on (999) yields:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																				| (1000)  ~ (all_219_2_167 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = very_low
% 66.43/27.20  																																																				| (1001) all_219_2_167 = 0 | (( ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = mod2 | all_25_0_37 = 0) & ( ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0) | (( ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = low) & (all_219_0_165 = 0 | all_219_1_166 = mod1))) & (all_219_0_165 = 0 | all_219_1_166 = high | all_25_0_37 = 0))
% 66.43/27.20  																																																				|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1001), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.20  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																				| (1002) all_219_2_167 = 0
% 66.43/27.20  																																																				|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																					| Combining equations (684,1002) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																					| (1003) all_25_2_39 = 0
% 66.43/27.20  																																																					|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																					| Simplifying 1003 yields:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																					| (984) all_25_2_39 = 0
% 66.43/27.20  																																																					|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																					| Equations (984) can reduce 854 to:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																					| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.20  																																																					|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.20  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																				| (1006)  ~ (all_219_2_167 = 0)
% 66.43/27.20  																																																				| (1007) ( ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = mod2 | all_25_0_37 = 0) & ( ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0) | (( ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = low) & (all_219_0_165 = 0 | all_219_1_166 = mod1))) & (all_219_0_165 = 0 | all_219_1_166 = high | all_25_0_37 = 0)
% 66.43/27.20  																																																				|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																					| Applying alpha-rule on (1007) yields:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																					| (1008)  ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = mod2 | all_25_0_37 = 0
% 66.43/27.20  																																																					| (1009)  ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0) | (( ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = low) & (all_219_0_165 = 0 | all_219_1_166 = mod1))
% 66.43/27.20  																																																					| (1010) all_219_0_165 = 0 | all_219_1_166 = high | all_25_0_37 = 0
% 66.43/27.20  																																																					|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																					| Equations (684) can reduce 1006 to:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																					| (854)  ~ (all_25_2_39 = 0)
% 66.43/27.20  																																																					|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1009), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.20  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																					| (1011)  ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0)
% 66.43/27.20  																																																					|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (983), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.20  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																						| (984) all_25_2_39 = 0
% 66.43/27.20  																																																						|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																							| Equations (984) can reduce 854 to:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																							| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.20  																																																							|
% 66.43/27.20  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.20  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.20  																																																						| (854)  ~ (all_25_2_39 = 0)
% 66.43/27.20  																																																						| (987) ( ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0) | (( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_4_4_7 = low) & (all_25_1_38 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = mod1))) & ( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_25_0_37 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = mod2) & (all_25_0_37 = 0 | all_25_1_38 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = high)
% 66.43/27.21  																																																						|
% 66.43/27.21  																																																							| Applying alpha-rule on (987) yields:
% 66.43/27.21  																																																							| (988)  ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0) | (( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_4_4_7 = low) & (all_25_1_38 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = mod1))
% 66.43/27.21  																																																							| (989)  ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_25_0_37 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = mod2
% 66.43/27.21  																																																							| (990) all_25_0_37 = 0 | all_25_1_38 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = high
% 66.43/27.21  																																																							|
% 66.43/27.21  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (990), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.21  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.21  																																																							| (995) all_25_0_37 = 0
% 66.43/27.21  																																																							|
% 66.43/27.21  																																																								| Equations (995) can reduce 1011 to:
% 66.43/27.21  																																																								| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.21  																																																								|
% 66.43/27.21  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.21  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.21  																																																							| (1011)  ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0)
% 66.43/27.21  																																																							| (1064) all_25_1_38 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = high
% 66.43/27.21  																																																							|
% 66.43/27.21  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1064), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.21  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.21  																																																								| (976) all_25_1_38 = 0
% 66.43/27.21  																																																								|
% 66.43/27.21  																																																									| Equations (976) can reduce 991 to:
% 66.43/27.21  																																																									| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.21  																																																									|
% 66.43/27.21  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.21  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.21  																																																								| (991)  ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0)
% 66.43/27.21  																																																								| (1068) all_4_4_7 = high
% 66.43/27.21  																																																								|
% 66.43/27.21  																																																									| Equations (1068) can reduce 965 to:
% 66.43/27.21  																																																									| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.21  																																																									|
% 66.43/27.21  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.21  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.21  																																																					| (995) all_25_0_37 = 0
% 66.43/27.21  																																																					| (1014) ( ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = low) & (all_219_0_165 = 0 | all_219_1_166 = mod1)
% 66.43/27.21  																																																					|
% 66.43/27.21  																																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (1014) yields:
% 66.43/27.21  																																																						| (1015)  ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = low
% 66.43/27.21  																																																						| (1016) all_219_0_165 = 0 | all_219_1_166 = mod1
% 66.43/27.21  																																																						|
% 66.43/27.21  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1016), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.21  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.21  																																																						| (977) all_219_0_165 = 0
% 66.43/27.21  																																																						|
% 66.43/27.21  																																																							| Combining equations (640,977) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.21  																																																							| (1075) all_25_1_38 = 0
% 66.43/27.21  																																																							|
% 66.43/27.21  																																																							| Simplifying 1075 yields:
% 66.43/27.21  																																																							| (976) all_25_1_38 = 0
% 66.43/27.21  																																																							|
% 66.43/27.21  																																																							| Equations (976) can reduce 991 to:
% 66.43/27.21  																																																							| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.21  																																																							|
% 66.43/27.21  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.21  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.21  																																																						| (1017)  ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0)
% 66.43/27.21  																																																						| (1079) all_219_1_166 = mod1
% 66.43/27.21  																																																						|
% 66.43/27.21  																																																							| Combining equations (626,1079) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.21  																																																							| (1080) all_4_4_7 = mod1
% 66.43/27.21  																																																							|
% 66.43/27.21  																																																							| Simplifying 1080 yields:
% 66.43/27.21  																																																							| (1081) all_4_4_7 = mod1
% 66.43/27.21  																																																							|
% 66.43/27.21  																																																							| Equations (1081) can reduce 968 to:
% 66.43/27.21  																																																							| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.21  																																																							|
% 66.43/27.21  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.21  																																																|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.21  																																																| (1083) greater(low, all_4_4_7) = 0
% 66.43/27.21  																																																| (1084) greater(mod1, all_4_4_7) = 0
% 66.43/27.21  																																																|
% 66.43/27.21  																																																	| Instantiating formula (5) with mod1, all_4_4_7, 0, all_887_0_234 and discharging atoms greater(mod1, all_4_4_7) = all_887_0_234, greater(mod1, all_4_4_7) = 0, yields:
% 66.43/27.21  																																																	| (1085) all_887_0_234 = 0
% 66.43/27.21  																																																	|
% 66.43/27.21  																																																	| Equations (1085) can reduce 973 to:
% 66.43/27.21  																																																	| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.21  																																																	|
% 66.43/27.21  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.21  																																															|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.21  																																															| (1087) hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_4_5_8
% 66.43/27.21  																																															| (1088) all_4_4_7 = all_4_5_8
% 66.43/27.21  																																															|
% 66.43/27.21  																																																| Combining equations (918,1088) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.21  																																																| (1081) all_4_4_7 = mod1
% 66.43/27.21  																																																|
% 66.43/27.21  																																																| From (1081) and (948) follows:
% 66.43/27.21  																																																| (1090) greater(mod1, mod1) = 0
% 66.43/27.21  																																																|
% 66.43/27.21  																																																| Instantiating formula (62) with mod1, mod1 and discharging atoms greater(mod1, mod1) = 0, yields:
% 66.43/27.21  																																																| (1091)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater(mod1, mod1) = v0)
% 66.43/27.21  																																																|
% 66.43/27.21  																																																| Instantiating (1091) with all_891_0_365 yields:
% 66.43/27.21  																																																| (1092)  ~ (all_891_0_365 = 0) & greater(mod1, mod1) = all_891_0_365
% 66.43/27.21  																																																|
% 66.43/27.21  																																																| Applying alpha-rule on (1092) yields:
% 66.43/27.21  																																																| (1093)  ~ (all_891_0_365 = 0)
% 66.43/27.21  																																																| (1094) greater(mod1, mod1) = all_891_0_365
% 66.43/27.21  																																																|
% 66.43/27.21  																																																| Instantiating formula (5) with mod1, mod1, all_891_0_365, 0 and discharging atoms greater(mod1, mod1) = all_891_0_365, greater(mod1, mod1) = 0, yields:
% 66.43/27.21  																																																| (1095) all_891_0_365 = 0
% 66.43/27.21  																																																|
% 66.43/27.21  																																																| Equations (1095) can reduce 1093 to:
% 66.43/27.21  																																																| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.21  																																																|
% 66.43/27.21  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.21  																																														|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.21  																																														| (1097) hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_4_2_5
% 66.43/27.21  																																														| (1098) all_4_2_5 = all_4_4_7
% 66.43/27.21  																																														|
% 66.43/27.21  																																															| Combining equations (946,1098) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.21  																																															| (1068) all_4_4_7 = high
% 66.43/27.21  																																															|
% 66.43/27.21  																																															| From (1068) and (951) follows:
% 66.43/27.21  																																															| (1100) greater(high, high) = 0
% 66.43/27.21  																																															|
% 66.43/27.21  																																															| Instantiating formula (62) with high, high and discharging atoms greater(high, high) = 0, yields:
% 66.43/27.21  																																															| (1101)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater(high, high) = v0)
% 66.43/27.21  																																															|
% 66.43/27.21  																																															| Instantiating (1101) with all_877_0_442 yields:
% 66.43/27.21  																																															| (1102)  ~ (all_877_0_442 = 0) & greater(high, high) = all_877_0_442
% 66.43/27.21  																																															|
% 66.43/27.21  																																															| Applying alpha-rule on (1102) yields:
% 66.43/27.21  																																															| (1103)  ~ (all_877_0_442 = 0)
% 66.43/27.21  																																															| (1104) greater(high, high) = all_877_0_442
% 66.43/27.21  																																															|
% 66.43/27.21  																																															| Instantiating formula (5) with high, high, all_877_0_442, 0 and discharging atoms greater(high, high) = all_877_0_442, greater(high, high) = 0, yields:
% 66.43/27.21  																																															| (1105) all_877_0_442 = 0
% 66.43/27.21  																																															|
% 66.43/27.21  																																															| Equations (1105) can reduce 1103 to:
% 66.43/27.21  																																															| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.21  																																															|
% 66.43/27.21  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.21  																																											|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.21  																																											| (953)  ~ (all_4_1_4 = 0)
% 66.43/27.21  																																											| (1108)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater(all_4_2_5, all_4_4_7) = v0)
% 66.43/27.21  																																											|
% 66.43/27.21  																																												| Instantiating (1108) with all_721_0_534 yields:
% 66.43/27.21  																																												| (1109)  ~ (all_721_0_534 = 0) & greater(all_4_2_5, all_4_4_7) = all_721_0_534
% 66.43/27.21  																																												|
% 66.43/27.21  																																												| Applying alpha-rule on (1109) yields:
% 66.43/27.21  																																												| (1110)  ~ (all_721_0_534 = 0)
% 66.43/27.21  																																												| (1111) greater(all_4_2_5, all_4_4_7) = all_721_0_534
% 66.43/27.21  																																												|
% 66.43/27.21  																																												| From (946) and (1111) follows:
% 66.43/27.21  																																												| (1112) greater(high, all_4_4_7) = all_721_0_534
% 66.43/27.21  																																												|
% 66.43/27.21  																																												| Instantiating formula (5) with high, all_4_4_7, 0, all_721_0_534 and discharging atoms greater(high, all_4_4_7) = all_721_0_534, greater(high, all_4_4_7) = 0, yields:
% 66.43/27.21  																																												| (1113) all_721_0_534 = 0
% 66.43/27.21  																																												|
% 66.43/27.21  																																												| Equations (1113) can reduce 1110 to:
% 66.43/27.21  																																												| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.21  																																												|
% 66.43/27.21  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.21  																																										|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.21  																																										| (1115)  ~ (greater(all_4_2_5, all_4_4_7) = 0)
% 66.43/27.21  																																										| (1116)  ~ (smaller(all_4_4_7, all_4_2_5) = 0)
% 66.43/27.21  																																										|
% 66.43/27.21  																																											| From (946) and (1115) follows:
% 66.43/27.21  																																											| (1117)  ~ (greater(high, all_4_4_7) = 0)
% 66.43/27.21  																																											|
% 66.43/27.21  																																											| Using (49) and (1117) yields:
% 66.43/27.21  																																											| (962)  ~ (all_4_4_7 = mod2)
% 66.43/27.21  																																											|
% 66.43/27.21  																																											| Using (37) and (1117) yields:
% 66.43/27.21  																																											| (968)  ~ (all_4_4_7 = mod1)
% 66.43/27.21  																																											|
% 66.43/27.21  																																											| Using (111) and (1117) yields:
% 66.43/27.21  																																											| (1120)  ~ (all_4_4_7 = low)
% 66.43/27.21  																																											|
% 66.43/27.21  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (165), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.21  																																											|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.21  																																											| (978)  ~ (all_25_3_40 = 0)
% 66.43/27.21  																																											|
% 66.43/27.21  																																												| Equations (269) can reduce 978 to:
% 66.43/27.21  																																												| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.21  																																												|
% 66.43/27.21  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.21  																																											|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.21  																																											| (269) all_25_3_40 = 0
% 66.43/27.21  																																											| (981) ( ~ (all_25_2_39 = 0) | all_4_4_7 = very_low) & (all_25_2_39 = 0 | (( ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0) | (( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_4_4_7 = low) & (all_25_1_38 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = mod1))) & ( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_25_0_37 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = mod2) & (all_25_0_37 = 0 | all_25_1_38 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = high)))
% 66.43/27.21  																																											|
% 66.43/27.21  																																												| Applying alpha-rule on (981) yields:
% 66.43/27.21  																																												| (982)  ~ (all_25_2_39 = 0) | all_4_4_7 = very_low
% 66.43/27.21  																																												| (983) all_25_2_39 = 0 | (( ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0) | (( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_4_4_7 = low) & (all_25_1_38 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = mod1))) & ( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_25_0_37 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = mod2) & (all_25_0_37 = 0 | all_25_1_38 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = high))
% 66.43/27.21  																																												|
% 66.43/27.21  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (983), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.21  																																												|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.21  																																												| (984) all_25_2_39 = 0
% 66.43/27.21  																																												|
% 66.43/27.21  																																													| Equations (984) can reduce 854 to:
% 66.43/27.21  																																													| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.21  																																													|
% 66.43/27.21  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.21  																																												|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.21  																																												| (854)  ~ (all_25_2_39 = 0)
% 66.43/27.21  																																												| (987) ( ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0) | (( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_4_4_7 = low) & (all_25_1_38 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = mod1))) & ( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_25_0_37 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = mod2) & (all_25_0_37 = 0 | all_25_1_38 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = high)
% 66.43/27.21  																																												|
% 66.43/27.21  																																													| Applying alpha-rule on (987) yields:
% 66.43/27.21  																																													| (988)  ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0) | (( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_4_4_7 = low) & (all_25_1_38 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = mod1))
% 66.43/27.21  																																													| (989)  ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_25_0_37 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = mod2
% 66.43/27.21  																																													| (990) all_25_0_37 = 0 | all_25_1_38 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = high
% 66.43/27.21  																																													|
% 66.43/27.21  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (509), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.21  																																													|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.21  																																													| (1134)  ~ (all_209_3_156 = 0)
% 66.43/27.21  																																													|
% 66.43/27.21  																																														| Equations (746) can reduce 1134 to:
% 66.43/27.21  																																														| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.21  																																														|
% 66.43/27.21  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.21  																																													|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.21  																																													| (746) all_209_3_156 = 0
% 66.43/27.21  																																													| (1137) ( ~ (all_209_2_155 = 0) | all_209_1_154 = very_low) & (all_209_2_155 = 0 | (( ~ (all_209_0_153 = 0) | (( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_209_1_154 = low) & (all_209_1_154 = mod1 | all_25_1_38 = 0))) & ( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_209_0_153 = 0 | all_209_1_154 = mod2) & (all_209_0_153 = 0 | all_209_1_154 = high | all_25_1_38 = 0)))
% 66.43/27.21  																																													|
% 66.43/27.21  																																														| Applying alpha-rule on (1137) yields:
% 66.43/27.21  																																														| (1138)  ~ (all_209_2_155 = 0) | all_209_1_154 = very_low
% 66.43/27.21  																																														| (1139) all_209_2_155 = 0 | (( ~ (all_209_0_153 = 0) | (( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_209_1_154 = low) & (all_209_1_154 = mod1 | all_25_1_38 = 0))) & ( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_209_0_153 = 0 | all_209_1_154 = mod2) & (all_209_0_153 = 0 | all_209_1_154 = high | all_25_1_38 = 0))
% 66.43/27.21  																																														|
% 66.43/27.21  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (988), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.21  																																														|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.21  																																														| (1011)  ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0)
% 66.43/27.21  																																														|
% 66.43/27.21  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1139), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.21  																																															|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.21  																																															| (1141) all_209_2_155 = 0
% 66.43/27.21  																																															|
% 66.43/27.21  																																																| Combining equations (1141,743) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.21  																																																| (984) all_25_2_39 = 0
% 66.43/27.21  																																																|
% 66.43/27.21  																																																| Equations (984) can reduce 854 to:
% 66.43/27.21  																																																| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.21  																																																|
% 66.43/27.21  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.21  																																															|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.21  																																															| (1144)  ~ (all_209_2_155 = 0)
% 66.43/27.21  																																															| (1145) ( ~ (all_209_0_153 = 0) | (( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_209_1_154 = low) & (all_209_1_154 = mod1 | all_25_1_38 = 0))) & ( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_209_0_153 = 0 | all_209_1_154 = mod2) & (all_209_0_153 = 0 | all_209_1_154 = high | all_25_1_38 = 0)
% 66.43/27.21  																																															|
% 66.43/27.21  																																																| Applying alpha-rule on (1145) yields:
% 66.43/27.21  																																																| (1146)  ~ (all_209_0_153 = 0) | (( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_209_1_154 = low) & (all_209_1_154 = mod1 | all_25_1_38 = 0))
% 66.43/27.21  																																																| (1147)  ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_209_0_153 = 0 | all_209_1_154 = mod2
