TSTP Solution File: MGT059+1 by Bliksem---1.12

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Bliksem---1.12
% Problem  : MGT059+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : bliksem %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 0s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 21:57:58 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.69s 1.10s
% Output   : Refutation 0.69s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : MGT059+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : bliksem %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Jun  9 08:42:38 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.69/1.10  *** allocated 10000 integers for termspace/termends
% 0.69/1.10  *** allocated 10000 integers for clauses
% 0.69/1.10  *** allocated 10000 integers for justifications
% 0.69/1.10  Bliksem 1.12
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  Automatic Strategy Selection
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  Clauses:
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  { ! smaller_or_equal( X, Y ), smaller( X, Y ), X = Y }.
% 0.69/1.10  { ! smaller( X, Y ), smaller_or_equal( X, Y ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  { ! X = Y, smaller_or_equal( X, Y ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  { ! greater_or_equal( X, Y ), greater( X, Y ), X = Y }.
% 0.69/1.10  { ! greater( X, Y ), greater_or_equal( X, Y ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  { ! X = Y, greater_or_equal( X, Y ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  { ! smaller( X, Y ), greater( Y, X ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  { ! greater( Y, X ), smaller( X, Y ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  { ! greater( X, Y ), ! greater( Y, X ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  { ! greater( X, Z ), ! greater( Z, Y ), greater( X, Y ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  { smaller( X, Y ), X = Y, greater( X, Y ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  { ! organization( X ), ! has_immunity( X, Y ), hazard_of_mortality( X, Y ) 
% 0.69/1.10    = very_low }.
% 0.69/1.10  { ! organization( X ), has_immunity( X, Y ), ! is_aligned( X, Y ), ! 
% 0.69/1.10    positional_advantage( X, Y ), hazard_of_mortality( X, Y ) = low }.
% 0.69/1.10  { ! organization( X ), has_immunity( X, Y ), is_aligned( X, Y ), ! 
% 0.69/1.10    positional_advantage( X, Y ), hazard_of_mortality( X, Y ) = mod1 }.
% 0.69/1.10  { ! organization( X ), has_immunity( X, Y ), ! is_aligned( X, Y ), 
% 0.69/1.10    positional_advantage( X, Y ), hazard_of_mortality( X, Y ) = mod2 }.
% 0.69/1.10  { ! organization( X ), has_immunity( X, Y ), is_aligned( X, Y ), 
% 0.69/1.10    positional_advantage( X, Y ), hazard_of_mortality( X, Y ) = high }.
% 0.69/1.10  { organization( skol1 ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  { has_immunity( skol1, skol2 ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  { has_immunity( skol1, skol3 ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  { ! hazard_of_mortality( skol1, skol2 ) = hazard_of_mortality( skol1, skol3
% 0.69/1.10     ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  percentage equality = 0.207547, percentage horn = 0.650000
% 0.69/1.10  This is a problem with some equality
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  Options Used:
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  useres =            1
% 0.69/1.10  useparamod =        1
% 0.69/1.10  useeqrefl =         1
% 0.69/1.10  useeqfact =         1
% 0.69/1.10  usefactor =         1
% 0.69/1.10  usesimpsplitting =  0
% 0.69/1.10  usesimpdemod =      5
% 0.69/1.10  usesimpres =        3
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  resimpinuse      =  1000
% 0.69/1.10  resimpclauses =     20000
% 0.69/1.10  substype =          eqrewr
% 0.69/1.10  backwardsubs =      1
% 0.69/1.10  selectoldest =      5
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  litorderings [0] =  split
% 0.69/1.10  litorderings [1] =  extend the termordering, first sorting on arguments
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  termordering =      kbo
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  litapriori =        0
% 0.69/1.10  termapriori =       1
% 0.69/1.10  litaposteriori =    0
% 0.69/1.10  termaposteriori =   0
% 0.69/1.10  demodaposteriori =  0
% 0.69/1.10  ordereqreflfact =   0
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  litselect =         negord
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  maxweight =         15
% 0.69/1.10  maxdepth =          30000
% 0.69/1.10  maxlength =         115
% 0.69/1.10  maxnrvars =         195
% 0.69/1.10  excuselevel =       1
% 0.69/1.10  increasemaxweight = 1
