TSTP Solution File: MGT060+1 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : MGT060+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:26:29 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.21s 0.46s
% Output : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : MGT060+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Jun 9 08:02:34 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.46
% 0.21/0.46 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.21/0.46 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.21/0.46 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.46 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.46 SPASS derived 138 clauses, backtracked 87 clauses, performed 8 splits and kept 221 clauses.
% 0.21/0.46 SPASS allocated 97680 KBytes.
% 0.21/0.46 SPASS spent 0:00:00.10 on the problem.
% 0.21/0.46 0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.21/0.46 0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.21/0.46 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.21/0.46 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.21/0.46 0:00:00.01 for the reduction.
% 0.21/0.46
% 0.21/0.46
% 0.21/0.46 Here is a proof with depth 2, length 71 :
% 0.21/0.46 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.21/0.46 1[0:Inp] || -> organization(skc3)*.
% 0.21/0.46 2[0:Inp] || -> has_immunity(skc3,skc5)*.
% 0.21/0.46 3[0:Inp] || -> greater(high,mod1)*l.
% 0.21/0.46 4[0:Inp] || -> greater(mod1,low)*l.
% 0.21/0.46 5[0:Inp] || -> greater(low,very_low)*l.
% 0.21/0.46 6[0:Inp] || -> greater(high,mod2)*l.
% 0.21/0.46 7[0:Inp] || -> greater(mod2,low)*l.
% 0.21/0.46 8[0:Inp] || has_immunity(skc3,skc4)* -> .
% 0.21/0.46 15[0:Inp] || greater(hazard_of_mortality(skc3,skc4),hazard_of_mortality(skc3,skc5))*r -> .
% 0.21/0.46 17[0:Inp] || -> greater(u,v) equal(u,v) smaller(u,v)*.
% 0.21/0.46 20[0:Inp] || greater(u,v)* greater(v,w)* -> greater(u,w)*.
% 0.21/0.46 21[0:Inp] organization(u) || has_immunity(u,v) -> equal(hazard_of_mortality(u,v),very_low)**.
% 0.21/0.46 22[0:Inp] organization(u) || -> has_immunity(u,v) positional_advantage(u,v) is_aligned(u,v) equal(hazard_of_mortality(u,v),high)**.
% 0.21/0.46 23[0:Inp] organization(u) || positional_advantage(u,v) -> has_immunity(u,v) is_aligned(u,v) equal(hazard_of_mortality(u,v),mod1)**.
% 0.21/0.46 24[0:Inp] organization(u) || is_aligned(u,v) -> has_immunity(u,v) positional_advantage(u,v) equal(hazard_of_mortality(u,v),mod2)**.
% 0.21/0.46 25[0:Inp] organization(u) || is_aligned(u,v) positional_advantage(u,v) -> has_immunity(u,v) equal(hazard_of_mortality(u,v),low)**.
% 0.21/0.46 31[0:Res:2.0,21.1] organization(skc3) || -> equal(hazard_of_mortality(skc3,skc5),very_low)**.
% 0.21/0.46 32[0:Res:25.4,8.0] organization(skc3) || positional_advantage(skc3,skc4) is_aligned(skc3,skc4) -> equal(hazard_of_mortality(skc3,skc4),low)**.
% 0.21/0.46 33[0:Res:23.4,8.0] organization(skc3) || positional_advantage(skc3,skc4) -> is_aligned(skc3,skc4) equal(hazard_of_mortality(skc3,skc4),mod1)**.
% 0.21/0.46 34[0:Res:24.4,8.0] organization(skc3) || is_aligned(skc3,skc4) -> positional_advantage(skc3,skc4) equal(hazard_of_mortality(skc3,skc4),mod2)**.
% 0.21/0.46 35[0:Res:22.4,8.0] organization(skc3) || -> is_aligned(skc3,skc4) positional_advantage(skc3,skc4) equal(hazard_of_mortality(skc3,skc4),high)**.
% 0.21/0.46 37[0:Res:17.2,15.0] || -> smaller(hazard_of_mortality(skc3,skc4),hazard_of_mortality(skc3,skc5))* equal(hazard_of_mortality(skc3,skc5),hazard_of_mortality(skc3,skc4)).
% 0.21/0.46 39[0:MRR:31.0,1.0] || -> equal(hazard_of_mortality(skc3,skc5),very_low)**.
% 0.21/0.46 40[0:Rew:39.0,15.0] || greater(hazard_of_mortality(skc3,skc4),very_low)*l -> .
% 0.21/0.46 42[0:MRR:35.0,1.0] || -> positional_advantage(skc3,skc4) is_aligned(skc3,skc4) equal(hazard_of_mortality(skc3,skc4),high)**.
% 0.21/0.46 43[0:Rew:39.0,37.1,39.0,37.0] || -> equal(hazard_of_mortality(skc3,skc4),very_low) smaller(hazard_of_mortality(skc3,skc4),very_low)*.
% 0.21/0.46 44[0:MRR:33.0,1.0] || positional_advantage(skc3,skc4) -> is_aligned(skc3,skc4) equal(hazard_of_mortality(skc3,skc4),mod1)**.
% 0.21/0.46 45[0:MRR:34.0,1.0] || is_aligned(skc3,skc4) -> positional_advantage(skc3,skc4) equal(hazard_of_mortality(skc3,skc4),mod2)**.
% 0.21/0.46 47[0:MRR:32.0,1.0] || is_aligned(skc3,skc4) positional_advantage(skc3,skc4) -> equal(hazard_of_mortality(skc3,skc4),low)**.
