TSTP Solution File: MGT058-1 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : MGT058-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:35:52 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 0.51s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   39 (  16 unt;  10 nHn;  38 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   68 (  20 equ;  22 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   7 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(definition_greater_or_equal_4,axiom,
    ( greater(X1,X2)
    | X1 = X2
    | ~ greater_or_equal(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ujpYVzexMd/E---3.1_7179.p',definition_greater_or_equal_4) ).

cnf(lemma_10_44,negated_conjecture,
    greater_or_equal(sigma,zero),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ujpYVzexMd/E---3.1_7179.p',lemma_10_44) ).

cnf(definition_smaller_8,axiom,
    ( smaller(X2,X1)
    | ~ greater(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ujpYVzexMd/E---3.1_7179.p',definition_smaller_8) ).

cnf(definition_3_30,axiom,
    ( positional_advantage(X1,X2)
    | ~ fragile_position(X1)
    | ~ smaller_or_equal(age(X1,X2),sigma) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ujpYVzexMd/E---3.1_7179.p',definition_3_30) ).

cnf(lemma_10_43,negated_conjecture,
    age(sk3,sk4) = zero,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ujpYVzexMd/E---3.1_7179.p',lemma_10_43) ).

cnf(lemma_10_46,negated_conjecture,
    fragile_position(sk3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ujpYVzexMd/E---3.1_7179.p',lemma_10_46) ).

cnf(definition_smaller_or_equal_2,axiom,
    ( smaller_or_equal(X1,X2)
    | ~ smaller(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ujpYVzexMd/E---3.1_7179.p',definition_smaller_or_equal_2) ).

cnf(lemma_10_45,negated_conjecture,
    greater_or_equal(tau,zero),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ujpYVzexMd/E---3.1_7179.p',lemma_10_45) ).

cnf(definition_4_36,axiom,
    ( ~ robust_position(X1)
    | ~ smaller_or_equal(age(X1,X2),tau)
    | ~ positional_advantage(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ujpYVzexMd/E---3.1_7179.p',definition_4_36) ).

cnf(lemma_10_47,negated_conjecture,
    robust_position(sk3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ujpYVzexMd/E---3.1_7179.p',lemma_10_47) ).

cnf(definition_smaller_or_equal_3,axiom,
    ( smaller_or_equal(X1,X2)
    | X1 != X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ujpYVzexMd/E---3.1_7179.p',definition_smaller_or_equal_3) ).

cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
    ( greater(X1,X2)
    | X1 = X2
    | ~ greater_or_equal(X1,X2) ),
    definition_greater_or_equal_4 ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    greater_or_equal(sigma,zero),
    lemma_10_44 ).

cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
    ( smaller(X2,X1)
    | ~ greater(X1,X2) ),
    definition_smaller_8 ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( zero = sigma
    | greater(sigma,zero) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    ( positional_advantage(X1,X2)
    | ~ fragile_position(X1)
    | ~ smaller_or_equal(age(X1,X2),sigma) ),
    definition_3_30 ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    age(sk3,sk4) = zero,
    lemma_10_43 ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    fragile_position(sk3),
    lemma_10_46 ).

cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
    ( smaller_or_equal(X1,X2)
    | ~ smaller(X1,X2) ),
    definition_smaller_or_equal_2 ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( zero = sigma
    | smaller(zero,sigma) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    greater_or_equal(tau,zero),
    lemma_10_45 ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( positional_advantage(sk3,sk4)
    | ~ smaller_or_equal(zero,sigma) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17])]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( zero = sigma
    | smaller_or_equal(zero,sigma) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( zero = tau
    | greater(tau,zero) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,axiom,
    ( ~ robust_position(X1)
    | ~ smaller_or_equal(age(X1,X2),tau)
    | ~ positional_advantage(X1,X2) ),
    definition_4_36 ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( zero = sigma
    | positional_advantage(sk3,sk4) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    robust_position(sk3),
    lemma_10_47 ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( zero = tau
    | smaller(zero,tau) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( zero = sigma
    | ~ smaller_or_equal(zero,tau) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26]),c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ( zero = tau
    | smaller_or_equal(zero,tau) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,axiom,
    ( smaller_or_equal(X1,X2)
    | X1 != X2 ),
    definition_smaller_or_equal_3 ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( zero = tau
    | zero = sigma ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    smaller_or_equal(X1,X1),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ( zero = sigma
    | tau != sigma ),
    inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    zero = sigma,
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_31]),c_0_32])]),c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    positional_advantage(sk3,sk4),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_34]),c_0_32])]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    ~ smaller_or_equal(sigma,tau),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_35]),c_0_26]),c_0_16]),c_0_34])]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    tau = sigma,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_34]),c_0_34]),c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]),c_0_32])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.13  % Problem    : MGT058-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.10/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 00:25:31 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.22/0.49  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.49  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ujpYVzexMd/E---3.1_7179.p
% 0.22/0.51  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.22/0.51  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.51  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.51  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51  # sh5l with pid 7306 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Result found by sh5l
% 0.22/0.51  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.51  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.51  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.22/0.51  # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.51  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2v with 163s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2v with pid 7315 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2v
% 0.22/0.51  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.51  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.51  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.22/0.51  # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.51  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2v with 163s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.22/0.51  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.22/0.51  
% 0.22/0.51  # Proof found!
% 0.22/0.51  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.22/0.51  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.51  # Parsed axioms                        : 29
% 0.22/0.51  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Initial clauses                      : 29
% 0.22/0.51  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 0.22/0.51  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 27
% 0.22/0.51  # Processed clauses                    : 88
% 0.22/0.51  # ...of these trivial                  : 3
% 0.22/0.51  # ...subsumed                          : 5
% 0.22/0.51  # ...remaining for further processing  : 80
% 0.22/0.51  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 2
% 0.22/0.51  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Backward-rewritten                   : 27
% 0.22/0.51  # Generated clauses                    : 49
% 0.22/0.51  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 53
% 0.22/0.51  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.22/0.51  # Paramodulations                      : 46
% 0.22/0.51  # Factorizations                       : 1
% 0.22/0.51  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Equation resolutions                 : 2
% 0.22/0.51  # Total rewrite steps                  : 57
% 0.22/0.51  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.22/0.51  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.22/0.51  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.51  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.22/0.51  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.51  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.22/0.51  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.22/0.51  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.22/0.51  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.22/0.51  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.22/0.51  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.22/0.51  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.22/0.51  # Current number of processed clauses  : 24
% 0.22/0.51  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 9
% 0.22/0.51  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.51  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.22/0.51  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 14
% 0.22/0.51  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 16
% 0.22/0.51  # ...number of literals in the above   : 48
% 0.22/0.51  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Current number of archived clauses   : 54
% 0.22/0.51  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 221
% 0.22/0.51  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 187
% 0.22/0.51  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 5
% 0.22/0.51  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 27
% 0.22/0.51  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 6
% 0.22/0.51  # BW rewrite match successes           : 3
% 0.22/0.51  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1277
% 0.22/0.51  
% 0.22/0.51  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.51  # User time                : 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.51  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.22/0.51  # Total time               : 0.007 s
% 0.22/0.51  # Maximum resident set size: 1616 pages
% 0.22/0.51  
% 0.22/0.51  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.51  # User time                : 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.51  # System time              : 0.008 s
% 0.22/0.51  # Total time               : 0.011 s
% 0.22/0.51  # Maximum resident set size: 1688 pages
% 0.22/0.51  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.22/0.51  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------