TSTP Solution File: MGT059+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : MGT059+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:10:16 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.23s 1.41s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 15 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 62 ( 18 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 16 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 65 ( 18 ~; 6 |; 24 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 16 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 8 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 17 ( 1 sgn 15 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(assumption_17,axiom,
! [X1,X4] :
( organization(X1)
=> ( ( has_immunity(X1,X4)
=> hazard_of_mortality(X1,X4) = very_low )
& ( ~ has_immunity(X1,X4)
=> ( ( ( is_aligned(X1,X4)
& positional_advantage(X1,X4) )
=> hazard_of_mortality(X1,X4) = low )
& ( ( ~ is_aligned(X1,X4)
& positional_advantage(X1,X4) )
=> hazard_of_mortality(X1,X4) = mod1 )
& ( ( is_aligned(X1,X4)
& ~ positional_advantage(X1,X4) )
=> hazard_of_mortality(X1,X4) = mod2 )
& ( ( ~ is_aligned(X1,X4)
& ~ positional_advantage(X1,X4) )
=> hazard_of_mortality(X1,X4) = high ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',assumption_17) ).
fof(assumption_2,conjecture,
! [X1,X5,X4] :
( ( organization(X1)
& has_immunity(X1,X5)
& has_immunity(X1,X4) )
=> hazard_of_mortality(X1,X5) = hazard_of_mortality(X1,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',assumption_2) ).
fof(c_0_2,plain,
! [X4,X1] :
( epred1_2(X1,X4)
<=> ( ( ( is_aligned(X1,X4)
& positional_advantage(X1,X4) )
=> hazard_of_mortality(X1,X4) = low )
& ( ( ~ is_aligned(X1,X4)
& positional_advantage(X1,X4) )
=> hazard_of_mortality(X1,X4) = mod1 )
& ( ( is_aligned(X1,X4)
& ~ positional_advantage(X1,X4) )
=> hazard_of_mortality(X1,X4) = mod2 )
& ( ( ~ is_aligned(X1,X4)
& ~ positional_advantage(X1,X4) )
=> hazard_of_mortality(X1,X4) = high ) ) ),
introduced(definition) ).
fof(c_0_3,axiom,
! [X1,X4] :
( organization(X1)
=> ( ( has_immunity(X1,X4)
=> hazard_of_mortality(X1,X4) = very_low )
& ( ~ has_immunity(X1,X4)
=> epred1_2(X1,X4) ) ) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[assumption_17,c_0_2]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X5,X4] :
( ( organization(X1)
& has_immunity(X1,X5)
& has_immunity(X1,X4) )
=> hazard_of_mortality(X1,X5) = hazard_of_mortality(X1,X4) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[assumption_2]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X5,X6,X6] :
( ( ~ has_immunity(X5,X6)
| hazard_of_mortality(X5,X6) = very_low
| ~ organization(X5) )
& ( has_immunity(X5,X6)
| epred1_2(X5,X6)
| ~ organization(X5) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( organization(esk1_0)
& has_immunity(esk1_0,esk2_0)
& has_immunity(esk1_0,esk3_0)
& hazard_of_mortality(esk1_0,esk2_0) != hazard_of_mortality(esk1_0,esk3_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2) = very_low
| ~ organization(X1)
| ~ has_immunity(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
has_immunity(esk1_0,esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
organization(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
has_immunity(esk1_0,esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
hazard_of_mortality(esk1_0,esk2_0) != hazard_of_mortality(esk1_0,esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
hazard_of_mortality(esk1_0,esk2_0) = very_low,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
hazard_of_mortality(esk1_0,esk3_0) = very_low,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_10]),c_0_9])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : MGT059+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jun 9 08:23:34 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/1.41 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.41 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.23/1.41 # Preprocessing time : 0.014 s
% 0.23/1.41
% 0.23/1.41 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.23/1.41 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.23/1.41 # Parsed axioms : 8
% 0.23/1.41 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 7
% 0.23/1.41 # Initial clauses : 4
% 0.23/1.41 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Initial clauses in saturation : 4
% 0.23/1.41 # Processed clauses : 4
% 0.23/1.41 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # ...remaining for further processing : 4
% 0.23/1.41 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of processed clauses : 4
% 0.23/1.41 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 3
% 0.23/1.41 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.23/1.41 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.41 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Termbank termtop insertions : 262
% 0.23/1.41
% 0.23/1.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.41 # User time : 0.012 s
% 0.23/1.41 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.23/1.41 # Total time : 0.014 s
% 0.23/1.41 # Maximum resident set size: 2648 pages
% 0.23/1.41 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.41 # Preprocessing time : 0.015 s
% 0.23/1.41
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof found!
% 0.23/1.41 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/1.41 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object total steps : 15
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object clause steps : 8
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object formula steps : 7
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object conjectures : 10
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object clause conjectures : 7
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object initial clauses used : 5
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object initial formulas used : 2
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object generating inferences : 2
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 7
% 0.23/1.41 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.23/1.41 # Parsed axioms : 8
% 0.23/1.41 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Initial clauses : 21
% 0.23/1.41 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Initial clauses in saturation : 21
% 0.23/1.41 # Processed clauses : 26
% 0.23/1.41 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # ...remaining for further processing : 25
% 0.23/1.41 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2
% 0.23/1.41 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.23/1.41 # Generated clauses : 13
% 0.23/1.41 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 9
% 0.23/1.41 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Paramodulations : 11
% 0.23/1.41 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Equation resolutions : 2
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of processed clauses : 22
% 0.23/1.41 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 7
% 0.23/1.41 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Non-unit-clauses : 15
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4
% 0.23/1.41 # ...number of literals in the above : 13
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.23/1.41 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 22
% 0.23/1.41 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 17
% 0.23/1.41 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.23/1.41 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 0.23/1.41 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.23/1.41 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1298
% 0.23/1.41
% 0.23/1.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.41 # User time : 0.012 s
% 0.23/1.41 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.23/1.41 # Total time : 0.016 s
% 0.23/1.41 # Maximum resident set size: 2880 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------