% 66.43/27.22  																																																| (1148) all_209_0_153 = 0 | all_209_1_154 = high | all_25_1_38 = 0
% 66.43/27.22  																																																|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1147), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.22  																																																|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																| (991)  ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0)
% 66.43/27.22  																																																|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1148), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.22  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																	| (1150) all_209_0_153 = 0
% 66.43/27.22  																																																	|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																		| Combining equations (1150,635) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																		| (995) all_25_0_37 = 0
% 66.43/27.22  																																																		|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																		| Equations (995) can reduce 1011 to:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																		| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.22  																																																		|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.22  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																	| (1153)  ~ (all_209_0_153 = 0)
% 66.43/27.22  																																																	| (1154) all_209_1_154 = high | all_25_1_38 = 0
% 66.43/27.22  																																																	|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1154), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.22  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																		| (976) all_25_1_38 = 0
% 66.43/27.22  																																																		|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																			| Equations (976) can reduce 991 to:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																			| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.22  																																																			|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.22  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																		| (991)  ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0)
% 66.43/27.22  																																																		| (1158) all_209_1_154 = high
% 66.43/27.22  																																																		|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (388), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.22  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																			| (976) all_25_1_38 = 0
% 66.43/27.22  																																																			|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																				| Equations (976) can reduce 991 to:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																				| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.22  																																																				|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.22  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																			| (991)  ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0)
% 66.43/27.22  																																																			| (1030)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_4_12_15) = v1 & organization(all_4_14_17) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 66.43/27.22  																																																			|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																				| Instantiating (1030) with all_765_0_535, all_765_1_536 yields:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																				| (1163) dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_4_12_15) = all_765_0_535 & organization(all_4_14_17) = all_765_1_536 & ( ~ (all_765_1_536 = 0) | all_765_0_535 = 0)
% 66.43/27.22  																																																				|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																				| Applying alpha-rule on (1163) yields:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																				| (1164) dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_4_12_15) = all_765_0_535
% 66.43/27.22  																																																				| (1165) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_765_1_536
% 66.43/27.22  																																																				| (1166)  ~ (all_765_1_536 = 0) | all_765_0_535 = 0
% 66.43/27.22  																																																				|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																				| Instantiating formula (12) with all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_4_12_15, all_765_0_535, all_33_0_44 and discharging atoms dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_4_12_15) = all_765_0_535, dissimilar(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16, all_4_12_15) = all_33_0_44, yields:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																				| (1167) all_765_0_535 = all_33_0_44
% 66.43/27.22  																																																				|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																				| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_765_1_536, 0 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_765_1_536, organization(all_4_14_17) = 0, yields:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																				| (1168) all_765_1_536 = 0
% 66.43/27.22  																																																				|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1166), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.22  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																				| (1169)  ~ (all_765_1_536 = 0)
% 66.43/27.22  																																																				|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																					| Equations (1168) can reduce 1169 to:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																					| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.22  																																																					|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.22  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																				| (1168) all_765_1_536 = 0
% 66.43/27.22  																																																				| (1172) all_765_0_535 = 0
% 66.43/27.22  																																																				|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																					| Combining equations (1172,1167) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																					| (1173) all_33_0_44 = 0
% 66.43/27.22  																																																					|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (176), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.22  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																					| (1174)  ~ (all_33_2_46 = 0)
% 66.43/27.22  																																																					|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																						| Equations (313) can reduce 1174 to:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																						| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.22  																																																						|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.22  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																					| (313) all_33_2_46 = 0
% 66.43/27.22  																																																					| (1177) ( ~ (all_33_0_44 = 0) | all_33_1_45 = 0) & ( ~ (all_33_1_45 = 0) | all_33_0_44 = 0)
% 66.43/27.22  																																																					|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (1177) yields:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																						| (1178)  ~ (all_33_0_44 = 0) | all_33_1_45 = 0
% 66.43/27.22  																																																						| (1179)  ~ (all_33_1_45 = 0) | all_33_0_44 = 0
% 66.43/27.22  																																																						|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1178), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.22  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																						| (1180)  ~ (all_33_0_44 = 0)
% 66.43/27.22  																																																						|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																							| Equations (1173) can reduce 1180 to:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																							| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.22  																																																							|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.22  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																						| (1173) all_33_0_44 = 0
% 66.43/27.22  																																																						| (1183) all_33_1_45 = 0
% 66.43/27.22  																																																						|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																							| From (1183) and (175) follows:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																							| (1184) greater(all_4_8_11, sigma) = 0
% 66.43/27.22  																																																							|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (415), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.22  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																							| (1185)  ~ (greater(all_4_8_11, sigma) = 0)
% 66.43/27.22  																																																							|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																								| Using (1184) and (1185) yields:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																								| (222) $false
% 66.43/27.22  																																																								|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.22  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																							| (1184) greater(all_4_8_11, sigma) = 0
% 66.43/27.22  																																																							| (1188) smaller(sigma, all_4_8_11) = 0
% 66.43/27.22  																																																							|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (416), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.22  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																								| (1185)  ~ (greater(all_4_8_11, sigma) = 0)
% 66.43/27.22  																																																								|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																									| Using (1184) and (1185) yields:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																									| (222) $false
% 66.43/27.22  																																																									|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.22  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																								| (1184) greater(all_4_8_11, sigma) = 0
% 66.43/27.22  																																																								| (1192)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater(sigma, all_4_8_11) = v0)
% 66.43/27.22  																																																								|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																									| Instantiating (1192) with all_849_0_544 yields:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																									| (1193)  ~ (all_849_0_544 = 0) & greater(sigma, all_4_8_11) = all_849_0_544
% 66.43/27.22  																																																									|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																									| Applying alpha-rule on (1193) yields:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																									| (1194)  ~ (all_849_0_544 = 0)
% 66.43/27.22  																																																									| (1195) greater(sigma, all_4_8_11) = all_849_0_544
% 66.43/27.22  																																																									|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (123), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.22  																																																									|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																									| (1196) smaller(all_4_8_11, sigma) = 0
% 66.43/27.22  																																																									|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																										| Instantiating formula (31) with all_849_0_544, sigma, all_4_8_11 and discharging atoms greater(sigma, all_4_8_11) = all_849_0_544, yields:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																										| (1197) all_849_0_544 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & smaller(all_4_8_11, sigma) = v0)
% 66.43/27.22  																																																										|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																										| Instantiating formula (18) with sigma, all_4_8_11 and discharging atoms smaller(all_4_8_11, sigma) = 0, yields:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																										| (1198) greater(sigma, all_4_8_11) = 0
% 66.43/27.22  																																																										|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1197), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.22  																																																										|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																										| (1199) all_849_0_544 = 0
% 66.43/27.22  																																																										|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																											| Equations (1199) can reduce 1194 to:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																											| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.22  																																																											|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.22  																																																										|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																										| (1194)  ~ (all_849_0_544 = 0)
% 66.43/27.22  																																																										| (1202)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & smaller(all_4_8_11, sigma) = v0)
% 66.43/27.22  																																																										|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																											| Instantiating formula (5) with sigma, all_4_8_11, 0, all_849_0_544 and discharging atoms greater(sigma, all_4_8_11) = all_849_0_544, greater(sigma, all_4_8_11) = 0, yields:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																											| (1199) all_849_0_544 = 0
% 66.43/27.22  																																																											|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																											| Equations (1199) can reduce 1194 to:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																											| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.22  																																																											|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.22  																																																									|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																									| (1205)  ~ (smaller(all_4_8_11, sigma) = 0)
% 66.43/27.22  																																																									| (1206) all_4_8_11 = sigma
% 66.43/27.22  																																																									|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																										| From (1206) and (1188) follows:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																										| (1207) smaller(sigma, sigma) = 0
% 66.43/27.22  																																																										|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																										| From (1206) and (1205) follows:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																										| (1208)  ~ (smaller(sigma, sigma) = 0)
% 66.43/27.22  																																																										|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																										| Using (1207) and (1208) yields:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																										| (222) $false
% 66.43/27.22  																																																										|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.22  																																																|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																| (976) all_25_1_38 = 0
% 66.43/27.22  																																																| (1211) all_209_0_153 = 0 | all_209_1_154 = mod2
% 66.43/27.22  																																																|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1211), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.22  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																	| (1150) all_209_0_153 = 0
% 66.43/27.22  																																																	|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																		| Combining equations (1150,635) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																		| (995) all_25_0_37 = 0
% 66.43/27.22  																																																		|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																		| Equations (995) can reduce 1011 to:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																		| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.22  																																																		|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.22  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																	| (1153)  ~ (all_209_0_153 = 0)
% 66.43/27.22  																																																	| (1216) all_209_1_154 = mod2
% 66.43/27.22  																																																	|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																		| Combining equations (1216,741) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																		| (1027) all_4_4_7 = mod2
% 66.43/27.22  																																																		|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																		| Equations (1027) can reduce 962 to:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																		| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.22  																																																		|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.22  																																														|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.22  																																														| (995) all_25_0_37 = 0
% 66.43/27.22  																																														| (1220) ( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_4_4_7 = low) & (all_25_1_38 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = mod1)
% 66.43/27.22  																																														|
% 66.43/27.22  																																															| Applying alpha-rule on (1220) yields:
% 66.43/27.22  																																															| (1221)  ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_4_4_7 = low
% 66.43/27.22  																																															| (1222) all_25_1_38 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = mod1
% 66.43/27.22  																																															|
% 66.43/27.22  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1222), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.22  																																															|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.22  																																															| (976) all_25_1_38 = 0
% 66.43/27.22  																																															|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1221), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.22  																																																|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																| (991)  ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0)
% 66.43/27.22  																																																|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																	| Equations (976) can reduce 991 to:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																	| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.22  																																																	|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.22  																																																|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																| (976) all_25_1_38 = 0
% 66.43/27.22  																																																| (1022) all_4_4_7 = low
% 66.43/27.22  																																																|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																	| Equations (1022) can reduce 1120 to:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																	| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.22  																																																	|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.22  																																															|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.22  																																															| (991)  ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0)
% 66.43/27.22  																																															| (1081) all_4_4_7 = mod1
% 66.43/27.22  																																															|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																| Equations (1081) can reduce 968 to:
% 66.43/27.22  																																																| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.22  																																																|
% 66.43/27.22  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.22  																																									|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.22  																																									| (957)  ~ (all_4_3_6 = 0)
% 66.43/27.22  																																									| (1233)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater(all_4_4_7, all_4_5_8) = v0)
% 66.43/27.22  																																									|
% 66.43/27.22  																																										| Instantiating (1233) with all_707_0_644 yields:
% 66.43/27.22  																																										| (1234)  ~ (all_707_0_644 = 0) & greater(all_4_4_7, all_4_5_8) = all_707_0_644
% 66.43/27.22  																																										|
% 66.43/27.22  																																										| Applying alpha-rule on (1234) yields:
% 66.43/27.22  																																										| (1235)  ~ (all_707_0_644 = 0)
% 66.43/27.22  																																										| (1236) greater(all_4_4_7, all_4_5_8) = all_707_0_644
% 66.43/27.22  																																										|
% 66.43/27.22  																																										| From (918) and (1236) follows:
% 66.43/27.22  																																										| (1237) greater(all_4_4_7, mod1) = all_707_0_644
% 66.43/27.22  																																										|
% 66.43/27.22  																																										| Instantiating formula (5) with all_4_4_7, mod1, 0, all_707_0_644 and discharging atoms greater(all_4_4_7, mod1) = all_707_0_644, greater(all_4_4_7, mod1) = 0, yields:
% 66.43/27.22  																																										| (1238) all_707_0_644 = 0
% 66.43/27.22  																																										|
% 66.43/27.22  																																										| Equations (1238) can reduce 1235 to:
% 66.43/27.22  																																										| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.22  																																										|
% 66.43/27.22  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.22  																																								|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.22  																																								| (1240)  ~ (greater(all_4_4_7, all_4_5_8) = 0)
% 66.43/27.22  																																								| (1241)  ~ (smaller(all_4_5_8, all_4_4_7) = 0)
% 66.43/27.22  																																								|
% 66.43/27.22  																																									| From (918) and (1240) follows:
% 66.43/27.22  																																									| (1242)  ~ (greater(all_4_4_7, mod1) = 0)
% 66.43/27.22  																																									|
% 66.43/27.22  																																									| From (918) and (1241) follows:
% 66.43/27.22  																																									| (1243)  ~ (smaller(mod1, all_4_4_7) = 0)
% 66.43/27.23  																																									|
% 66.43/27.23  																																									| Using (37) and (1242) yields:
% 66.43/27.23  																																									| (965)  ~ (all_4_4_7 = high)
% 66.43/27.23  																																									|
% 66.43/27.23  																																									| Using (63) and (1242) yields:
% 66.43/27.23  																																									| (962)  ~ (all_4_4_7 = mod2)
% 66.43/27.23  																																									|
% 66.43/27.23  																																									| Using (919) and (1243) yields:
% 66.43/27.23  																																									| (957)  ~ (all_4_3_6 = 0)
% 66.43/27.23  																																									|
% 66.43/27.23  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (120), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.23  																																									|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.23  																																									| (949) all_4_3_6 = 0
% 66.43/27.23  																																									|
% 66.43/27.23  																																										| Equations (949) can reduce 957 to:
% 66.43/27.23  																																										| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.23  																																										|
% 66.43/27.23  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.23  																																									|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.23  																																									| (957)  ~ (all_4_3_6 = 0)
% 66.43/27.23  																																									| (1233)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater(all_4_4_7, all_4_5_8) = v0)
% 66.43/27.23  																																									|
% 66.43/27.23  																																										| Instantiating (1233) with all_711_0_645 yields:
% 66.43/27.23  																																										| (1251)  ~ (all_711_0_645 = 0) & greater(all_4_4_7, all_4_5_8) = all_711_0_645
% 66.43/27.23  																																										|
% 66.43/27.23  																																										| Applying alpha-rule on (1251) yields:
% 66.43/27.23  																																										| (1252)  ~ (all_711_0_645 = 0)
% 66.43/27.23  																																										| (1253) greater(all_4_4_7, all_4_5_8) = all_711_0_645
% 66.43/27.23  																																										|
% 66.43/27.23  																																										| From (918) and (1253) follows:
% 66.43/27.23  																																										| (1254) greater(all_4_4_7, mod1) = all_711_0_645
% 66.43/27.23  																																										|
% 66.43/27.23  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (118), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.23  																																										|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.23  																																										| (1255) greater(all_4_5_8, all_4_4_7) = 0
% 66.43/27.23  																																										|
% 66.43/27.23  																																											| From (918) and (1255) follows:
% 66.43/27.23  																																											| (1084) greater(mod1, all_4_4_7) = 0
% 66.43/27.23  																																											|
% 66.43/27.23  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (89), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.23  																																											|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.23  																																											| (966)  ~ (hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_4_5_8)
% 66.43/27.23  																																											|
% 66.43/27.23  																																												| From (918) and (966) follows:
% 66.43/27.23  																																												| (967)  ~ (hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = mod1)
% 66.43/27.23  																																												|
% 66.43/27.23  																																												| Using (71) and (967) yields:
% 66.43/27.23  																																												| (968)  ~ (all_4_4_7 = mod1)
% 66.43/27.23  																																												|
% 66.43/27.23  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (119), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.23  																																												|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.23  																																												| (949) all_4_3_6 = 0
% 66.43/27.23  																																												|
% 66.43/27.23  																																													| Equations (949) can reduce 957 to:
% 66.43/27.23  																																													| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.23  																																													|
% 66.43/27.23  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.23  																																												|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.23  																																												| (957)  ~ (all_4_3_6 = 0)
% 66.43/27.23  																																												| (1263) all_4_4_7 = all_4_5_8 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & smaller_or_equal(all_4_5_8, all_4_4_7) = v0)
% 66.43/27.23  																																												|
% 66.43/27.23  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1263), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.23  																																													|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.23  																																													| (1088) all_4_4_7 = all_4_5_8
% 66.43/27.23  																																													|
% 66.43/27.23  																																														| Combining equations (918,1088) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.23  																																														| (1081) all_4_4_7 = mod1
% 66.43/27.23  																																														|
