TSTP Solution File: MGT059-1 by Beagle---0.9.51
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem : MGT059-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:49:45 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 3.28s 1.74s
% Output : CNFRefutation 3.28s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 22
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 33 ( 12 unt; 17 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 22 ( 9 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 15 ( 9 ~; 6 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 17 ( 9 >; 8 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 10 ( 8 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 8 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 (; 4 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ smaller_or_equal > smaller > positional_advantage > is_aligned > has_immunity > greater_or_equal > greater > organization > hazard_of_mortality > #nlpp > very_low > sk3 > sk2 > sk1 > mod2 > mod1 > low > high
%Foreground sorts:
%Background operators:
%Foreground operators:
tff(hazard_of_mortality,type,
hazard_of_mortality: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(greater,type,
greater: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(high,type,
high: $i ).
tff(mod2,type,
mod2: $i ).
tff(sk2,type,
sk2: $i ).
tff(organization,type,
organization: $i > $o ).
tff(sk1,type,
sk1: $i ).
tff(positional_advantage,type,
positional_advantage: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(very_low,type,
very_low: $i ).
tff(is_aligned,type,
is_aligned: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(low,type,
low: $i ).
tff(smaller,type,
smaller: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(has_immunity,type,
has_immunity: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(sk3,type,
sk3: $i ).
tff(mod1,type,
mod1: $i ).
tff(greater_or_equal,type,
greater_or_equal: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(smaller_or_equal,type,
smaller_or_equal: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(f_170,axiom,
organization(sk1),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_172,axiom,
has_immunity(sk1,sk3),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_121,axiom,
! [A,B] :
( ~ organization(A)
| ~ has_immunity(A,B)
| ( hazard_of_mortality(A,B) = very_low ) ),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_171,axiom,
has_immunity(sk1,sk2),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_174,axiom,
hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk2) != hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(c_34,plain,
organization(sk1),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_170]) ).
tff(c_38,plain,
has_immunity(sk1,sk3),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_172]) ).
tff(c_100,plain,
! [A_54,B_55] :
( ( hazard_of_mortality(A_54,B_55) = very_low )
| ~ has_immunity(A_54,B_55)
| ~ organization(A_54) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_121]) ).
tff(c_106,plain,
( ( hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3) = very_low )
| ~ organization(sk1) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_38,c_100]) ).
tff(c_112,plain,
hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3) = very_low,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_34,c_106]) ).
tff(c_36,plain,
has_immunity(sk1,sk2),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_171]) ).
tff(c_103,plain,
( ( hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk2) = very_low )
| ~ organization(sk1) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_36,c_100]) ).
tff(c_109,plain,
hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk2) = very_low,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_34,c_103]) ).
tff(c_40,plain,
hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3) != hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk2),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_174]) ).
tff(c_113,plain,
hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3) != very_low,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_109,c_40]) ).
tff(c_123,plain,
$false,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_112,c_113]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : MGT059-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.16/0.34 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Aug 3 20:47:37 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 3.28/1.74 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.28/1.74
% 3.28/1.74 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.28/1.77
% 3.28/1.77 Inference rules
% 3.28/1.77 ----------------------
% 3.28/1.77 #Ref : 0
% 3.28/1.77 #Sup : 14
% 3.28/1.77 #Fact : 2
% 3.28/1.77 #Define : 0
% 3.28/1.77 #Split : 0
% 3.28/1.77 #Chain : 0
% 3.28/1.77 #Close : 0
% 3.28/1.77
% 3.28/1.77 Ordering : KBO
% 3.28/1.77
% 3.28/1.77 Simplification rules
% 3.28/1.77 ----------------------
% 3.28/1.77 #Subsume : 0
% 3.28/1.77 #Demod : 4
% 3.28/1.77 #Tautology : 13
% 3.28/1.77 #SimpNegUnit : 0
% 3.28/1.77 #BackRed : 1
% 3.28/1.77
% 3.28/1.77 #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.28/1.77 #Strategies tried : 1
% 3.28/1.77
% 3.28/1.77 Timing (in seconds)
% 3.28/1.77 ----------------------
% 3.28/1.78 Preprocessing : 0.50
% 3.28/1.78 Parsing : 0.23
% 3.28/1.78 CNF conversion : 0.03
% 3.28/1.78 Main loop : 0.22
% 3.28/1.78 Inferencing : 0.08
% 3.28/1.78 Reduction : 0.06
% 3.28/1.78 Demodulation : 0.04
% 3.28/1.78 BG Simplification : 0.02
% 3.28/1.78 Subsumption : 0.05
% 3.28/1.78 Abstraction : 0.01
% 3.28/1.78 MUC search : 0.00
% 3.28/1.78 Cooper : 0.00
% 3.28/1.78 Total : 0.77
% 3.28/1.78 Index Insertion : 0.00
% 3.28/1.78 Index Deletion : 0.00
% 3.28/1.78 Index Matching : 0.00
% 3.28/1.78 BG Taut test : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------