TSTP Solution File: MGT053+1 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : MGT053+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:26:27 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.18s 0.45s
% Output : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : MGT053+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 9 09:32:04 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.45
% 0.18/0.45 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.18/0.45 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.18/0.45 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.45 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.45 SPASS derived 95 clauses, backtracked 10 clauses, performed 3 splits and kept 68 clauses.
% 0.18/0.45 SPASS allocated 97651 KBytes.
% 0.18/0.45 SPASS spent 0:00:00.10 on the problem.
% 0.18/0.45 0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.18/0.45 0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.18/0.45 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.18/0.45 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.18/0.45 0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.18/0.45
% 0.18/0.45
% 0.18/0.45 Here is a proof with depth 6, length 41 :
% 0.18/0.45 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.18/0.45 1[0:Inp] || dissimilar(u,v,w)*+ -> organization(u).
% 0.18/0.45 8[0:Inp] || -> dissimilar(skc3,skc5,skc4)* dissimilar(skc3,skc4,skc5).
% 0.18/0.45 11[0:Inp] || dissimilar(skc3,skc5,skc4)* dissimilar(skc3,skc4,skc5) -> .
% 0.18/0.45 14[0:Inp] || dissimilar(u,v,w)*+ -> is_aligned(u,w) is_aligned(u,v).
% 0.18/0.45 16[0:Inp] || is_aligned(u,v) is_aligned(u,w) dissimilar(u,w,v)*+ -> .
% 0.18/0.45 17[0:Inp] organization(u) || is_aligned(u,v)+ -> is_aligned(u,w) dissimilar(u,v,w)*.
% 0.18/0.45 18[0:Inp] organization(u) || is_aligned(u,v)+ -> is_aligned(u,w) dissimilar(u,w,v)*.
% 0.18/0.45 21[1:Spt:8.0] || -> dissimilar(skc3,skc5,skc4)*.
% 0.18/0.45 22[1:MRR:11.0,21.0] || dissimilar(skc3,skc4,skc5)*+ -> .
% 0.18/0.45 23[1:Res:21.0,1.0] || -> organization(skc3)*.
% 0.18/0.45 25[1:Res:21.0,14.0] || -> is_aligned(skc3,skc4) is_aligned(skc3,skc5)*.
% 0.18/0.45 26[1:Res:21.0,16.2] || is_aligned(skc3,skc4)+ is_aligned(skc3,skc5)* -> .
% 0.18/0.45 31[1:Res:25.1,18.1] organization(skc3) || -> is_aligned(skc3,skc4) is_aligned(skc3,u) dissimilar(skc3,u,skc5)*.
% 0.18/0.45 32[1:SSi:31.0,23.0] || -> is_aligned(skc3,skc4) is_aligned(skc3,u) dissimilar(skc3,u,skc5)*.
% 0.18/0.45 33[2:Spt:32.0] || -> is_aligned(skc3,skc4)*.
% 0.18/0.45 34[2:MRR:26.0,33.0] || is_aligned(skc3,skc5)*+ -> .
% 0.18/0.45 42[2:Res:33.0,17.1] organization(skc3) || -> is_aligned(skc3,u) dissimilar(skc3,skc4,u)*.
% 0.18/0.45 43[2:SSi:42.0,23.0] || -> is_aligned(skc3,u) dissimilar(skc3,skc4,u)*.
% 0.18/0.45 48[2:Res:43.1,22.0] || -> is_aligned(skc3,skc5)*.
% 0.18/0.45 49[2:MRR:48.0,34.0] || -> .
% 0.18/0.45 52[2:Spt:49.0,32.0,33.0] || is_aligned(skc3,skc4)* -> .
% 0.18/0.45 53[2:Spt:49.0,32.1,32.2] || -> is_aligned(skc3,u) dissimilar(skc3,u,skc5)*.
% 0.18/0.45 58[2:Res:53.1,22.0] || -> is_aligned(skc3,skc4)*.
% 0.18/0.45 59[2:MRR:58.0,52.0] || -> .
% 0.18/0.45 62[1:Spt:59.0,8.0,21.0] || dissimilar(skc3,skc5,skc4)*+ -> .
% 0.18/0.45 63[1:Spt:59.0,8.1] || -> dissimilar(skc3,skc4,skc5)*.
% 0.18/0.45 64[1:Res:63.0,14.0] || -> is_aligned(skc3,skc5)* is_aligned(skc3,skc4).
% 0.18/0.45 65[1:Res:63.0,1.0] || -> organization(skc3)*.
% 0.18/0.45 66[1:Res:63.0,16.2] || is_aligned(skc3,skc5)* is_aligned(skc3,skc4) -> .
% 0.18/0.45 67[2:Spt:64.0] || -> is_aligned(skc3,skc5)*.
% 0.18/0.45 68[2:MRR:66.0,67.0] || is_aligned(skc3,skc4)*+ -> .
% 0.18/0.45 69[2:Res:67.0,17.1] organization(skc3) || -> is_aligned(skc3,u) dissimilar(skc3,skc5,u)*.
% 0.18/0.45 71[2:SSi:69.0,65.0] || -> is_aligned(skc3,u) dissimilar(skc3,skc5,u)*.
% 0.18/0.45 76[2:Res:71.1,62.0] || -> is_aligned(skc3,skc4)*.
% 0.18/0.45 77[2:MRR:76.0,68.0] || -> .
% 0.18/0.45 80[2:Spt:77.0,64.0,67.0] || is_aligned(skc3,skc5)*+ -> .
% 0.18/0.45 81[2:Spt:77.0,64.1] || -> is_aligned(skc3,skc4)*.
% 0.18/0.45 83[2:Res:81.0,18.1] organization(skc3) || -> is_aligned(skc3,u) dissimilar(skc3,u,skc4)*.
% 0.18/0.45 85[2:SSi:83.0,65.0] || -> is_aligned(skc3,u) dissimilar(skc3,u,skc4)*.
% 0.18/0.45 142[2:Res:85.1,62.0] || -> is_aligned(skc3,skc5)*.
% 0.18/0.45 143[2:MRR:142.0,80.0] || -> .
% 0.18/0.45 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.18/0.45 Formulae used in the proof : definition_2 lemma_7
% 0.18/0.45
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------