% 66.43/27.23  																																														| Equations (1081) can reduce 968 to:
% 66.43/27.23  																																														| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.23  																																														|
% 66.43/27.23  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.23  																																													|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.23  																																													| (1267)  ~ (all_4_4_7 = all_4_5_8)
% 66.43/27.23  																																													| (1268)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & smaller_or_equal(all_4_5_8, all_4_4_7) = v0)
% 66.43/27.23  																																													|
% 66.43/27.23  																																														| Equations (918) can reduce 1267 to:
% 66.43/27.23  																																														| (968)  ~ (all_4_4_7 = mod1)
% 66.43/27.23  																																														|
% 66.43/27.23  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (123), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.23  																																														|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.23  																																														| (1196) smaller(all_4_8_11, sigma) = 0
% 66.43/27.23  																																														|
% 66.43/27.23  																																															| Instantiating formula (58) with all_711_0_645, mod1, mod2, all_4_4_7 and discharging atoms greater(all_4_4_7, mod1) = all_711_0_645, greater(mod2, mod1) = 0, yields:
% 66.43/27.23  																																															| (1271) all_711_0_645 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater(all_4_4_7, mod2) = v0)
% 66.43/27.23  																																															|
% 66.43/27.23  																																															| Instantiating formula (60) with all_711_0_645, mod1, all_4_4_7 and discharging atoms greater(all_4_4_7, mod1) = all_711_0_645, yields:
% 66.43/27.23  																																															| (1272) all_711_0_645 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = mod1 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater_or_equal(all_4_4_7, mod1) = v0)
% 66.43/27.23  																																															|
% 66.43/27.23  																																															| Instantiating formula (58) with all_157_0_91, tau, all_4_8_11, sigma and discharging atoms greater(sigma, tau) = all_157_0_91, yields:
% 66.43/27.23  																																															| (1273) all_157_0_91 = 0 |  ~ (greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0) |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater(sigma, all_4_8_11) = v0)
% 66.43/27.23  																																															|
% 66.43/27.23  																																															| Instantiating formula (18) with sigma, all_4_8_11 and discharging atoms smaller(all_4_8_11, sigma) = 0, yields:
% 66.43/27.23  																																															| (1198) greater(sigma, all_4_8_11) = 0
% 66.43/27.23  																																															|
% 66.43/27.23  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1271), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.23  																																															|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.23  																																															| (1275) all_711_0_645 = 0
% 66.43/27.23  																																															|
% 66.43/27.23  																																																| Equations (1275) can reduce 1252 to:
% 66.43/27.23  																																																| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.23  																																																|
% 66.43/27.23  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.23  																																															|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.23  																																															| (1252)  ~ (all_711_0_645 = 0)
% 66.43/27.23  																																															| (1278)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater(all_4_4_7, mod2) = v0)
% 66.43/27.23  																																															|
% 66.43/27.23  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1273), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.23  																																																|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.23  																																																| (1279)  ~ (greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0)
% 66.43/27.23  																																																|
% 66.43/27.23  																																																	| Using (1198) and (347) yields:
% 66.43/27.23  																																																	| (1280)  ~ (all_4_8_11 = tau)
% 66.43/27.23  																																																	|
% 66.43/27.23  																																																	| Using (211) and (1279) yields:
% 66.43/27.23  																																																	| (1281)  ~ (all_61_1_69 = 0)
% 66.43/27.23  																																																	|
% 66.43/27.23  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (412), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.23  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.23  																																																	| (1282) all_4_8_11 = tau
% 66.43/27.23  																																																	|
% 66.43/27.23  																																																		| Equations (1282) can reduce 1280 to:
% 66.43/27.23  																																																		| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.23  																																																		|
% 66.43/27.23  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.23  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.23  																																																	| (1280)  ~ (all_4_8_11 = tau)
% 66.43/27.23  																																																	| (1285) all_61_1_69 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater_or_equal(all_4_8_11, tau) = v0)
% 66.43/27.23  																																																	|
% 66.43/27.23  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (407), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.23  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.23  																																																		| (1286) all_61_1_69 = 0
% 66.43/27.23  																																																		|
% 66.43/27.23  																																																			| Equations (1286) can reduce 1281 to:
% 66.43/27.23  																																																			| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.23  																																																			|
% 66.43/27.23  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.23  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.23  																																																		| (1281)  ~ (all_61_1_69 = 0)
% 66.43/27.23  																																																		| (1289)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater(all_4_8_11, all_4_6_9) = v0)
% 66.43/27.23  																																																		|
% 66.43/27.23  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (413), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.23  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.23  																																																			| (1286) all_61_1_69 = 0
% 66.43/27.23  																																																			|
% 66.43/27.23  																																																				| Equations (1286) can reduce 1281 to:
% 66.43/27.23  																																																				| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.23  																																																				|
% 66.43/27.23  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.23  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.23  																																																			| (1281)  ~ (all_61_1_69 = 0)
% 66.43/27.23  																																																			| (1293)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & smaller(tau, all_4_8_11) = v0)
% 66.43/27.23  																																																			|
% 66.43/27.23  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1285), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.23  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.23  																																																				| (1286) all_61_1_69 = 0
% 66.43/27.23  																																																				|
% 66.43/27.23  																																																					| Equations (1286) can reduce 1281 to:
% 66.43/27.23  																																																					| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.23  																																																					|
% 66.43/27.23  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.23  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.23  																																																				| (1281)  ~ (all_61_1_69 = 0)
% 66.43/27.23  																																																				| (1297)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater_or_equal(all_4_8_11, tau) = v0)
% 66.43/27.23  																																																				|
% 66.43/27.23  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (411), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.23  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.23  																																																					| (1298) smaller(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0
% 66.43/27.23  																																																					|
% 66.43/27.23  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (424), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.23  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.23  																																																						| (1299) all_59_1_67 = 0
% 66.43/27.23  																																																						|
% 66.43/27.23  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (208), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.23  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.23  																																																							| (1300)  ~ (all_59_0_66 = 0)
% 66.43/27.23  																																																							|
% 66.43/27.23  																																																								| Equations (291) can reduce 1300 to:
% 66.43/27.23  																																																								| (1011)  ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0)
% 66.43/27.23  																																																								|
% 66.43/27.23  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (509), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.23  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.23  																																																								| (1134)  ~ (all_209_3_156 = 0)
% 66.43/27.23  																																																								|
% 66.43/27.23  																																																									| Equations (746) can reduce 1134 to:
% 66.43/27.23  																																																									| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.23  																																																									|
% 66.43/27.23  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.23  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.23  																																																								| (746) all_209_3_156 = 0
% 66.43/27.23  																																																								| (1137) ( ~ (all_209_2_155 = 0) | all_209_1_154 = very_low) & (all_209_2_155 = 0 | (( ~ (all_209_0_153 = 0) | (( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_209_1_154 = low) & (all_209_1_154 = mod1 | all_25_1_38 = 0))) & ( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_209_0_153 = 0 | all_209_1_154 = mod2) & (all_209_0_153 = 0 | all_209_1_154 = high | all_25_1_38 = 0)))
% 66.43/27.23  																																																								|
% 66.43/27.23  																																																									| Applying alpha-rule on (1137) yields:
% 66.43/27.23  																																																									| (1138)  ~ (all_209_2_155 = 0) | all_209_1_154 = very_low
% 66.43/27.23  																																																									| (1139) all_209_2_155 = 0 | (( ~ (all_209_0_153 = 0) | (( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_209_1_154 = low) & (all_209_1_154 = mod1 | all_25_1_38 = 0))) & ( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_209_0_153 = 0 | all_209_1_154 = mod2) & (all_209_0_153 = 0 | all_209_1_154 = high | all_25_1_38 = 0))
% 66.43/27.23  																																																									|
% 66.43/27.23  																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (531), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.23  																																																									|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.23  																																																									| (996)  ~ (all_219_3_168 = 0)
% 66.43/27.23  																																																									|
% 66.43/27.23  																																																										| Equations (739) can reduce 996 to:
% 66.43/27.23  																																																										| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.23  																																																										|
% 66.43/27.23  																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.23  																																																									|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.23  																																																									| (739) all_219_3_168 = 0
% 66.43/27.23  																																																									| (999) ( ~ (all_219_2_167 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = very_low) & (all_219_2_167 = 0 | (( ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = mod2 | all_25_0_37 = 0) & ( ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0) | (( ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = low) & (all_219_0_165 = 0 | all_219_1_166 = mod1))) & (all_219_0_165 = 0 | all_219_1_166 = high | all_25_0_37 = 0)))
% 66.43/27.23  																																																									|
% 66.43/27.23  																																																										| Applying alpha-rule on (999) yields:
% 66.43/27.23  																																																										| (1000)  ~ (all_219_2_167 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = very_low
% 66.43/27.23  																																																										| (1001) all_219_2_167 = 0 | (( ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = mod2 | all_25_0_37 = 0) & ( ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0) | (( ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = low) & (all_219_0_165 = 0 | all_219_1_166 = mod1))) & (all_219_0_165 = 0 | all_219_1_166 = high | all_25_0_37 = 0))
% 66.43/27.23  																																																										|
% 66.43/27.23  																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1139), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.23  																																																										|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.23  																																																										| (1141) all_209_2_155 = 0
% 66.43/27.23  																																																										|
% 66.43/27.23  																																																											| Combining equations (743,1141) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.23  																																																											| (1003) all_25_2_39 = 0
% 66.43/27.23  																																																											|
% 66.43/27.23  																																																											| Simplifying 1003 yields:
% 66.43/27.23  																																																											| (984) all_25_2_39 = 0
% 66.43/27.23  																																																											|
% 66.43/27.23  																																																											| Equations (984) can reduce 854 to:
% 66.43/27.23  																																																											| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.23  																																																											|
% 66.43/27.23  																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.23  																																																										|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.23  																																																										| (1144)  ~ (all_209_2_155 = 0)
% 66.43/27.23  																																																										| (1145) ( ~ (all_209_0_153 = 0) | (( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_209_1_154 = low) & (all_209_1_154 = mod1 | all_25_1_38 = 0))) & ( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_209_0_153 = 0 | all_209_1_154 = mod2) & (all_209_0_153 = 0 | all_209_1_154 = high | all_25_1_38 = 0)
% 66.43/27.23  																																																										|
% 66.43/27.23  																																																											| Applying alpha-rule on (1145) yields:
% 66.43/27.23  																																																											| (1146)  ~ (all_209_0_153 = 0) | (( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_209_1_154 = low) & (all_209_1_154 = mod1 | all_25_1_38 = 0))
% 66.43/27.23  																																																											| (1147)  ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_209_0_153 = 0 | all_209_1_154 = mod2
% 66.43/27.23  																																																											| (1148) all_209_0_153 = 0 | all_209_1_154 = high | all_25_1_38 = 0
% 66.43/27.23  																																																											|
% 66.43/27.23  																																																											| Equations (743) can reduce 1144 to:
% 66.43/27.23  																																																											| (854)  ~ (all_25_2_39 = 0)
% 66.43/27.23  																																																											|
% 66.43/27.23  																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1148), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.23  																																																											|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.23  																																																											| (1150) all_209_0_153 = 0
% 66.43/27.23  																																																											|
% 66.43/27.23  																																																												| Combining equations (635,1150) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.23  																																																												| (1325) all_25_0_37 = 0
% 66.43/27.23  																																																												|
% 66.43/27.23  																																																												| Simplifying 1325 yields:
% 66.43/27.23  																																																												| (995) all_25_0_37 = 0
% 66.43/27.23  																																																												|
% 66.43/27.23  																																																												| Equations (995) can reduce 1011 to:
% 66.43/27.23  																																																												| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.23  																																																												|
% 66.43/27.23  																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.23  																																																											|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.23  																																																											| (1153)  ~ (all_209_0_153 = 0)
% 66.43/27.23  																																																											| (1154) all_209_1_154 = high | all_25_1_38 = 0
% 66.43/27.23  																																																											|
% 66.43/27.23  																																																												| Equations (635) can reduce 1153 to:
% 66.43/27.23  																																																												| (1011)  ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0)
% 66.43/27.23  																																																												|
% 66.43/27.23  																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1001), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.23  																																																												|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.23  																																																												| (1002) all_219_2_167 = 0
% 66.43/27.23  																																																												|
% 66.43/27.23  																																																													| Combining equations (684,1002) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.23  																																																													| (1003) all_25_2_39 = 0
% 66.43/27.23  																																																													|
% 66.43/27.23  																																																													| Simplifying 1003 yields:
% 66.43/27.23  																																																													| (984) all_25_2_39 = 0
% 66.43/27.23  																																																													|
% 66.43/27.23  																																																													| Equations (984) can reduce 854 to:
% 66.43/27.23  																																																													| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.23  																																																													|
% 66.43/27.23  																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.23  																																																												|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.23  																																																												| (1006)  ~ (all_219_2_167 = 0)
% 66.43/27.23  																																																												| (1007) ( ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = mod2 | all_25_0_37 = 0) & ( ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0) | (( ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = low) & (all_219_0_165 = 0 | all_219_1_166 = mod1))) & (all_219_0_165 = 0 | all_219_1_166 = high | all_25_0_37 = 0)
% 66.43/27.23  																																																												|
% 66.43/27.23  																																																													| Applying alpha-rule on (1007) yields:
% 66.43/27.23  																																																													| (1008)  ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = mod2 | all_25_0_37 = 0
% 66.43/27.24  																																																													| (1009)  ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0) | (( ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = low) & (all_219_0_165 = 0 | all_219_1_166 = mod1))
% 66.43/27.24  																																																													| (1010) all_219_0_165 = 0 | all_219_1_166 = high | all_25_0_37 = 0
% 66.43/27.24  																																																													|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1010), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.24  																																																													|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																													| (977) all_219_0_165 = 0
% 66.43/27.24  																																																													|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1008), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.24  																																																														|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																														| (1017)  ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0)
% 66.43/27.24  																																																														|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																															| Equations (977) can reduce 1017 to:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																															| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.24  																																																															|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.24  																																																														|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																														| (977) all_219_0_165 = 0
% 66.43/27.24  																																																														| (1344) all_219_1_166 = mod2 | all_25_0_37 = 0
% 66.43/27.24  																																																														|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1344), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.24  																																																															|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																															| (995) all_25_0_37 = 0
% 66.43/27.24  																																																															|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																																| Equations (995) can reduce 1011 to:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																																| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.24  																																																																|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.24  																																																															|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																															| (1011)  ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0)
% 66.43/27.24  																																																															| (1348) all_219_1_166 = mod2
% 66.43/27.24  																																																															|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																																| Combining equations (626,1348) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																																| (1349) all_4_4_7 = mod2
% 66.43/27.24  																																																																|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																																| Simplifying 1349 yields:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																																| (1027) all_4_4_7 = mod2
% 66.43/27.24  																																																																|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																																| Equations (1027) can reduce 962 to:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																																| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.24  																																																																|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.24  																																																													|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																													| (1017)  ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0)
% 66.43/27.24  																																																													| (1353) all_219_1_166 = high | all_25_0_37 = 0
% 66.43/27.24  																																																													|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1353), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.24  																																																														|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																														| (995) all_25_0_37 = 0
% 66.43/27.24  																																																														|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																															| Equations (995) can reduce 1011 to:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																															| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.24  																																																															|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.24  																																																														|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																														| (1011)  ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0)
% 66.43/27.24  																																																														| (1357) all_219_1_166 = high
% 66.43/27.24  																																																														|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																															| Combining equations (626,1357) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																															| (1358) all_4_4_7 = high
% 66.43/27.24  																																																															|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																															| Simplifying 1358 yields:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																															| (1068) all_4_4_7 = high
% 66.43/27.24  																																																															|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																															| Equations (1068) can reduce 965 to:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																															| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.24  																																																															|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.24  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																							| (1361) all_59_0_66 = 0
% 66.43/27.24  																																																							| (1362)  ~ (all_59_1_67 = 0)
% 66.43/27.24  																																																							|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																								| Equations (1299) can reduce 1362 to:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																								| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.24  																																																								|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.24  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																						| (1362)  ~ (all_59_1_67 = 0)
% 66.43/27.24  																																																						| (1365)  ~ (all_4_8_11 = tau) &  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & smaller(all_4_8_11, tau) = v0)
% 66.43/27.24  																																																						|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																							| Applying alpha-rule on (1365) yields:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																							| (1280)  ~ (all_4_8_11 = tau)