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  maxselected =       10000000
% 0.69/1.10  maxnrclauses =      10000000
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  showgenerated =    0
% 0.69/1.10  showkept =         0
% 0.69/1.10  showselected =     0
% 0.69/1.10  showdeleted =      0
% 0.69/1.10  showresimp =       1
% 0.69/1.10  showstatus =       2000
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  prologoutput =     0
% 0.69/1.10  nrgoals =          5000000
% 0.69/1.10  totalproof =       1
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  Symbols occurring in the translation:
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  {}  [0, 0]      (w:1, o:2, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.69/1.10  .  [1, 2]      (w:1, o:25, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.69/1.10  !  [4, 1]      (w:0, o:19, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.69/1.10  =  [13, 2]      (w:1, o:0, a:0, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.69/1.10  ==>  [14, 2]      (w:1, o:0, a:0, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.69/1.10  smaller_or_equal  [37, 2]      (w:1, o:49, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.69/1.10  smaller  [38, 2]      (w:1, o:50, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.69/1.10  greater_or_equal  [39, 2]      (w:1, o:51, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.69/1.10  greater  [40, 2]      (w:1, o:52, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.69/1.10  organization  [43, 1]      (w:1, o:24, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.69/1.10  has_immunity  [44, 2]      (w:1, o:53, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.69/1.10  hazard_of_mortality  [45, 2]      (w:1, o:54, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.69/1.10  very_low  [46, 0]      (w:1, o:10, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.69/1.10  is_aligned  [47, 2]      (w:1, o:55, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.69/1.10  positional_advantage  [48, 2]      (w:1, o:56, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.69/1.10  low  [49, 0]      (w:1, o:11, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.69/1.10  mod1  [50, 0]      (w:1, o:12, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.69/1.10  mod2  [51, 0]      (w:1, o:13, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.69/1.10  high  [52, 0]      (w:1, o:14, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.69/1.10  skol1  [54, 0]      (w:1, o:16, a:1, s:1, b:1), 
% 0.69/1.10  skol2  [55, 0]      (w:1, o:17, a:1, s:1, b:1), 
% 0.69/1.10  skol3  [56, 0]      (w:1, o:18, a:1, s:1, b:1).
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  Starting Search:
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  Bliksems!, er is een bewijs:
% 0.69/1.10  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.69/1.10  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  (11) {G0,W10,D3,L3,V2,M3} I { ! organization( X ), ! has_immunity( X, Y ), 
% 0.69/1.10    hazard_of_mortality( X, Y ) ==> very_low }.
% 0.69/1.10  (16) {G0,W2,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { organization( skol1 ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  (17) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { has_immunity( skol1, skol2 ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  (18) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { has_immunity( skol1, skol3 ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  (19) {G0,W7,D3,L1,V0,M1} I { ! hazard_of_mortality( skol1, skol3 ) ==> 
% 0.69/1.10    hazard_of_mortality( skol1, skol2 ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  (184) {G1,W5,D3,L1,V0,M1} R(11,17);r(16) { hazard_of_mortality( skol1, 
% 0.69/1.10    skol2 ) ==> very_low }.
% 0.69/1.10  (187) {G2,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} P(11,19);d(184);q;r(16) { ! has_immunity( skol1, 
% 0.69/1.10    skol3 ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  (188) {G3,W0,D0,L0,V0,M0} S(187);r(18) {  }.
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.69/1.10  found a proof!
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  Unprocessed initial clauses:
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  (190) {G0,W9,D2,L3,V2,M3}  { ! smaller_or_equal( X, Y ), smaller( X, Y ), X
% 0.69/1.10     = Y }.
% 0.69/1.10  (191) {G0,W6,D2,L2,V2,M2}  { ! smaller( X, Y ), smaller_or_equal( X, Y )
% 0.69/1.10     }.
% 0.69/1.10  (192) {G0,W6,D2,L2,V2,M2}  { ! X = Y, smaller_or_equal( X, Y ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  (193) {G0,W9,D2,L3,V2,M3}  { ! greater_or_equal( X, Y ), greater( X, Y ), X
% 0.69/1.10     = Y }.
% 0.69/1.10  (194) {G0,W6,D2,L2,V2,M2}  { ! greater( X, Y ), greater_or_equal( X, Y )
% 0.69/1.10     }.
