TSTP Solution File: MGT054+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : MGT054+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:26:28 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.47s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : MGT054+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Jun  9 10:46:23 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.47  
% 0.20/0.47  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.20/0.47  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.20/0.47  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.47  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.20/0.47  SPASS derived 182 clauses, backtracked 8 clauses, performed 2 splits and kept 122 clauses.
% 0.20/0.47  SPASS allocated 97767 KBytes.
% 0.20/0.47  SPASS spent	0:00:00.11 on the problem.
% 0.20/0.47  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.20/0.47  		0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.20/0.47  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.20/0.47  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.20/0.47  		0:00:00.01 for the reduction.
% 0.20/0.47  
% 0.20/0.47  
% 0.20/0.47  Here is a proof with depth 4, length 56 :
% 0.20/0.47  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.20/0.47  1[0:Inp] ||  -> organization(skc4)*.
% 0.20/0.47  2[0:Inp] || has_endowment(skc4)* -> .
% 0.20/0.47  4[0:Inp] ||  -> greater(age(skc4,skc7),sigma)*l.
% 0.20/0.47  5[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(age(skc4,skc5),zero)**.
% 0.20/0.47  6[0:Inp] ||  -> smaller_or_equal(age(skc4,skc6),sigma)*.
% 0.20/0.47  7[0:Inp] || dissimilar(u,v,w)* -> organization(u).
% 0.20/0.47  12[0:Inp] || smaller(u,v)* -> greater(v,u).
% 0.20/0.47  14[0:Inp] || greater(hazard_of_mortality(skc4,skc7),hazard_of_mortality(skc4,skc6))*l -> .
% 0.20/0.47  15[0:Inp] || greater(u,v)*+ greater(v,u)* -> .
% 0.20/0.47  16[0:Inp] organization(u) || has_immunity(u,v)* -> has_endowment(u).
% 0.20/0.47  18[0:Inp] || smaller_or_equal(u,v) -> equal(u,v) smaller(u,v)*.
% 0.20/0.47  21[0:Inp] || greater(u,v)* greater(v,w)* -> greater(u,w)*.
% 0.20/0.47  22[0:Inp] organization(u) || equal(age(u,v),zero)** -> is_aligned(u,v).
% 0.20/0.47  23[0:Inp] || is_aligned(u,v) is_aligned(u,w) dissimilar(u,w,v)* -> .
% 0.20/0.47  24[0:Inp] organization(u) || is_aligned(u,v) -> is_aligned(u,w) dissimilar(u,v,w)*.
% 0.20/0.47  26[0:Inp] organization(u) || has_immunity(u,v) -> has_immunity(u,w) greater(hazard_of_mortality(u,w),hazard_of_mortality(u,v))*.
% 0.20/0.47  27[0:Inp] organization(u) || is_aligned(u,v) -> is_aligned(u,w) greater(capability(u,v),capability(u,w))*.
% 0.20/0.47  28[0:Inp] organization(u) || greater(age(u,v),sigma) equal(age(u,w),zero) -> dissimilar(u,w,v)*.
% 0.20/0.47  29[0:Inp] organization(u) || equal(age(u,v),zero) dissimilar(u,v,w)* -> greater(age(u,w),sigma).
% 0.20/0.47  30[0:Inp] organization(u) || greater(capability(u,v),capability(u,w))* -> has_immunity(u,w) greater(hazard_of_mortality(u,w),hazard_of_mortality(u,v)) has_immunity(u,v).
% 0.20/0.47  31[0:MRR:29.0,7.1] || equal(age(u,v),zero) dissimilar(u,v,w)* -> greater(age(u,w),sigma).
% 0.20/0.47  32[0:MRR:30.4,26.1] organization(u) || greater(capability(u,v),capability(u,w))* -> has_immunity(u,w) greater(hazard_of_mortality(u,w),hazard_of_mortality(u,v)).
% 0.20/0.47  37[0:Res:1.0,24.0] || is_aligned(skc4,u) -> is_aligned(skc4,v) dissimilar(skc4,u,v)*.
% 0.20/0.47  39[0:Res:1.0,22.0] || equal(age(skc4,u),zero)** -> is_aligned(skc4,u).
% 0.20/0.47  40[0:Res:1.0,16.0] || has_immunity(skc4,u)* -> has_endowment(skc4).
% 0.20/0.47  42[0:Res:6.0,18.0] ||  -> equal(age(skc4,skc6),sigma) smaller(age(skc4,skc6),sigma)*.
% 0.20/0.47  43[0:Res:5.0,31.0] || dissimilar(skc4,skc5,u)* -> greater(age(skc4,u),sigma).
