TSTP Solution File: MGT059+1 by PyRes---1.3
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : PyRes---1.3
% Problem : MGT059+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:23:33 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.76s 0.95s
% Output : Refutation 0.76s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11 % Problem : MGT059+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 9 08:29:50 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.76/0.95 # Version: 1.3
% 0.76/0.95 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.76/0.95 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.76/0.95 fof(assumption_2,conjecture,(![X]:(![T0]:(![T]:(((organization(X)&has_immunity(X,T0))&has_immunity(X,T))=>hazard_of_mortality(X,T0)=hazard_of_mortality(X,T))))),input).
% 0.76/0.95 fof(c9,negated_conjecture,(~(![X]:(![T0]:(![T]:(((organization(X)&has_immunity(X,T0))&has_immunity(X,T))=>hazard_of_mortality(X,T0)=hazard_of_mortality(X,T)))))),inference(assume_negation,status(cth),[assumption_2])).
% 0.76/0.95 fof(c10,negated_conjecture,(?[X]:(?[T0]:(?[T]:(((organization(X)&has_immunity(X,T0))&has_immunity(X,T))&hazard_of_mortality(X,T0)!=hazard_of_mortality(X,T))))),inference(fof_nnf,status(thm),[c9])).
% 0.76/0.95 fof(c11,negated_conjecture,(?[X2]:(?[X3]:(?[X4]:(((organization(X2)&has_immunity(X2,X3))&has_immunity(X2,X4))&hazard_of_mortality(X2,X3)!=hazard_of_mortality(X2,X4))))),inference(variable_rename,status(thm),[c10])).
% 0.76/0.95 fof(c12,negated_conjecture,(((organization(skolem0001)&has_immunity(skolem0001,skolem0002))&has_immunity(skolem0001,skolem0003))&hazard_of_mortality(skolem0001,skolem0002)!=hazard_of_mortality(skolem0001,skolem0003)),inference(skolemize,status(esa),[c11])).
% 0.76/0.95 cnf(c16,negated_conjecture,hazard_of_mortality(skolem0001,skolem0002)!=hazard_of_mortality(skolem0001,skolem0003),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c12])).
% 0.76/0.95 cnf(c13,negated_conjecture,organization(skolem0001),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c12])).
% 0.76/0.95 cnf(c14,negated_conjecture,has_immunity(skolem0001,skolem0002),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c12])).
% 0.76/0.95 fof(assumption_17,axiom,(![X]:(![T]:(organization(X)=>((has_immunity(X,T)=>hazard_of_mortality(X,T)=very_low)&((~has_immunity(X,T))=>(((((is_aligned(X,T)&positional_advantage(X,T))=>hazard_of_mortality(X,T)=low)&(((~is_aligned(X,T))&positional_advantage(X,T))=>hazard_of_mortality(X,T)=mod1))&((is_aligned(X,T)&(~positional_advantage(X,T)))=>hazard_of_mortality(X,T)=mod2))&(((~is_aligned(X,T))&(~positional_advantage(X,T)))=>hazard_of_mortality(X,T)=high))))))),input).
% 0.76/0.95 fof(c17,axiom,(![X]:(![T]:(organization(X)=>((has_immunity(X,T)=>hazard_of_mortality(X,T)=very_low)&(~has_immunity(X,T)=>(((((is_aligned(X,T)&positional_advantage(X,T))=>hazard_of_mortality(X,T)=low)&((~is_aligned(X,T)&positional_advantage(X,T))=>hazard_of_mortality(X,T)=mod1))&((is_aligned(X,T)&~positional_advantage(X,T))=>hazard_of_mortality(X,T)=mod2))&((~is_aligned(X,T)&~positional_advantage(X,T))=>hazard_of_mortality(X,T)=high))))))),inference(fof_simplification,status(thm),[assumption_17])).
% 0.76/0.95 fof(c18,axiom,(![X]:(![T]:(~organization(X)|((~has_immunity(X,T)|hazard_of_mortality(X,T)=very_low)&(has_immunity(X,T)|(((((~is_aligned(X,T)|~positional_advantage(X,T))|hazard_of_mortality(X,T)=low)&((is_aligned(X,T)|~positional_advantage(X,T))|hazard_of_mortality(X,T)=mod1))&((~is_aligned(X,T)|positional_advantage(X,T))|hazard_of_mortality(X,T)=mod2))&((is_aligned(X,T)|positional_advantage(X,T))|hazard_of_mortality(X,T)=high))))))),inference(fof_nnf,status(thm),[c17])).
% 0.76/0.95 fof(c19,axiom,(![X]:(~organization(X)|((![T]:(~has_immunity(X,T)|hazard_of_mortality(X,T)=very_low))&(![T]:(has_immunity(X,T)|(((((~is_aligned(X,T)|~positional_advantage(X,T))|hazard_of_mortality(X,T)=low)&((is_aligned(X,T)|~positional_advantage(X,T))|hazard_of_mortality(X,T)=mod1))&((~is_aligned(X,T)|positional_advantage(X,T))|hazard_of_mortality(X,T)=mod2))&((is_aligned(X,T)|positional_advantage(X,T))|hazard_of_mortality(X,T)=high))))))),inference(shift_quantors,status(thm),[c18])).
