TSTP Solution File: MGT053-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : MGT053-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:37:16 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.46s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 27 ( 6 unt; 14 nHn; 19 RR)
% Number of literals : 63 ( 0 equ; 26 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 34 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(definition_2_30,axiom,
( is_aligned(X1,X2)
| is_aligned(X1,X3)
| ~ dissimilar(X1,X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.pIxmmyH1qm/E---3.1_24941.p',definition_2_30) ).
cnf(lemma_7_36,negated_conjecture,
( dissimilar(sk1,sk2,sk3)
| dissimilar(sk1,sk3,sk2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.pIxmmyH1qm/E---3.1_24941.p',lemma_7_36) ).
cnf(definition_2_29,axiom,
( organization(X1)
| ~ dissimilar(X1,X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.pIxmmyH1qm/E---3.1_24941.p',definition_2_29) ).
cnf(definition_2_34,axiom,
( is_aligned(X1,X3)
| dissimilar(X1,X3,X2)
| ~ organization(X1)
| ~ is_aligned(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.pIxmmyH1qm/E---3.1_24941.p',definition_2_34) ).
cnf(definition_2_31,axiom,
( ~ dissimilar(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ is_aligned(X1,X2)
| ~ is_aligned(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.pIxmmyH1qm/E---3.1_24941.p',definition_2_31) ).
cnf(definition_2_33,axiom,
( is_aligned(X1,X3)
| dissimilar(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ organization(X1)
| ~ is_aligned(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.pIxmmyH1qm/E---3.1_24941.p',definition_2_33) ).
cnf(lemma_7_39,negated_conjecture,
( ~ dissimilar(sk1,sk3,sk2)
| ~ dissimilar(sk1,sk2,sk3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.pIxmmyH1qm/E---3.1_24941.p',lemma_7_39) ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
( is_aligned(X1,X2)
| is_aligned(X1,X3)
| ~ dissimilar(X1,X2,X3) ),
definition_2_30 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( dissimilar(sk1,sk2,sk3)
| dissimilar(sk1,sk3,sk2) ),
lemma_7_36 ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
( organization(X1)
| ~ dissimilar(X1,X2,X3) ),
definition_2_29 ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
( is_aligned(X1,X3)
| dissimilar(X1,X3,X2)
| ~ organization(X1)
| ~ is_aligned(X1,X2) ),
definition_2_34 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( is_aligned(sk1,sk3)
| is_aligned(sk1,sk2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
organization(sk1),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_8]),c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( is_aligned(sk1,sk2)
| is_aligned(sk1,X1)
| dissimilar(sk1,X1,sk3) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
( ~ dissimilar(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ is_aligned(X1,X2)
| ~ is_aligned(X1,X3) ),
definition_2_31 ).
cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
( is_aligned(X1,X3)
| dissimilar(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ organization(X1)
| ~ is_aligned(X1,X2) ),
definition_2_33 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( is_aligned(sk1,sk2)
| dissimilar(sk1,sk2,sk3) ),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( ~ is_aligned(sk1,sk2)
| ~ is_aligned(sk1,sk3) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_8]),c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( is_aligned(sk1,X1)
| dissimilar(sk1,sk2,sk3)
| dissimilar(sk1,sk2,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_12])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
( ~ dissimilar(sk1,sk3,sk2)
| ~ dissimilar(sk1,sk2,sk3) ),
lemma_7_39 ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
dissimilar(sk1,sk2,sk3),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
( is_aligned(sk1,sk2)
| is_aligned(sk1,X1)
| dissimilar(sk1,sk3,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
~ dissimilar(sk1,sk3,sk2),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20])]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
is_aligned(sk1,sk2),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]),c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
~ is_aligned(sk1,sk3),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_23])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
( is_aligned(sk1,X1)
| dissimilar(sk1,X1,sk2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_23]),c_0_12])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_22]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.11 % Problem : MGT053-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.32 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.12/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 00:43:52 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.45 Running first-order model finding
% 0.18/0.45 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.pIxmmyH1qm/E---3.1_24941.p
% 0.18/0.46 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.18/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # sh5l with pid 25088 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Result found by sh5l
% 0.18/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.18/0.46 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.46 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 25094 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.18/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.18/0.46 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.46 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.18/0.46 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.18/0.46
% 0.18/0.46 # Proof found!
% 0.18/0.46 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.18/0.46 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.46 # Parsed axioms : 22
% 0.18/0.46 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 11
% 0.18/0.46 # Initial clauses : 11
% 0.18/0.46 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 4
% 0.18/0.46 # Initial clauses in saturation : 7
% 0.18/0.46 # Processed clauses : 31
% 0.18/0.46 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # ...subsumed : 4
% 0.18/0.46 # ...remaining for further processing : 27
% 0.18/0.46 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Backward-subsumed : 2
% 0.18/0.46 # Backward-rewritten : 7
% 0.18/0.46 # Generated clauses : 37
% 0.18/0.46 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 33
% 0.18/0.46 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 4
% 0.18/0.46 # Paramodulations : 33
% 0.18/0.46 # Factorizations : 4
% 0.18/0.46 # NegExts : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Total rewrite steps : 28
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.46 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.46 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.46 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.46 # Current number of processed clauses : 11
% 0.18/0.46 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 3
% 0.18/0.46 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.18/0.46 # Non-unit-clauses : 6
% 0.18/0.46 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 13
% 0.18/0.46 # ...number of literals in the above : 50
% 0.18/0.46 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Current number of archived clauses : 16
% 0.18/0.46 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 22
% 0.18/0.46 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15
% 0.18/0.46 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 8
% 0.18/0.46 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.18/0.46 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 0.18/0.46 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.18/0.46 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Termbank termtop insertions : 761
% 0.18/0.46
% 0.18/0.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.46 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.18/0.46 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.18/0.46 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.18/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 1628 pages
% 0.18/0.46
% 0.18/0.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.46 # User time : 0.006 s
% 0.18/0.46 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.18/0.46 # Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.18/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 1680 pages
% 0.18/0.46 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------