TSTP Solution File: MGT060+1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : MGT060+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 09:07:07 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.88s 0.94s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.88s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : MGT060+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 06:42:14 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.57 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.88/0.93 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.88/0.93 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.88/0.93 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.88/0.93 % Transform :cnf
% 0.88/0.93 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.88/0.93 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.88/0.93
% 0.88/0.93 % Result :Theorem 0.300000s
% 0.88/0.93 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.300000s
% 0.88/0.93 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.88/0.94 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.88/0.94 % File : MGT060+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.88/0.94 % Domain : Management (Organisation Theory)
% 0.88/0.94 % Problem : Hazard of mortality is lower during periods of immunity
% 0.88/0.94 % Version : [Han98] axioms.
% 0.88/0.94 % English : An organization's hazard of mortality is lower during periods in
% 0.88/0.94 % which it has immunity than in periods in which it does not.
% 0.88/0.94
% 0.88/0.94 % Refs : [Kam00] Kamps (2000), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.88/0.94 % : [CH00] Carroll & Hannan (2000), The Demography of Corporation
% 0.88/0.94 % : [Han98] Hannan (1998), Rethinking Age Dependence in Organizati
% 0.88/0.94 % Source : [Kam00]
% 0.88/0.94 % Names : ASSUMPTION 3 [Han98]
% 0.88/0.94
% 0.88/0.94 % Status : Theorem
% 0.88/0.94 % Rating : 0.17 v8.1.0, 0.14 v7.5.0, 0.16 v7.4.0, 0.17 v7.3.0, 0.14 v7.2.0, 0.10 v7.1.0, 0.17 v7.0.0, 0.13 v6.4.0, 0.19 v6.3.0, 0.21 v6.2.0, 0.24 v6.1.0, 0.27 v6.0.0, 0.22 v5.5.0, 0.19 v5.4.0, 0.25 v5.3.0, 0.30 v5.2.0, 0.25 v5.1.0, 0.24 v5.0.0, 0.25 v4.1.0, 0.26 v4.0.0, 0.25 v3.5.0, 0.21 v3.2.0, 0.18 v3.1.0, 0.33 v2.4.0
% 0.88/0.94 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% 0.88/0.94 % Number of atoms : 41 ( 8 equ)
% 0.88/0.94 % Maximal formula atoms : 16 ( 3 avg)
% 0.88/0.94 % Number of connectives : 35 ( 7 ~; 4 |; 12 &)
% 0.88/0.94 % ( 3 <=>; 9 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% 0.88/0.94 % Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 4 avg)
% 0.88/0.94 % Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% 0.88/0.94 % Number of predicates : 9 ( 8 usr; 0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 0.88/0.94 % Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.88/0.94 % Number of variables : 18 ( 18 !; 0 ?)
% 0.88/0.94 % SPC : FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ
% 0.88/0.94
% 0.88/0.94 % Comments : See MGT042+1.p for the mnemonic names.
% 0.88/0.94 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.88/0.94 include('Axioms/MGT001+0.ax').
% 0.88/0.94 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.88/0.94 %----Problem Axioms
% 0.88/0.94 %----An organization's immunity. alignment of capability with the
% 0.88/0.94 %----current state of the environment and positional advantage jointly
% 0.88/0.94 %----affect the hazard of mortality with the following ordinal scaling:
% 0.88/0.94 fof(assumption_17,axiom,
% 0.88/0.94 ! [X,T] :
% 0.88/0.94 ( organization(X)
% 0.88/0.94 => ( ( has_immunity(X,T)
% 0.88/0.94 => hazard_of_mortality(X,T) = very_low )
% 0.88/0.94 & ( ~ has_immunity(X,T)
% 0.88/0.94 => ( ( ( is_aligned(X,T)
% 0.88/0.94 & positional_advantage(X,T) )
% 0.88/0.94 => hazard_of_mortality(X,T) = low )
% 0.88/0.94 & ( ( ~ is_aligned(X,T)
% 0.88/0.94 & positional_advantage(X,T) )
% 0.88/0.94 => hazard_of_mortality(X,T) = mod1 )
% 0.88/0.94 & ( ( is_aligned(X,T)
% 0.88/0.94 & ~ positional_advantage(X,T) )
% 0.88/0.94 => hazard_of_mortality(X,T) = mod2 )
% 0.88/0.94 & ( ( ~ is_aligned(X,T)
% 0.88/0.94 & ~ positional_advantage(X,T) )
% 0.88/0.94 => hazard_of_mortality(X,T) = high ) ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.88/0.94
% 0.88/0.94 %----The levels of hazard of mortality are ordered:
% 0.88/0.94 %----
% 0.88/0.94 %----Split over 5 separate formulas because TPTP gives an error on top
% 0.88/0.94 %----level occurrences of `&'.