% 66.43/27.24  																																																							| (1367)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & smaller(all_4_8_11, tau) = v0)
% 66.43/27.24  																																																							|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																							| Instantiating (1367) with all_1179_0_751 yields:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																							| (1368)  ~ (all_1179_0_751 = 0) & smaller(all_4_8_11, tau) = all_1179_0_751
% 66.43/27.24  																																																							|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																							| Applying alpha-rule on (1368) yields:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																							| (1369)  ~ (all_1179_0_751 = 0)
% 66.43/27.24  																																																							| (1370) smaller(all_4_8_11, tau) = all_1179_0_751
% 66.43/27.24  																																																							|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																							| Instantiating formula (11) with all_4_8_11, tau, 0, all_1179_0_751 and discharging atoms smaller(all_4_8_11, tau) = all_1179_0_751, smaller(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0, yields:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																							| (1371) all_1179_0_751 = 0
% 66.43/27.24  																																																							|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																							| Equations (1371) can reduce 1369 to:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																							| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.24  																																																							|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.24  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																					| (1373)  ~ (smaller(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0)
% 66.43/27.24  																																																					| (1374) all_61_1_69 = 0 | all_4_8_11 = tau
% 66.43/27.24  																																																					|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1374), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.24  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																						| (1282) all_4_8_11 = tau
% 66.43/27.24  																																																						|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																							| Equations (1282) can reduce 1280 to:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																							| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.24  																																																							|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.24  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																						| (1280)  ~ (all_4_8_11 = tau)
% 66.43/27.24  																																																						| (1286) all_61_1_69 = 0
% 66.43/27.24  																																																						|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																							| Equations (1286) can reduce 1281 to:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																							| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.24  																																																							|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.24  																																																|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																| (1380) greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0
% 66.43/27.24  																																																| (1381) all_157_0_91 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater(sigma, all_4_8_11) = v0)
% 66.43/27.24  																																																|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (416), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.24  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																	| (1185)  ~ (greater(all_4_8_11, sigma) = 0)
% 66.43/27.24  																																																	|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (410), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.24  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																		| (1279)  ~ (greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0)
% 66.43/27.24  																																																		|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																			| Using (1380) and (1279) yields:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																			| (222) $false
% 66.43/27.24  																																																			|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.24  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																		| (1380) greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0
% 66.43/27.24  																																																		| (1386)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater(tau, all_4_8_11) = v0)
% 66.43/27.24  																																																		|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (422), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.24  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																			| (1279)  ~ (greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0)
% 66.43/27.24  																																																			|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																				| Using (1380) and (1279) yields:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																				| (222) $false
% 66.43/27.24  																																																				|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.24  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																			| (1380) greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0
% 66.43/27.24  																																																			| (1390) all_13_0_18 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater(zero, all_4_8_11) = v0)
% 66.43/27.24  																																																			|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (281), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.24  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																				| (1391)  ~ (greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = all_65_1_73)
% 66.43/27.24  																																																				|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																					| From (276) and (1391) follows:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																					| (1279)  ~ (greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0)
% 66.43/27.24  																																																					|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																					| Using (1380) and (1279) yields:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																					| (222) $false
% 66.43/27.24  																																																					|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.24  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																				| (1394) greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = all_65_1_73
% 66.43/27.24  																																																				| (1395) all_65_1_73 = all_61_1_69
% 66.43/27.24  																																																				|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																					| Combining equations (276,1395) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																					| (1286) all_61_1_69 = 0
% 66.43/27.24  																																																					|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																					| From (1286) and (211) follows:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																					| (1380) greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0
% 66.43/27.24  																																																					|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (420), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.24  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																					| (1183) all_33_1_45 = 0
% 66.43/27.24  																																																					|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																						| From (1183) and (175) follows:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																						| (1184) greater(all_4_8_11, sigma) = 0
% 66.43/27.24  																																																						|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																						| Using (1184) and (1185) yields:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																						| (222) $false
% 66.43/27.24  																																																						|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.24  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																					| (1401)  ~ (all_33_1_45 = 0)
% 66.43/27.24  																																																					| (1402)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = v0)
% 66.43/27.24  																																																					|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																						| Instantiating (1402) with all_1060_0_762 yields:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																						| (1403)  ~ (all_1060_0_762 = 0) & greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = all_1060_0_762
% 66.43/27.24  																																																						|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (1403) yields:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																						| (1404)  ~ (all_1060_0_762 = 0)
% 66.43/27.24  																																																						| (1405) greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = all_1060_0_762
% 66.43/27.24  																																																						|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (409), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.24  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																						| (1279)  ~ (greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0)
% 66.43/27.24  																																																						|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																							| Using (1380) and (1279) yields:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																							| (222) $false
% 66.43/27.24  																																																							|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.24  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																						| (1380) greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0
% 66.43/27.24  																																																						| (1409) smaller(tau, all_4_8_11) = 0
% 66.43/27.24  																																																						|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (414), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.24  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																							| (1279)  ~ (greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0)
% 66.43/27.24  																																																							|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																								| Using (1380) and (1279) yields:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																								| (222) $false
% 66.43/27.24  																																																								|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.24  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																							| (1380) greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0
% 66.43/27.24  																																																							| (1413) all_33_1_45 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater(tau, sigma) = v0)
% 66.43/27.24  																																																							|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (408), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.24  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																								| (1279)  ~ (greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0)
% 66.43/27.24  																																																								|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																									| Using (1380) and (1279) yields:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																									| (222) $false
% 66.43/27.24  																																																									|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.24  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																								| (1380) greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0
% 66.43/27.24  																																																								| (1417) all_57_1_65 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater(all_4_7_10, all_4_8_11) = v0)
% 66.43/27.24  																																																								|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																									| Instantiating formula (5) with all_4_8_11, tau, 0, all_1060_0_762 and discharging atoms greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = all_1060_0_762, greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0, yields:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																									| (1418) all_1060_0_762 = 0
% 66.43/27.24  																																																									|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																									| Equations (1418) can reduce 1404 to:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																									| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.24  																																																									|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.24  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																	| (1184) greater(all_4_8_11, sigma) = 0
% 66.43/27.24  																																																	| (1192)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater(sigma, all_4_8_11) = v0)
% 66.43/27.24  																																																	|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (410), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.24  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																		| (1279)  ~ (greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0)
% 66.43/27.24  																																																		|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																			| Using (1380) and (1279) yields:
% 66.43/27.24  																																																			| (222) $false
% 66.43/27.24  																																																			|
% 66.43/27.24  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.24  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																		| (1380) greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0
% 66.43/27.25  																																																		| (1386)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater(tau, all_4_8_11) = v0)
% 66.43/27.25  																																																		|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (422), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.25  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																			| (1279)  ~ (greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0)
% 66.43/27.25  																																																			|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																				| Using (1380) and (1279) yields:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																				| (222) $false
% 66.43/27.25  																																																				|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.25  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																			| (1380) greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0
% 66.43/27.25  																																																			| (1390) all_13_0_18 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater(zero, all_4_8_11) = v0)
% 66.43/27.25  																																																			|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (282), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.25  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																				| (1430)  ~ (greater(all_4_8_11, sigma) = all_37_1_49)
% 66.43/27.25  																																																				|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																					| From (279) and (1430) follows:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																					| (1185)  ~ (greater(all_4_8_11, sigma) = 0)
% 66.43/27.25  																																																					|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																					| Using (1184) and (1185) yields:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																					| (222) $false
% 66.43/27.25  																																																					|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.25  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																				| (1433) greater(all_4_8_11, sigma) = all_37_1_49
% 66.43/27.25  																																																				| (1434) all_37_1_49 = all_33_1_45
% 66.43/27.25  																																																				|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																					| Combining equations (279,1434) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																					| (1183) all_33_1_45 = 0
% 66.43/27.25  																																																					|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (176), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.25  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																					| (1174)  ~ (all_33_2_46 = 0)
% 66.43/27.25  																																																					|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																						| Equations (313) can reduce 1174 to:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																						| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.25  																																																						|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.25  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																					| (313) all_33_2_46 = 0
% 66.43/27.25  																																																					| (1177) ( ~ (all_33_0_44 = 0) | all_33_1_45 = 0) & ( ~ (all_33_1_45 = 0) | all_33_0_44 = 0)
% 66.43/27.25  																																																					|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (1177) yields:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																						| (1178)  ~ (all_33_0_44 = 0) | all_33_1_45 = 0
% 66.43/27.25  																																																						| (1179)  ~ (all_33_1_45 = 0) | all_33_0_44 = 0
% 66.43/27.25  																																																						|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (281), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.25  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																						| (1391)  ~ (greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = all_65_1_73)
% 66.43/27.25  																																																						|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																							| From (276) and (1391) follows:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																							| (1279)  ~ (greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0)
% 66.43/27.25  																																																							|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																							| Using (1380) and (1279) yields:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																							| (222) $false
% 66.43/27.25  																																																							|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.25  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																						| (1394) greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = all_65_1_73
% 66.43/27.25  																																																						| (1395) all_65_1_73 = all_61_1_69
% 66.43/27.25  																																																						|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																							| Combining equations (276,1395) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																							| (1286) all_61_1_69 = 0
% 66.43/27.25  																																																							|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (212), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.25  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																							| (1281)  ~ (all_61_1_69 = 0)
% 66.43/27.25  																																																							|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																								| Equations (1286) can reduce 1281 to:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																								| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.25  																																																								|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.25  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																							| (1286) all_61_1_69 = 0
% 66.43/27.25  																																																							| (1451) all_61_0_68 = 0
% 66.43/27.25  																																																							|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																								| Combining equations (262,1451) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																								| (1325) all_25_0_37 = 0
% 66.43/27.25  																																																								|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																								| Simplifying 1325 yields:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																								| (995) all_25_0_37 = 0
% 66.43/27.25  																																																								|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																								| Combining equations (995,635) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																								| (1150) all_209_0_153 = 0
% 66.43/27.25  																																																								|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (447), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.25  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																								| (1455)  ~ (all_187_3_120 = 0)
% 66.43/27.25  																																																								|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																									| Equations (782) can reduce 1455 to:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																									| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.25  																																																									|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.25  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																								| (782) all_187_3_120 = 0
% 66.43/27.25  																																																								| (1458) ( ~ (all_25_2_39 = 0) | all_187_2_119 = very_low) & (all_25_2_39 = 0 | (( ~ (all_187_0_117 = 0) | (( ~ (all_187_1_118 = 0) | all_187_2_119 = low) & (all_187_1_118 = 0 | all_187_2_119 = mod1))) & ( ~ (all_187_1_118 = 0) | all_187_0_117 = 0 | all_187_2_119 = mod2) & (all_187_0_117 = 0 | all_187_1_118 = 0 | all_187_2_119 = high)))
% 66.43/27.25  																																																								|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																									| Applying alpha-rule on (1458) yields:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																									| (1459)  ~ (all_25_2_39 = 0) | all_187_2_119 = very_low
% 66.43/27.25  																																																									| (1460) all_25_2_39 = 0 | (( ~ (all_187_0_117 = 0) | (( ~ (all_187_1_118 = 0) | all_187_2_119 = low) & (all_187_1_118 = 0 | all_187_2_119 = mod1))) & ( ~ (all_187_1_118 = 0) | all_187_0_117 = 0 | all_187_2_119 = mod2) & (all_187_0_117 = 0 | all_187_1_118 = 0 | all_187_2_119 = high))
% 66.43/27.25  																																																									|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1460), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.25  																																																									|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																									| (984) all_25_2_39 = 0
% 66.43/27.25  																																																									|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																										| Equations (984) can reduce 854 to:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																										| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.25  																																																										|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.25  																																																									|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																									| (854)  ~ (all_25_2_39 = 0)
% 66.43/27.25  																																																									| (1464) ( ~ (all_187_0_117 = 0) | (( ~ (all_187_1_118 = 0) | all_187_2_119 = low) & (all_187_1_118 = 0 | all_187_2_119 = mod1))) & ( ~ (all_187_1_118 = 0) | all_187_0_117 = 0 | all_187_2_119 = mod2) & (all_187_0_117 = 0 | all_187_1_118 = 0 | all_187_2_119 = high)
% 66.43/27.25  																																																									|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1272), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.25  																																																										|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																										| (1275) all_711_0_645 = 0
% 66.43/27.25  																																																										|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																											| Equations (1275) can reduce 1252 to:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																											| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.25  																																																											|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.25  																																																										|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																										| (1252)  ~ (all_711_0_645 = 0)
% 66.43/27.25  																																																										| (1468) all_4_4_7 = mod1 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater_or_equal(all_4_4_7, mod1) = v0)
% 66.43/27.25  																																																										|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1468), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.25  																																																											|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																											| (1081) all_4_4_7 = mod1
% 66.43/27.25  																																																											|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																												| Equations (1081) can reduce 968 to:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																												| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.25  																																																												|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.25  																																																											|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																											| (968)  ~ (all_4_4_7 = mod1)
% 66.43/27.25  																																																											| (1472)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater_or_equal(all_4_4_7, mod1) = v0)
% 66.43/27.25  																																																											|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1179), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.25  																																																												|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																												| (1401)  ~ (all_33_1_45 = 0)
% 66.43/27.25  																																																												|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																													| Equations (1183) can reduce 1401 to:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																													| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.25  																																																													|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.25  																																																												|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																												| (1183) all_33_1_45 = 0
% 66.43/27.25  																																																												| (1173) all_33_0_44 = 0
% 66.43/27.25  																																																												|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																													| Combining equations (1173,647) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																													| (1477) all_205_1_150 = 0
% 66.43/27.25  																																																													|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (501), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.25  																																																													|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																													| (1478)  ~ (all_205_1_150 = 0)
% 66.43/27.25  																																																													|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																														| Equations (1477) can reduce 1478 to:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																														| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.25  																																																														|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.25  																																																													|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																													| (1477) all_205_1_150 = 0
% 66.43/27.25  																																																													| (1481) all_205_0_149 = 0 &  ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0)
% 66.43/27.25  																																																													|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																														| Applying alpha-rule on (1481) yields:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																														| (761) all_205_0_149 = 0
