TSTP Solution File: MGT050-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : MGT050-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:26:01 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 14.95s 15.16s
% Output : Refutation 14.95s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : MGT050-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.32 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 9 09:14:32 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.34 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.34 The process was started by sandbox on n028.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.34 Thu Jun 9 09:14:32 2022
% 0.12/0.34 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 2714.
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.34 set(auto).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.34 clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 list(usable).
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=6.
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.34 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.12/0.34 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.12/0.34 clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.34 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 30 during input processing: 0 [copy,30,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.34 30 back subsumes 26.
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.18/0.38
% 0.18/0.38 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.18/0.38
% 0.18/0.38 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.18/0.38
% 0.18/0.38
% 0.18/0.38 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.18/0.38
% 0.18/0.38 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.18/0.38 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.18/0.38 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.18/0.38 number of clauses in intial UL: 25
% 0.18/0.38 number of clauses initially in problem: 29
% 0.18/0.38 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 86
% 0.18/0.38 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.18/0.38 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.18/0.38 absolute distinct symbol count: 18
% 0.18/0.38 distinct predicate count: 8
% 0.18/0.38 distinct function count: 7
% 0.18/0.38 distinct constant count: 3
% 0.18/0.38
% 0.18/0.38 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.18/0.38
% 0.18/0.38
% 0.18/0.38
% 0.18/0.38 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.18/0.38
% 0.18/0.38 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.18/0.38
% 0.18/0.38 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.65/1.89
% 1.65/1.89
% 1.65/1.89 Changing weight limit from 60 to 47.
% 1.65/1.89
% 1.65/1.89 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.65/1.89
% 1.65/1.89 Model 3 [ 4 1 981 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.65/1.89
% 1.65/1.89 Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.65/1.89
% 1.65/1.89 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.65/1.89
% 1.65/1.89 Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.65/1.89
% 1.65/1.89 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.65/1.89
% 1.65/1.89 Resetting weight limit to 47 after 125 givens.
% 1.65/1.89
% 1.73/1.98
% 1.73/1.98
% 1.73/1.98 Changing weight limit from 47 to 39.
% 1.73/1.98
% 1.73/1.98 Resetting weight limit to 39 after 130 givens.
% 1.73/1.98
% 2.20/2.38
% 2.20/2.38
% 2.20/2.38 Changing weight limit from 39 to 37.
% 2.20/2.38
% 2.20/2.38 Resetting weight limit to 37 after 150 givens.
% 2.20/2.38
% 2.72/2.91
% 2.72/2.91
% 2.72/2.91 Changing weight limit from 37 to 32.
% 2.72/2.91
% 2.72/2.91 Resetting weight limit to 32 after 175 givens.
% 2.72/2.91
% 4.08/4.29
% 4.08/4.29
% 4.08/4.29 Changing weight limit from 32 to 28.
% 4.08/4.29
% 4.08/4.29 Resetting weight limit to 28 after 180 givens.
% 4.08/4.29
% 6.22/6.44
% 6.22/6.44
% 6.22/6.44 Changing weight limit from 28 to 21.
% 6.22/6.44
% 6.22/6.44 Resetting weight limit to 21 after 195 givens.
% 6.22/6.44
% 8.31/8.49
% 8.31/8.49
% 8.31/8.49 Changing weight limit from 21 to 19.
% 8.31/8.49
% 8.31/8.49 Resetting weight limit to 19 after 220 givens.
% 8.31/8.49
% 14.95/15.16
% 14.95/15.16 -- HEY sandbox, WE HAVE A PROOF!! --
% 14.95/15.16
% 14.95/15.16 Model 6 [ 1 1 1415 ] (0.00 seconds, 38239 Inserts)
% 14.95/15.16
% 14.95/15.16 -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at 14.78 sec ----> 17760 [hyper,17756,11,165,unit_del,23,25,25] {-} $F.
% 14.95/15.16
% 14.95/15.16 Length of proof is 15. Level of proof is 7.
% 14.95/15.16
% 14.95/15.16 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 14.95/15.16 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 14.95/15.16 % SZS output start Refutation
% 14.95/15.16
% 14.95/15.16 3 [] {+} A!=B|smaller_or_equal(A,B).
% 14.95/15.16 6 [] {+} A!=B|greater_or_equal(A,B).
% 14.95/15.16 7 [] {+} -smaller(A,B)|greater(B,A).
% 14.95/15.16 9 [] {+} -greater(A,B)| -greater(B,A).
% 14.95/15.16 11 [] {+} -organization(A)|has_endowment(A)| -has_immunity(A,B).
% 14.95/15.16 12 [] {+} -organization(A)|has_immunity(A,B)|has_immunity(A,C)| -greater(capability(A,C),capability(A,B))| -greater_or_equal(position(A,C),position(A,B))|smaller(hazard_of_mortality(A,C),hazard_of_mortality(A,B)).
