TSTP Solution File: MGT053+1 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : MGT053+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:25:40 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.17s 0.46s
% Output : Refutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 19 ( 5 unt; 11 nHn; 13 RR)
% Number of literals : 42 ( 0 equ; 11 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 19 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(12,axiom,
( ~ dissimilar(X,Y,Z)
| organization(X) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',definition_2) ).
cnf(13,axiom,
( ~ dissimilar(X,Y,Z)
| ~ is_aligned(X,Y)
| ~ is_aligned(X,Z) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',definition_2) ).
cnf(14,axiom,
( ~ dissimilar(X,Y,Z)
| is_aligned(X,Y)
| is_aligned(X,Z) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',definition_2) ).
cnf(15,axiom,
( dissimilar(X,Y,Z)
| ~ organization(X)
| ~ is_aligned(X,Y)
| is_aligned(X,Z) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',definition_2) ).
cnf(16,axiom,
( dissimilar(X,Y,Z)
| ~ organization(X)
| is_aligned(X,Y)
| ~ is_aligned(X,Z) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',definition_2) ).
cnf(17,negated_conjecture,
( ~ dissimilar('SKOLEMAAAM1','SKOLEMAAAM2','SKOLEMAAAM3')
| ~ dissimilar('SKOLEMAAAM1','SKOLEMAAAM3','SKOLEMAAAM2') ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lemma_7) ).
cnf(18,negated_conjecture,
( dissimilar('SKOLEMAAAM1','SKOLEMAAAM2','SKOLEMAAAM3')
| dissimilar('SKOLEMAAAM1','SKOLEMAAAM3','SKOLEMAAAM2') ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lemma_7) ).
cnf(21,plain,
( dissimilar('SKOLEMAAAM1','SKOLEMAAAM3','SKOLEMAAAM2')
| organization('SKOLEMAAAM1') ),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[12,18]) ).
cnf(25,plain,
( dissimilar('SKOLEMAAAM1','SKOLEMAAAM3','SKOLEMAAAM2')
| is_aligned('SKOLEMAAAM1','SKOLEMAAAM2')
| is_aligned('SKOLEMAAAM1','SKOLEMAAAM3') ),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[14,18]) ).
cnf(27,plain,
organization('SKOLEMAAAM1'),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[12,21]) ).
cnf(30,plain,
( is_aligned('SKOLEMAAAM1','SKOLEMAAAM2')
| is_aligned('SKOLEMAAAM1','SKOLEMAAAM3') ),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[14,25]) ).
cnf(31,plain,
( is_aligned('SKOLEMAAAM1','SKOLEMAAAM2')
| dissimilar('SKOLEMAAAM1','SKOLEMAAAM3',X)
| is_aligned('SKOLEMAAAM1',X) ),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[15,30,27]) ).
cnf(32,plain,
( is_aligned('SKOLEMAAAM1','SKOLEMAAAM2')
| dissimilar('SKOLEMAAAM1',X,'SKOLEMAAAM3')
| is_aligned('SKOLEMAAAM1',X) ),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[16,30,27]) ).
cnf(34,plain,
is_aligned('SKOLEMAAAM1','SKOLEMAAAM2'),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[17,32,31]) ).
cnf(36,plain,
( dissimilar('SKOLEMAAAM1','SKOLEMAAAM2',X)
| is_aligned('SKOLEMAAAM1',X) ),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[15,34,27]) ).
cnf(37,plain,
( dissimilar('SKOLEMAAAM1',X,'SKOLEMAAAM2')
| is_aligned('SKOLEMAAAM1',X) ),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[16,34,27]) ).
cnf(38,plain,
is_aligned('SKOLEMAAAM1','SKOLEMAAAM3'),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[17,37,36]) ).
cnf(39,plain,
dissimilar('SKOLEMAAAM1','SKOLEMAAAM2','SKOLEMAAAM3'),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[13,38,18,34]) ).
cnf(42,plain,
$false,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[13,38,34]),39]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : MGT053+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.06/0.11 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.32 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.32 % DateTime : Thu Jun 9 09:38:22 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.43 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.43 *
% 0.17/0.43 *
% 0.17/0.44 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.17/0.44 *
% 0.17/0.44 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.17/0.44 *
% 0.17/0.44 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.17/0.44 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.17/0.44 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.17/0.44 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.17/0.44 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.17/0.44 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.17/0.44 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.17/0.44 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.17/0.44 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.17/0.44 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.17/0.44 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.17/0.44 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.17/0.44 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.17/0.44 *
% 0.17/0.44 "."
