TSTP Solution File: MGT054+1 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : MGT054+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:25:40 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.53s
% Output : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 17
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 31 ( 19 unt; 5 nHn; 29 RR)
% Number of literals : 58 ( 7 equ; 31 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 10 ( 8 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 29 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
( ~ smaller_or_equal(X,Y)
| smaller(X,Y)
| X = Y ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MGT001+0.ax',definition_smaller_or_equal) ).
cnf(7,axiom,
( ~ smaller(X,Y)
| greater(Y,X) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MGT001+0.ax',definition_smaller) ).
cnf(9,axiom,
( ~ greater(X,Y)
| ~ greater(Y,X) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MGT001+0.ax',meaning_postulate_greater_strict) ).
cnf(12,axiom,
( ~ organization(X)
| has_endowment(X)
| ~ has_immunity(X,Y) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_1) ).
cnf(15,axiom,
( ~ dissimilar(X,Y,Z)
| ~ is_aligned(X,Y)
| ~ is_aligned(X,Z) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',definition_2) ).
cnf(17,axiom,
( dissimilar(X,Y,Z)
| ~ organization(X)
| ~ is_aligned(X,Y)
| is_aligned(X,Z) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',definition_2) ).
cnf(19,axiom,
( ~ organization(X)
| age(X,Y) != zero
| is_aligned(X,Y) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_13) ).
cnf(20,axiom,
( ~ organization(X)
| ~ is_aligned(X,Y)
| is_aligned(X,Z)
| greater(capability(X,Y),capability(X,Z)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_14) ).
cnf(21,axiom,
( ~ organization(X)
| age(X,Y) != zero
| ~ greater(age(X,Z),sigma)
| dissimilar(X,Y,Z) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_15) ).
cnf(22,axiom,
( ~ organization(X)
| age(X,Y) != zero
| greater(age(X,Z),sigma)
| ~ dissimilar(X,Y,Z) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_15) ).
cnf(23,axiom,
( ~ organization(X)
| has_immunity(X,Y)
| has_immunity(X,Z)
| ~ greater(capability(X,Z),capability(X,Y))
| greater(hazard_of_mortality(X,Y),hazard_of_mortality(X,Z)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_16) ).
cnf(24,negated_conjecture,
organization('SKOLEMAAAV1'),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',theorem_5) ).
cnf(25,negated_conjecture,
~ has_endowment('SKOLEMAAAV1'),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',theorem_5) ).
cnf(26,negated_conjecture,
age('SKOLEMAAAV1','SKOLEMAAAV2') = zero,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',theorem_5) ).
cnf(27,negated_conjecture,
smaller_or_equal(age('SKOLEMAAAV1','SKOLEMAAAV3'),sigma),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',theorem_5) ).
cnf(28,negated_conjecture,
greater(age('SKOLEMAAAV1','SKOLEMAAAV4'),sigma),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',theorem_5) ).
cnf(30,negated_conjecture,
~ greater(hazard_of_mortality('SKOLEMAAAV1','SKOLEMAAAV4'),hazard_of_mortality('SKOLEMAAAV1','SKOLEMAAAV3')),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',theorem_5) ).
cnf(40,plain,
~ has_immunity('SKOLEMAAAV1',X),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[12,24,25]) ).
cnf(41,plain,
( smaller(age('SKOLEMAAAV1','SKOLEMAAAV3'),sigma)
| age('SKOLEMAAAV1','SKOLEMAAAV3') = sigma ),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[1,27]) ).
cnf(45,plain,
is_aligned('SKOLEMAAAV1','SKOLEMAAAV2'),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[19,24,26]) ).
cnf(46,plain,
dissimilar('SKOLEMAAAV1','SKOLEMAAAV2','SKOLEMAAAV4'),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[21,24,26,28]) ).
cnf(52,plain,
~ greater(capability('SKOLEMAAAV1','SKOLEMAAAV3'),capability('SKOLEMAAAV1','SKOLEMAAAV4')),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[23,40,24,40,30]) ).
cnf(57,plain,
~ is_aligned('SKOLEMAAAV1','SKOLEMAAAV4'),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[15,46,45]) ).
cnf(71,plain,
~ is_aligned('SKOLEMAAAV1','SKOLEMAAAV3'),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[20,52,24,57]) ).
cnf(76,plain,
dissimilar('SKOLEMAAAV1','SKOLEMAAAV2','SKOLEMAAAV3'),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[17,71,24,45]) ).
cnf(80,plain,
greater(age('SKOLEMAAAV1','SKOLEMAAAV3'),sigma),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[22,76,24,26]) ).
cnf(91,plain,
~ greater(sigma,age('SKOLEMAAAV1','SKOLEMAAAV3')),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[9,80]) ).
cnf(126,plain,
~ smaller(age('SKOLEMAAAV1','SKOLEMAAAV3'),sigma),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[7,91]) ).
cnf(127,plain,
age('SKOLEMAAAV1','SKOLEMAAAV3') = sigma,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[41,126]) ).
cnf(129,plain,
greater(sigma,sigma),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[80,127,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(131,plain,
$false,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[91,129,127,theory(equality)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : MGT054+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.10/0.13 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.14/0.33 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 9 10:54:25 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.45 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.46 *
% 0.20/0.46 *
% 0.20/0.46 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.46 *
% 0.20/0.46 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.46 *
% 0.20/0.47 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.47 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.47 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.47 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.47 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.47 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.47 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.47 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.47 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.47 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.47 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.47 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.47 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.47 *
% 0.20/0.47 "."
