TSTP Solution File: MGT050-1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : MGT050-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:26:26 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 11.95s 12.13s
% Output   : Refutation 11.95s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : MGT050-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.14/0.33  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.33  % DateTime : Thu Jun  9 09:08:49 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 11.95/12.13  
% 11.95/12.13  SPASS V 3.9 
% 11.95/12.13  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 11.95/12.13  % SZS status Theorem
% 11.95/12.13  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 11.95/12.13  SPASS derived 16457 clauses, backtracked 967 clauses, performed 8 splits and kept 5025 clauses.
% 11.95/12.13  SPASS allocated 89474 KBytes.
% 11.95/12.13  SPASS spent	0:0:11.41 on the problem.
% 11.95/12.13  		0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 11.95/12.13  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 11.95/12.13  		0:00:00.30 for inferences.
% 11.95/12.13  		0:00:00.11 for the backtracking.
% 11.95/12.13  		0:0:10.92 for the reduction.
% 11.95/12.13  
% 11.95/12.13  
% 11.95/12.13  Here is a proof with depth 5, length 36 :
% 11.95/12.13  % SZS output start Refutation
% 11.95/12.13  1[0:Inp] organization(u) || has_immunity(u,v)* -> has_endowment(u).
% 11.95/12.13  2[0:Inp] organization(u) || greater_or_equal(position(u,v),position(u,w)) greater(capability(u,v),capability(u,w)) -> has_immunity(u,v) has_immunity(u,w) smaller(hazard_of_mortality(u,v),hazard_of_mortality(u,w))*.
% 11.95/12.13  6[0:Inp] organization(u) || greater(internal_friction(u,v),internal_friction(u,w)) smaller_or_equal(stock_of_knowledge(u,v),stock_of_knowledge(u,w))* -> smaller(capability(u,v),capability(u,w)).
% 11.95/12.13  9[0:Inp] organization(u) || equal(external_ties(u,v),external_ties(u,w))* -> equal(position(u,v),position(u,w)).
% 11.95/12.13  10[0:Inp] organization(u) ||  -> equal(stock_of_knowledge(u,v),stock_of_knowledge(u,w))*.
% 11.95/12.13  11[0:Inp] organization(u) ||  -> equal(external_ties(u,v),external_ties(u,w))*.
% 11.95/12.13  12[0:Inp] organization(u) || greater(age(u,v),age(u,w))* -> greater(internal_friction(u,v),internal_friction(u,w)).
% 11.95/12.13  13[0:Inp] ||  -> organization(sk1)*.
% 11.95/12.13  14[0:Inp] || has_endowment(sk1)* -> .
% 11.95/12.13  15[0:Inp] ||  -> greater(age(sk1,sk3),age(sk1,sk2))*r.
% 11.95/12.13  16[0:Inp] || greater(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3),hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk2))*r -> .
% 11.95/12.13  19[0:Inp] || equal(u,v) -> smaller_or_equal(u,v)*.
% 11.95/12.13  22[0:Inp] || equal(u,v) -> greater_or_equal(u,v)*.
% 11.95/12.13  23[0:Inp] || smaller(u,v)* -> greater(v,u).
% 11.95/12.13  29[0:Res:13.0,2.0] || greater(capability(sk1,u),capability(sk1,v)) greater_or_equal(position(sk1,u),position(sk1,v)) -> has_immunity(sk1,v) has_immunity(sk1,u) smaller(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,u),hazard_of_mortality(sk1,v))*.
% 11.95/12.13  36[0:Res:13.0,9.0] || equal(external_ties(sk1,u),external_ties(sk1,v))* -> equal(position(sk1,u),position(sk1,v)).
% 11.95/12.13  38[0:Res:13.0,11.0] ||  -> equal(external_ties(sk1,u),external_ties(sk1,v))*.
% 11.95/12.13  39[0:Res:13.0,1.0] || has_immunity(sk1,u)* -> has_endowment(sk1).