% 0.17/0.44 *
% 0.17/0.44 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-09T09:38:22
% 0.17/0.44 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n029.cluster.edu at 2022-06-09T09:38:22
% 0.17/0.46
% 0.17/0.46
% 0.17/0.46 #||
% 0.17/0.46 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.46 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.46 ||#
% 0.17/0.46
% 0.17/0.46 ; Summary of computation:
% 0.17/0.46 ; 108 formulas have been input or derived (from 36 formulas).
% 0.17/0.46 ; 42 (39%) were retained. Of these,
% 0.17/0.46 ; 10 (24%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.17/0.46 ; 32 (76%) are still being kept.
% 0.17/0.46 ;
% 0.17/0.46 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.17/0.46 ; 0.001 5% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 0.17/0.46 ; 0.001 5% Assert (8 calls)
% 0.17/0.46 ; 0.002 10% Process new row (91 calls)
% 0.17/0.46 ; 0.002 10% Resolution (70 calls)
% 0.17/0.46 ; 0.000 0% Paramodulation (35 calls)
% 0.17/0.46 ; 0.000 0% Factoring (13 calls)
% 0.17/0.46 ; 0.001 5% Condensing (55 calls)
% 0.17/0.46 ; 0.001 5% Forward subsumption (55 calls)
% 0.17/0.46 ; 0.000 0% Backward subsumption (32 calls)
% 0.17/0.46 ; 0.000 0% Clause clause subsumption (38 calls)
% 0.17/0.46 ; 0.001 5% Forward simplification (80 calls)
% 0.17/0.46 ; 0.000 0% Backward simplification (42 calls)
% 0.17/0.46 ; 0.000 0% Ordering (86 calls)
% 0.17/0.46 ; 0.000 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 0.17/0.46 ; 0.000 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 0.17/0.46 ; 0.012 57% Other
% 0.17/0.46 ; 0.021 Total
% 0.17/0.46 ; 0.023 Real time
% 0.17/0.46 ;
% 0.17/0.46 ; Term-hash-array has 28 terms in all.
% 0.17/0.46 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 22 entries (26 at peak, 32 added, 10 deleted).
% 0.17/0.46 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 38 nodes (68 at peak, 88 added, 50 deleted).
% 0.17/0.46 ; Retrieved 39 possibly forward subsuming rows in 55 calls.
% 0.17/0.46 ; Retrieved 8 possibly backward subsumed rows in 32 calls.
% 0.17/0.46 ; Path-index has 29 entries (29 at peak, 36 added, 7 deleted).
% 0.17/0.46 ; Path-index has 49 nodes (49 at peak, 54 added, 5 deleted).
% 0.17/0.46 ; Trie-index has 29 entries (29 at peak, 36 added, 7 deleted).
% 0.17/0.46 ; Trie-index has 43 nodes (43 at peak, 53 added, 10 deleted).
% 0.17/0.46 ; Retrieved 16 generalization terms in 31 calls.
% 0.17/0.46 ; Retrieved 11 instance terms in 9 calls.
% 0.17/0.46 ; Retrieved 473 unifiable terms in 233 calls.
% 0.17/0.46 ;
% 0.17/0.46 ; The agenda of rows to process has 3 entries:
% 0.17/0.46 ; 1 with value 12 2 with value 16
% 0.17/0.46 ; The agenda of input rows to give has 1 entry:
% 0.17/0.46 ; 1 with value 5
% 0.17/0.46 ; The agenda of rows to give has 3 entries:
% 0.17/0.46 ; 2 with value (4 12) 1 with value (4 22)
% 0.17/0.46 Evaluation took:
% 0.17/0.46 0.024 seconds of real time
% 0.17/0.46 0.0197 seconds of user run time
% 0.17/0.46 0.003952 seconds of system run time
% 0.17/0.46 0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.17/0.46 0 page faults and
% 0.17/0.46 3,377,480 bytes consed.
% 0.17/0.46 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.17/0.46 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-09T09:38:22
% 0.17/0.46 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.17/0.46 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------