% 0.69/1.10  (195) {G0,W6,D2,L2,V2,M2}  { ! X = Y, greater_or_equal( X, Y ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  (196) {G0,W6,D2,L2,V2,M2}  { ! smaller( X, Y ), greater( Y, X ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  (197) {G0,W6,D2,L2,V2,M2}  { ! greater( Y, X ), smaller( X, Y ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  (198) {G0,W6,D2,L2,V2,M2}  { ! greater( X, Y ), ! greater( Y, X ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  (199) {G0,W9,D2,L3,V3,M3}  { ! greater( X, Z ), ! greater( Z, Y ), greater
% 0.69/1.10    ( X, Y ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  (200) {G0,W9,D2,L3,V2,M3}  { smaller( X, Y ), X = Y, greater( X, Y ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  (201) {G0,W10,D3,L3,V2,M3}  { ! organization( X ), ! has_immunity( X, Y ), 
% 0.69/1.10    hazard_of_mortality( X, Y ) = very_low }.
% 0.69/1.10  (202) {G0,W16,D3,L5,V2,M5}  { ! organization( X ), has_immunity( X, Y ), ! 
% 0.69/1.10    is_aligned( X, Y ), ! positional_advantage( X, Y ), hazard_of_mortality( 
% 0.69/1.10    X, Y ) = low }.
% 0.69/1.10  (203) {G0,W16,D3,L5,V2,M5}  { ! organization( X ), has_immunity( X, Y ), 
% 0.69/1.10    is_aligned( X, Y ), ! positional_advantage( X, Y ), hazard_of_mortality( 
% 0.69/1.10    X, Y ) = mod1 }.
% 0.69/1.10  (204) {G0,W16,D3,L5,V2,M5}  { ! organization( X ), has_immunity( X, Y ), ! 
% 0.69/1.10    is_aligned( X, Y ), positional_advantage( X, Y ), hazard_of_mortality( X
% 0.69/1.10    , Y ) = mod2 }.
% 0.69/1.10  (205) {G0,W16,D3,L5,V2,M5}  { ! organization( X ), has_immunity( X, Y ), 
% 0.69/1.10    is_aligned( X, Y ), positional_advantage( X, Y ), hazard_of_mortality( X
% 0.69/1.10    , Y ) = high }.
% 0.69/1.10  (206) {G0,W2,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { organization( skol1 ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  (207) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { has_immunity( skol1, skol2 ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  (208) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { has_immunity( skol1, skol3 ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  (209) {G0,W7,D3,L1,V0,M1}  { ! hazard_of_mortality( skol1, skol2 ) = 
% 0.69/1.10    hazard_of_mortality( skol1, skol3 ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  Total Proof:
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  subsumption: (11) {G0,W10,D3,L3,V2,M3} I { ! organization( X ), ! 
% 0.69/1.10    has_immunity( X, Y ), hazard_of_mortality( X, Y ) ==> very_low }.
% 0.69/1.10  parent0: (201) {G0,W10,D3,L3,V2,M3}  { ! organization( X ), ! has_immunity
% 0.69/1.10    ( X, Y ), hazard_of_mortality( X, Y ) = very_low }.
% 0.69/1.10  substitution0:
% 0.69/1.10     X := X
% 0.69/1.10     Y := Y
% 0.69/1.10  end
% 0.69/1.10  permutation0:
% 0.69/1.10     0 ==> 0
% 0.69/1.10     1 ==> 1
% 0.69/1.10     2 ==> 2
% 0.69/1.10  end
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  *** allocated 15000 integers for clauses
% 0.69/1.10  subsumption: (16) {G0,W2,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { organization( skol1 ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  parent0: (206) {G0,W2,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { organization( skol1 ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  substitution0:
% 0.69/1.10  end
% 0.69/1.10  permutation0:
% 0.69/1.10     0 ==> 0
% 0.69/1.10  end
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  subsumption: (17) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { has_immunity( skol1, skol2 ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  parent0: (207) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { has_immunity( skol1, skol2 ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  substitution0:
% 0.69/1.10  end
% 0.69/1.10  permutation0:
% 0.69/1.10     0 ==> 0
% 0.69/1.10  end
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  subsumption: (18) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { has_immunity( skol1, skol3 ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  parent0: (208) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { has_immunity( skol1, skol3 ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  substitution0:
% 0.69/1.10  end
% 0.69/1.10  permutation0:
% 0.69/1.10     0 ==> 0
% 0.69/1.10  end
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  eqswap: (266) {G0,W7,D3,L1,V0,M1}  { ! hazard_of_mortality( skol1, skol3 ) 
% 0.69/1.10    = hazard_of_mortality( skol1, skol2 ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  parent0[0]: (209) {G0,W7,D3,L1,V0,M1}  { ! hazard_of_mortality( skol1, 
% 0.69/1.10    skol2 ) = hazard_of_mortality( skol1, skol3 ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  substitution0:
% 0.69/1.10  end
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  subsumption: (19) {G0,W7,D3,L1,V0,M1} I { ! hazard_of_mortality( skol1, 
% 0.69/1.10    skol3 ) ==> hazard_of_mortality( skol1, skol2 ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  parent0: (266) {G0,W7,D3,L1,V0,M1}  { ! hazard_of_mortality( skol1, skol3 )
% 0.69/1.10     = hazard_of_mortality( skol1, skol2 ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  substitution0:
% 0.69/1.10  end
% 0.69/1.10  permutation0:
% 0.69/1.10     0 ==> 0
% 0.69/1.10  end
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  eqswap: (267) {G0,W10,D3,L3,V2,M3}  { very_low ==> hazard_of_mortality( X, 
% 0.69/1.10    Y ), ! organization( X ), ! has_immunity( X, Y ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  parent0[2]: (11) {G0,W10,D3,L3,V2,M3} I { ! organization( X ), ! 