% 11.95/12.13  45[0:Res:15.0,12.1] organization(sk1) ||  -> greater(internal_friction(sk1,sk3),internal_friction(sk1,sk2))*r.
% 11.95/12.13  48[0:Res:23.1,16.0] || smaller(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk2),hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3))* -> .
% 11.95/12.13  49[0:MRR:39.1,14.0] || has_immunity(sk1,u)* -> .
% 11.95/12.13  50[0:MRR:45.0,13.0] ||  -> greater(internal_friction(sk1,sk3),internal_friction(sk1,sk2))*r.
% 11.95/12.13  52[0:MRR:29.2,29.3,49.0,49.0] || greater_or_equal(position(sk1,u),position(sk1,v)) greater(capability(sk1,u),capability(sk1,v)) -> smaller(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,u),hazard_of_mortality(sk1,v))*.
% 11.95/12.13  99[0:SpL:38.0,36.0] || equal(external_ties(sk1,u),external_ties(sk1,v))*+ -> equal(position(sk1,w),position(sk1,v))*.
% 11.95/12.13  110[0:EqR:99.0] ||  -> equal(position(sk1,u),position(sk1,v))*.
% 11.95/12.13  327[0:SpL:10.1,6.2] organization(u) organization(u) || greater(internal_friction(u,v),internal_friction(u,w)) smaller_or_equal(stock_of_knowledge(u,x),stock_of_knowledge(u,w))* -> smaller(capability(u,v),capability(u,w))*.
% 11.95/12.13  332[0:Obv:327.0] organization(u) || greater(internal_friction(u,v),internal_friction(u,w))+ smaller_or_equal(stock_of_knowledge(u,x),stock_of_knowledge(u,w))* -> smaller(capability(u,v),capability(u,w))*.
% 11.95/12.13  1451[0:Res:50.0,332.1] organization(sk1) || smaller_or_equal(stock_of_knowledge(sk1,u),stock_of_knowledge(sk1,sk2))* -> smaller(capability(sk1,sk3),capability(sk1,sk2)).
% 11.95/12.13  1482[0:SSi:1451.0,13.0] || smaller_or_equal(stock_of_knowledge(sk1,u),stock_of_knowledge(sk1,sk2))* -> smaller(capability(sk1,sk3),capability(sk1,sk2)).
% 11.95/12.13  1500[0:Res:19.1,1482.0] || equal(stock_of_knowledge(sk1,u),stock_of_knowledge(sk1,sk2))*+ -> smaller(capability(sk1,sk3),capability(sk1,sk2))*.
% 11.95/12.13  1511[0:EqR:1500.0] ||  -> smaller(capability(sk1,sk3),capability(sk1,sk2))*.
% 11.95/12.13  1520[0:Res:1511.0,23.0] ||  -> greater(capability(sk1,sk2),capability(sk1,sk3))*l.
% 11.95/12.13  18189[0:Res:52.2,48.0] || greater_or_equal(position(sk1,sk2),position(sk1,sk3))* greater(capability(sk1,sk2),capability(sk1,sk3)) -> .
% 11.95/12.13  18194[0:MRR:18189.1,1520.0] || greater_or_equal(position(sk1,sk2),position(sk1,sk3))* -> .
% 11.95/12.13  18214[0:Res:22.1,18194.0] || equal(position(sk1,sk2),position(sk1,sk3))** -> .
% 11.95/12.13  18215[0:UnC:18214.0,110.0] ||  -> .
% 11.95/12.13  % SZS output end Refutation
% 11.95/12.13  Formulae used in the proof : assumption_1_41 assumption_4_42 assumption_5_46 assumption_6_49 assumption_10_50 assumption_11_51 assumption_12_52 theorem_3_53 theorem_3_54 theorem_3_55 theorem_3_56 definition_smaller_or_equal_3 definition_greater_or_equal_6 definition_smaller_7
% 11.95/12.13  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------