TSTP Solution File: MGT057+1 by Princess---230619
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Princess---230619
% Problem : MGT057+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 09:16:31 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 8.43s 2.06s
% Output : Proof 12.37s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : MGT057+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 06:31:25 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.63 ________ _____
% 0.18/0.63 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.18/0.63 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/
% 0.18/0.63 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ )
% 0.18/0.63 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.18/0.63
% 0.18/0.63 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.18/0.63 (2023-06-19)
% 0.18/0.63
% 0.18/0.63 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.18/0.63 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.18/0.63 Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.18/0.63 Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.18/0.63
% 0.18/0.63 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.18/0.63
% 0.18/0.63 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.18/0.65 Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.18/0.67 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.18/0.67 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.18/0.67 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.18/0.67 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.18/0.67 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.18/0.67 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 0.18/0.67 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 2.72/1.16 Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 2.72/1.17 Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 2.99/1.23 Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 2.99/1.23 Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 2.99/1.23 Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 2.99/1.23 Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 2.99/1.23 Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 5.68/1.64 Prover 5: Proving ...
% 5.68/1.65 Prover 2: Proving ...
% 5.68/1.67 Prover 6: Proving ...
% 5.68/1.69 Prover 1: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 6.28/1.70 Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 6.28/1.72 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.28/1.72 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.16/1.88 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.16/1.88 Prover 0: Proving ...
% 8.43/2.06 Prover 3: proved (1393ms)
% 8.43/2.06
% 8.43/2.06 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 8.43/2.06
% 8.43/2.06 Prover 6: stopped
% 8.43/2.06 Prover 5: stopped
% 8.43/2.06 Prover 2: stopped
% 8.43/2.07 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 8.43/2.07 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 8.43/2.07 Prover 0: stopped
% 8.43/2.07 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 8.43/2.08 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 9.09/2.10 Prover 13: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 9.09/2.11 Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 9.09/2.14 Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 9.09/2.14 Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 9.09/2.14 Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 9.09/2.19 Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 9.09/2.22 Prover 10: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 9.09/2.23 Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 9.54/2.28 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 10.40/2.29 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 10.40/2.29 Prover 7: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 10.66/2.32 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 10.66/2.36 Prover 13: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 10.66/2.39 Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ...