% 0.69/1.10    has_immunity( X, Y ), hazard_of_mortality( X, Y ) ==> very_low }.
% 0.69/1.10  substitution0:
% 0.69/1.10     X := X
% 0.69/1.10     Y := Y
% 0.69/1.10  end
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  resolution: (268) {G1,W7,D3,L2,V0,M2}  { very_low ==> hazard_of_mortality( 
% 0.69/1.10    skol1, skol2 ), ! organization( skol1 ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  parent0[2]: (267) {G0,W10,D3,L3,V2,M3}  { very_low ==> hazard_of_mortality
% 0.69/1.10    ( X, Y ), ! organization( X ), ! has_immunity( X, Y ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  parent1[0]: (17) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { has_immunity( skol1, skol2 ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  substitution0:
% 0.69/1.10     X := skol1
% 0.69/1.10     Y := skol2
% 0.69/1.10  end
% 0.69/1.10  substitution1:
% 0.69/1.10  end
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  resolution: (269) {G1,W5,D3,L1,V0,M1}  { very_low ==> hazard_of_mortality( 
% 0.69/1.10    skol1, skol2 ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  parent0[1]: (268) {G1,W7,D3,L2,V0,M2}  { very_low ==> hazard_of_mortality( 
% 0.69/1.10    skol1, skol2 ), ! organization( skol1 ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  parent1[0]: (16) {G0,W2,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { organization( skol1 ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  substitution0:
% 0.69/1.10  end
% 0.69/1.10  substitution1:
% 0.69/1.10  end
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  eqswap: (270) {G1,W5,D3,L1,V0,M1}  { hazard_of_mortality( skol1, skol2 ) 
% 0.69/1.10    ==> very_low }.
% 0.69/1.10  parent0[0]: (269) {G1,W5,D3,L1,V0,M1}  { very_low ==> hazard_of_mortality( 
% 0.69/1.10    skol1, skol2 ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  substitution0:
% 0.69/1.10  end
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  subsumption: (184) {G1,W5,D3,L1,V0,M1} R(11,17);r(16) { hazard_of_mortality
% 0.69/1.10    ( skol1, skol2 ) ==> very_low }.
% 0.69/1.10  parent0: (270) {G1,W5,D3,L1,V0,M1}  { hazard_of_mortality( skol1, skol2 ) 
% 0.69/1.10    ==> very_low }.
% 0.69/1.10  substitution0:
% 0.69/1.10  end
% 0.69/1.10  permutation0:
% 0.69/1.10     0 ==> 0
% 0.69/1.10  end
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  eqswap: (272) {G0,W7,D3,L1,V0,M1}  { ! hazard_of_mortality( skol1, skol2 ) 
% 0.69/1.10    ==> hazard_of_mortality( skol1, skol3 ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  parent0[0]: (19) {G0,W7,D3,L1,V0,M1} I { ! hazard_of_mortality( skol1, 
% 0.69/1.10    skol3 ) ==> hazard_of_mortality( skol1, skol2 ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  substitution0:
% 0.69/1.10  end
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  paramod: (275) {G1,W10,D3,L3,V0,M3}  { ! hazard_of_mortality( skol1, skol2
% 0.69/1.10     ) ==> very_low, ! organization( skol1 ), ! has_immunity( skol1, skol3 )
% 0.69/1.10     }.
