TSTP Solution File: MGT053-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : MGT053-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:26:02 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 5.05s 5.26s
% Output : Refutation 5.05s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : MGT053-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jun 9 11:39:57 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.36 The process was started by sandbox2 on n027.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.36 Thu Jun 9 11:39:57 2022
% 0.13/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 8766.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 list(usable).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.13/0.36 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.13/0.36 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.13/0.36 clauses in usable.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 22 during input processing: 0 [copy,22,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.39 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.39 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.39 number of clauses in intial UL: 19
% 0.19/0.39 number of clauses initially in problem: 22
% 0.19/0.39 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 86
% 0.19/0.39 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.19/0.39 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.39 absolute distinct symbol count: 11
% 0.19/0.39 distinct predicate count: 8
% 0.19/0.39 distinct function count: 0
% 0.19/0.39 distinct constant count: 3
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 =========== start of search ===========
% 3.61/3.81
% 3.61/3.81
% 3.61/3.81 Changing weight limit from 60 to 26.
% 3.61/3.81
% 3.61/3.81 Resetting weight limit to 26 after 70 givens.
% 3.61/3.81
% 5.05/5.26
% 5.05/5.26 -------- PROOF --------
% 5.05/5.26 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 5.05/5.26 % SZS output start Refutation
% 5.05/5.26
% 5.05/5.26 -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at 4.87 sec ----> 5352 [hyper,5348,16,2708] {-} $F.
% 5.05/5.26
% 5.05/5.26 Length of proof is 10. Level of proof is 4.
% 5.05/5.26
% 5.05/5.26 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 5.05/5.26 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 5.05/5.26 % SZS output start Refutation
% 5.05/5.26
% 5.05/5.26 11 [] {+} -dissimilar(A,B,C)|organization(A).
% 5.05/5.26 12 [] {+} -dissimilar(A,B,C)|is_aligned(A,B)|is_aligned(A,C).
% 5.05/5.26 13 [] {+} -dissimilar(A,B,C)| -is_aligned(A,B)| -is_aligned(A,C).
% 5.05/5.26 14 [] {+} -organization(A)| -is_aligned(A,B)|is_aligned(A,C)|dissimilar(A,B,C).
% 5.05/5.26 15 [] {+} -organization(A)| -is_aligned(A,B)|is_aligned(A,C)|dissimilar(A,C,B).
% 5.05/5.26 16 [] {+} -dissimilar(sk1,sk3,sk2)| -dissimilar(sk1,sk2,sk3).
% 5.05/5.26 21 [] {-} dissimilar(sk1,sk2,sk3)|dissimilar(sk1,sk3,sk2).
% 5.05/5.26 31 [hyper,21,12] {+} dissimilar(sk1,sk3,sk2)|is_aligned(sk1,sk2)|is_aligned(sk1,sk3).
% 5.05/5.26 32 [hyper,21,11] {+} dissimilar(sk1,sk3,sk2)|organization(sk1).
% 5.05/5.26 33 [hyper,21,12] {+} dissimilar(sk1,sk2,sk3)|is_aligned(sk1,sk3)|is_aligned(sk1,sk2).
% 5.05/5.26 34 [hyper,21,11] {+} dissimilar(sk1,sk2,sk3)|organization(sk1).
% 5.05/5.26 2400 [hyper,31,15,32,factor_simp,factor_simp,factor_simp] {+} dissimilar(sk1,sk3,sk2)|is_aligned(sk1,sk3).
% 5.05/5.26 2402 [hyper,31,14,32,factor_simp,factor_simp,factor_simp] {+} dissimilar(sk1,sk3,sk2)|is_aligned(sk1,sk2).
% 5.05/5.26 2640 [hyper,33,15,34,factor_simp,factor_simp,factor_simp] {+} dissimilar(sk1,sk2,sk3)|is_aligned(sk1,sk2).
% 5.05/5.26 2642 [hyper,33,14,34,factor_simp,factor_simp,factor_simp] {+} dissimilar(sk1,sk2,sk3)|is_aligned(sk1,sk3).
% 5.05/5.26 2708 [hyper,2402,13,21,2400,factor_simp,factor_simp] {-} dissimilar(sk1,sk3,sk2).
% 5.05/5.26 5348 [hyper,2642,13,2708,2640,factor_simp] {-} dissimilar(sk1,sk2,sk3).
% 5.05/5.26 5352 [hyper,5348,16,2708] {-} $F.
% 5.05/5.26
% 5.05/5.26 % SZS output end Refutation
% 5.05/5.26 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 5.05/5.26
% 5.05/5.26
% 5.05/5.26 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 5.05/5.26
% 5.05/5.26
% 5.05/5.26 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 5.05/5.26
% 5.05/5.26 ============ end of search ============
% 5.05/5.26
% 5.05/5.26 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 5.05/5.26
% 5.05/5.26 true clauses given 29 (39.2%)
% 5.05/5.26 false clauses given 45
% 5.05/5.26
% 5.05/5.26 FALSE TRUE
% 5.05/5.26 8 0 9
% 5.05/5.26 9 0 18
% 5.05/5.26 10 11 22
% 5.05/5.26 12 0 36
% 5.05/5.26 13 0 33
% 5.05/5.26 14 0 69
% 5.05/5.26 15 0 48
% 5.05/5.26 16 605 600
% 5.05/5.26 17 8 6
% 5.05/5.26 18 0 32
% 5.05/5.26 19 0 251
% 5.05/5.26 20 0 387
% 5.05/5.26 21 0 24
% 5.05/5.26 22 0 904
% 5.05/5.26 23 0 36
% 5.05/5.26 26 0 91
% 5.05/5.26 tot: 624 2566 (80.4% true)
% 5.05/5.26
% 5.05/5.26
% 5.05/5.26 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 5.05/5.26
% 5.05/5.26 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 5.05/5.26
% 5.05/5.26 Process 8766 finished Thu Jun 9 11:40:02 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------