% 11.35/2.42 Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ...
% 11.35/2.44 Prover 10: Found proof (size 20)
% 11.35/2.44 Prover 10: proved (356ms)
% 11.35/2.44 Prover 7: stopped
% 11.35/2.44 Prover 8: stopped
% 11.35/2.44 Prover 4: stopped
% 11.35/2.44 Prover 1: stopped
% 11.35/2.44 Prover 13: stopped
% 11.35/2.45 Prover 11: stopped
% 11.35/2.45
% 11.35/2.45 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 11.35/2.45
% 11.35/2.45 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 11.35/2.45 Assumptions after simplification:
% 11.35/2.45 ---------------------------------
% 11.35/2.46
% 11.35/2.46 (assumption_2)
% 11.84/2.52 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : ! [v4: $i] : (v4 = v3
% 11.84/2.52 | ~ (hazard_of_mortality(v0, v2) = v4) | ~ (hazard_of_mortality(v0, v1) =
% 11.84/2.52 v3) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ has_immunity(v0, v2) | ~
% 11.84/2.52 has_immunity(v0, v1) | ~ organization(v0))
% 11.84/2.52
% 11.84/2.52 (assumption_3)
% 11.84/2.52 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : ! [v4: $i] : ( ~
% 11.84/2.52 (hazard_of_mortality(v0, v2) = v3) | ~ (hazard_of_mortality(v0, v1) = v4) |
% 11.84/2.52 ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ has_immunity(v0, v1) | ~
% 11.84/2.52 organization(v0) | has_immunity(v0, v2) | greater(v3, v4))
% 11.84/2.52
% 11.84/2.52 (definition_1)
% 11.84/2.53 $i(eta) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (age(v0, v1) = v2) |
% 11.84/2.53 ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ has_immunity(v0, v1) | ~ has_endowment(v0) | ~
% 11.84/2.53 greater(v2, eta)) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (age(v0,
% 11.84/2.53 v1) = v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ has_endowment(v0) | ~
% 11.84/2.53 smaller_or_equal(v2, eta) | has_immunity(v0, v1)) & ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ $i(v0)
% 11.84/2.53 | ~ has_endowment(v0) | organization(v0)) & ? [v0: $i] : ( ~ $i(v0) |
% 11.84/2.53 has_endowment(v0) | ? [v1: $i] : ? [v2: $i] : ($i(v1) & ( ~
% 11.84/2.53 organization(v0) | (age(v0, v1) = v2 & $i(v2) & has_immunity(v0, v1) &
% 11.84/2.53 greater(v2, eta)) | (age(v0, v1) = v2 & $i(v2) & smaller_or_equal(v2,
% 11.84/2.53 eta) & ~ has_immunity(v0, v1)))))
% 11.84/2.53
% 11.84/2.53 (definition_smaller)
% 11.84/2.53 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ greater(v1, v0) |
% 11.84/2.53 smaller(v0, v1)) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~
% 11.84/2.53 smaller(v0, v1) | greater(v1, v0))
% 11.84/2.53
% 11.84/2.53 (definition_smaller_or_equal)
% 11.84/2.54 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~
% 11.84/2.54 smaller_or_equal(v0, v1) | smaller(v0, v1)) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : (
% 11.84/2.54 ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ smaller(v0, v1) | smaller_or_equal(v0, v1)) & ?
% 11.84/2.54 [v0: $i] : ( ~ $i(v0) | smaller_or_equal(v0, v0))
% 11.84/2.54
% 11.84/2.54 (theorem_6)
% 11.84/2.54 $i(zero) & $i(eta) & ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: $i] : ? [v2: $i] : ? [v3: $i] :
% 11.84/2.54 ? [v4: $i] : ? [v5: $i] : ? [v6: $i] : ? [v7: $i] : ? [v8: $i] :
% 11.84/2.54 (hazard_of_mortality(v0, v2) = v7 & age(v0, v3) = v5 & age(v0, v2) = v4 &
