TSTP Solution File: MGT059-1 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : MGT059-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:10:43 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.37s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : MGT059-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 9 08:46:35 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.36 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.36 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.19/0.36 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.19/0.36 #
% 0.19/0.36 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.36 # Number of axioms: 20 Number of unprocessed: 20
% 0.19/0.36 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.19/0.36 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.19/0.36 # Hello from C++
% 0.19/0.36 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.19/0.36 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.19/0.36 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.19/0.36 # 20 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.19/0.36 # Creating start rules for all 4 conjectures.
% 0.19/0.36 # There are 4 start rule candidates:
% 0.19/0.36 # Found 6 unit axioms.
% 0.19/0.36 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.19/0.36 # 4 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.19/0.36 # 14 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.19/0.36 # 6 unit axiom clauses
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.19/0.36 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 4
% 0.19/0.36 # Returning from population with 10 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.19/0.36 # We now have 10 tableaux to operate on
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 2 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 2 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.19/0.37 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.37 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.37 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.37
% 0.19/0.37 # End clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.37 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_37, negated_conjecture, (organization(sk1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_38, negated_conjecture, (has_immunity(sk1,sk2))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_39, negated_conjecture, (has_immunity(sk1,sk3))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (smaller_or_equal(X1,X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (greater_or_equal(X1,X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_40, negated_conjecture, (hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3)!=hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk2))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (~greater(X1,X2)|~greater(X2,X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (greater(X1,X2)|~smaller(X2,X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (smaller_or_equal(X1,X2)|~smaller(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (smaller(X1,X2)|~greater(X2,X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (greater_or_equal(X1,X2)|~greater(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2)=very_low|~has_immunity(X1,X2)|~organization(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (X1=X2|smaller(X1,X2)|~smaller_or_equal(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (X1=X2|greater(X1,X2)|~greater_or_equal(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (X1=X2|greater(X1,X2)|smaller(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_30, plain, (greater(X1,X2)|~greater(X3,X2)|~greater(X1,X3))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2)=low|has_immunity(X1,X2)|~positional_advantage(X1,X2)|~is_aligned(X1,X2)|~organization(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2)=mod1|is_aligned(X1,X2)|has_immunity(X1,X2)|~positional_advantage(X1,X2)|~organization(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2)=mod2|positional_advantage(X1,X2)|has_immunity(X1,X2)|~is_aligned(X1,X2)|~organization(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_36, plain, (hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2)=high|positional_advantage(X1,X2)|is_aligned(X1,X2)|has_immunity(X1,X2)|~organization(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.19/0.37 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.19/0.37 # Found 5 steps
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_40, negated_conjecture, (hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3)!=hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk2)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_43, plain, (hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3)!=hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk2)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_24])).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_64, plain, (greater(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3),hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk2))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_29])).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_65, plain, (~greater_or_equal(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3),hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk2))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_65, ...])).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_273, plain, (~greater(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk2),hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_273, ...])).
