TSTP Solution File: MGT060-1 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : MGT060-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:26:29 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.41s
% Output : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11 % Problem : MGT060-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.10/0.11 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 9 09:34:20 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.41
% 0.18/0.41 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.18/0.41 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.18/0.41 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.41 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.41 SPASS derived 138 clauses, backtracked 87 clauses, performed 8 splits and kept 221 clauses.
% 0.18/0.41 SPASS allocated 75700 KBytes.
% 0.18/0.41 SPASS spent 0:00:00.07 on the problem.
% 0.18/0.41 0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 0.18/0.41 0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.18/0.41 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.18/0.41 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.18/0.41 0:00:00.01 for the reduction.
% 0.18/0.41
% 0.18/0.41
% 0.18/0.41 Here is a proof with depth 2, length 71 :
% 0.18/0.41 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.18/0.41 1[0:Inp] organization(u) || has_immunity(u,v) -> equal(hazard_of_mortality(u,v),very_low)**.
% 0.18/0.41 2[0:Inp] organization(u) || positional_advantage(u,v) is_aligned(u,v) -> has_immunity(u,v) equal(hazard_of_mortality(u,v),low)**.
% 0.18/0.41 3[0:Inp] organization(u) || positional_advantage(u,v) -> is_aligned(u,v) has_immunity(u,v) equal(hazard_of_mortality(u,v),mod1)**.
% 0.18/0.41 4[0:Inp] organization(u) || is_aligned(u,v) -> positional_advantage(u,v) has_immunity(u,v) equal(hazard_of_mortality(u,v),mod2)**.
% 0.18/0.41 5[0:Inp] organization(u) || -> positional_advantage(u,v) is_aligned(u,v) has_immunity(u,v) equal(hazard_of_mortality(u,v),high)**.
% 0.18/0.41 6[0:Inp] || -> greater(high,mod1)*l.
% 0.18/0.41 7[0:Inp] || -> greater(mod1,low)*l.
% 0.18/0.41 8[0:Inp] || -> greater(low,very_low)*l.
% 0.18/0.41 9[0:Inp] || -> greater(high,mod2)*l.
% 0.18/0.41 10[0:Inp] || -> greater(mod2,low)*l.
% 0.18/0.41 11[0:Inp] || -> organization(sk1)*.
% 0.18/0.41 12[0:Inp] || -> has_immunity(sk1,sk2)*.
% 0.18/0.41 13[0:Inp] || has_immunity(sk1,sk3)* -> .
% 0.18/0.41 14[0:Inp] || greater(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3),hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk2))*l -> .
% 0.18/0.41 24[0:Inp] || greater(u,v)* greater(v,w)* -> greater(u,w)*.
% 0.18/0.41 25[0:Inp] || -> greater(u,v) equal(u,v) smaller(u,v)*.
% 0.18/0.41 31[0:Res:12.0,1.1] organization(sk1) || -> equal(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk2),very_low)**.
% 0.18/0.41 32[0:Res:2.3,13.0] organization(sk1) || is_aligned(sk1,sk3) positional_advantage(sk1,sk3) -> equal(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3),low)**.
% 0.18/0.41 33[0:Res:3.2,13.0] organization(sk1) || positional_advantage(sk1,sk3) -> is_aligned(sk1,sk3) equal(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3),mod1)**.
% 0.18/0.41 34[0:Res:4.2,13.0] organization(sk1) || is_aligned(sk1,sk3) -> positional_advantage(sk1,sk3) equal(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3),mod2)**.
% 0.18/0.41 35[0:Res:5.1,13.0] organization(sk1) || -> is_aligned(sk1,sk3) positional_advantage(sk1,sk3) equal(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3),high)**.
% 0.18/0.41 37[0:Res:25.2,14.0] || -> smaller(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3),hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk2))* equal(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3),hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk2)).
% 0.18/0.41 39[0:MRR:31.0,11.0] || -> equal(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk2),very_low)**.
% 0.18/0.41 40[0:Rew:39.0,14.0] || greater(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3),very_low)*l -> .
% 0.18/0.41 42[0:MRR:35.0,11.0] || -> positional_advantage(sk1,sk3) is_aligned(sk1,sk3) equal(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3),high)**.
% 0.18/0.41 43[0:Rew:39.0,37.1,39.0,37.0] || -> equal(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3),very_low) smaller(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3),very_low)*.
% 0.18/0.41 44[0:MRR:33.0,11.0] || positional_advantage(sk1,sk3) -> is_aligned(sk1,sk3) equal(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3),mod1)**.
% 0.18/0.41 45[0:MRR:34.0,11.0] || is_aligned(sk1,sk3) -> positional_advantage(sk1,sk3) equal(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3),mod2)**.
% 0.18/0.41 47[0:MRR:32.0,11.0] || positional_advantage(sk1,sk3) is_aligned(sk1,sk3) -> equal(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3),low)**.
% 0.18/0.41 53[1:Spt:45.2] || -> equal(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3),mod2)**.