% 11.84/2.54 age(v0, v1) = zero & $i(v7) & $i(v5) & $i(v4) & $i(v3) & $i(v2) & $i(v1) &
% 11.84/2.54 $i(v0) & organization(v0) & has_endowment(v0) & greater(v5, eta) &
% 11.84/2.54 greater(eta, zero) & smaller_or_equal(v4, eta) & (( ~ (v8 = v7) &
% 11.84/2.54 hazard_of_mortality(v0, v1) = v8 & $i(v8)) | (hazard_of_mortality(v0,
% 11.84/2.54 v3) = v6 & $i(v6) & ~ greater(v6, v7))))
% 11.84/2.54
% 11.84/2.54 Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 11.84/2.54 --------------------------------------------
% 11.84/2.54 definition_greater_or_equal, meaning_postulate_greater_comparable,
% 11.84/2.54 meaning_postulate_greater_strict, meaning_postulate_greater_transitive
% 11.84/2.54
% 11.84/2.54 Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 11.84/2.54 ---------------------------------
% 11.84/2.54
% 11.84/2.54 Begin of proof
% 11.84/2.55 |
% 11.84/2.55 | ALPHA: (definition_smaller_or_equal) implies:
% 11.84/2.55 | (1) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ smaller(v0, v1)
% 11.84/2.55 | | smaller_or_equal(v0, v1))
% 11.84/2.55 |
% 11.84/2.55 | ALPHA: (definition_smaller) implies:
% 11.84/2.55 | (2) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ greater(v1, v0)
% 11.84/2.55 | | smaller(v0, v1))
% 11.84/2.55 |
% 11.84/2.55 | ALPHA: (definition_1) implies:
% 11.84/2.55 | (3) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (age(v0, v1) = v2) | ~
% 11.84/2.55 | $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ has_endowment(v0) | ~ smaller_or_equal(v2,
% 11.84/2.55 | eta) | has_immunity(v0, v1))
% 11.84/2.56 | (4) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (age(v0, v1) = v2) | ~
% 11.84/2.56 | $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ has_immunity(v0, v1) | ~ has_endowment(v0) |
% 11.84/2.56 | ~ greater(v2, eta))
% 11.84/2.56 |
% 11.84/2.56 | ALPHA: (theorem_6) implies:
% 11.84/2.56 | (5) $i(eta)
% 11.84/2.56 | (6) $i(zero)
% 11.84/2.56 | (7) ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: $i] : ? [v2: $i] : ? [v3: $i] : ? [v4: $i] :
% 11.84/2.56 | ? [v5: $i] : ? [v6: $i] : ? [v7: $i] : ? [v8: $i] :
% 11.84/2.56 | (hazard_of_mortality(v0, v2) = v7 & age(v0, v3) = v5 & age(v0, v2) = v4
% 11.84/2.56 | & age(v0, v1) = zero & $i(v7) & $i(v5) & $i(v4) & $i(v3) & $i(v2) &
% 11.84/2.56 | $i(v1) & $i(v0) & organization(v0) & has_endowment(v0) & greater(v5,
% 11.84/2.56 | eta) & greater(eta, zero) & smaller_or_equal(v4, eta) & (( ~ (v8 =
% 11.84/2.56 | v7) & hazard_of_mortality(v0, v1) = v8 & $i(v8)) |
% 11.84/2.56 | (hazard_of_mortality(v0, v3) = v6 & $i(v6) & ~ greater(v6, v7))))
% 11.84/2.56 |
% 11.84/2.56 | DELTA: instantiating (7) with fresh symbols all_16_0, all_16_1, all_16_2,
% 11.84/2.56 | all_16_3, all_16_4, all_16_5, all_16_6, all_16_7, all_16_8 gives:
% 11.84/2.57 | (8) hazard_of_mortality(all_16_8, all_16_6) = all_16_1 & age(all_16_8,
% 11.84/2.57 | all_16_5) = all_16_3 & age(all_16_8, all_16_6) = all_16_4 &
% 11.84/2.57 | age(all_16_8, all_16_7) = zero & $i(all_16_1) & $i(all_16_3) &
% 11.84/2.57 | $i(all_16_4) & $i(all_16_5) & $i(all_16_6) & $i(all_16_7) &
% 11.84/2.57 | $i(all_16_8) & organization(all_16_8) & has_endowment(all_16_8) &
% 11.84/2.57 | greater(all_16_3, eta) & greater(eta, zero) &
% 11.84/2.57 | smaller_or_equal(all_16_4, eta) & (( ~ (all_16_0 = all_16_1) &
% 11.84/2.57 | hazard_of_mortality(all_16_8, all_16_7) = all_16_0 & $i(all_16_0))
% 11.84/2.57 | | (hazard_of_mortality(all_16_8, all_16_5) = all_16_2 & $i(all_16_2)
% 11.84/2.57 | & ~ greater(all_16_2, all_16_1)))
% 11.84/2.57 |
% 11.84/2.57 | ALPHA: (8) implies:
% 11.84/2.57 | (9) smaller_or_equal(all_16_4, eta)
% 11.84/2.57 | (10) greater(eta, zero)
