TSTP Solution File: MGT057+1 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : MGT057+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:26:29 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.44s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11 % Problem : MGT057+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 9 12:27:32 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.19/0.44 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.19/0.44 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.44 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.44 SPASS derived 197 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 1 splits and kept 86 clauses.
% 0.19/0.44 SPASS allocated 97798 KBytes.
% 0.19/0.44 SPASS spent 0:00:00.10 on the problem.
% 0.19/0.44 0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 0.19/0.44 0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.19/0.44 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.19/0.44 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.19/0.44 0:00:00.01 for the reduction.
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44 Here is a proof with depth 4, length 30 :
% 0.19/0.44 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.44 1[0:Inp] || -> has_endowment(skc4)*.
% 0.19/0.44 2[0:Inp] || -> organization(skc4)*.
% 0.19/0.44 3[0:Inp] || -> greater(eta,zero)*r.
% 0.19/0.44 4[0:Inp] || -> greater(age(skc4,skc7),eta)*l.
% 0.19/0.44 5[0:Inp] || -> smaller_or_equal(age(skc4,skc6),eta)*.
% 0.19/0.44 6[0:Inp] || -> equal(age(skc4,skc5),zero)**.
% 0.19/0.44 8[0:Inp] || smaller(u,v)* -> smaller_or_equal(u,v).
% 0.19/0.44 13[0:Inp] || greater(u,v) -> smaller(v,u)*.
% 0.19/0.44 19[0:Inp] has_endowment(u) || smaller_or_equal(age(u,v),eta)* -> has_immunity(u,v).
% 0.19/0.44 20[0:Inp] has_endowment(u) || has_immunity(u,v) greater(age(u,v),eta)*l -> .
% 0.19/0.44 23[0:Inp] || equal(hazard_of_mortality(skc4,skc6),hazard_of_mortality(skc4,skc5)) greater(hazard_of_mortality(skc4,skc7),hazard_of_mortality(skc4,skc6))*l -> .
% 0.19/0.44 26[0:Inp] organization(u) || has_immunity(u,v) -> has_immunity(u,w) greater(hazard_of_mortality(u,w),hazard_of_mortality(u,v))*.
% 0.19/0.44 27[0:Inp] organization(u) || has_immunity(u,v) has_immunity(u,w) -> equal(hazard_of_mortality(u,v),hazard_of_mortality(u,w))*.
% 0.19/0.44 28[0:Res:2.0,26.0] || has_immunity(skc4,u) -> has_immunity(skc4,v) greater(hazard_of_mortality(skc4,v),hazard_of_mortality(skc4,u))*.
% 0.19/0.44 31[0:Res:2.0,27.0] || has_immunity(skc4,u) has_immunity(skc4,v) -> equal(hazard_of_mortality(skc4,u),hazard_of_mortality(skc4,v))*.
% 0.19/0.44 35[0:Res:1.0,19.0] || smaller_or_equal(age(skc4,u),eta)* -> has_immunity(skc4,u).
% 0.19/0.44 41[0:Res:5.0,19.1] has_endowment(skc4) || -> has_immunity(skc4,skc6)*.
% 0.19/0.44 45[0:Res:3.0,13.0] || -> smaller(zero,eta)*.
% 0.19/0.44 47[0:Res:4.0,20.2] has_endowment(skc4) || has_immunity(skc4,skc7)* -> .
% 0.19/0.44 56[0:MRR:41.0,1.0] || -> has_immunity(skc4,skc6)*.
% 0.19/0.44 57[0:MRR:47.0,1.0] || has_immunity(skc4,skc7)* -> .
% 0.19/0.44 61[0:Res:45.0,8.0] || -> smaller_or_equal(zero,eta)*.
% 0.19/0.44 63[0:SpL:6.0,35.0] || smaller_or_equal(zero,eta) -> has_immunity(skc4,skc5)*.
% 0.19/0.44 66[0:MRR:63.0,61.0] || -> has_immunity(skc4,skc5)*.
% 0.19/0.44 237[0:Res:28.2,23.1] || has_immunity(skc4,skc6) equal(hazard_of_mortality(skc4,skc6),hazard_of_mortality(skc4,skc5))** -> has_immunity(skc4,skc7).
% 0.19/0.44 254[0:MRR:237.0,237.2,56.0,57.0] || equal(hazard_of_mortality(skc4,skc6),hazard_of_mortality(skc4,skc5))** -> .
% 0.19/0.44 263[0:SpL:31.2,254.0] || has_immunity(skc4,u) has_immunity(skc4,skc6) equal(hazard_of_mortality(skc4,u),hazard_of_mortality(skc4,skc5))* -> .
% 0.19/0.44 267[0:MRR:263.1,56.0] || has_immunity(skc4,u) equal(hazard_of_mortality(skc4,u),hazard_of_mortality(skc4,skc5))* -> .
% 0.19/0.44 268[0:EqR:267.1] || has_immunity(skc4,skc5)* -> .
% 0.19/0.44 277[0:MRR:268.0,66.0] || -> .
% 0.19/0.44 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.19/0.44 Formulae used in the proof : theorem_6 definition_smaller_or_equal definition_smaller definition_1 assumption_3 assumption_2
% 0.19/0.44
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------