TSTP Solution File: MGT059+1 by Otter---3.3
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Otter---3.3
% Problem : MGT059+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : otter-tptp-script %s
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:06:15 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 1.73s 1.94s
% Output : Refutation 1.73s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 9 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 9 RR)
% Number of literals : 11 ( 5 equ; 4 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 2 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(11,axiom,
( ~ organization(A)
| ~ has_immunity(A,B)
| hazard_of_mortality(A,B) = very_low ),
file('MGT059+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(16,axiom,
hazard_of_mortality(dollar_c3,dollar_c2) != hazard_of_mortality(dollar_c3,dollar_c1),
file('MGT059+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(20,axiom,
organization(dollar_c3),
file('MGT059+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(21,axiom,
has_immunity(dollar_c3,dollar_c2),
file('MGT059+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(22,axiom,
has_immunity(dollar_c3,dollar_c1),
file('MGT059+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(29,plain,
hazard_of_mortality(dollar_c3,dollar_c2) = very_low,
inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[21,11,20]),
[iquote('hyper,21,11,20')] ).
cnf(30,plain,
hazard_of_mortality(dollar_c3,dollar_c1) != very_low,
inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(back_demod,[status(thm)],[16]),29])]),
[iquote('back_demod,16,demod,29,flip.1')] ).
cnf(35,plain,
hazard_of_mortality(dollar_c3,dollar_c1) = very_low,
inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[22,11,20]),
[iquote('hyper,22,11,20')] ).
cnf(37,plain,
$false,
inference(binary,[status(thm)],[35,30]),
[iquote('binary,35.1,30.1')] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : MGT059+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.10/0.13 % Command : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 04:08:33 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 1.73/1.94 ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.73/1.94 The process was started by sandbox on n028.cluster.edu,
% 1.73/1.94 Wed Jul 27 04:08:33 2022
% 1.73/1.94 The command was "./otter". The process ID is 10167.
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.73/1.94 set(auto).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.73/1.94 clear(print_given).
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94 formula_list(usable).
% 1.73/1.94 all A (A=A).
% 1.73/1.94 all X Y (smaller_or_e_qual(X,Y)<->smaller(X,Y)|X=Y).
% 1.73/1.94 all X Y (greater_or_e_qual(X,Y)<->greater(X,Y)|X=Y).
% 1.73/1.94 all X Y (smaller(X,Y)<->greater(Y,X)).
% 1.73/1.94 all X Y (-(greater(X,Y)&greater(Y,X))).
% 1.73/1.94 all X Y Z (greater(X,Y)&greater(Y,Z)->greater(X,Z)).
% 1.73/1.94 all X Y (smaller(X,Y)|X=Y|greater(X,Y)).
% 1.73/1.94 all X T (organization(X)-> (has_immunity(X,T)->hazard_of_mortality(X,T)=very_low)& (-has_immunity(X,T)-> (is_aligned(X,T)&positional_advantage(X,T)->hazard_of_mortality(X,T)=low)& (-is_aligned(X,T)&positional_advantage(X,T)->hazard_of_mortality(X,T)=mod1)& (is_aligned(X,T)& -positional_advantage(X,T)->hazard_of_mortality(X,T)=mod2)& (-is_aligned(X,T)& -positional_advantage(X,T)->hazard_of_mortality(X,T)=high))).
% 1.73/1.94 -(all X T0 T (organization(X)&has_immunity(X,T0)&has_immunity(X,T)->hazard_of_mortality(X,T0)=hazard_of_mortality(X,T))).
% 1.73/1.94 end_of_list.
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94 -------> usable clausifies to:
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94 list(usable).
% 1.73/1.94 0 [] A=A.
% 1.73/1.94 0 [] -smaller_or_e_qual(X,Y)|smaller(X,Y)|X=Y.
% 1.73/1.94 0 [] smaller_or_e_qual(X,Y)| -smaller(X,Y).
% 1.73/1.94 0 [] smaller_or_e_qual(X,Y)|X!=Y.
% 1.73/1.94 0 [] -greater_or_e_qual(X,Y)|greater(X,Y)|X=Y.
% 1.73/1.94 0 [] greater_or_e_qual(X,Y)| -greater(X,Y).
% 1.73/1.94 0 [] greater_or_e_qual(X,Y)|X!=Y.
% 1.73/1.94 0 [] -smaller(X,Y)|greater(Y,X).
% 1.73/1.94 0 [] smaller(X,Y)| -greater(Y,X).
% 1.73/1.94 0 [] -greater(X,Y)| -greater(Y,X).
% 1.73/1.94 0 [] -greater(X,Y)| -greater(Y,Z)|greater(X,Z).
% 1.73/1.94 0 [] smaller(X,Y)|X=Y|greater(X,Y).
% 1.73/1.94 0 [] -organization(X)| -has_immunity(X,T)|hazard_of_mortality(X,T)=very_low.