% 0.69/1.10  parent0[2]: (11) {G0,W10,D3,L3,V2,M3} I { ! organization( X ), ! 
% 0.69/1.10    has_immunity( X, Y ), hazard_of_mortality( X, Y ) ==> very_low }.
% 0.69/1.10  parent1[0; 5]: (272) {G0,W7,D3,L1,V0,M1}  { ! hazard_of_mortality( skol1, 
% 0.69/1.10    skol2 ) ==> hazard_of_mortality( skol1, skol3 ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  substitution0:
% 0.69/1.10     X := skol1
% 0.69/1.10     Y := skol3
% 0.69/1.10  end
% 0.69/1.10  substitution1:
% 0.69/1.10  end
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  paramod: (278) {G2,W8,D2,L3,V0,M3}  { ! very_low ==> very_low, ! 
% 0.69/1.10    organization( skol1 ), ! has_immunity( skol1, skol3 ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  parent0[0]: (184) {G1,W5,D3,L1,V0,M1} R(11,17);r(16) { hazard_of_mortality
% 0.69/1.10    ( skol1, skol2 ) ==> very_low }.
% 0.69/1.10  parent1[0; 2]: (275) {G1,W10,D3,L3,V0,M3}  { ! hazard_of_mortality( skol1, 
% 0.69/1.10    skol2 ) ==> very_low, ! organization( skol1 ), ! has_immunity( skol1, 
% 0.69/1.10    skol3 ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  substitution0:
% 0.69/1.10  end
% 0.69/1.10  substitution1:
% 0.69/1.10  end
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  eqrefl: (279) {G0,W5,D2,L2,V0,M2}  { ! organization( skol1 ), ! 
% 0.69/1.10    has_immunity( skol1, skol3 ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  parent0[0]: (278) {G2,W8,D2,L3,V0,M3}  { ! very_low ==> very_low, ! 
% 0.69/1.10    organization( skol1 ), ! has_immunity( skol1, skol3 ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  substitution0:
% 0.69/1.10  end
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  resolution: (280) {G1,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { ! has_immunity( skol1, skol3 ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  parent0[0]: (279) {G0,W5,D2,L2,V0,M2}  { ! organization( skol1 ), ! 
% 0.69/1.10    has_immunity( skol1, skol3 ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  parent1[0]: (16) {G0,W2,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { organization( skol1 ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  substitution0:
% 0.69/1.10  end
% 0.69/1.10  substitution1:
% 0.69/1.10  end
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  subsumption: (187) {G2,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} P(11,19);d(184);q;r(16) { ! 
% 0.69/1.10    has_immunity( skol1, skol3 ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  parent0: (280) {G1,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { ! has_immunity( skol1, skol3 ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  substitution0:
% 0.69/1.10  end
% 0.69/1.10  permutation0:
% 0.69/1.10     0 ==> 0
% 0.69/1.10  end
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  resolution: (281) {G1,W0,D0,L0,V0,M0}  {  }.
% 0.69/1.10  parent0[0]: (187) {G2,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} P(11,19);d(184);q;r(16) { ! 
% 0.69/1.10    has_immunity( skol1, skol3 ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  parent1[0]: (18) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { has_immunity( skol1, skol3 ) }.
% 0.69/1.10  substitution0:
% 0.69/1.10  end
% 0.69/1.10  substitution1:
% 0.69/1.10  end
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  subsumption: (188) {G3,W0,D0,L0,V0,M0} S(187);r(18) {  }.
% 0.69/1.10  parent0: (281) {G1,W0,D0,L0,V0,M0}  {  }.
% 0.69/1.10  substitution0:
% 0.69/1.10  end
% 0.69/1.10  permutation0:
% 0.69/1.10  end
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  Proof check complete!
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  Memory use:
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  space for terms:        2524
% 0.69/1.10  space for clauses:      9211
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  clauses generated:      394
% 0.69/1.10  clauses kept:           189
% 0.69/1.10  clauses selected:       34
% 0.69/1.10  clauses deleted:        3
% 0.69/1.10  clauses inuse deleted:  0
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  subsentry:          676
% 0.69/1.10  literals s-matched: 569
% 0.69/1.10  literals matched:   569
% 0.69/1.10  full subsumption:   68
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  checksum:           -1291583583
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  
% 0.69/1.10  Bliksem ended
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------