% 0.88/0.94 fof(assumption_18a,axiom,
% 0.88/0.94 greater(high,mod1) ).
% 0.88/0.94
% 0.88/0.94 fof(assumption_18b,axiom,
% 0.88/0.94 greater(mod1,low) ).
% 0.88/0.94
% 0.88/0.94 fof(assumption_18c,axiom,
% 0.88/0.94 greater(low,very_low) ).
% 0.88/0.94
% 0.88/0.94 fof(assumption_18d,axiom,
% 0.88/0.94 greater(high,mod2) ).
% 0.88/0.94
% 0.88/0.94 fof(assumption_18e,axiom,
% 0.88/0.94 greater(mod2,low) ).
% 0.88/0.94
% 0.88/0.94 %----Problem theorems
% 0.88/0.94 %----Text says on p.152 ``These assumptions [A17,A18] have the same effect
% 0.88/0.94 %---- as assumptions 2 and 3 in the formalization used in section III.''
% 0.88/0.94 %----This is indeed the case for these assumptions are now derivable.
% 0.88/0.94 %----A3 from A17, A18a,b,c,e (also needs D<, MP>str, MP>com, MP>tra).
% 0.88/0.94 %----
% 0.88/0.94 %----An organization's hazard of mortality is lower during periods in
% 0.88/0.94 %----which it has immunity than in periods in which it does not.
% 0.88/0.94 fof(assumption_3,conjecture,
% 0.88/0.94 ! [X,T0,T] :
% 0.88/0.94 ( ( organization(X)
% 0.88/0.94 & has_immunity(X,T0)
% 0.88/0.94 & ~ has_immunity(X,T) )
% 0.88/0.94 => greater(hazard_of_mortality(X,T),hazard_of_mortality(X,T0)) ) ).
% 0.88/0.94
% 0.88/0.94 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.88/0.94 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.88/0.94 % Proof found
% 0.88/0.94 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.88/0.94 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.88/0.94 %ClaNum:48(EqnAxiom:22)
% 0.88/0.94 %VarNum:94(SingletonVarNum:35)
% 0.88/0.94 %MaxLitNum:4
% 0.88/0.94 %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.88/0.94 %SharedTerms:19
% 0.88/0.94 %goalClause: 23 29 30 31
% 0.88/0.94 %singleGoalClaCount:4
% 0.88/0.94 [23]P1(a1)
% 0.88/0.94 [24]P2(a2,a7)
% 0.88/0.94 [25]P2(a8,a2)
% 0.88/0.94 [26]P2(a9,a2)
% 0.88/0.94 [27]P2(a3,a8)
% 0.88/0.94 [28]P2(a3,a9)
% 0.88/0.94 [29]P4(a1,a4)
% 0.88/0.94 [30]~P4(a1,a5)
% 0.88/0.94 [31]~P2(f6(a1,a5),f6(a1,a4))
% 0.88/0.94 [32]~E(x321,x322)+P7(x321,x322)
% 0.88/0.94 [33]~E(x331,x332)+P5(x331,x332)
% 0.88/0.94 [36]~P8(x361,x362)+P7(x361,x362)
% 0.88/0.94 [37]~P2(x372,x371)+P8(x371,x372)
% 0.88/0.94 [38]~P2(x381,x382)+P5(x381,x382)
% 0.88/0.94 [39]~P8(x392,x391)+P2(x391,x392)
% 0.88/0.94 [43]~P2(x432,x431)+~P2(x431,x432)
% 0.88/0.95 [34]P8(x341,x342)+P2(x341,x342)+E(x341,x342)
% 0.88/0.95 [35]P3(x351,x352)+~P1(x351)+P4(x351,x352)
% 0.88/0.95 [40]P8(x401,x402)+~P7(x401,x402)+E(x401,x402)
% 0.88/0.95 [41]P2(x411,x412)+~P5(x411,x412)+E(x411,x412)
% 0.88/0.95 [42]~P1(x421)+~P4(x421,x422)+E(f6(x421,x422),a7)
% 0.88/0.95 [44]~P2(x441,x443)+P2(x441,x442)+~P2(x443,x442)
% 0.88/0.95 [45]P6(x451,x452)+P9(x451,x452)+~P3(x451,x452)+E(f6(x451,x452),a3)
% 0.88/0.95 [46]P6(x461,x462)+~P9(x461,x462)+~P3(x461,x462)+E(f6(x461,x462),a8)
% 0.88/0.95 [47]P9(x471,x472)+~P6(x471,x472)+~P3(x471,x472)+E(f6(x471,x472),a9)
% 0.88/0.95 [48]~P6(x481,x482)+~P9(x481,x482)+~P3(x481,x482)+E(f6(x481,x482),a2)
% 0.88/0.95 %EqnAxiom
% 0.88/0.95 [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.88/0.95 [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.88/0.95 [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.88/0.95 [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f6(x41,x43),f6(x42,x43))
% 0.88/0.95 [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f6(x53,x51),f6(x53,x52))
% 0.88/0.95 [6]~P1(x61)+P1(x62)+~E(x61,x62)
% 0.88/0.95 [7]P2(x72,x73)+~E(x71,x72)+~P2(x71,x73)
% 0.88/0.95 [8]P2(x83,x82)+~E(x81,x82)+~P2(x83,x81)
% 0.88/0.95 [9]P6(x92,x93)+~E(x91,x92)+~P6(x91,x93)
% 0.88/0.95 [10]P6(x103,x102)+~E(x101,x102)+~P6(x103,x101)
% 0.88/0.95 [11]P3(x112,x113)+~E(x111,x112)+~P3(x111,x113)
% 0.88/0.95 [12]P3(x123,x122)+~E(x121,x122)+~P3(x123,x121)
% 0.88/0.95 [13]P4(x132,x133)+~E(x131,x132)+~P4(x131,x133)
% 0.88/0.95 [14]P4(x143,x142)+~E(x141,x142)+~P4(x143,x141)
% 0.88/0.95 [15]P9(x152,x153)+~E(x151,x152)+~P9(x151,x153)
% 0.88/0.95 [16]P9(x163,x162)+~E(x161,x162)+~P9(x163,x161)
% 0.88/0.95 [17]P8(x172,x173)+~E(x171,x172)+~P8(x171,x173)
% 0.88/0.95 [18]P8(x183,x182)+~E(x181,x182)+~P8(x183,x181)
% 0.88/0.95 [19]P7(x192,x193)+~E(x191,x192)+~P7(x191,x193)
% 0.88/0.95 [20]P7(x203,x202)+~E(x201,x202)+~P7(x203,x201)
% 0.88/0.95 [21]P5(x212,x213)+~E(x211,x212)+~P5(x211,x213)
% 0.88/0.95 [22]P5(x223,x222)+~E(x221,x222)+~P5(x223,x221)
% 0.88/0.95