% 11.84/2.57 | (11) greater(all_16_3, eta)
% 11.84/2.57 | (12) has_endowment(all_16_8)
% 11.84/2.57 | (13) organization(all_16_8)
% 11.84/2.57 | (14) $i(all_16_8)
% 11.84/2.57 | (15) $i(all_16_7)
% 11.84/2.57 | (16) $i(all_16_6)
% 11.84/2.57 | (17) $i(all_16_5)
% 11.84/2.57 | (18) age(all_16_8, all_16_7) = zero
% 11.84/2.57 | (19) age(all_16_8, all_16_6) = all_16_4
% 11.84/2.57 | (20) age(all_16_8, all_16_5) = all_16_3
% 11.84/2.57 | (21) hazard_of_mortality(all_16_8, all_16_6) = all_16_1
% 11.84/2.57 | (22) ( ~ (all_16_0 = all_16_1) & hazard_of_mortality(all_16_8, all_16_7) =
% 11.84/2.57 | all_16_0 & $i(all_16_0)) | (hazard_of_mortality(all_16_8, all_16_5)
% 11.84/2.57 | = all_16_2 & $i(all_16_2) & ~ greater(all_16_2, all_16_1))
% 11.84/2.57 |
% 11.84/2.58 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with zero, eta, simplifying with (5), (6), (10)
% 11.84/2.58 | gives:
% 11.84/2.58 | (23) smaller(zero, eta)
% 11.84/2.58 |
% 11.84/2.58 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with all_16_8, all_16_6, all_16_4, simplifying
% 11.84/2.58 | with (9), (12), (14), (16), (19) gives:
% 11.84/2.58 | (24) has_immunity(all_16_8, all_16_6)
% 11.84/2.58 |
% 11.84/2.58 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with zero, eta, simplifying with (5), (6), (23)
% 11.84/2.58 | gives:
% 11.84/2.58 | (25) smaller_or_equal(zero, eta)
% 11.84/2.58 |
% 11.84/2.58 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with all_16_8, all_16_7, zero, simplifying with
% 11.84/2.58 | (12), (14), (15), (18), (25) gives:
% 11.84/2.58 | (26) has_immunity(all_16_8, all_16_7)
% 11.84/2.58 |
% 12.31/2.58 | BETA: splitting (22) gives:
% 12.31/2.58 |
% 12.31/2.58 | Case 1:
% 12.31/2.58 | |
% 12.31/2.58 | | (27) ~ (all_16_0 = all_16_1) & hazard_of_mortality(all_16_8, all_16_7) =
% 12.31/2.58 | | all_16_0 & $i(all_16_0)
% 12.31/2.58 | |
% 12.31/2.58 | | ALPHA: (27) implies:
% 12.31/2.58 | | (28) ~ (all_16_0 = all_16_1)
% 12.31/2.58 | | (29) hazard_of_mortality(all_16_8, all_16_7) = all_16_0
% 12.31/2.58 | |
% 12.31/2.58 | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (assumption_2) with all_16_8, all_16_7, all_16_6,
% 12.31/2.58 | | all_16_0, all_16_1, simplifying with (13), (14), (15), (16),
% 12.31/2.58 | | (21), (24), (26), (29) gives:
% 12.31/2.58 | | (30) all_16_0 = all_16_1
% 12.31/2.58 | |
% 12.31/2.58 | | REDUCE: (28), (30) imply:
% 12.31/2.58 | | (31) $false
% 12.31/2.59 | |
% 12.31/2.59 | | CLOSE: (31) is inconsistent.
% 12.31/2.59 | |
% 12.31/2.59 | Case 2:
% 12.31/2.59 | |
% 12.31/2.59 | | (32) hazard_of_mortality(all_16_8, all_16_5) = all_16_2 & $i(all_16_2) &
% 12.31/2.59 | | ~ greater(all_16_2, all_16_1)
% 12.31/2.59 | |
% 12.31/2.59 | | ALPHA: (32) implies:
% 12.31/2.59 | | (33) ~ greater(all_16_2, all_16_1)
% 12.31/2.59 | | (34) hazard_of_mortality(all_16_8, all_16_5) = all_16_2
% 12.31/2.59 | |
% 12.31/2.59 | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (assumption_3) with all_16_8, all_16_6, all_16_5,
% 12.31/2.59 | | all_16_2, all_16_1, simplifying with (13), (14), (16), (17),
% 12.31/2.59 | | (21), (24), (33), (34) gives:
% 12.31/2.59 | | (35) has_immunity(all_16_8, all_16_5)
% 12.31/2.59 | |
% 12.37/2.59 | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with all_16_8, all_16_5, all_16_3,
% 12.37/2.59 | | simplifying with (11), (12), (14), (17), (20), (35) gives:
% 12.37/2.59 | | (36) $false
% 12.37/2.59 | |
% 12.37/2.59 | | CLOSE: (36) is inconsistent.
% 12.37/2.59 | |
% 12.37/2.59 | End of split
% 12.37/2.59 |
% 12.37/2.59 End of proof
% 12.37/2.59 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 12.37/2.59
% 12.37/2.59 1961ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------