% 0.76/0.95 fof(c21,axiom,(![X5]:(![X6]:(![X7]:(~organization(X5)|((~has_immunity(X5,X6)|hazard_of_mortality(X5,X6)=very_low)&(has_immunity(X5,X7)|(((((~is_aligned(X5,X7)|~positional_advantage(X5,X7))|hazard_of_mortality(X5,X7)=low)&((is_aligned(X5,X7)|~positional_advantage(X5,X7))|hazard_of_mortality(X5,X7)=mod1))&((~is_aligned(X5,X7)|positional_advantage(X5,X7))|hazard_of_mortality(X5,X7)=mod2))&((is_aligned(X5,X7)|positional_advantage(X5,X7))|hazard_of_mortality(X5,X7)=high)))))))),inference(shift_quantors,status(thm),[fof(c20,axiom,(![X5]:(~organization(X5)|((![X6]:(~has_immunity(X5,X6)|hazard_of_mortality(X5,X6)=very_low))&(![X7]:(has_immunity(X5,X7)|(((((~is_aligned(X5,X7)|~positional_advantage(X5,X7))|hazard_of_mortality(X5,X7)=low)&((is_aligned(X5,X7)|~positional_advantage(X5,X7))|hazard_of_mortality(X5,X7)=mod1))&((~is_aligned(X5,X7)|positional_advantage(X5,X7))|hazard_of_mortality(X5,X7)=mod2))&((is_aligned(X5,X7)|positional_advantage(X5,X7))|hazard_of_mortality(X5,X7)=high))))))),inference(variable_rename,status(thm),[c19])).])).
% 0.76/0.95 fof(c22,axiom,(![X5]:(![X6]:(![X7]:((~organization(X5)|(~has_immunity(X5,X6)|hazard_of_mortality(X5,X6)=very_low))&((((~organization(X5)|(has_immunity(X5,X7)|((~is_aligned(X5,X7)|~positional_advantage(X5,X7))|hazard_of_mortality(X5,X7)=low)))&(~organization(X5)|(has_immunity(X5,X7)|((is_aligned(X5,X7)|~positional_advantage(X5,X7))|hazard_of_mortality(X5,X7)=mod1))))&(~organization(X5)|(has_immunity(X5,X7)|((~is_aligned(X5,X7)|positional_advantage(X5,X7))|hazard_of_mortality(X5,X7)=mod2))))&(~organization(X5)|(has_immunity(X5,X7)|((is_aligned(X5,X7)|positional_advantage(X5,X7))|hazard_of_mortality(X5,X7)=high)))))))),inference(distribute,status(thm),[c21])).
% 0.76/0.95 cnf(c23,axiom,~organization(X157)|~has_immunity(X157,X158)|hazard_of_mortality(X157,X158)=very_low,inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c22])).
% 0.76/0.95 cnf(c222,plain,~organization(skolem0001)|hazard_of_mortality(skolem0001,skolem0002)=very_low,inference(resolution,status(thm),[c23, c14])).
% 0.76/0.95 cnf(c655,plain,hazard_of_mortality(skolem0001,skolem0002)=very_low,inference(resolution,status(thm),[c222, c13])).
% 0.76/0.95 cnf(transitivity,axiom,X30!=X32|X32!=X31|X30=X31,eq_axiom).
% 0.76/0.95 cnf(symmetry,axiom,X28!=X29|X29=X28,eq_axiom).
% 0.76/0.95 cnf(c15,negated_conjecture,has_immunity(skolem0001,skolem0003),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c12])).
% 0.76/0.95 cnf(c223,plain,~organization(skolem0001)|hazard_of_mortality(skolem0001,skolem0003)=very_low,inference(resolution,status(thm),[c23, c15])).
% 0.76/0.95 cnf(c769,plain,hazard_of_mortality(skolem0001,skolem0003)=very_low,inference(resolution,status(thm),[c223, c13])).
% 0.76/0.95 cnf(c780,plain,very_low=hazard_of_mortality(skolem0001,skolem0003),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c769, symmetry])).
% 0.76/0.95 cnf(c832,plain,X731!=very_low|X731=hazard_of_mortality(skolem0001,skolem0003),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c780, transitivity])).
% 0.76/0.95 cnf(c1228,plain,hazard_of_mortality(skolem0001,skolem0002)=hazard_of_mortality(skolem0001,skolem0003),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c832, c655])).
% 0.76/0.95 cnf(c2066,plain,$false,inference(resolution,status(thm),[c1228, c16])).
% 0.76/0.95 # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.76/0.95
% 0.76/0.95 # Initial clauses : 32
% 0.76/0.95 # Processed clauses : 218
% 0.76/0.95 # Factors computed : 20
% 0.76/0.95 # Resolvents computed: 2021
% 0.76/0.95 # Tautologies deleted: 6
% 0.76/0.95 # Forward subsumed : 248
% 0.76/0.95 # Backward subsumed : 10
% 0.76/0.95 # -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.76/0.95 # User time : 0.607 s
% 0.76/0.95 # System time : 0.014 s
% 0.76/0.95 # Total time : 0.621 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------