% 0.20/0.47  45[0:Res:5.0,22.1] organization(skc4) ||  -> is_aligned(skc4,skc5)*.
% 0.20/0.47  54[0:Res:4.0,28.2] organization(skc4) || equal(age(skc4,u),zero) -> dissimilar(skc4,u,skc7)*.
% 0.20/0.47  62[0:Res:32.3,14.0] organization(skc4) || greater(capability(skc4,skc6),capability(skc4,skc7))*r -> has_immunity(skc4,skc7).
% 0.20/0.47  68[0:MRR:40.1,2.0] || has_immunity(skc4,u)* -> .
% 0.20/0.47  69[0:MRR:45.0,1.0] ||  -> is_aligned(skc4,skc5)*.
% 0.20/0.47  70[0:MRR:54.0,1.0] || equal(age(skc4,u),zero) -> dissimilar(skc4,u,skc7)*.
% 0.20/0.47  72[0:MRR:62.0,62.2,1.0,68.0] || greater(capability(skc4,skc6),capability(skc4,skc7))*r -> .
% 0.20/0.47  95[0:Res:42.1,12.0] ||  -> equal(age(skc4,skc6),sigma) greater(sigma,age(skc4,skc6))*r.
% 0.20/0.47  101[0:Res:70.1,23.2] || equal(age(skc4,u),zero)** is_aligned(skc4,skc7) is_aligned(skc4,u) -> .
% 0.20/0.47  104[0:MRR:101.2,39.1] || equal(age(skc4,u),zero)** is_aligned(skc4,skc7) -> .
% 0.20/0.47  109[0:SpL:5.0,104.0] || equal(zero,zero) is_aligned(skc4,skc7)* -> .
% 0.20/0.47  110[0:Obv:109.0] || is_aligned(skc4,skc7)* -> .
% 0.20/0.47  117[1:Spt:95.0] ||  -> equal(age(skc4,skc6),sigma)**.
% 0.20/0.47  134[0:Res:37.2,43.0] || is_aligned(skc4,skc5) -> is_aligned(skc4,u) greater(age(skc4,u),sigma)*l.
% 0.20/0.47  137[0:MRR:134.0,69.0] ||  -> is_aligned(skc4,u) greater(age(skc4,u),sigma)*l.
% 0.20/0.47  139[1:SpR:117.0,137.1] ||  -> is_aligned(skc4,skc6)* greater(sigma,sigma).
% 0.20/0.47  151[0:Res:137.1,15.0] || greater(sigma,age(skc4,u))*r -> is_aligned(skc4,u).
% 0.20/0.47  177[1:SpL:117.0,151.0] || greater(sigma,sigma) -> is_aligned(skc4,skc6)*.
% 0.20/0.47  178[1:MRR:177.0,139.1] ||  -> is_aligned(skc4,skc6)*.
% 0.20/0.47  219[0:Res:27.3,72.0] organization(skc4) || is_aligned(skc4,skc6) -> is_aligned(skc4,skc7)*.
% 0.20/0.47  234[0:SSi:219.0,1.0] || is_aligned(skc4,skc6) -> is_aligned(skc4,skc7)*.
% 0.20/0.47  235[1:MRR:234.0,234.1,178.0,110.0] ||  -> .
% 0.20/0.47  240[1:Spt:235.0,95.0,117.0] || equal(age(skc4,skc6),sigma)** -> .
% 0.20/0.47  241[1:Spt:235.0,95.1] ||  -> greater(sigma,age(skc4,skc6))*r.
% 0.20/0.47  242[0:MRR:234.1,110.0] || is_aligned(skc4,skc6)* -> .
% 0.20/0.47  246[1:OCh:21.1,21.0,241.0,137.1] ||  -> is_aligned(skc4,skc6)* greater(sigma,sigma).
% 0.20/0.47  247[1:NCh:21.2,21.1,241.0,151.0] || greater(sigma,sigma) -> is_aligned(skc4,skc6)*.
% 0.20/0.47  254[1:MRR:246.0,242.0] ||  -> greater(sigma,sigma)*.
% 0.20/0.47  255[1:MRR:247.0,247.1,254.0,242.0] ||  -> .
% 0.20/0.47  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.20/0.47  Formulae used in the proof : theorem_5 definition_2 definition_smaller meaning_postulate_greater_strict assumption_1 definition_smaller_or_equal meaning_postulate_greater_transitive assumption_13 assumption_3 assumption_14 assumption_15 assumption_16
% 0.20/0.47  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------