TSTP Solution File: MGT053-1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : MGT053-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:25:40 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.51s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   19 (   5 unt;  11 nHn;  13 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   42 (   0 equ;  11 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   19 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(definition_2_29,axiom,
    ( ~ dissimilar(X,Y,Z)
    | organization(X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',definition_2_29) ).

cnf(definition_2_30,axiom,
    ( ~ dissimilar(X,Y,Z)
    | is_aligned(X,Y)
    | is_aligned(X,Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',definition_2_30) ).

cnf(definition_2_31,axiom,
    ( ~ dissimilar(X,Y,Z)
    | ~ is_aligned(X,Y)
    | ~ is_aligned(X,Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',definition_2_31) ).

cnf(definition_2_33,axiom,
    ( ~ organization(X)
    | ~ is_aligned(X,Y)
    | is_aligned(X,Z)
    | dissimilar(X,Y,Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',definition_2_33) ).

cnf(definition_2_34,axiom,
    ( ~ organization(X)
    | ~ is_aligned(X,Y)
    | is_aligned(X,Z)
    | dissimilar(X,Z,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',definition_2_34) ).

cnf(lemma_7_36,negated_conjecture,
    ( dissimilar(sk1,sk2,sk3)
    | dissimilar(sk1,sk3,sk2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lemma_7_36) ).

cnf(lemma_7_39,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ dissimilar(sk1,sk3,sk2)
    | ~ dissimilar(sk1,sk2,sk3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lemma_7_39) ).

cnf(21,plain,
    ( dissimilar(sk1,sk3,sk2)
    | organization(sk1) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[definition_2_29,lemma_7_36]) ).

cnf(25,plain,
    ( dissimilar(sk1,sk3,sk2)
    | is_aligned(sk1,sk2)
    | is_aligned(sk1,sk3) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[definition_2_30,lemma_7_36]) ).

cnf(27,plain,
    organization(sk1),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[definition_2_29,21]) ).

cnf(30,plain,
    ( is_aligned(sk1,sk2)
    | is_aligned(sk1,sk3) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[definition_2_30,25]) ).

cnf(31,plain,
    ( is_aligned(sk1,sk2)
    | is_aligned(sk1,X)
    | dissimilar(sk1,X,sk3) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[definition_2_34,30,27]) ).

cnf(32,plain,
    ( is_aligned(sk1,sk2)
    | is_aligned(sk1,X)
    | dissimilar(sk1,sk3,X) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[definition_2_33,30,27]) ).

cnf(34,plain,
    is_aligned(sk1,sk2),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[lemma_7_39,32,31]) ).

cnf(36,plain,
    ( is_aligned(sk1,X)
    | dissimilar(sk1,X,sk2) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[definition_2_34,34,27]) ).

cnf(37,plain,
    ( is_aligned(sk1,X)
    | dissimilar(sk1,sk2,X) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[definition_2_33,34,27]) ).

cnf(38,plain,
    is_aligned(sk1,sk3),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[lemma_7_39,37,36]) ).

cnf(39,plain,
    dissimilar(sk1,sk2,sk3),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[definition_2_31,38,lemma_7_36,34]) ).

cnf(42,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[definition_2_31,38,34]),39]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : MGT053-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Jun  9 11:28:53 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.46   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.46   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.46   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  "."
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.47  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-09T11:28:53
% 0.19/0.47  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n018.cluster.edu at 2022-06-09T11:28:53
% 0.19/0.51  
% 0.19/0.51  
% 0.19/0.51  #||
% 0.19/0.51  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.51  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.51  ||#
% 0.19/0.51  
% 0.19/0.51  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.19/0.51  ;       107 formulas have been input or derived (from 36 formulas).
% 0.19/0.51  ;        42 (39%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.19/0.51  ;           10 (24%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.19/0.51  ;           32 (76%) are still being kept.
% 0.19/0.51  ; 
% 0.19/0.51  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.19/0.51  ;     0.005  12%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.19/0.51  ;     0.000   0%   Assert                       (22 calls)
% 0.19/0.51  ;     0.001   2%   Process new row              (90 calls)
% 0.19/0.51  ;     0.005  12%   Resolution                   (70 calls)
% 0.19/0.51  ;     0.001   2%   Paramodulation               (35 calls)
% 0.19/0.51  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (13 calls)
% 0.19/0.51  ;     0.002   5%   Condensing                   (54 calls)
% 0.19/0.51  ;     0.000   0%   Forward subsumption          (54 calls)
% 0.19/0.51  ;     0.001   2%   Backward subsumption         (32 calls)
% 0.19/0.51  ;     0.001   2%   Clause clause subsumption    (37 calls)
% 0.19/0.51  ;     0.001   2%   Forward simplification       (79 calls)
% 0.19/0.51  ;     0.000   0%   Backward simplification      (42 calls)
% 0.19/0.51  ;     0.000   0%   Ordering                     (94 calls)
% 0.19/0.51  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.19/0.51  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.19/0.51  ;     0.023  58%   Other
% 0.19/0.51  ;     0.040        Total
% 0.19/0.51  ;     0.043        Real time
% 0.19/0.51  ; 
% 0.19/0.51  ; Term-hash-array has 30 terms in all.
% 0.19/0.51  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 22 entries (26 at peak, 32 added, 10 deleted).
% 0.19/0.51  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 38 nodes (68 at peak, 88 added, 50 deleted).
% 0.19/0.51  ;  Retrieved 38 possibly forward subsuming rows in 54 calls.
% 0.19/0.51  ;  Retrieved 8 possibly backward subsumed rows in 32 calls.
% 0.19/0.51  ; Path-index has 31 entries (31 at peak, 38 added, 7 deleted).
% 0.19/0.51  ; Path-index has 49 nodes (49 at peak, 54 added, 5 deleted).
% 0.19/0.51  ; Trie-index has 31 entries (31 at peak, 38 added, 7 deleted).
% 0.19/0.51  ; Trie-index has 43 nodes (43 at peak, 53 added, 10 deleted).
% 0.19/0.51  ; Retrieved 16 generalization terms in 31 calls.
% 0.19/0.51  ; Retrieved 11 instance terms in 9 calls.
% 0.19/0.51  ; Retrieved 523 unifiable terms in 239 calls.
% 0.19/0.51  ; 
% 0.19/0.51  ; The agenda of rows to process has 3 entries:
% 0.19/0.51  ;     1 with value 12              2 with value 16
% 0.19/0.51  ; The agenda of input rows to give has 1 entry:
% 0.19/0.51  ;     1 with value 5
% 0.19/0.51  ; The agenda of rows to give has 3 entries:
% 0.19/0.51  ;     2 with value (4 12)          1 with value (4 22)
% 0.19/0.51  Evaluation took:
% 0.19/0.51    0.044 seconds of real time
% 0.19/0.51    0.035411 seconds of user run time
% 0.19/0.51    0.007952 seconds of system run time
% 0.19/0.51    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.19/0.51    0 page faults and
% 0.19/0.51    3,250,232 bytes consed.
% 0.19/0.51  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.19/0.51  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-09T11:28:53
% 0.19/0.51  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.19/0.51  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------