% 0.20/0.47 *
% 0.20/0.47 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-09T10:54:25
% 0.20/0.47 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n019.cluster.edu at 2022-06-09T10:54:25
% 0.20/0.53
% 0.20/0.53
% 0.20/0.53 #||
% 0.20/0.53 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.53 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.54 ||#
% 0.20/0.54
% 0.20/0.54 ; Summary of computation:
% 0.20/0.54 ; 397 formulas have been input or derived (from 87 formulas).
% 0.20/0.54 ; 131 (33%) were retained. Of these,
% 0.20/0.54 ; 17 (13%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.20/0.54 ; 114 (87%) are still being kept.
% 0.20/0.54 ;
% 0.20/0.54 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.20/0.54 ; 0.004 6% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 0.20/0.54 ; 0.001 1% Assert (14 calls)
% 0.20/0.54 ; 0.012 18% Process new row (326 calls)
% 0.20/0.54 ; 0.009 13% Resolution (172 calls)
% 0.20/0.54 ; 0.000 0% Paramodulation (86 calls)
% 0.20/0.54 ; 0.000 0% Factoring (5 calls)
% 0.20/0.54 ; 0.004 6% Condensing (92 calls)
% 0.20/0.54 ; 0.001 1% Forward subsumption (92 calls)
% 0.20/0.54 ; 0.001 1% Backward subsumption (54 calls)
% 0.20/0.54 ; 0.002 3% Clause clause subsumption (61 calls)
% 0.20/0.54 ; 0.007 10% Forward simplification (326 calls)
% 0.20/0.54 ; 0.001 1% Backward simplification (131 calls)
% 0.20/0.54 ; 0.001 1% Ordering (226 calls)
% 0.20/0.54 ; 0.000 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 0.20/0.54 ; 0.001 1% Purity testing (1 call)
% 0.20/0.54 ; 0.024 35% Other
% 0.20/0.54 ; 0.068 Total
% 0.20/0.54 ; 0.072 Real time
% 0.20/0.54 ;
% 0.20/0.54 ; Term-hash-array has 152 terms in all.
% 0.20/0.54 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 49 entries (54 at peak, 54 added, 5 deleted).
% 0.20/0.54 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 204 nodes (243 at peak, 243 added, 39 deleted).
% 0.20/0.54 ; Retrieved 84 possibly forward subsuming rows in 92 calls.
% 0.20/0.54 ; Retrieved 3 possibly backward subsumed rows in 54 calls.
% 0.20/0.54 ; Path-index has 144 entries (155 at peak, 159 added, 15 deleted).
% 0.20/0.54 ; Path-index has 268 nodes (275 at peak, 275 added, 7 deleted).
% 0.20/0.54 ; Trie-index has 144 entries (155 at peak, 159 added, 15 deleted).
% 0.20/0.54 ; Trie-index has 306 nodes (320 at peak, 325 added, 19 deleted).
% 0.20/0.54 ; Retrieved 218 generalization terms in 593 calls.
% 0.20/0.54 ; Retrieved 81 instance terms in 76 calls.
% 0.20/0.54 ; Retrieved 2,533 unifiable terms in 1,057 calls.
% 0.20/0.54 ;
% 0.20/0.54 ; The agenda of backward simplifiable rows to process has 8 entries:
% 0.20/0.54 ; 8 with value 0
% 0.20/0.54 ; The agenda of rows to process has 2 entries:
% 0.20/0.54 ; 1 with value 14 1 with value 21
% 0.20/0.54 ; The agenda of rows to give has 34 entries:
% 0.20/0.54 ; 2 with value (4 8) 1 with value (4 15) 2 with value (4 22)
% 0.20/0.54 ; 1 with value (4 9) 2 with value (4 17) 2 with value (4 25)
% 0.20/0.54 ; 1 with value (4 10) 3 with value (4 20) 4 with value (4 26)
% 0.20/0.54 ; 14 with value (4 14) 1 with value (4 21) 1 with value (4 29)
% 0.20/0.54 Evaluation took:
% 0.20/0.54 0.073 seconds of real time
% 0.20/0.54 0.062379 seconds of user run time
% 0.20/0.54 0.010077 seconds of system run time
% 0.20/0.54 0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.20/0.54 0 page faults and
% 0.20/0.54 5,294,064 bytes consed.
% 0.20/0.54 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.20/0.54 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-09T10:54:25
% 0.20/0.54 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.20/0.54 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------