% 1.73/1.94 0 [] -organization(X)|has_immunity(X,T)| -is_aligned(X,T)| -positional_advantage(X,T)|hazard_of_mortality(X,T)=low.
% 1.73/1.94 0 [] -organization(X)|has_immunity(X,T)|is_aligned(X,T)| -positional_advantage(X,T)|hazard_of_mortality(X,T)=mod1.
% 1.73/1.94 0 [] -organization(X)|has_immunity(X,T)| -is_aligned(X,T)|positional_advantage(X,T)|hazard_of_mortality(X,T)=mod2.
% 1.73/1.94 0 [] -organization(X)|has_immunity(X,T)|is_aligned(X,T)|positional_advantage(X,T)|hazard_of_mortality(X,T)=high.
% 1.73/1.94 0 [] organization($c3).
% 1.73/1.94 0 [] has_immunity($c3,$c2).
% 1.73/1.94 0 [] has_immunity($c3,$c1).
% 1.73/1.94 0 [] hazard_of_mortality($c3,$c2)!=hazard_of_mortality($c3,$c1).
% 1.73/1.94 end_of_list.
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 1.73/1.94 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, factoring, and unit
% 1.73/1.94 deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 1.73/1.94 clauses in usable.
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: set(para_from).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: set(para_into).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: set(factor).
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94 ------------> process usable:
% 1.73/1.94 ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 1 [] -smaller_or_e_qual(A,B)|smaller(A,B)|A=B.
% 1.73/1.94 ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 2 [] smaller_or_e_qual(A,B)| -smaller(A,B).
% 1.73/1.94 ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 3 [] smaller_or_e_qual(A,B)|A!=B.
% 1.73/1.94 ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 4 [] -greater_or_e_qual(A,B)|greater(A,B)|A=B.
% 1.73/1.94 ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 5 [] greater_or_e_qual(A,B)| -greater(A,B).
% 1.73/1.94 ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 6 [] greater_or_e_qual(A,B)|A!=B.
% 1.73/1.94 ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 7 [] -smaller(A,B)|greater(B,A).
% 1.73/1.94 ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 8 [] smaller(A,B)| -greater(B,A).
% 1.73/1.94 ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 9 [] -greater(A,B)| -greater(B,A).
% 1.73/1.94 ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 10 [] -greater(A,B)| -greater(B,C)|greater(A,C).
% 1.73/1.94 ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 11 [] -organization(A)| -has_immunity(A,B)|hazard_of_mortality(A,B)=very_low.
% 1.73/1.94 ** KEPT (pick-wt=16): 12 [] -organization(A)|has_immunity(A,B)| -is_aligned(A,B)| -positional_advantage(A,B)|hazard_of_mortality(A,B)=low.
% 1.73/1.94 ** KEPT (pick-wt=16): 13 [] -organization(A)|has_immunity(A,B)|is_aligned(A,B)| -positional_advantage(A,B)|hazard_of_mortality(A,B)=mod1.
% 1.73/1.94 ** KEPT (pick-wt=16): 14 [] -organization(A)|has_immunity(A,B)| -is_aligned(A,B)|positional_advantage(A,B)|hazard_of_mortality(A,B)=mod2.
% 1.73/1.94 ** KEPT (pick-wt=16): 15 [] -organization(A)|has_immunity(A,B)|is_aligned(A,B)|positional_advantage(A,B)|hazard_of_mortality(A,B)=high.
% 1.73/1.94 ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 16 [] hazard_of_mortality($c3,$c2)!=hazard_of_mortality($c3,$c1).
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94 ------------> process sos:
% 1.73/1.94 ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 18 [] A=A.
% 1.73/1.94 ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 19 [] smaller(A,B)|A=B|greater(A,B).
% 1.73/1.94 ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 20 [] organization($c3).
% 1.73/1.94 ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 21 [] has_immunity($c3,$c2).
% 1.73/1.94 ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 22 [] has_immunity($c3,$c1).
% 1.73/1.94 Following clause subsumed by 18 during input processing: 0 [copy,18,flip.1] A=A.
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94 ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94 -------- PROOF --------
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 0.00 sec ----> 37 [binary,35.1,30.1] $F.
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94 Length of proof is 3. Level of proof is 2.
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.73/1.94 % SZS status Theorem
% 1.73/1.94 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.73/1.94 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94 ============ end of search ============
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94 -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.73/1.94 clauses given 4
% 1.73/1.94 clauses generated 13
% 1.73/1.94 clauses kept 34
% 1.73/1.94 clauses forward subsumed 2
% 1.73/1.94 clauses back subsumed 0
% 1.73/1.94 Kbytes malloced 976
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94 ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.73/1.94 user CPU time 0.00 (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.73/1.94 system CPU time 0.00 (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.73/1.94 wall-clock time 2 (0 hr, 0 min, 2 sec)
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94 Process 10167 finished Wed Jul 27 04:08:35 2022
% 1.73/1.94 Otter interrupted
% 1.73/1.94 PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------