TSTP Solution File: MGT053+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : MGT053+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:26:02 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 5.16s 5.37s
% Output : Refutation 5.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.13 % Problem : MGT053+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.05/0.14 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Thu Jun 9 09:32:40 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.38 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.21/0.38 The process was started by sandbox2 on n019.cluster.edu,
% 0.21/0.38 Thu Jun 9 09:32:40 2022
% 0.21/0.38 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 16685.
% 0.21/0.38
% 0.21/0.38 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.21/0.38 set(auto).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.21/0.38 clear(print_given).
% 0.21/0.38
% 0.21/0.38 formula_list(usable).
% 0.21/0.38
% 0.21/0.38 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 0.21/0.38
% 0.21/0.38 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.21/0.38 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.21/0.38 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.21/0.38 clauses in usable.
% 0.21/0.38
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.21/0.38 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.21/0.38
% 0.21/0.38 ------------> process usable:
% 0.21/0.38
% 0.21/0.38 ------------> process sos:
% 0.21/0.38 Following clause subsumed by 22 during input processing: 0 [copy,22,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.21/0.38
% 0.21/0.38 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.21/0.41
% 0.21/0.41 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.21/0.41
% 0.21/0.41 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.21/0.41
% 0.21/0.41
% 0.21/0.41 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.21/0.41
% 0.21/0.41 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.21/0.41 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.21/0.41 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.21/0.41 number of clauses in intial UL: 19
% 0.21/0.41 number of clauses initially in problem: 22
% 0.21/0.41 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 86
% 0.21/0.41 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.21/0.41 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.21/0.41 absolute distinct symbol count: 11
% 0.21/0.41 distinct predicate count: 8
% 0.21/0.41 distinct function count: 0
% 0.21/0.41 distinct constant count: 3
% 0.21/0.41
% 0.21/0.41 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.21/0.41
% 0.21/0.41
% 0.21/0.41
% 0.21/0.41 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.21/0.41
% 0.21/0.41 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.21/0.41
% 0.21/0.41 =========== start of search ===========
% 3.70/3.89
% 3.70/3.89
% 3.70/3.89 Changing weight limit from 60 to 26.
% 3.70/3.89
% 3.70/3.89 Resetting weight limit to 26 after 70 givens.
% 3.70/3.89
% 5.16/5.37
% 5.16/5.37 -------- PROOF --------
% 5.16/5.37 % SZS status Theorem
% 5.16/5.37 % SZS output start Refutation
% 5.16/5.37
% 5.16/5.37 -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at 4.96 sec ----> 5352 [hyper,5348,16,2708] {-} $F.
% 5.16/5.37
% 5.16/5.37 Length of proof is 10. Level of proof is 4.
% 5.16/5.37
% 5.16/5.37 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 5.16/5.37 % SZS status Theorem
% 5.16/5.37 % SZS output start Refutation
% 5.16/5.37
% 5.16/5.37 11 [] {+} -dissimilar(A,B,C)|organization(A).
% 5.16/5.37 12 [] {+} -dissimilar(A,B,C)|is_aligned(A,B)|is_aligned(A,C).
% 5.16/5.37 13 [] {+} -dissimilar(A,B,C)| -is_aligned(A,B)| -is_aligned(A,C).
% 5.16/5.37 14 [] {+} dissimilar(A,B,C)| -organization(A)| -is_aligned(A,B)|is_aligned(A,C).
% 5.16/5.37 15 [] {+} dissimilar(A,B,C)| -organization(A)|is_aligned(A,B)| -is_aligned(A,C).
% 5.16/5.37 16 [] {+} -dissimilar($c3,$c2,$c1)| -dissimilar($c3,$c1,$c2).
% 5.16/5.37 21 [] {-} dissimilar($c3,$c2,$c1)|dissimilar($c3,$c1,$c2).
% 5.16/5.37 31 [hyper,21,12] {+} dissimilar($c3,$c1,$c2)|is_aligned($c3,$c2)|is_aligned($c3,$c1).
% 5.16/5.37 32 [hyper,21,11] {+} dissimilar($c3,$c1,$c2)|organization($c3).
% 5.16/5.37 33 [hyper,21,12] {+} dissimilar($c3,$c2,$c1)|is_aligned($c3,$c1)|is_aligned($c3,$c2).
% 5.16/5.37 34 [hyper,21,11] {+} dissimilar($c3,$c2,$c1)|organization($c3).
% 5.16/5.37 2400 [hyper,31,15,32,factor_simp,factor_simp,factor_simp] {+} dissimilar($c3,$c1,$c2)|is_aligned($c3,$c1).
% 5.16/5.37 2402 [hyper,31,14,32,factor_simp,factor_simp,factor_simp] {+} dissimilar($c3,$c1,$c2)|is_aligned($c3,$c2).
% 5.16/5.37 2640 [hyper,33,15,34,factor_simp,factor_simp,factor_simp] {+} dissimilar($c3,$c2,$c1)|is_aligned($c3,$c2).
% 5.16/5.37 2642 [hyper,33,14,34,factor_simp,factor_simp,factor_simp] {+} dissimilar($c3,$c2,$c1)|is_aligned($c3,$c1).
% 5.16/5.37 2708 [hyper,2402,13,21,2400,factor_simp,factor_simp] {-} dissimilar($c3,$c1,$c2).
% 5.16/5.37 5348 [hyper,2642,13,2708,2640,factor_simp] {-} dissimilar($c3,$c2,$c1).
% 5.16/5.37 5352 [hyper,5348,16,2708] {-} $F.
% 5.16/5.37
% 5.16/5.37 % SZS output end Refutation
% 5.16/5.37 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 5.16/5.37
% 5.16/5.37
% 5.16/5.37 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 5.16/5.37
% 5.16/5.37
% 5.16/5.37 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 5.16/5.37
% 5.16/5.37 ============ end of search ============
% 5.16/5.37
% 5.16/5.37 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 5.16/5.37
% 5.16/5.37 true clauses given 29 (39.2%)
% 5.16/5.37 false clauses given 45
% 5.16/5.37
% 5.16/5.37 FALSE TRUE
% 5.16/5.37 8 0 9
% 5.16/5.37 9 0 18
% 5.16/5.37 10 11 22
% 5.16/5.37 12 0 36
% 5.16/5.37 13 0 33
% 5.16/5.37 14 0 69
% 5.16/5.37 15 0 48
% 5.16/5.37 16 605 600
% 5.16/5.37 17 8 6
% 5.16/5.37 18 0 32
% 5.16/5.37 19 0 250
% 5.16/5.37 20 0 387
% 5.16/5.37 21 0 24
% 5.16/5.37 22 0 904
% 5.16/5.37 23 0 36
% 5.16/5.37 26 0 91
% 5.16/5.37 tot: 624 2565 (80.4% true)
% 5.16/5.37
% 5.16/5.37
% 5.16/5.37 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 5.16/5.37
% 5.16/5.37 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 5.16/5.37
% 5.16/5.37 Process 16685 finished Thu Jun 9 09:32:45 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------