TSTP Solution File: MGT059-1 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : MGT059-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:37:18 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.50s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   13 (  10 unt;   0 nHn;  13 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   18 (   6 equ;   8 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    5 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(assumption_17_32,axiom,
    ( hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = very_low
    | ~ organization(X1)
    | ~ has_immunity(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bK71m3oBkH/E---3.1_1087.p',assumption_17_32) ).

cnf(assumption_2_37,negated_conjecture,
    organization(sk1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bK71m3oBkH/E---3.1_1087.p',assumption_2_37) ).

cnf(assumption_2_40,negated_conjecture,
    hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk2) != hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bK71m3oBkH/E---3.1_1087.p',assumption_2_40) ).

cnf(assumption_2_39,negated_conjecture,
    has_immunity(sk1,sk3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bK71m3oBkH/E---3.1_1087.p',assumption_2_39) ).

cnf(assumption_2_38,negated_conjecture,
    has_immunity(sk1,sk2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bK71m3oBkH/E---3.1_1087.p',assumption_2_38) ).

cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
    ( hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = very_low
    | ~ organization(X1)
    | ~ has_immunity(X1,X2) ),
    assumption_17_32 ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    organization(sk1),
    assumption_2_37 ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk2) != hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3),
    assumption_2_40 ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( hazard_of_mortality(sk1,X1) = very_low
    | ~ has_immunity(sk1,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    has_immunity(sk1,sk3),
    assumption_2_39 ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk2) != very_low,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    has_immunity(sk1,sk2),
    assumption_2_38 ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_8]),c_0_11])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem    : MGT059-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.10/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 00:41:30 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.48  Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bK71m3oBkH/E---3.1_1087.p
% 0.20/0.50  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.20/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 1165 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 0.20/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.50  # Search class: FGHSF-FFSS22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.50  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 1169 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.20/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.50  # Search class: FGHSF-FFSS22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.50  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.50  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.50  
% 0.20/0.50  # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.50  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.50  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.50  # Parsed axioms                        : 20
% 0.20/0.50  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Initial clauses                      : 20
% 0.20/0.50  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 20
% 0.20/0.50  # Processed clauses                    : 36
% 0.20/0.50  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # ...remaining for further processing  : 36
% 0.20/0.50  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 2
% 0.20/0.50  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Generated clauses                    : 6
% 0.20/0.50  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4
% 0.20/0.50  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Paramodulations                      : 4
% 0.20/0.50  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Equation resolutions                 : 2
% 0.20/0.50  # Total rewrite steps                  : 2
% 0.20/0.50  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50  # Current number of processed clauses  : 14
% 0.20/0.50  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 5
% 0.20/0.50  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.20/0.50  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 7
% 0.20/0.50  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 8
% 0.20/0.50  # ...number of literals in the above   : 32
% 0.20/0.50  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Current number of archived clauses   : 20
% 0.20/0.50  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 32
% 0.20/0.50  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15
% 0.20/0.50  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.20/0.50  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 502
% 0.20/0.50  
% 0.20/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50  # User time                : 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.50  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.50  # Total time               : 0.005 s
% 0.20/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1648 pages
% 0.20/0.50  
% 0.20/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50  # User time                : 0.013 s
% 0.20/0.50  # System time              : 0.008 s
% 0.20/0.50  # Total time               : 0.021 s
% 0.20/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1684 pages
% 0.20/0.50  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------