% 0.88/0.95 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(49,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (~P2(a7,a2)),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[24,43])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(50,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (~P8(f6(a1,a4),f6(a1,a5))),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[24,31,43,39])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(51,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (~E(a4,a5)),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[29,30,24,31,43,39,14])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(52,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (~E(a8,a7)),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[29,30,24,25,31,43,39,14,7])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(53,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (P2(a8,a7)),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[29,30,24,25,31,43,39,14,7,44])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(55,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (P3(a1,a5)),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[23,29,30,24,25,31,43,39,14,7,44,35])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(58,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (P5(a2,a7)),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[23,29,30,24,25,31,43,39,14,7,44,35,2,38])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(60,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (P8(a7,a2)),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[23,29,30,24,25,31,43,39,14,7,44,35,2,38,37])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(62,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (P7(a7,a2)),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[23,29,30,24,25,31,43,39,14,7,44,35,2,38,37,36])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(64,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (~P8(f6(a1,a4),x641)+~E(x641,f6(a1,a5))),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[23,29,30,24,25,31,43,39,14,7,44,35,2,38,37,36,18])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(80,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (~P2(a2,a9)),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[26,43])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(82,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (E(f6(a1,a4),a7)),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[23,26,29,43,42])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(84,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (E(a7,f6(a1,a4))),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[23,26,29,43,42,2])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(87,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (~E(a8,f6(a1,a4))),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[23,26,29,52,58,62,43,42,2,22,19,3])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(88,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (P2(a9,a7)),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[23,26,29,24,52,58,62,43,42,2,22,19,3,44])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(91,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (~E(a7,a9)),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[23,26,29,24,52,58,60,62,43,42,2,22,19,3,44,17,8])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(93,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (~E(a2,f6(a1,a5))),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[23,26,29,24,49,52,58,60,62,43,42,2,22,19,3,44,17,8,7,64])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(95,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (P2(a2,f6(a1,a4))),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[23,26,29,24,49,52,58,60,62,43,42,2,22,19,3,44,17,8,7,64,6,39])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(97,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (P5(f6(a1,a4),a7)),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[23,26,29,24,49,52,58,60,62,43,42,2,22,19,3,44,17,8,7,64,6,39,33])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(99,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (P7(f6(a1,a4),a7)),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[23,26,29,24,49,52,58,60,62,43,42,2,22,19,3,44,17,8,7,64,6,39,33,32])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(101,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (E(f6(x1011,f6(a1,a4)),f6(x1011,a7))),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[23,26,29,24,49,52,58,60,62,43,42,2,22,19,3,44,17,8,7,64,6,39,33,32,5])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(102,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (E(f6(f6(a1,a4),x1021),f6(a7,x1021))),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[23,26,29,24,49,52,58,60,62,43,42,2,22,19,3,44,17,8,7,64,6,39,33,32,5,4])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(117,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (~P2(a8,a3)),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[27,43])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(119,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (~P2(a7,a8)),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[27,49,25,43,44])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(121,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (~P8(a2,a7)),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[27,49,25,43,44,39])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(123,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (~E(f6(a1,a4),a9)),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[27,49,25,84