% 0.18/0.41 58[1:Rew:53.0,40.0] || greater(mod2,very_low)*l -> .
% 0.18/0.41 88[1:NCh:24.2,24.0,58.0,10.0] || greater(low,very_low)*l -> .
% 0.18/0.41 90[1:MRR:88.0,8.0] || -> .
% 0.18/0.41 91[1:Spt:90.0,45.2,53.0] || equal(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3),mod2)** -> .
% 0.18/0.41 92[1:Spt:90.0,45.0,45.1] || is_aligned(sk1,sk3) -> positional_advantage(sk1,sk3)*.
% 0.18/0.41 93[1:MRR:42.1,92.0] || -> positional_advantage(sk1,sk3) equal(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3),high)**.
% 0.18/0.41 94[1:MRR:47.0,92.1] || is_aligned(sk1,sk3) -> equal(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3),low)**.
% 0.18/0.41 95[2:Spt:44.2] || -> equal(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3),mod1)**.
% 0.18/0.41 100[2:Rew:95.0,40.0] || greater(mod1,very_low)*l -> .
% 0.18/0.41 137[2:NCh:24.2,24.0,100.0,7.0] || greater(low,very_low)*l -> .
% 0.18/0.41 139[2:MRR:137.0,8.0] || -> .
% 0.18/0.41 140[2:Spt:139.0,44.2,95.0] || equal(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3),mod1)** -> .
% 0.18/0.41 141[2:Spt:139.0,44.0,44.1] || positional_advantage(sk1,sk3)* -> is_aligned(sk1,sk3).
% 0.18/0.41 143[3:Spt:43.0] || -> equal(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3),very_low)**.
% 0.18/0.41 147[3:Rew:143.0,93.1] || -> positional_advantage(sk1,sk3)* equal(high,very_low).
% 0.18/0.41 148[3:Rew:143.0,94.1] || is_aligned(sk1,sk3)* -> equal(low,very_low).
% 0.18/0.41 149[3:Rew:143.0,40.0] || greater(very_low,very_low)* -> .
% 0.18/0.41 151[4:Spt:147.0] || -> positional_advantage(sk1,sk3)*.
% 0.18/0.41 152[4:MRR:141.0,151.0] || -> is_aligned(sk1,sk3)*.
% 0.18/0.41 153[4:MRR:148.0,152.0] || -> equal(low,very_low)**.
% 0.18/0.41 154[4:Rew:153.0,8.0] || -> greater(very_low,very_low)*.
% 0.18/0.41 159[4:MRR:154.0,149.0] || -> .
% 0.18/0.41 162[4:Spt:159.0,147.0,151.0] || positional_advantage(sk1,sk3)* -> .
% 0.18/0.41 163[4:Spt:159.0,147.1] || -> equal(high,very_low)**.
% 0.18/0.41 164[4:Rew:163.0,9.0] || -> greater(very_low,mod2)*r.
% 0.18/0.41 172[4:OCh:24.1,24.0,164.0,10.0] || -> greater(very_low,low)*r.
% 0.18/0.41 174[4:OCh:24.1,24.0,172.0,8.0] || -> greater(very_low,very_low)*.
% 0.18/0.41 175[4:MRR:174.0,149.0] || -> .
% 0.18/0.41 176[3:Spt:175.0,43.0,143.0] || equal(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3),very_low)** -> .
% 0.18/0.41 177[3:Spt:175.0,43.1] || -> smaller(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3),very_low)*.
% 0.18/0.41 182[4:Spt:93.1] || -> equal(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3),high)**.
% 0.18/0.41 191[4:Rew:182.0,40.0] || greater(high,very_low)*l -> .
% 0.18/0.41 195[4:NCh:24.2,24.0,191.0,6.0] || greater(mod1,very_low)*l -> .
% 0.18/0.41 199[4:NCh:24.2,24.0,195.0,7.0] || greater(low,very_low)*l -> .
% 0.18/0.41 201[4:MRR:199.0,8.0] || -> .
% 0.18/0.41 202[4:Spt:201.0,93.1,182.0] || equal(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3),high)** -> .
% 0.18/0.41 203[4:Spt:201.0,93.0] || -> positional_advantage(sk1,sk3)*.
% 0.18/0.41 204[4:MRR:141.0,203.0] || -> is_aligned(sk1,sk3)*.
% 0.18/0.41 205[4:MRR:94.0,204.0] || -> equal(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3),low)**.
% 0.18/0.41 214[4:Rew:205.0,40.0] || greater(low,very_low)*l -> .
% 0.18/0.41 215[4:MRR:214.0,8.0] || -> .
% 0.18/0.41 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.18/0.41 Formulae used in the proof : assumption_17_32 assumption_17_33 assumption_17_34 assumption_17_35 assumption_17_36 assumption_18a_37 assumption_18b_38 assumption_18c_39 assumption_18d_40 assumption_18e_41 assumption_3_42 assumption_3_43 assumption_3_44 assumption_3_45 meaning_postulate_greater_transitive_10 meaning_postulate_greater_comparable_11
% 0.18/0.41
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------