% 14.95/15.16 16 [] {+} -organization(A)| -smaller_or_equal(stock_of_knowledge(A,B),stock_of_knowledge(A,C))| -greater(internal_friction(A,B),internal_friction(A,C))|smaller(capability(A,B),capability(A,C)).
% 14.95/15.16 19 [] {+} -organization(A)|external_ties(A,B)!=external_ties(A,C)|position(A,B)=position(A,C).
% 14.95/15.16 20 [] {+} -organization(A)|stock_of_knowledge(A,B)=stock_of_knowledge(A,C).
% 14.95/15.16 21 [] {+} -organization(A)|external_ties(A,B)=external_ties(A,C).
% 14.95/15.16 22 [] {+} -organization(A)| -greater(age(A,B),age(A,C))|greater(internal_friction(A,B),internal_friction(A,C)).
% 14.95/15.16 23 [] {+} -has_endowment(sk1).
% 14.95/15.16 24 [] {+} -greater(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3),hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk2)).
% 14.95/15.16 25 [factor,9.1.2] {+} -greater(A,A).
% 14.95/15.16 27 [] {+} smaller(A,B)|A=B|greater(A,B).
% 14.95/15.16 28 [] {+} organization(sk1).
% 14.95/15.16 29 [] {-} greater(age(sk1,sk3),age(sk1,sk2)).
% 14.95/15.16 31 [hyper,27,7] {+} A=B|greater(A,B)|greater(B,A).
% 14.95/15.16 83 [hyper,28,21] {+} external_ties(sk1,A)=external_ties(sk1,B).
% 14.95/15.16 84 [hyper,28,20] {+} stock_of_knowledge(sk1,A)=stock_of_knowledge(sk1,B).
% 14.95/15.16 88 [hyper,29,22,28] {-} greater(internal_friction(sk1,sk3),internal_friction(sk1,sk2)).
% 14.95/15.16 162 [para_from,31.1.1,88.1.1.1] {-} greater(internal_friction(A,sk3),internal_friction(sk1,sk2))|greater(sk1,A)|greater(A,sk1).
% 14.95/15.16 165 [para_from,31.1.1,28.1.1] {+} organization(A)|greater(sk1,A)|greater(A,sk1).
% 14.95/15.16 2960 [hyper,83,19,28] {+} position(sk1,A)=position(sk1,B).
% 14.95/15.16 3109 [hyper,84,3] {+} smaller_or_equal(stock_of_knowledge(sk1,A),stock_of_knowledge(sk1,B)).
% 14.95/15.16 3559 [hyper,2960,6] {+} greater_or_equal(position(sk1,A),position(sk1,B)).
% 14.95/15.16 4265 [hyper,3109,16,28,162,unit_del,25,25] {-} smaller(capability(sk1,sk3),capability(sk1,sk2)).
% 14.95/15.16 4290 [hyper,4265,7] {-} greater(capability(sk1,sk2),capability(sk1,sk3)).
% 14.95/15.16 4666 [hyper,3559,12,28,4290] {-} has_immunity(sk1,sk3)|has_immunity(sk1,sk2)|smaller(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk2),hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3)).
% 14.95/15.16 17754 [hyper,4666,7,unit_del,24] {-} has_immunity(sk1,sk3)|has_immunity(sk1,sk2).
% 14.95/15.16 17756 [hyper,17754,11,165,unit_del,23,25,25] {+} has_immunity(sk1,sk2).
% 14.95/15.16 17760 [hyper,17756,11,165,unit_del,23,25,25] {-} $F.
% 14.95/15.16
% 14.95/15.16 % SZS output end Refutation
% 14.95/15.16 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 14.95/15.16
% 14.95/15.16
% 14.95/15.16 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 14.95/15.16
% 14.95/15.16
% 14.95/15.16 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 14.95/15.16
% 14.95/15.16 ============ end of search ============
% 14.95/15.16
% 14.95/15.16 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 14.95/15.16
% 14.95/15.16 true clauses given 112 (32.7%)
% 14.95/15.16 false clauses given 230
% 14.95/15.16
% 14.95/15.16 FALSE TRUE
% 14.95/15.16 3 1 0
% 14.95/15.16 10 9 0
% 14.95/15.16 12 0 406
% 14.95/15.16 13 160 482
% 14.95/15.16 14 66 302
% 14.95/15.16 15 81 127
% 14.95/15.16 16 172 774
% 14.95/15.16 17 51 191
% 14.95/15.16 18 74 57
% 14.95/15.16 19 1312 735
% 14.95/15.16 tot: 1926 3074 (61.5% true)
% 14.95/15.16
% 14.95/15.16
% 14.95/15.16 Model 6 [ 1 1 1415 ] (0.00 seconds, 38239 Inserts)
% 14.95/15.16
% 14.95/15.16 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 14.95/15.16
% 14.95/15.16 Process 2714 finished Thu Jun 9 09:14:47 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------