% 0.21/0.46 53[1:Spt:45.2] || -> equal(hazard_of_mortality(skc3,skc4),mod2)**.
% 0.21/0.46 58[1:Rew:53.0,40.0] || greater(mod2,very_low)*l -> .
% 0.21/0.46 88[1:NCh:20.2,20.0,58.0,7.0] || greater(low,very_low)*l -> .
% 0.21/0.46 90[1:MRR:88.0,5.0] || -> .
% 0.21/0.46 91[1:Spt:90.0,45.2,53.0] || equal(hazard_of_mortality(skc3,skc4),mod2)** -> .
% 0.21/0.46 92[1:Spt:90.0,45.0,45.1] || is_aligned(skc3,skc4) -> positional_advantage(skc3,skc4)*.
% 0.21/0.46 93[1:MRR:42.1,92.0] || -> positional_advantage(skc3,skc4) equal(hazard_of_mortality(skc3,skc4),high)**.
% 0.21/0.46 94[1:MRR:47.1,92.1] || is_aligned(skc3,skc4) -> equal(hazard_of_mortality(skc3,skc4),low)**.
% 0.21/0.46 95[2:Spt:44.2] || -> equal(hazard_of_mortality(skc3,skc4),mod1)**.
% 0.21/0.46 100[2:Rew:95.0,40.0] || greater(mod1,very_low)*l -> .
% 0.21/0.46 137[2:NCh:20.2,20.0,100.0,4.0] || greater(low,very_low)*l -> .
% 0.21/0.46 139[2:MRR:137.0,5.0] || -> .
% 0.21/0.46 140[2:Spt:139.0,44.2,95.0] || equal(hazard_of_mortality(skc3,skc4),mod1)** -> .
% 0.21/0.46 141[2:Spt:139.0,44.0,44.1] || positional_advantage(skc3,skc4)* -> is_aligned(skc3,skc4).
% 0.21/0.46 143[3:Spt:43.0] || -> equal(hazard_of_mortality(skc3,skc4),very_low)**.
% 0.21/0.46 147[3:Rew:143.0,93.1] || -> positional_advantage(skc3,skc4)* equal(high,very_low).
% 0.21/0.46 148[3:Rew:143.0,94.1] || is_aligned(skc3,skc4)* -> equal(low,very_low).
% 0.21/0.46 149[3:Rew:143.0,40.0] || greater(very_low,very_low)* -> .
% 0.21/0.46 151[4:Spt:147.0] || -> positional_advantage(skc3,skc4)*.
% 0.21/0.46 152[4:MRR:141.0,151.0] || -> is_aligned(skc3,skc4)*.
% 0.21/0.46 153[4:MRR:148.0,152.0] || -> equal(low,very_low)**.
% 0.21/0.46 154[4:Rew:153.0,5.0] || -> greater(very_low,very_low)*.
% 0.21/0.46 159[4:MRR:154.0,149.0] || -> .
% 0.21/0.46 162[4:Spt:159.0,147.0,151.0] || positional_advantage(skc3,skc4)* -> .
% 0.21/0.46 163[4:Spt:159.0,147.1] || -> equal(high,very_low)**.
% 0.21/0.46 164[4:Rew:163.0,6.0] || -> greater(very_low,mod2)*r.
% 0.21/0.46 172[4:OCh:20.1,20.0,164.0,7.0] || -> greater(very_low,low)*r.
% 0.21/0.46 174[4:OCh:20.1,20.0,172.0,5.0] || -> greater(very_low,very_low)*.
% 0.21/0.46 175[4:MRR:174.0,149.0] || -> .
% 0.21/0.46 176[3:Spt:175.0,43.0,143.0] || equal(hazard_of_mortality(skc3,skc4),very_low)** -> .
% 0.21/0.46 177[3:Spt:175.0,43.1] || -> smaller(hazard_of_mortality(skc3,skc4),very_low)*.
% 0.21/0.46 182[4:Spt:93.1] || -> equal(hazard_of_mortality(skc3,skc4),high)**.
% 0.21/0.46 191[4:Rew:182.0,40.0] || greater(high,very_low)*l -> .
% 0.21/0.46 195[4:NCh:20.2,20.0,191.0,3.0] || greater(mod1,very_low)*l -> .
% 0.21/0.46 199[4:NCh:20.2,20.0,195.0,4.0] || greater(low,very_low)*l -> .
% 0.21/0.46 201[4:MRR:199.0,5.0] || -> .
% 0.21/0.46 202[4:Spt:201.0,93.1,182.0] || equal(hazard_of_mortality(skc3,skc4),high)** -> .
% 0.21/0.46 203[4:Spt:201.0,93.0] || -> positional_advantage(skc3,skc4)*.
% 0.21/0.46 204[4:MRR:141.0,203.0] || -> is_aligned(skc3,skc4)*.
% 0.21/0.46 205[4:MRR:94.0,204.0] || -> equal(hazard_of_mortality(skc3,skc4),low)**.
% 0.21/0.46 214[4:Rew:205.0,40.0] || greater(low,very_low)*l -> .
% 0.21/0.46 215[4:MRR:214.0,5.0] || -> .
% 0.21/0.46 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.21/0.46 Formulae used in the proof : assumption_3 assumption_18a assumption_18b assumption_18c assumption_18d assumption_18e meaning_postulate_greater_comparable meaning_postulate_greater_transitive assumption_17
% 0.21/0.46
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------