,91,43,44,39,3])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(124,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (~E(f6(a1,a5),a2)),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[27,49,25,93,84,91,43,44,39,3,2])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(144,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (~P2(a9,a3)),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[28,43])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(148,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (~P2(a2,a3)),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[28,80,43,38,44])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(151,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (~P8(a2,f6(a1,a4))),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[28,97,80,121,82,43,38,44,21,18])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(153,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (E(f6(x1531,a7),f6(x1531,f6(a1,a4)))),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[28,101,97,80,121,82,43,38,44,21,18,7,2])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(154,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (E(f6(f6(a1,a4),f6(a1,a4)),f6(a7,a7))),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[28,101,102,97,80,121,82,43,38,44,21,18,7,2,3])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(157,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (P5(f6(a1,a4),f6(a1,a4))),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[28,101,102,97,80,121,82,84,43,38,44,21,18,7,2,3,22])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(161,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (~E(a2,a3)),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[28,26,51,101,102,97,80,121,82,84,50,43,38,44,21,18,7,2,3,22,17,34,8])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(162,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (~P9(a1,a5)+~P6(a1,a5)),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[28,26,51,101,102,97,124,80,121,55,82,84,50,43,38,44,21,18,7,2,3,22,17,34,8,48])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(180,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (P8(a2,a3)),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[153,148,161,32,34])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(186,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (~P2(a7,a3)),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[25,24,153,148,161,32,34,43,39,44])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(190,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (P7(f6(f6(a1,a4),a7),f6(a7,a7))),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[25,24,153,154,148,161,102,32,34,43,39,44,19,20])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(192,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (~E(f6(a1,a4),a8)),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[25,24,157,153,154,87,148,161,102,82,32,34,43,39,44,19,20,21,2])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(193,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (~P2(f6(a1,a4),a8)),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[25,24,157,153,154,87,119,148,161,102,82,32,34,43,39,44,19,20,21,2,7])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(194,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (~E(a7,a3)),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[25,24,157,153,154,87,119,148,161,102,82,32,34,43,39,44,19,20,21,2,7,8])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(197,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (P8(a8,a3)),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[27,25,24,157,153,154,87,119,148,161,102,82,32,34,43,39,44,19,20,21,2,7,8,36,37])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(204,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (~P2(a7,a9)),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[88,43])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(206,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (~P8(a3,a8)),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[117,88,43,39])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(208,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (~P2(f6(a1,a5),a2)),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[31,95,117,88,43,39,44])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(212,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (P7(f6(a1,a4),f6(a1,a4))),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[31,95,190,117,88,99,102,84,43,39,44,19,20])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(215,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (P5(f6(f6(a1,a4),f6(a1,a4)),f6(a7,a7))),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[31,95,151,180,190,117,88,154,99,102,84,43,39,44,19,20,18,2,33])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(217,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (E(f6(a7,x2171),f6(f6(a1,a4),x2171))),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