% 66.43/27.25  																																																														| (991)  ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0)
% 66.43/27.25  																																																														|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (509), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.25  																																																														|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																														| (1134)  ~ (all_209_3_156 = 0)
% 66.43/27.25  																																																														|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																															| Equations (746) can reduce 1134 to:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																															| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.25  																																																															|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.25  																																																														|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																														| (746) all_209_3_156 = 0
% 66.43/27.25  																																																														| (1137) ( ~ (all_209_2_155 = 0) | all_209_1_154 = very_low) & (all_209_2_155 = 0 | (( ~ (all_209_0_153 = 0) | (( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_209_1_154 = low) & (all_209_1_154 = mod1 | all_25_1_38 = 0))) & ( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_209_0_153 = 0 | all_209_1_154 = mod2) & (all_209_0_153 = 0 | all_209_1_154 = high | all_25_1_38 = 0)))
% 66.43/27.25  																																																														|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																															| Applying alpha-rule on (1137) yields:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																															| (1138)  ~ (all_209_2_155 = 0) | all_209_1_154 = very_low
% 66.43/27.25  																																																															| (1139) all_209_2_155 = 0 | (( ~ (all_209_0_153 = 0) | (( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_209_1_154 = low) & (all_209_1_154 = mod1 | all_25_1_38 = 0))) & ( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_209_0_153 = 0 | all_209_1_154 = mod2) & (all_209_0_153 = 0 | all_209_1_154 = high | all_25_1_38 = 0))
% 66.43/27.25  																																																															|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1139), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.25  																																																															|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																															| (1141) all_209_2_155 = 0
% 66.43/27.25  																																																															|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																																| Combining equations (1141,743) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																																| (984) all_25_2_39 = 0
% 66.43/27.25  																																																																|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																																| Equations (984) can reduce 854 to:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																																| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.25  																																																																|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.25  																																																															|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																															| (1144)  ~ (all_209_2_155 = 0)
% 66.43/27.25  																																																															| (1145) ( ~ (all_209_0_153 = 0) | (( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_209_1_154 = low) & (all_209_1_154 = mod1 | all_25_1_38 = 0))) & ( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_209_0_153 = 0 | all_209_1_154 = mod2) & (all_209_0_153 = 0 | all_209_1_154 = high | all_25_1_38 = 0)
% 66.43/27.25  																																																															|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																																| Applying alpha-rule on (1145) yields:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																																| (1146)  ~ (all_209_0_153 = 0) | (( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_209_1_154 = low) & (all_209_1_154 = mod1 | all_25_1_38 = 0))
% 66.43/27.25  																																																																| (1147)  ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_209_0_153 = 0 | all_209_1_154 = mod2
% 66.43/27.25  																																																																| (1148) all_209_0_153 = 0 | all_209_1_154 = high | all_25_1_38 = 0
% 66.43/27.25  																																																																|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1146), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.25  																																																																|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																																| (1153)  ~ (all_209_0_153 = 0)
% 66.43/27.25  																																																																|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																																	| Equations (1150) can reduce 1153 to:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																																	| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.25  																																																																	|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.25  																																																																|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																																| (1150) all_209_0_153 = 0
% 66.43/27.25  																																																																| (1501) ( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_209_1_154 = low) & (all_209_1_154 = mod1 | all_25_1_38 = 0)
% 66.43/27.25  																																																																|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																																	| Applying alpha-rule on (1501) yields:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																																	| (1502)  ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_209_1_154 = low
% 66.43/27.25  																																																																	| (1503) all_209_1_154 = mod1 | all_25_1_38 = 0
% 66.43/27.25  																																																																	|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1503), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.25  																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																																	| (976) all_25_1_38 = 0
% 66.43/27.25  																																																																	|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																																		| Equations (976) can reduce 991 to:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																																		| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.25  																																																																		|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.25  																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																																	| (991)  ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0)
% 66.43/27.25  																																																																	| (1507) all_209_1_154 = mod1
% 66.43/27.25  																																																																	|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																																		| Combining equations (1507,741) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																																		| (1081) all_4_4_7 = mod1
% 66.43/27.25  																																																																		|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																																		| Equations (1081) can reduce 968 to:
% 66.43/27.25  																																																																		| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.25  																																																																		|
% 66.43/27.25  																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.26  																																														|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.26  																																														| (1205)  ~ (smaller(all_4_8_11, sigma) = 0)
% 66.43/27.26  																																														| (1206) all_4_8_11 = sigma
% 66.43/27.26  																																														|
% 66.43/27.26  																																															| From (1206) and (207) follows:
% 66.43/27.26  																																															| (1512) smaller_or_equal(sigma, tau) = all_59_1_67
% 66.43/27.26  																																															|
% 66.43/27.26  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (424), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.26  																																															|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.26  																																															| (1299) all_59_1_67 = 0
% 66.43/27.26  																																															|
% 66.43/27.26  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (208), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.26  																																																|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.26  																																																| (1300)  ~ (all_59_0_66 = 0)
% 66.43/27.26  																																																|
% 66.43/27.26  																																																	| Equations (291) can reduce 1300 to:
% 66.43/27.26  																																																	| (1011)  ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0)
% 66.43/27.26  																																																	|
% 66.43/27.26  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (447), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.26  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.26  																																																	| (1455)  ~ (all_187_3_120 = 0)
% 66.43/27.26  																																																	|
% 66.43/27.26  																																																		| Equations (782) can reduce 1455 to:
% 66.43/27.26  																																																		| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.26  																																																		|
% 66.43/27.26  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.26  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.26  																																																	| (782) all_187_3_120 = 0
% 66.43/27.26  																																																	| (1458) ( ~ (all_25_2_39 = 0) | all_187_2_119 = very_low) & (all_25_2_39 = 0 | (( ~ (all_187_0_117 = 0) | (( ~ (all_187_1_118 = 0) | all_187_2_119 = low) & (all_187_1_118 = 0 | all_187_2_119 = mod1))) & ( ~ (all_187_1_118 = 0) | all_187_0_117 = 0 | all_187_2_119 = mod2) & (all_187_0_117 = 0 | all_187_1_118 = 0 | all_187_2_119 = high)))
% 66.43/27.26  																																																	|
% 66.43/27.26  																																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (1458) yields:
% 66.43/27.26  																																																		| (1459)  ~ (all_25_2_39 = 0) | all_187_2_119 = very_low
% 66.43/27.26  																																																		| (1460) all_25_2_39 = 0 | (( ~ (all_187_0_117 = 0) | (( ~ (all_187_1_118 = 0) | all_187_2_119 = low) & (all_187_1_118 = 0 | all_187_2_119 = mod1))) & ( ~ (all_187_1_118 = 0) | all_187_0_117 = 0 | all_187_2_119 = mod2) & (all_187_0_117 = 0 | all_187_1_118 = 0 | all_187_2_119 = high))
% 66.43/27.26  																																																		|
% 66.43/27.26  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1460), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.26  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.26  																																																		| (984) all_25_2_39 = 0
% 66.43/27.26  																																																		|
% 66.43/27.26  																																																			| Equations (984) can reduce 854 to:
% 66.43/27.26  																																																			| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.26  																																																			|
% 66.43/27.26  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.26  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.26  																																																		| (854)  ~ (all_25_2_39 = 0)
% 66.43/27.26  																																																		| (1464) ( ~ (all_187_0_117 = 0) | (( ~ (all_187_1_118 = 0) | all_187_2_119 = low) & (all_187_1_118 = 0 | all_187_2_119 = mod1))) & ( ~ (all_187_1_118 = 0) | all_187_0_117 = 0 | all_187_2_119 = mod2) & (all_187_0_117 = 0 | all_187_1_118 = 0 | all_187_2_119 = high)
% 66.43/27.26  																																																		|
% 66.43/27.26  																																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (1464) yields:
% 66.43/27.26  																																																			| (1526)  ~ (all_187_0_117 = 0) | (( ~ (all_187_1_118 = 0) | all_187_2_119 = low) & (all_187_1_118 = 0 | all_187_2_119 = mod1))
% 66.43/27.26  																																																			| (1527)  ~ (all_187_1_118 = 0) | all_187_0_117 = 0 | all_187_2_119 = mod2
% 66.43/27.26  																																																			| (1528) all_187_0_117 = 0 | all_187_1_118 = 0 | all_187_2_119 = high
% 66.43/27.26  																																																			|
% 66.43/27.26  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1528), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.26  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.26  																																																			| (1529) all_187_0_117 = 0
% 66.43/27.26  																																																			|
% 66.43/27.26  																																																				| Combining equations (755,1529) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.26  																																																				| (1325) all_25_0_37 = 0
% 66.43/27.26  																																																				|
% 66.43/27.26  																																																				| Simplifying 1325 yields:
% 66.43/27.26  																																																				| (995) all_25_0_37 = 0
% 66.43/27.26  																																																				|
% 66.43/27.26  																																																				| Equations (995) can reduce 1011 to:
% 66.43/27.26  																																																				| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.26  																																																				|
% 66.43/27.26  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.26  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.26  																																																			| (1533)  ~ (all_187_0_117 = 0)
% 66.43/27.26  																																																			| (1534) all_187_1_118 = 0 | all_187_2_119 = high
% 66.43/27.26  																																																			|
% 66.43/27.26  																																																				| Equations (755) can reduce 1533 to:
% 66.43/27.26  																																																				| (1011)  ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0)
% 66.43/27.26  																																																				|
% 66.43/27.26  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1534), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.26  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.26  																																																				| (1536) all_187_1_118 = 0
% 66.43/27.26  																																																				|
% 66.43/27.26  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1527), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.26  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.26  																																																					| (1537)  ~ (all_187_1_118 = 0)
% 66.43/27.26  																																																					|
% 66.43/27.26  																																																						| Equations (1536) can reduce 1537 to:
% 66.43/27.26  																																																						| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.26  																																																						|
% 66.43/27.26  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.26  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.26  																																																					| (1536) all_187_1_118 = 0
% 66.43/27.26  																																																					| (1540) all_187_0_117 = 0 | all_187_2_119 = mod2
% 66.43/27.26  																																																					|
% 66.43/27.26  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1540), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.26  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.26  																																																						| (1529) all_187_0_117 = 0
% 66.43/27.26  																																																						|
% 66.43/27.26  																																																							| Combining equations (755,1529) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.26  																																																							| (1325) all_25_0_37 = 0
% 66.43/27.26  																																																							|
% 66.43/27.26  																																																							| Simplifying 1325 yields:
% 66.43/27.26  																																																							| (995) all_25_0_37 = 0
% 66.43/27.26  																																																							|
% 66.43/27.26  																																																							| Equations (995) can reduce 1011 to:
% 66.43/27.26  																																																							| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.26  																																																							|
% 66.43/27.26  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.26  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.26  																																																						| (1533)  ~ (all_187_0_117 = 0)
% 66.43/27.26  																																																						| (1546) all_187_2_119 = mod2
% 66.43/27.26  																																																						|
% 66.43/27.26  																																																							| Combining equations (757,1546) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.26  																																																							| (1349) all_4_4_7 = mod2
% 66.43/27.26  																																																							|
% 66.43/27.26  																																																							| Simplifying 1349 yields:
% 66.43/27.26  																																																							| (1027) all_4_4_7 = mod2
% 66.43/27.26  																																																							|
% 66.43/27.26  																																																							| Equations (1027) can reduce 962 to:
% 66.43/27.26  																																																							| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.26  																																																							|
% 66.43/27.26  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.26  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.26  																																																				| (1537)  ~ (all_187_1_118 = 0)
% 66.43/27.26  																																																				| (1551) all_187_2_119 = high
% 66.43/27.26  																																																				|
% 66.43/27.26  																																																					| Combining equations (757,1551) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.26  																																																					| (1358) all_4_4_7 = high
% 66.43/27.26  																																																					|
% 66.43/27.26  																																																					| Simplifying 1358 yields:
% 66.43/27.26  																																																					| (1068) all_4_4_7 = high
% 66.43/27.26  																																																					|
% 66.43/27.26  																																																					| Equations (1068) can reduce 965 to:
% 66.43/27.26  																																																					| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.26  																																																					|
% 66.43/27.26  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.26  																																																|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.26  																																																| (1361) all_59_0_66 = 0
% 66.43/27.26  																																																| (1362)  ~ (all_59_1_67 = 0)
% 66.43/27.26  																																																|
% 66.43/27.26  																																																	| Equations (1299) can reduce 1362 to:
% 66.43/27.26  																																																	| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.26  																																																	|
% 66.43/27.26  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.26  																																															|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.26  																																															| (1362)  ~ (all_59_1_67 = 0)
% 66.43/27.26  																																															| (1365)  ~ (all_4_8_11 = tau) &  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & smaller(all_4_8_11, tau) = v0)
% 66.43/27.26  																																															|
% 66.43/27.26  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (286), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.26  																																																|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.26  																																																| (1560)  ~ (smaller_or_equal(sigma, tau) = all_59_1_67)
% 66.43/27.26  																																																|
% 66.43/27.26  																																																	| Using (1512) and (1560) yields:
% 66.43/27.26  																																																	| (222) $false
% 66.43/27.26  																																																	|
% 66.43/27.26  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.26  																																																|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.26  																																																| (1512) smaller_or_equal(sigma, tau) = all_59_1_67
% 66.43/27.26  																																																| (1299) all_59_1_67 = 0
% 66.43/27.26  																																																|
% 66.43/27.26  																																																	| Equations (1299) can reduce 1362 to:
% 66.43/27.26  																																																	| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.26  																																																	|
% 66.43/27.26  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.26  																																											|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.26  																																											| (1087) hazard_of_mortality(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = all_4_5_8
% 66.43/27.26  																																											| (1088) all_4_4_7 = all_4_5_8
% 66.43/27.26  																																											|
% 66.43/27.26  																																												| Combining equations (918,1088) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.26  																																												| (1081) all_4_4_7 = mod1
% 66.43/27.26  																																												|
% 66.43/27.26  																																												| From (1081) and (1084) follows:
% 66.43/27.26  																																												| (1090) greater(mod1, mod1) = 0
% 66.43/27.26  																																												|
% 66.43/27.26  																																												| From (1081) and (1242) follows:
% 66.43/27.26  																																												| (1569)  ~ (greater(mod1, mod1) = 0)
% 66.43/27.26  																																												|
% 66.43/27.26  																																												| Using (1090) and (1569) yields:
% 66.43/27.26  																																												| (222) $false
% 66.43/27.26  																																												|
% 66.43/27.26  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.26  																																										|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.26  																																										| (1571)  ~ (greater(all_4_5_8, all_4_4_7) = 0)
% 66.43/27.26  																																										| (1572) all_4_3_6 = 0 | all_4_4_7 = all_4_5_8
% 66.43/27.26  																																										|
% 66.43/27.26  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1572), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.26  																																											|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.26  																																											| (949) all_4_3_6 = 0
% 66.43/27.26  																																											|
% 66.43/27.26  																																												| Equations (949) can reduce 957 to:
% 66.43/27.26  																																												| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.26  																																												|
% 66.43/27.26  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.26  																																											|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.26  																																											| (957)  ~ (all_4_3_6 = 0)
% 66.43/27.26  																																											| (1088) all_4_4_7 = all_4_5_8
% 66.43/27.26  																																											|
% 66.43/27.26  																																												| Combining equations (918,1088) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.26  																																												| (1081) all_4_4_7 = mod1
% 66.43/27.26  																																												|
% 66.43/27.26  																																												| Combining equations (1081,757) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.26  																																												| (1578) all_187_2_119 = mod1
% 66.43/27.26  																																												|
% 66.43/27.26  																																												| Combining equations (1081,626) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.26  																																												| (1079) all_219_1_166 = mod1
% 66.43/27.26  																																												|
% 66.43/27.26  																																												| Equations (1081) can reduce 965 to:
% 66.43/27.26  																																												| (1580)  ~ (high = mod1)
% 66.43/27.26  																																												|
% 66.43/27.26  																																												| Simplifying 1580 yields:
% 66.43/27.26  																																												| (1581)  ~ (high = mod1)
% 66.43/27.26  																																												|
% 66.43/27.26  																																												| Equations (1081) can reduce 962 to:
% 66.43/27.26  																																												| (1582)  ~ (mod2 = mod1)
% 66.43/27.26  																																												|
% 66.43/27.26  																																												| Simplifying 1582 yields:
% 66.43/27.26  																																												| (1583)  ~ (mod2 = mod1)
% 66.43/27.26  																																												|
% 66.43/27.26  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (418), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.26  																																												|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.26  																																												| (613) all_29_0_42 = 0
% 66.43/27.26  																																												|
% 66.43/27.26  																																													| Equations (613) can reduce 170 to:
% 66.43/27.26  																																													| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.26  																																													|
% 66.43/27.26  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.26  																																												|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.26  																																												| (170)  ~ (all_29_0_42 = 0)
% 66.43/27.26  																																												| (1587) mod2 = mod1 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater_or_equal(mod1, mod2) = v0)
% 66.43/27.26  																																												|
% 66.43/27.26  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1587), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.26  																																													|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.26  																																													| (1588) mod2 = mod1
% 66.43/27.26  																																													|
% 66.43/27.26  																																														| Equations (1588) can reduce 1583 to:
% 66.43/27.26  																																														| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.26  																																														|
% 66.43/27.26  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.26  																																													|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.26  																																													| (1583)  ~ (mod2 = mod1)
% 66.43/27.26  																																													| (1591)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater_or_equal(mod1, mod2) = v0)
% 66.43/27.26  																																													|
% 66.43/27.26  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (123), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.26  																																														|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.26  																																														| (1196) smaller(all_4_8_11, sigma) = 0
% 66.43/27.26  																																														|