% 0.19/0.37 # End printing tableau
% 0.19/0.37 # SZS output end
% 0.19/0.37 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.19/0.37 # Creating equality axioms
% 0.19/0.37 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 2 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 2 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.19/0.37 # Creating equality axioms
% 0.19/0.37 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.19/0.37 # Creating equality axioms
% 0.19/0.37 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.19/0.37 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.37 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.37 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.37
% 0.19/0.37 # End clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.37 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_37, negated_conjecture, (organization(sk1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_38, negated_conjecture, (has_immunity(sk1,sk2))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_39, negated_conjecture, (has_immunity(sk1,sk3))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (smaller_or_equal(X1,X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (greater_or_equal(X1,X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_40, negated_conjecture, (hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3)!=hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk2))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (~greater(X1,X2)|~greater(X2,X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (greater(X1,X2)|~smaller(X2,X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (smaller_or_equal(X1,X2)|~smaller(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (smaller(X1,X2)|~greater(X2,X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (greater_or_equal(X1,X2)|~greater(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2)=very_low|~has_immunity(X1,X2)|~organization(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (X1=X2|smaller(X1,X2)|~smaller_or_equal(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (X1=X2|greater(X1,X2)|~greater_or_equal(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (X1=X2|greater(X1,X2)|smaller(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_30, plain, (greater(X1,X2)|~greater(X3,X2)|~greater(X1,X3))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2)=low|has_immunity(X1,X2)|~positional_advantage(X1,X2)|~is_aligned(X1,X2)|~organization(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2)=mod1|is_aligned(X1,X2)|has_immunity(X1,X2)|~positional_advantage(X1,X2)|~organization(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2)=mod2|positional_advantage(X1,X2)|has_immunity(X1,X2)|~is_aligned(X1,X2)|~organization(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_36, plain, (hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2)=high|positional_advantage(X1,X2)|is_aligned(X1,X2)|has_immunity(X1,X2)|~organization(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.19/0.37 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.19/0.37 # Found 5 steps
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_40, negated_conjecture, (hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3)!=hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk2)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_43, plain, (hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3)!=hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk2)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_21])).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_61, plain, (smaller(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3),hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk2))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_27])).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_62, plain, (~smaller_or_equal(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3),hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk2))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_62, ...])).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_274, plain, (greater(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk2),hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_274, ...])).
% 0.19/0.37 # End printing tableau
% 0.19/0.37 # SZS output end
% 0.19/0.37 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.19/0.37 # Creating equality axioms
% 0.19/0.37 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.19/0.37 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.19/0.37 # Child (23949) has found a proof.
% 0.19/0.37
% 0.19/0.37 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.37 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.37 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.37
% 0.19/0.37 # End clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.37 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_37, negated_conjecture, (organization(sk1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_38, negated_conjecture, (has_immunity(sk1,sk2))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_39, negated_conjecture, (has_immunity(sk1,sk3))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (smaller_or_equal(X1,X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (greater_or_equal(X1,X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_40, negated_conjecture, (hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3)!=hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk2))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (~greater(X1,X2)|~greater(X2,X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (greater(X1,X2)|~smaller(X2,X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (smaller_or_equal(X1,X2)|~smaller(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (smaller(X1,X2)|~greater(X2,X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (greater_or_equal(X1,X2)|~greater(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2)=very_low|~has_immunity(X1,X2)|~organization(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (X1=X2|smaller(X1,X2)|~smaller_or_equal(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (X1=X2|greater(X1,X2)|~greater_or_equal(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (X1=X2|greater(X1,X2)|smaller(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_30, plain, (greater(X1,X2)|~greater(X3,X2)|~greater(X1,X3))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2)=low|has_immunity(X1,X2)|~positional_advantage(X1,X2)|~is_aligned(X1,X2)|~organization(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2)=mod1|is_aligned(X1,X2)|has_immunity(X1,X2)|~positional_advantage(X1,X2)|~organization(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2)=mod2|positional_advantage(X1,X2)|has_immunity(X1,X2)|~is_aligned(X1,X2)|~organization(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_36, plain, (hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2)=high|positional_advantage(X1,X2)|is_aligned(X1,X2)|has_immunity(X1,X2)|~organization(X1))).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_272, plain, (X4=X4)).
% 0.19/0.37 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.19/0.37 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.19/0.37 # Found 8 steps
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_272, plain, (X3=X3), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_336, plain, (X3=X3), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_277])).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_885, plain, ($false), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_272])).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_883, plain, (smaller(X3,X3)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_27])).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_889, plain, (greater(X3,X3)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_29])).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_892, plain, (~greater(X3,X3)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_889])).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_886, plain, (~smaller(X3,X3)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_28])).
% 0.19/0.37 cnf(i_0_970, plain, (~greater(X3,X3)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_970, ...])).
% 0.19/0.37 # End printing tableau
% 0.19/0.37 # SZS output end
% 0.19/0.37 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.19/0.37 # Proof search is over...
% 0.19/0.37 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------