[31,95,151,180,190,117,88,154,99,102,84,43,39,44,19,20,18,2,33,4])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(241,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (~E(f6(a1,a4),a3)),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[27,192,193,53,206,38,34,39,44,17])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(242,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (P5(f6(f6(a1,a4),a7),f6(a7,a7))),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[27,215,192,193,53,206,101,38,34,39,44,17,21])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(246,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (P2(a3,f6(a1,a4))),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[27,26,49,215,192,193,53,194,206,101,84,38,34,39,44,17,21,2,7,8])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(247,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (~E(a8,f6(a1,a5))),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[27,26,49,215,192,193,53,194,206,101,84,38,34,39,44,17,21,2,7,8,64])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(248,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (~P2(f6(a1,a4),a3)),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[27,26,49,215,192,193,53,194,206,101,84,38,34,39,44,17,21,2,7,8,64,43])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(264,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (~P5(f6(a1,a4),a3)),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[241,248,41])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(266,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (P8(a7,a3)),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[241,186,248,194,41,34])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(270,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (P5(f6(a7,a7),f6(a7,a7))),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[242,241,144,186,248,194,102,41,34,39,21])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(272,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (~P2(f6(a1,a4),a9)),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[242,241,144,186,204,248,194,102,82,41,34,39,21,7])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(295,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (P8(f6(a1,a4),a3)),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[212,197,266,84,82,36,19,17])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(297,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (~E(f6(a1,a5),a8)),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[212,247,264,197,266,84,82,36,19,17,21,2])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(323,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (P7(f6(a7,x3231),f6(f6(a1,a4),x3231))),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[217,32])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(330,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (P5(f6(a7,x3301),f6(f6(a1,a4),x3301))),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[246,270,217,153,31,32,44,7,21,33])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(334,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (P6(a1,a5)+E(f6(a1,a5),a3)),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[297,246,270,217,153,31,55,32,44,7,21,33,46,45])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(352,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (P7(f6(a1,a4),a3)),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[295,36])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(354,plain,
% 0.88/0.95 (P8(f6(a1,a5),a2)),
% 0.88/0.95 inference(scs_inference,[],[208,295,124,36,34])).
% 0.88/0.95 cnf(356,plain,
% 0.88/0.96 (~P8(a2,f6(a1,a5))),
% 0.88/0.96 inference(scs_inference,[],[208,295,124,36,34,39])).
% 0.88/0.96 cnf(360,plain,
% 0.88/0.96 (~P2(f6(a1,a5),a8)),
% 0.88/0.96 inference(scs_inference,[],[25,208,330,295,124,102,36,34,39,22,44])).
% 0.88/0.96 cnf(384,plain,
% 0.88/0.96 (P8(f6(a1,a4),a9)),
% 0.88/0.96 inference(scs_inference,[],[123,272,101,33,34])).
% 0.88/0.96 cnf(386,plain,
% 0.88/0.96 (P2(a2,f6(a1,a5))),
% 0.88/0.96 inference(scs_inference,[],[354,123,272,101,33,34,39])).
% 0.88/0.96 cnf(414,plain,
% 0.88/0.96 (~E(a9,f6(a1,a5))),
% 0.88/0.96 inference(scs_inference,[],[26,50,386,360,384,323,161,148,154,41,32,20,39,44,18])).
% 0.88/0.96 cnf(427,plain,
% 0.88/0.96 (P6(a1,a5)),
% 0.88/0.96 inference(scs_inference,[],[26,50,55,386,360,384,352,323,161,247,144,148,154,82,41,32,20,39,44,18,8,45,40,37,43,34,19,334])).
% 0.88/0.96 cnf(446,plain,
% 0.88/0.96 (~P9(a1,a5)),
% 0.88/0.96 inference(scs_inference,[],[427,162])).
% 0.88/0.96 cnf(454,plain,
% 0.88/0.96 (P9(a1,a5)),
% 0.88/0.96 inference(scs_inference,[],[55,427,414,360,384,356,297,99,93,82,40,34,19,2,17,47])).
% 0.88/0.96 cnf(474,plain,
% 0.88/0.96 ($false),
% 0.88/0.96 inference(scs_inference,[],[454,446]),
% 0.88/0.96 ['proof']).
% 0.88/0.96 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.88/0.96 % Total time :0.300000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------