% 66.43/27.26  																																															| Instantiating formula (58) with all_157_0_91, tau, all_4_8_11, sigma and discharging atoms greater(sigma, tau) = all_157_0_91, yields:
% 66.43/27.26  																																															| (1273) all_157_0_91 = 0 |  ~ (greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0) |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater(sigma, all_4_8_11) = v0)
% 66.43/27.26  																																															|
% 66.43/27.26  																																															| Instantiating formula (18) with sigma, all_4_8_11 and discharging atoms smaller(all_4_8_11, sigma) = 0, yields:
% 66.43/27.26  																																															| (1198) greater(sigma, all_4_8_11) = 0
% 66.43/27.26  																																															|
% 66.43/27.26  																																															| Instantiating formula (29) with all_286_0_212, mod1, high and discharging atoms smaller(high, mod1) = all_286_0_212, yields:
% 66.43/27.26  																																															| (1595) all_286_0_212 = 0 | high = mod1 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & smaller_or_equal(high, mod1) = v0)
% 66.43/27.26  																																															|
% 66.43/27.26  																																															| Instantiating formula (29) with all_306_0_216, mod1, mod2 and discharging atoms smaller(mod2, mod1) = all_306_0_216, yields:
% 66.43/27.27  																																															| (1596) all_306_0_216 = 0 | mod2 = mod1 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & smaller_or_equal(mod2, mod1) = v0)
% 66.43/27.27  																																															|
% 66.43/27.27  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (416), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.27  																																															|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.27  																																															| (1185)  ~ (greater(all_4_8_11, sigma) = 0)
% 66.43/27.27  																																															|
% 66.43/27.27  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1273), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.27  																																																|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.27  																																																| (1279)  ~ (greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0)
% 66.43/27.27  																																																|
% 66.43/27.27  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1595), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.27  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.27  																																																	| (1599) all_286_0_212 = 0
% 66.43/27.27  																																																	|
% 66.43/27.27  																																																		| Equations (1599) can reduce 611 to:
% 66.43/27.27  																																																		| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.27  																																																		|
% 66.43/27.27  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.27  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.27  																																																	| (611)  ~ (all_286_0_212 = 0)
% 66.43/27.27  																																																	| (1602) high = mod1 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & smaller_or_equal(high, mod1) = v0)
% 66.43/27.27  																																																	|
% 66.43/27.27  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1596), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.27  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.27  																																																		| (1603) all_306_0_216 = 0
% 66.43/27.27  																																																		|
% 66.43/27.27  																																																			| Equations (1603) can reduce 618 to:
% 66.43/27.27  																																																			| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.27  																																																			|
% 66.43/27.27  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.27  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.27  																																																		| (618)  ~ (all_306_0_216 = 0)
% 66.43/27.27  																																																		| (1606) mod2 = mod1 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & smaller_or_equal(mod2, mod1) = v0)
% 66.43/27.27  																																																		|
% 66.43/27.27  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1602), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.27  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.27  																																																			| (1607) high = mod1
% 66.43/27.27  																																																			|
% 66.43/27.27  																																																				| Equations (1607) can reduce 1581 to:
% 66.43/27.27  																																																				| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.27  																																																				|
% 66.43/27.27  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.27  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.27  																																																			| (1581)  ~ (high = mod1)
% 66.43/27.27  																																																			| (1610)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & smaller_or_equal(high, mod1) = v0)
% 66.43/27.27  																																																			|
% 66.43/27.27  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1606), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.27  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.27  																																																				| (1588) mod2 = mod1
% 66.43/27.27  																																																				|
% 66.43/27.27  																																																					| Equations (1588) can reduce 1583 to:
% 66.43/27.27  																																																					| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.27  																																																					|
% 66.43/27.27  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.27  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.27  																																																				| (1583)  ~ (mod2 = mod1)
% 66.43/27.27  																																																				| (1614)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & smaller_or_equal(mod2, mod1) = v0)
% 66.43/27.27  																																																				|
% 66.43/27.27  																																																					| Using (1198) and (347) yields:
% 66.43/27.27  																																																					| (1280)  ~ (all_4_8_11 = tau)
% 66.43/27.27  																																																					|
% 66.43/27.27  																																																					| Using (211) and (1279) yields:
% 66.43/27.27  																																																					| (1281)  ~ (all_61_1_69 = 0)
% 66.43/27.27  																																																					|
% 66.43/27.27  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (411), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.27  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.27  																																																					| (1298) smaller(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0
% 66.43/27.27  																																																					|
% 66.43/27.27  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (424), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.27  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.27  																																																						| (1299) all_59_1_67 = 0
% 66.43/27.27  																																																						|
% 66.43/27.27  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (208), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.27  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.27  																																																							| (1300)  ~ (all_59_0_66 = 0)
% 66.43/27.27  																																																							|
% 66.43/27.27  																																																								| Equations (291) can reduce 1300 to:
% 66.43/27.27  																																																								| (1011)  ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0)
% 66.43/27.27  																																																								|
% 66.43/27.27  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (531), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.27  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.27  																																																								| (996)  ~ (all_219_3_168 = 0)
% 66.43/27.27  																																																								|
% 66.43/27.27  																																																									| Equations (739) can reduce 996 to:
% 66.43/27.27  																																																									| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.27  																																																									|
% 66.43/27.27  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.27  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.27  																																																								| (739) all_219_3_168 = 0
% 66.43/27.27  																																																								| (999) ( ~ (all_219_2_167 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = very_low) & (all_219_2_167 = 0 | (( ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = mod2 | all_25_0_37 = 0) & ( ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0) | (( ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = low) & (all_219_0_165 = 0 | all_219_1_166 = mod1))) & (all_219_0_165 = 0 | all_219_1_166 = high | all_25_0_37 = 0)))
% 66.43/27.27  																																																								|
% 66.43/27.27  																																																									| Applying alpha-rule on (999) yields:
% 66.43/27.27  																																																									| (1000)  ~ (all_219_2_167 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = very_low
% 66.43/27.27  																																																									| (1001) all_219_2_167 = 0 | (( ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = mod2 | all_25_0_37 = 0) & ( ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0) | (( ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = low) & (all_219_0_165 = 0 | all_219_1_166 = mod1))) & (all_219_0_165 = 0 | all_219_1_166 = high | all_25_0_37 = 0))
% 66.43/27.27  																																																									|
% 66.43/27.27  																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1001), into two cases.
% 66.43/27.27  																																																									|-Branch one:
% 66.43/27.27  																																																									| (1002) all_219_2_167 = 0
% 66.43/27.27  																																																									|
% 66.43/27.27  																																																										| Combining equations (684,1002) yields a new equation:
% 66.43/27.27  																																																										| (1003) all_25_2_39 = 0
% 66.43/27.27  																																																										|
% 66.43/27.27  																																																										| Simplifying 1003 yields:
% 66.43/27.27  																																																										| (984) all_25_2_39 = 0
% 66.43/27.27  																																																										|
% 66.43/27.27  																																																										| Equations (984) can reduce 854 to:
% 66.43/27.27  																																																										| (231) $false
% 66.43/27.27  																																																										|
% 66.43/27.27  																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.43/27.27  																																																									|-Branch two:
% 66.43/27.27  																																																									| (1006)  ~ (all_219_2_167 = 0)
% 66.82/27.27  																																																									| (1007) ( ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = mod2 | all_25_0_37 = 0) & ( ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0) | (( ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = low) & (all_219_0_165 = 0 | all_219_1_166 = mod1))) & (all_219_0_165 = 0 | all_219_1_166 = high | all_25_0_37 = 0)
% 66.82/27.27  																																																									|
% 66.82/27.27  																																																										| Applying alpha-rule on (1007) yields:
% 66.82/27.27  																																																										| (1008)  ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = mod2 | all_25_0_37 = 0
% 66.82/27.27  																																																										| (1009)  ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0) | (( ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = low) & (all_219_0_165 = 0 | all_219_1_166 = mod1))
% 66.82/27.27  																																																										| (1010) all_219_0_165 = 0 | all_219_1_166 = high | all_25_0_37 = 0
% 66.82/27.27  																																																										|
% 66.82/27.27  																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1010), into two cases.
% 66.82/27.27  																																																										|-Branch one:
% 66.82/27.27  																																																										| (977) all_219_0_165 = 0
% 66.82/27.27  																																																										|
% 66.82/27.27  																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1008), into two cases.
% 66.82/27.27  																																																											|-Branch one:
% 66.82/27.27  																																																											| (1017)  ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0)
% 66.82/27.27  																																																											|
% 66.82/27.27  																																																												| Equations (977) can reduce 1017 to:
% 66.82/27.27  																																																												| (231) $false
% 66.82/27.27  																																																												|
% 66.82/27.27  																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.82/27.27  																																																											|-Branch two:
% 66.82/27.27  																																																											| (977) all_219_0_165 = 0
% 66.82/27.27  																																																											| (1344) all_219_1_166 = mod2 | all_25_0_37 = 0
% 66.82/27.27  																																																											|
% 66.82/27.27  																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1344), into two cases.
% 66.82/27.27  																																																												|-Branch one:
% 66.82/27.27  																																																												| (995) all_25_0_37 = 0
% 66.82/27.27  																																																												|
% 66.82/27.27  																																																													| Equations (995) can reduce 1011 to:
% 66.82/27.27  																																																													| (231) $false
% 66.82/27.27  																																																													|
% 66.82/27.27  																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.82/27.27  																																																												|-Branch two:
% 66.82/27.27  																																																												| (1011)  ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0)
% 66.82/27.27  																																																												| (1348) all_219_1_166 = mod2
% 66.82/27.27  																																																												|
% 66.82/27.27  																																																													| Combining equations (1079,1348) yields a new equation:
% 66.82/27.27  																																																													| (1588) mod2 = mod1
% 66.82/27.27  																																																													|
% 66.82/27.27  																																																													| Equations (1588) can reduce 1583 to:
% 66.82/27.27  																																																													| (231) $false
% 66.82/27.27  																																																													|
% 66.82/27.27  																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.82/27.27  																																																										|-Branch two:
% 66.82/27.27  																																																										| (1017)  ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0)
% 66.82/27.27  																																																										| (1353) all_219_1_166 = high | all_25_0_37 = 0
% 66.82/27.27  																																																										|
% 66.82/27.27  																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1353), into two cases.
% 66.82/27.27  																																																											|-Branch one:
% 66.82/27.27  																																																											| (995) all_25_0_37 = 0
% 66.82/27.27  																																																											|
% 66.82/27.27  																																																												| Equations (995) can reduce 1011 to:
% 66.82/27.27  																																																												| (231) $false
% 66.82/27.27  																																																												|
% 66.82/27.27  																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.82/27.27  																																																											|-Branch two:
% 66.82/27.27  																																																											| (1011)  ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0)
% 66.82/27.27  																																																											| (1357) all_219_1_166 = high
% 66.82/27.27  																																																											|
% 66.82/27.27  																																																												| Combining equations (1079,1357) yields a new equation:
% 66.82/27.27  																																																												| (1607) high = mod1
% 66.82/27.27  																																																												|
% 66.82/27.27  																																																												| Equations (1607) can reduce 1581 to:
% 66.82/27.27  																																																												| (231) $false
% 66.82/27.27  																																																												|
% 66.82/27.27  																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.82/27.27  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 66.82/27.27  																																																							| (1361) all_59_0_66 = 0
% 66.82/27.27  																																																							| (1362)  ~ (all_59_1_67 = 0)
% 66.82/27.27  																																																							|
% 66.82/27.27  																																																								| Equations (1299) can reduce 1362 to:
% 66.82/27.27  																																																								| (231) $false
% 66.82/27.27  																																																								|
% 66.82/27.27  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.82/27.27  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 66.82/27.27  																																																						| (1362)  ~ (all_59_1_67 = 0)
% 66.82/27.27  																																																						| (1365)  ~ (all_4_8_11 = tau) &  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & smaller(all_4_8_11, tau) = v0)
% 66.82/27.27  																																																						|
% 66.82/27.27  																																																							| Applying alpha-rule on (1365) yields:
% 66.82/27.27  																																																							| (1280)  ~ (all_4_8_11 = tau)
% 66.82/27.27  																																																							| (1367)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & smaller(all_4_8_11, tau) = v0)
% 66.82/27.27  																																																							|
% 66.82/27.27  																																																							| Instantiating (1367) with all_1149_0_920 yields:
% 66.82/27.27  																																																							| (1662)  ~ (all_1149_0_920 = 0) & smaller(all_4_8_11, tau) = all_1149_0_920
% 66.82/27.27  																																																							|
% 66.82/27.27  																																																							| Applying alpha-rule on (1662) yields:
% 66.82/27.27  																																																							| (1663)  ~ (all_1149_0_920 = 0)
% 66.82/27.27  																																																							| (1664) smaller(all_4_8_11, tau) = all_1149_0_920
% 66.82/27.27  																																																							|
% 66.82/27.27  																																																							| Instantiating formula (11) with all_4_8_11, tau, 0, all_1149_0_920 and discharging atoms smaller(all_4_8_11, tau) = all_1149_0_920, smaller(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0, yields:
% 66.82/27.27  																																																							| (1665) all_1149_0_920 = 0
% 66.82/27.27  																																																							|
% 66.82/27.27  																																																							| Equations (1665) can reduce 1663 to:
% 66.82/27.27  																																																							| (231) $false
% 66.82/27.27  																																																							|
% 66.82/27.27  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.82/27.27  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 66.82/27.27  																																																					| (1373)  ~ (smaller(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0)
% 66.82/27.27  																																																					| (1374) all_61_1_69 = 0 | all_4_8_11 = tau
% 66.82/27.27  																																																					|
% 66.82/27.27  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (413), into two cases.
% 66.82/27.27  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 66.82/27.27  																																																						| (1286) all_61_1_69 = 0
% 66.82/27.27  																																																						|
% 66.82/27.27  																																																							| Equations (1286) can reduce 1281 to:
% 66.82/27.27  																																																							| (231) $false
% 66.82/27.27  																																																							|
% 66.82/27.27  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.82/27.27  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 66.82/27.27  																																																						| (1281)  ~ (all_61_1_69 = 0)
% 66.82/27.27  																																																						| (1293)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & smaller(tau, all_4_8_11) = v0)
% 66.82/27.27  																																																						|
% 66.82/27.27  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (412), into two cases.
% 66.82/27.27  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 66.82/27.27  																																																							| (1282) all_4_8_11 = tau
% 66.82/27.27  																																																							|
% 66.82/27.27  																																																								| Equations (1282) can reduce 1280 to:
% 66.82/27.27  																																																								| (231) $false
% 66.82/27.27  																																																								|
% 66.82/27.27  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.82/27.27  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 66.82/27.27  																																																							| (1280)  ~ (all_4_8_11 = tau)
% 66.82/27.27  																																																							| (1285) all_61_1_69 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater_or_equal(all_4_8_11, tau) = v0)
% 66.82/27.27  																																																							|
% 66.82/27.27  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1374), into two cases.
% 66.82/27.27  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 66.82/27.27  																																																								| (1282) all_4_8_11 = tau
% 66.82/27.27  																																																								|
% 66.82/27.27  																																																									| Equations (1282) can reduce 1280 to:
% 66.82/27.27  																																																									| (231) $false
% 66.82/27.27  																																																									|
% 66.82/27.27  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.82/27.27  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 66.82/27.27  																																																								| (1280)  ~ (all_4_8_11 = tau)
% 66.82/27.27  																																																								| (1286) all_61_1_69 = 0
% 66.82/27.27  																																																								|
% 66.82/27.27  																																																									| Equations (1286) can reduce 1281 to:
% 66.82/27.27  																																																									| (231) $false
% 66.82/27.27  																																																									|
% 66.82/27.27  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.82/27.27  																																																|-Branch two:
% 66.82/27.27  																																																| (1380) greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0
% 66.82/27.27  																																																| (1381) all_157_0_91 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater(sigma, all_4_8_11) = v0)
% 66.82/27.27  																																																|
% 66.82/27.27  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (280), into two cases.
% 66.82/27.27  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 66.82/27.27  																																																	| (1279)  ~ (greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0)
% 66.82/27.28  																																																	|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																		| Using (1380) and (1279) yields:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																		| (222) $false
% 66.82/27.28  																																																		|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.82/27.28  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																	| (1380) greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0
% 66.82/27.28  																																																	| (1286) all_61_1_69 = 0
% 66.82/27.28  																																																	|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																		| From (1286) and (211) follows:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																		| (1380) greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0
% 66.82/27.28  																																																		|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (408), into two cases.
% 66.82/27.28  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																		| (1279)  ~ (greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0)
% 66.82/27.28  																																																		|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																			| Using (1380) and (1279) yields:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																			| (222) $false
% 66.82/27.28  																																																			|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.82/27.28  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																		| (1380) greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0
% 66.82/27.28  																																																		| (1417) all_57_1_65 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater(all_4_7_10, all_4_8_11) = v0)
% 66.82/27.28  																																																		|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (409), into two cases.
% 66.82/27.28  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																			| (1279)  ~ (greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0)
% 66.82/27.28  																																																			|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																				| Using (1380) and (1279) yields:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																				| (222) $false
% 66.82/27.28  																																																				|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.82/27.28  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																			| (1380) greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0
% 66.82/27.28  																																																			| (1409) smaller(tau, all_4_8_11) = 0
% 66.82/27.28  																																																			|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (422), into two cases.
% 66.82/27.28  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																				| (1279)  ~ (greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0)
% 66.82/27.28  																																																				|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																					| Using (1380) and (1279) yields:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																					| (222) $false
% 66.82/27.28  																																																					|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.82/27.28  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																				| (1380) greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0
% 66.82/27.28  																																																				| (1390) all_13_0_18 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater(zero, all_4_8_11) = v0)
% 66.82/27.28  																																																				|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (414), into two cases.
% 66.82/27.28  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																					| (1279)  ~ (greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0)
% 66.82/27.28  																																																					|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																						| Using (1380) and (1279) yields:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																						| (222) $false
% 66.82/27.28  																																																						|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.82/27.28  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																					| (1380) greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0
% 66.82/27.28  																																																					| (1413) all_33_1_45 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater(tau, sigma) = v0)
% 66.82/27.28  																																																					|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (420), into two cases.
% 66.82/27.28  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																						| (1183) all_33_1_45 = 0
% 66.82/27.28  																																																						|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																							| From (1183) and (175) follows:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																							| (1184) greater(all_4_8_11, sigma) = 0
% 66.82/27.28  																																																							|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																							| Using (1184) and (1185) yields:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																							| (222) $false
% 66.82/27.28  																																																							|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.82/27.28  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																						| (1401)  ~ (all_33_1_45 = 0)
% 66.82/27.28  																																																						| (1402)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = v0)
% 66.82/27.28  																																																						|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																							| Instantiating (1402) with all_1071_0_943 yields:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																							| (1710)  ~ (all_1071_0_943 = 0) & greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = all_1071_0_943
% 66.82/27.28  																																																							|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																							| Applying alpha-rule on (1710) yields:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																							| (1711)  ~ (all_1071_0_943 = 0)
% 66.82/27.28  																																																							| (1712) greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = all_1071_0_943
% 66.82/27.28  																																																							|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (410), into two cases.
% 66.82/27.28  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																							| (1279)  ~ (greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0)
% 66.82/27.28  																																																							|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																								| Using (1380) and (1279) yields:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																								| (222) $false
% 66.82/27.28  																																																								|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.82/27.28  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																							| (1380) greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0
% 66.82/27.28  																																																							| (1386)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater(tau, all_4_8_11) = v0)
% 66.82/27.28  																																																							|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																								| Instantiating formula (5) with all_4_8_11, tau, 0, all_1071_0_943 and discharging atoms greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = all_1071_0_943, greater(all_4_8_11, tau) = 0, yields:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																								| (1717) all_1071_0_943 = 0
% 66.82/27.28  																																																								|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																								| Equations (1717) can reduce 1711 to:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																								| (231) $false
% 66.82/27.28  																																																								|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.82/27.28  																																															|-Branch two:
% 66.82/27.28  																																															| (1184) greater(all_4_8_11, sigma) = 0
% 66.82/27.28  																																															| (1192)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & greater(sigma, all_4_8_11) = v0)
% 66.82/27.28  																																															|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																| Instantiating (1192) with all_959_0_968 yields:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																| (1721)  ~ (all_959_0_968 = 0) & greater(sigma, all_4_8_11) = all_959_0_968
% 66.82/27.28  																																																|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																| Applying alpha-rule on (1721) yields:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																| (1722)  ~ (all_959_0_968 = 0)
% 66.82/27.28  																																																| (1723) greater(sigma, all_4_8_11) = all_959_0_968
% 66.82/27.28  																																																|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																| Instantiating formula (5) with sigma, all_4_8_11, 0, all_959_0_968 and discharging atoms greater(sigma, all_4_8_11) = all_959_0_968, greater(sigma, all_4_8_11) = 0, yields:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																| (1724) all_959_0_968 = 0
% 66.82/27.28  																																																|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																| Equations (1724) can reduce 1722 to:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																| (231) $false
% 66.82/27.28  																																																|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.82/27.28  																																														|-Branch two:
% 66.82/27.28  																																														| (1205)  ~ (smaller(all_4_8_11, sigma) = 0)
% 66.82/27.28  																																														| (1206) all_4_8_11 = sigma
% 66.82/27.28  																																														|
% 66.82/27.28  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (424), into two cases.
% 66.82/27.28  																																															|-Branch one:
% 66.82/27.28  																																															| (1299) all_59_1_67 = 0
% 66.82/27.28  																																															|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (208), into two cases.
% 66.82/27.28  																																																|-Branch one:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																| (1300)  ~ (all_59_0_66 = 0)
% 66.82/27.28  																																																|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																	| Equations (291) can reduce 1300 to:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																	| (1011)  ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0)
% 66.82/27.28  																																																	|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (531), into two cases.
% 66.82/27.28  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																	| (996)  ~ (all_219_3_168 = 0)
% 66.82/27.28  																																																	|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																		| Equations (739) can reduce 996 to:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																		| (231) $false
% 66.82/27.28  																																																		|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.82/27.28  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																	| (739) all_219_3_168 = 0
% 66.82/27.28  																																																	| (999) ( ~ (all_219_2_167 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = very_low) & (all_219_2_167 = 0 | (( ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = mod2 | all_25_0_37 = 0) & ( ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0) | (( ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = low) & (all_219_0_165 = 0 | all_219_1_166 = mod1))) & (all_219_0_165 = 0 | all_219_1_166 = high | all_25_0_37 = 0)))
% 66.82/27.28  																																																	|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (999) yields:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																		| (1000)  ~ (all_219_2_167 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = very_low
% 66.82/27.28  																																																		| (1001) all_219_2_167 = 0 | (( ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = mod2 | all_25_0_37 = 0) & ( ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0) | (( ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = low) & (all_219_0_165 = 0 | all_219_1_166 = mod1))) & (all_219_0_165 = 0 | all_219_1_166 = high | all_25_0_37 = 0))
% 66.82/27.28  																																																		|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1001), into two cases.
% 66.82/27.28  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																		| (1002) all_219_2_167 = 0
% 66.82/27.28  																																																		|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																			| Combining equations (684,1002) yields a new equation:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																			| (1003) all_25_2_39 = 0
% 66.82/27.28  																																																			|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																			| Simplifying 1003 yields:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																			| (984) all_25_2_39 = 0
% 66.82/27.28  																																																			|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																			| Equations (984) can reduce 854 to:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																			| (231) $false
% 66.82/27.28  																																																			|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.82/27.28  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																		| (1006)  ~ (all_219_2_167 = 0)
% 66.82/27.28  																																																		| (1007) ( ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = mod2 | all_25_0_37 = 0) & ( ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0) | (( ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = low) & (all_219_0_165 = 0 | all_219_1_166 = mod1))) & (all_219_0_165 = 0 | all_219_1_166 = high | all_25_0_37 = 0)
% 66.82/27.28  																																																		|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (1007) yields:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																			| (1008)  ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = mod2 | all_25_0_37 = 0
% 66.82/27.28  																																																			| (1009)  ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0) | (( ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0) | all_219_1_166 = low) & (all_219_0_165 = 0 | all_219_1_166 = mod1))
% 66.82/27.28  																																																			| (1010) all_219_0_165 = 0 | all_219_1_166 = high | all_25_0_37 = 0
% 66.82/27.28  																																																			|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																			| Equations (684) can reduce 1006 to:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																			| (854)  ~ (all_25_2_39 = 0)
% 66.82/27.28  																																																			|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1010), into two cases.
% 66.82/27.28  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																			| (977) all_219_0_165 = 0
% 66.82/27.28  																																																			|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																				| Combining equations (640,977) yields a new equation:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																				| (1075) all_25_1_38 = 0
% 66.82/27.28  																																																				|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																				| Simplifying 1075 yields:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																				| (976) all_25_1_38 = 0
% 66.82/27.28  																																																				|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																				| Combining equations (976,740) yields a new equation:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																				| (1536) all_187_1_118 = 0
% 66.82/27.28  																																																				|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (447), into two cases.
% 66.82/27.28  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																				| (1455)  ~ (all_187_3_120 = 0)
% 66.82/27.28  																																																				|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																					| Equations (782) can reduce 1455 to:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																					| (231) $false
% 66.82/27.28  																																																					|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.82/27.28  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																				| (782) all_187_3_120 = 0
% 66.82/27.28  																																																				| (1458) ( ~ (all_25_2_39 = 0) | all_187_2_119 = very_low) & (all_25_2_39 = 0 | (( ~ (all_187_0_117 = 0) | (( ~ (all_187_1_118 = 0) | all_187_2_119 = low) & (all_187_1_118 = 0 | all_187_2_119 = mod1))) & ( ~ (all_187_1_118 = 0) | all_187_0_117 = 0 | all_187_2_119 = mod2) & (all_187_0_117 = 0 | all_187_1_118 = 0 | all_187_2_119 = high)))
% 66.82/27.28  																																																				|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																					| Applying alpha-rule on (1458) yields:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																					| (1459)  ~ (all_25_2_39 = 0) | all_187_2_119 = very_low
% 66.82/27.28  																																																					| (1460) all_25_2_39 = 0 | (( ~ (all_187_0_117 = 0) | (( ~ (all_187_1_118 = 0) | all_187_2_119 = low) & (all_187_1_118 = 0 | all_187_2_119 = mod1))) & ( ~ (all_187_1_118 = 0) | all_187_0_117 = 0 | all_187_2_119 = mod2) & (all_187_0_117 = 0 | all_187_1_118 = 0 | all_187_2_119 = high))
% 66.82/27.28  																																																					|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (509), into two cases.
% 66.82/27.28  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																					| (1134)  ~ (all_209_3_156 = 0)
% 66.82/27.28  																																																					|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																						| Equations (746) can reduce 1134 to:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																						| (231) $false
% 66.82/27.28  																																																						|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.82/27.28  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																					| (746) all_209_3_156 = 0
% 66.82/27.28  																																																					| (1137) ( ~ (all_209_2_155 = 0) | all_209_1_154 = very_low) & (all_209_2_155 = 0 | (( ~ (all_209_0_153 = 0) | (( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_209_1_154 = low) & (all_209_1_154 = mod1 | all_25_1_38 = 0))) & ( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_209_0_153 = 0 | all_209_1_154 = mod2) & (all_209_0_153 = 0 | all_209_1_154 = high | all_25_1_38 = 0)))
% 66.82/27.28  																																																					|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (1137) yields:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																						| (1138)  ~ (all_209_2_155 = 0) | all_209_1_154 = very_low
% 66.82/27.28  																																																						| (1139) all_209_2_155 = 0 | (( ~ (all_209_0_153 = 0) | (( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_209_1_154 = low) & (all_209_1_154 = mod1 | all_25_1_38 = 0))) & ( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_209_0_153 = 0 | all_209_1_154 = mod2) & (all_209_0_153 = 0 | all_209_1_154 = high | all_25_1_38 = 0))
% 66.82/27.28  																																																						|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1139), into two cases.
% 66.82/27.28  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																						| (1141) all_209_2_155 = 0
% 66.82/27.28  																																																						|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																							| Combining equations (1141,743) yields a new equation:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																							| (984) all_25_2_39 = 0
% 66.82/27.28  																																																							|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																							| Equations (984) can reduce 854 to:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																							| (231) $false
% 66.82/27.28  																																																							|
% 66.82/27.28  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.82/27.28  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 66.82/27.28  																																																						| (1144)  ~ (all_209_2_155 = 0)
% 66.82/27.28  																																																						| (1145) ( ~ (all_209_0_153 = 0) | (( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_209_1_154 = low) & (all_209_1_154 = mod1 | all_25_1_38 = 0))) & ( ~ (all_25_1_38 = 0) | all_209_0_153 = 0 | all_209_1_154 = mod2) & (all_209_0_153 = 0 | all_209_1_154 = high | all_25_1_38 = 0)
% 66.82/27.29  																																																						|
% 66.82/27.29  																																																							| Equations (743) can reduce 1144 to:
% 66.82/27.29  																																																							| (854)  ~ (all_25_2_39 = 0)
% 66.82/27.29  																																																							|
% 66.82/27.29  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1460), into two cases.
% 66.82/27.29  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 66.82/27.29  																																																							| (984) all_25_2_39 = 0
% 66.82/27.29  																																																							|
% 66.82/27.29  																																																								| Equations (984) can reduce 854 to:
% 66.82/27.29  																																																								| (231) $false
% 66.82/27.29  																																																								|
% 66.82/27.29  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.82/27.29  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 66.82/27.29  																																																							| (854)  ~ (all_25_2_39 = 0)
% 66.82/27.29  																																																							| (1464) ( ~ (all_187_0_117 = 0) | (( ~ (all_187_1_118 = 0) | all_187_2_119 = low) & (all_187_1_118 = 0 | all_187_2_119 = mod1))) & ( ~ (all_187_1_118 = 0) | all_187_0_117 = 0 | all_187_2_119 = mod2) & (all_187_0_117 = 0 | all_187_1_118 = 0 | all_187_2_119 = high)
% 66.82/27.29  																																																							|
% 66.82/27.29  																																																								| Applying alpha-rule on (1464) yields:
% 66.82/27.29  																																																								| (1526)  ~ (all_187_0_117 = 0) | (( ~ (all_187_1_118 = 0) | all_187_2_119 = low) & (all_187_1_118 = 0 | all_187_2_119 = mod1))
% 66.82/27.29  																																																								| (1527)  ~ (all_187_1_118 = 0) | all_187_0_117 = 0 | all_187_2_119 = mod2
% 66.82/27.29  																																																								| (1528) all_187_0_117 = 0 | all_187_1_118 = 0 | all_187_2_119 = high
% 66.82/27.29  																																																								|
% 66.82/27.29  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1527), into two cases.
% 66.82/27.29  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 66.82/27.29  																																																								| (1537)  ~ (all_187_1_118 = 0)
% 66.82/27.29  																																																								|
% 66.82/27.29  																																																									| Equations (1536) can reduce 1537 to:
% 66.82/27.29  																																																									| (231) $false
% 66.82/27.29  																																																									|
% 66.82/27.29  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.82/27.29  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 66.82/27.29  																																																								| (1536) all_187_1_118 = 0
% 66.82/27.29  																																																								| (1540) all_187_0_117 = 0 | all_187_2_119 = mod2
% 66.82/27.29  																																																								|
% 66.82/27.29  																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1540), into two cases.
% 66.82/27.29  																																																									|-Branch one:
% 66.82/27.29  																																																									| (1529) all_187_0_117 = 0
% 66.82/27.29  																																																									|
% 66.82/27.29  																																																										| Combining equations (755,1529) yields a new equation:
% 66.82/27.29  																																																										| (1325) all_25_0_37 = 0
% 66.82/27.29  																																																										|
% 66.82/27.29  																																																										| Simplifying 1325 yields:
% 66.82/27.29  																																																										| (995) all_25_0_37 = 0
% 66.82/27.29  																																																										|
% 66.82/27.29  																																																										| Equations (995) can reduce 1011 to:
% 66.82/27.29  																																																										| (231) $false
% 66.82/27.29  																																																										|
% 66.82/27.29  																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.82/27.29  																																																									|-Branch two:
% 66.82/27.29  																																																									| (1533)  ~ (all_187_0_117 = 0)
% 66.82/27.29  																																																									| (1546) all_187_2_119 = mod2
% 66.82/27.29  																																																									|
% 66.82/27.29  																																																										| Combining equations (1578,1546) yields a new equation:
% 66.82/27.29  																																																										| (1588) mod2 = mod1
% 66.82/27.29  																																																										|
% 66.82/27.29  																																																										| Equations (1588) can reduce 1583 to:
% 66.82/27.29  																																																										| (231) $false
% 66.82/27.29  																																																										|
% 66.82/27.29  																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.82/27.29  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 66.82/27.29  																																																			| (1017)  ~ (all_219_0_165 = 0)
% 66.82/27.29  																																																			| (1353) all_219_1_166 = high | all_25_0_37 = 0
% 66.82/27.29  																																																			|
% 66.82/27.29  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1353), into two cases.
% 66.82/27.29  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 66.82/27.29  																																																				| (995) all_25_0_37 = 0
% 66.82/27.29  																																																				|
% 66.82/27.29  																																																					| Equations (995) can reduce 1011 to:
% 66.82/27.29  																																																					| (231) $false
% 66.82/27.29  																																																					|
% 66.82/27.29  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.82/27.29  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 66.82/27.29  																																																				| (1011)  ~ (all_25_0_37 = 0)
% 66.82/27.29  																																																				| (1357) all_219_1_166 = high
% 66.82/27.29  																																																				|
% 66.82/27.29  																																																					| Combining equations (1079,1357) yields a new equation:
% 66.82/27.29  																																																					| (1607) high = mod1
% 66.82/27.29  																																																					|
% 66.82/27.29  																																																					| Equations (1607) can reduce 1581 to:
% 66.82/27.29  																																																					| (231) $false
% 66.82/27.29  																																																					|
% 66.82/27.29  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.82/27.29  																																																|-Branch two:
% 66.82/27.29  																																																| (1361) all_59_0_66 = 0
% 66.82/27.29  																																																| (1362)  ~ (all_59_1_67 = 0)
% 66.82/27.29  																																																|
% 66.82/27.29  																																																	| Equations (1299) can reduce 1362 to:
% 66.82/27.29  																																																	| (231) $false
% 66.82/27.29  																																																	|
% 66.82/27.29  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.82/27.29  																																															|-Branch two:
% 66.82/27.29  																																															| (1362)  ~ (all_59_1_67 = 0)
% 66.82/27.29  																																															| (1365)  ~ (all_4_8_11 = tau) &  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & smaller(all_4_8_11, tau) = v0)
% 66.82/27.29  																																															|
% 66.82/27.29  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (285), into two cases.
% 66.82/27.29  																																																|-Branch one:
% 66.82/27.29  																																																| (1801)  ~ (smaller_or_equal(all_4_8_11, tau) = all_55_1_63)
% 66.82/27.29  																																																|
% 66.82/27.29  																																																	| From (1206)(284) and (1801) follows:
% 66.82/27.29  																																																	| (1802)  ~ (smaller_or_equal(sigma, tau) = 0)
% 66.91/27.29  																																																	|
% 66.91/27.29  																																																	| Using (122) and (1802) yields:
% 66.91/27.29  																																																	| (222) $false
% 66.91/27.29  																																																	|
% 66.91/27.29  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.91/27.29  																																																|-Branch two:
% 66.91/27.29  																																																| (1804) smaller_or_equal(all_4_8_11, tau) = all_55_1_63
% 66.91/27.29  																																																| (1805) all_59_1_67 = all_55_1_63
% 66.91/27.29  																																																|
% 66.91/27.29  																																																	| Combining equations (284,1805) yields a new equation:
% 66.91/27.29  																																																	| (1299) all_59_1_67 = 0
% 66.91/27.29  																																																	|
% 66.91/27.29  																																																	| Equations (1299) can reduce 1362 to:
% 66.91/27.29  																																																	| (231) $false
% 66.91/27.29  																																																	|
% 66.91/27.29  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.91/27.29  																															|-Branch two:
% 66.91/27.29  																															| (1808) has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_10_13) = 0
% 66.91/27.29  																															| (1809)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (organization(all_4_14_17) = v0 & has_endowment(all_4_14_17) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 66.91/27.29  																															|
% 66.91/27.29  																																| Instantiating (1809) with all_477_0_996, all_477_1_997 yields:
% 66.91/27.29  																																| (1810) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_477_1_997 & has_endowment(all_4_14_17) = all_477_0_996 & ( ~ (all_477_1_997 = 0) | all_477_0_996 = 0)
% 66.91/27.29  																																|
% 66.91/27.29  																																| Applying alpha-rule on (1810) yields:
% 66.91/27.29  																																| (1811) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_477_1_997
% 66.91/27.29  																																| (1812) has_endowment(all_4_14_17) = all_477_0_996
% 66.91/27.29  																																| (1813)  ~ (all_477_1_997 = 0) | all_477_0_996 = 0
% 66.91/27.29  																																|
% 66.91/27.29  																																| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_477_1_997, 0 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_477_1_997, organization(all_4_14_17) = 0, yields:
% 66.91/27.29  																																| (1814) all_477_1_997 = 0
% 66.91/27.29  																																|
% 66.91/27.29  																																| Instantiating formula (13) with all_4_14_17, all_477_0_996, all_4_9_12 and discharging atoms has_endowment(all_4_14_17) = all_477_0_996, has_endowment(all_4_14_17) = all_4_9_12, yields:
% 66.91/27.29  																																| (1815) all_477_0_996 = all_4_9_12
% 66.91/27.29  																																|
% 66.91/27.29  																																| Using (1812) and (236) yields:
% 66.91/27.29  																																| (1816)  ~ (all_477_0_996 = 0)
% 66.91/27.29  																																|
% 66.91/27.29  																																| Equations (1815) can reduce 1816 to:
% 66.91/27.29  																																| (68)  ~ (all_4_9_12 = 0)
% 66.91/27.29  																																|
% 66.91/27.29  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1813), into two cases.
% 66.91/27.29  																																|-Branch one:
% 66.91/27.29  																																| (1818)  ~ (all_477_1_997 = 0)
% 66.91/27.29  																																|
% 66.91/27.29  																																	| Equations (1814) can reduce 1818 to:
% 66.91/27.29  																																	| (231) $false
% 66.91/27.29  																																	|
% 66.91/27.29  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.91/27.29  																																|-Branch two:
% 66.91/27.29  																																| (1814) all_477_1_997 = 0
% 66.91/27.29  																																| (1821) all_477_0_996 = 0
% 66.91/27.29  																																|
% 66.91/27.29  																																	| Combining equations (1821,1815) yields a new equation:
% 66.91/27.29  																																	| (230) all_4_9_12 = 0
% 66.91/27.29  																																	|
% 66.91/27.29  																																	| Equations (230) can reduce 68 to:
% 66.91/27.29  																																	| (231) $false
% 66.91/27.29  																																	|
% 66.91/27.29  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.91/27.29  																														|-Branch two:
% 66.91/27.29  																														| (1824) has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_11_14) = 0
% 66.91/27.29  																														| (1809)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (organization(all_4_14_17) = v0 & has_endowment(all_4_14_17) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 66.91/27.29  																														|
% 66.91/27.29  																															| Instantiating (1809) with all_465_0_998, all_465_1_999 yields:
% 66.91/27.29  																															| (1826) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_465_1_999 & has_endowment(all_4_14_17) = all_465_0_998 & ( ~ (all_465_1_999 = 0) | all_465_0_998 = 0)
% 66.91/27.29  																															|
% 66.91/27.29  																															| Applying alpha-rule on (1826) yields:
% 66.91/27.29  																															| (1827) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_465_1_999
% 66.91/27.29  																															| (1828) has_endowment(all_4_14_17) = all_465_0_998
% 66.91/27.29  																															| (1829)  ~ (all_465_1_999 = 0) | all_465_0_998 = 0
% 66.91/27.29  																															|
% 66.91/27.29  																															| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_465_1_999, 0 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_465_1_999, organization(all_4_14_17) = 0, yields:
% 66.91/27.29  																															| (1830) all_465_1_999 = 0
% 66.91/27.29  																															|
% 66.91/27.29  																															| Instantiating formula (13) with all_4_14_17, all_465_0_998, all_4_9_12 and discharging atoms has_endowment(all_4_14_17) = all_465_0_998, has_endowment(all_4_14_17) = all_4_9_12, yields:
% 66.91/27.29  																															| (1831) all_465_0_998 = all_4_9_12
% 66.91/27.29  																															|
% 66.91/27.29  																															| Using (1828) and (236) yields:
% 66.91/27.29  																															| (1832)  ~ (all_465_0_998 = 0)
% 66.91/27.29  																															|
% 66.91/27.29  																															| Equations (1831) can reduce 1832 to:
% 66.91/27.29  																															| (68)  ~ (all_4_9_12 = 0)
% 66.91/27.29  																															|
% 66.91/27.29  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1829), into two cases.
% 66.91/27.29  																															|-Branch one:
% 66.91/27.29  																															| (1834)  ~ (all_465_1_999 = 0)
% 66.91/27.29  																															|
% 66.91/27.29  																																| Equations (1830) can reduce 1834 to:
% 66.91/27.29  																																| (231) $false
% 66.91/27.29  																																|
% 66.91/27.29  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.91/27.29  																															|-Branch two:
% 66.91/27.29  																															| (1830) all_465_1_999 = 0
% 66.91/27.29  																															| (1837) all_465_0_998 = 0
% 66.91/27.29  																															|
% 66.91/27.29  																																| Combining equations (1837,1831) yields a new equation:
% 66.91/27.29  																																| (230) all_4_9_12 = 0
% 66.91/27.29  																																|
% 66.91/27.29  																																| Equations (230) can reduce 68 to:
% 66.91/27.29  																																| (231) $false
% 66.91/27.29  																																|
% 66.91/27.29  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.91/27.29  																							|-Branch two:
% 66.91/27.29  																							| (1840) has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_12_15) = 0
% 66.91/27.29  																							| (1809)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (organization(all_4_14_17) = v0 & has_endowment(all_4_14_17) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 66.91/27.29  																							|
% 66.91/27.29  																								| Instantiating (1809) with all_413_0_1000, all_413_1_1001 yields:
% 66.91/27.29  																								| (1842) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_413_1_1001 & has_endowment(all_4_14_17) = all_413_0_1000 & ( ~ (all_413_1_1001 = 0) | all_413_0_1000 = 0)
% 66.91/27.30  																								|
% 66.91/27.30  																								| Applying alpha-rule on (1842) yields:
% 66.91/27.30  																								| (1843) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_413_1_1001
% 66.91/27.30  																								| (1844) has_endowment(all_4_14_17) = all_413_0_1000
% 66.91/27.30  																								| (1845)  ~ (all_413_1_1001 = 0) | all_413_0_1000 = 0
% 66.91/27.30  																								|
% 66.91/27.30  																								| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_413_1_1001, 0 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_413_1_1001, organization(all_4_14_17) = 0, yields:
% 66.91/27.30  																								| (1846) all_413_1_1001 = 0
% 66.91/27.30  																								|
% 66.91/27.30  																								| Instantiating formula (13) with all_4_14_17, all_413_0_1000, all_4_9_12 and discharging atoms has_endowment(all_4_14_17) = all_413_0_1000, has_endowment(all_4_14_17) = all_4_9_12, yields:
% 66.91/27.30  																								| (1847) all_413_0_1000 = all_4_9_12
% 66.91/27.30  																								|
% 66.91/27.30  																								| Using (1844) and (236) yields:
% 66.91/27.30  																								| (1848)  ~ (all_413_0_1000 = 0)
% 66.91/27.30  																								|
% 66.91/27.30  																								| Equations (1847) can reduce 1848 to:
% 66.91/27.30  																								| (68)  ~ (all_4_9_12 = 0)
% 66.91/27.30  																								|
% 66.91/27.30  																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1845), into two cases.
% 66.91/27.30  																								|-Branch one:
% 66.91/27.30  																								| (1850)  ~ (all_413_1_1001 = 0)
% 66.91/27.30  																								|
% 66.91/27.30  																									| Equations (1846) can reduce 1850 to:
% 66.91/27.30  																									| (231) $false
% 66.91/27.30  																									|
% 66.91/27.30  																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.91/27.30  																								|-Branch two:
% 66.91/27.30  																								| (1846) all_413_1_1001 = 0
% 66.91/27.30  																								| (1853) all_413_0_1000 = 0
% 66.91/27.30  																								|
% 66.91/27.30  																									| Combining equations (1853,1847) yields a new equation:
% 66.91/27.30  																									| (230) all_4_9_12 = 0
% 66.91/27.30  																									|
% 66.91/27.30  																									| Equations (230) can reduce 68 to:
% 66.91/27.30  																									| (231) $false
% 66.91/27.30  																									|
% 66.91/27.30  																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.91/27.30  																						|-Branch two:
% 66.91/27.30  																						| (1856) has_immunity(all_4_14_17, all_4_13_16) = 0
% 66.91/27.30  																						| (1809)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (organization(all_4_14_17) = v0 & has_endowment(all_4_14_17) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 66.91/27.30  																						|
% 66.91/27.30  																							| Instantiating (1809) with all_409_0_1004, all_409_1_1005 yields:
% 66.91/27.30  																							| (1858) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_409_1_1005 & has_endowment(all_4_14_17) = all_409_0_1004 & ( ~ (all_409_1_1005 = 0) | all_409_0_1004 = 0)
% 66.91/27.30  																							|
% 66.91/27.30  																							| Applying alpha-rule on (1858) yields:
% 66.91/27.30  																							| (1859) organization(all_4_14_17) = all_409_1_1005
% 66.91/27.30  																							| (1860) has_endowment(all_4_14_17) = all_409_0_1004
% 66.91/27.30  																							| (1861)  ~ (all_409_1_1005 = 0) | all_409_0_1004 = 0
% 66.91/27.30  																							|
% 66.91/27.30  																							| Instantiating formula (8) with all_4_14_17, all_409_1_1005, 0 and discharging atoms organization(all_4_14_17) = all_409_1_1005, organization(all_4_14_17) = 0, yields:
% 66.91/27.30  																							| (1862) all_409_1_1005 = 0
% 66.91/27.30  																							|
% 66.91/27.30  																							| Instantiating formula (13) with all_4_14_17, all_409_0_1004, all_4_9_12 and discharging atoms has_endowment(all_4_14_17) = all_409_0_1004, has_endowment(all_4_14_17) = all_4_9_12, yields:
% 66.91/27.30  																							| (1863) all_409_0_1004 = all_4_9_12
% 66.91/27.30  																							|
% 66.91/27.30  																							| Using (1860) and (236) yields:
% 66.91/27.30  																							| (1864)  ~ (all_409_0_1004 = 0)
% 66.91/27.30  																							|
% 66.91/27.30  																							| Equations (1863) can reduce 1864 to:
% 66.91/27.30  																							| (68)  ~ (all_4_9_12 = 0)
% 66.91/27.30  																							|
% 66.91/27.30  																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1861), into two cases.
% 66.91/27.30  																							|-Branch one:
% 66.91/27.30  																							| (1866)  ~ (all_409_1_1005 = 0)
% 66.91/27.30  																							|
% 66.91/27.30  																								| Equations (1862) can reduce 1866 to:
% 66.91/27.30  																								| (231) $false
% 66.91/27.30  																								|
% 66.91/27.30  																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.91/27.30  																							|-Branch two:
% 66.91/27.30  																							| (1862) all_409_1_1005 = 0
% 66.91/27.30  																							| (1869) all_409_0_1004 = 0
% 66.91/27.30  																							|
% 66.91/27.30  																								| Combining equations (1869,1863) yields a new equation:
% 66.91/27.30  																								| (230) all_4_9_12 = 0
% 66.91/27.30  																								|
% 66.91/27.30  																								| Equations (230) can reduce 68 to:
% 66.91/27.30  																								| (231) $false
% 66.91/27.30  																								|
% 66.91/27.30  																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.91/27.30  																	|-Branch two:
% 66.91/27.30  																	| (1872) all_195_0_133 = 0
% 66.91/27.30  																	| (1873)  ~ (all_195_1_134 = 0)
% 66.91/27.30  																	|
% 66.91/27.30  																		| Equations (643) can reduce 1873 to:
% 66.91/27.30  																		| (231) $false
% 66.91/27.30  																		|
% 66.91/27.30  																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.91/27.30  														|-Branch two:
% 66.91/27.30  														| (1875) all_51_0_58 = 0
% 66.91/27.30  														| (1876)  ~ (all_51_1_59 = 0)
% 66.91/27.30  														|
% 66.91/27.30  															| Equations (603) can reduce 1876 to:
% 66.91/27.30  															| (231) $false
% 66.91/27.30  															|
% 66.91/27.30  															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.91/27.30  									|-Branch two:
% 66.91/27.30  									| (1878) greater(sigma, tau) = 0
% 66.91/27.30  									| (1879) greater(all_4_7_10, tau) = 0
% 66.91/27.30  									|
% 66.91/27.30  										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (278), into two cases.
% 66.91/27.30  										|-Branch one:
% 66.91/27.30  										| (1880)  ~ (greater(all_4_7_10, tau) = 0)
% 66.91/27.30  										|
% 66.91/27.30  											| Using (1879) and (1880) yields:
% 66.91/27.30  											| (222) $false
% 66.91/27.30  											|
% 66.91/27.30  											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.91/27.30  										|-Branch two:
% 66.91/27.30  										| (1879) greater(all_4_7_10, tau) = 0
% 66.91/27.30  										| (1883) all_57_1_65 = 0
% 66.91/27.30  										|
% 66.91/27.30  											| Equations (1883) can reduce 346 to:
% 66.91/27.30  											| (231) $false
% 66.91/27.30  											|
% 66.91/27.30  											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.91/27.30  								|-Branch two:
% 66.91/27.30  								| (1883) all_57_1_65 = 0
% 66.91/27.30  								| (1886) all_57_0_64 = 0
% 66.91/27.30  								|
% 66.91/27.30  									| Combining equations (1886,260) yields a new equation:
% 66.91/27.30  									| (935) all_19_0_26 = 0
% 66.91/27.30  									|
% 66.91/27.30  									| Equations (935) can reduce 333 to:
% 66.91/27.30  									| (231) $false
% 66.91/27.30  									|
% 66.91/27.30  									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.91/27.30  					|-Branch two:
% 66.91/27.30  					| (1889) all_55_0_62 = 0
% 66.91/27.30  					| (1890)  ~ (all_55_1_63 = 0)
% 66.91/27.30  					|
% 66.91/27.30  						| Equations (284) can reduce 1890 to:
% 66.91/27.30  						| (231) $false
% 66.91/27.30  						|
% 66.91/27.30  						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 66.91/27.30  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 66.91/27.30  
% 66.91/27.30  26697ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------