TSTP Solution File: MGT050-1 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : MGT050-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:10:40 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.38s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : MGT050-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 9 09:14:51 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.36 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.18/0.36 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.18/0.36 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.18/0.36 #
% 0.18/0.36 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.18/0.36 # Number of axioms: 27 Number of unprocessed: 27
% 0.18/0.36 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.18/0.36 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.18/0.36 # Hello from C++
% 0.18/0.36 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.18/0.36 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.18/0.36 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.18/0.36 # 27 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.18/0.36 # Creating start rules for all 4 conjectures.
% 0.18/0.36 # There are 4 start rule candidates:
% 0.18/0.36 # Found 6 unit axioms.
% 0.18/0.36 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.18/0.36 # 4 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.18/0.36 # 21 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.18/0.36 # 6 unit axiom clauses
% 0.18/0.36
% 0.18/0.36 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.18/0.36 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 4
% 0.18/0.36 # Returning from population with 13 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.18/0.36 # We now have 13 tableaux to operate on
% 0.18/0.38 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.18/0.38 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.18/0.38 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.18/0.38 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.18/0.38 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.18/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.18/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.18/0.38 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.18/0.38 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.38 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.38 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.18/0.38
% 0.18/0.38 # End clausification derivation
% 0.18/0.38 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_51, negated_conjecture, (organization(sk1))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_53, negated_conjecture, (greater(age(sk1,sk3),age(sk1,sk2)))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_30, plain, (smaller_or_equal(X1,X1))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (greater_or_equal(X1,X1))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_52, negated_conjecture, (~has_endowment(sk1))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_54, negated_conjecture, (~greater(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3),hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk2)))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_36, plain, (~greater(X1,X2)|~greater(X2,X1))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (greater(X1,X2)|~smaller(X2,X1))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (smaller_or_equal(X1,X2)|~smaller(X1,X2))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (smaller(X1,X2)|~greater(X2,X1))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_39, plain, (has_endowment(X1)|~has_immunity(X1,X2)|~organization(X1))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (greater_or_equal(X1,X2)|~greater(X1,X2))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (X1=X2|greater(X1,X2)|~greater_or_equal(X1,X2))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_37, plain, (greater(X1,X2)|~greater(X3,X2)|~greater(X1,X3))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_38, plain, (X1=X2|greater(X1,X2)|smaller(X1,X2))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (X1=X2|smaller(X1,X2)|~smaller_or_equal(X1,X2))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_48, plain, (stock_of_knowledge(X1,X2)=stock_of_knowledge(X1,X3)|~organization(X1))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_49, plain, (external_ties(X1,X2)=external_ties(X1,X3)|~organization(X1))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_47, plain, (position(X1,X2)=position(X1,X3)|~organization(X1))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_46, plain, (greater(position(X1,X2),position(X1,X3))|~organization(X1)|~greater(external_ties(X1,X2),external_ties(X1,X3)))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_50, plain, (greater(internal_friction(X1,X2),internal_friction(X1,X3))|~organization(X1)|~greater(age(X1,X2),age(X1,X3)))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_45, plain, (capability(X1,X2)=capability(X1,X3)|internal_friction(X1,X2)!=internal_friction(X1,X3)|~organization(X1))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_43, plain, (greater(capability(X1,X2),capability(X1,X3))|~organization(X1)|~greater(stock_of_knowledge(X1,X2),stock_of_knowledge(X1,X3))|~smaller_or_equal(internal_friction(X1,X2),internal_friction(X1,X3)))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_44, plain, (smaller(capability(X1,X2),capability(X1,X3))|~organization(X1)|~greater(internal_friction(X1,X2),internal_friction(X1,X3))|~smaller_or_equal(stock_of_knowledge(X1,X2),stock_of_knowledge(X1,X3)))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_40, plain, (has_immunity(X1,X2)|has_immunity(X1,X3)|smaller(hazard_of_mortality(X1,X3),hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2))|~organization(X1)|~greater(capability(X1,X3),capability(X1,X2))|~greater_or_equal(position(X1,X3),position(X1,X2)))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_42, plain, (hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2)=hazard_of_mortality(X1,X3)|has_immunity(X1,X2)|has_immunity(X1,X3)|capability(X1,X2)!=capability(X1,X3)|~organization(X1))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_41, plain, (has_immunity(X1,X2)|has_immunity(X1,X3)|smaller(hazard_of_mortality(X1,X3),hazard_of_mortality(X1,X2))|~organization(X1)|~greater(position(X1,X3),position(X1,X2))|~greater_or_equal(capability(X1,X3),capability(X1,X2)))).
% 0.18/0.38 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.18/0.38 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.18/0.38 # Found 4 steps
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_53, negated_conjecture, (greater(age(sk1,sk3),age(sk1,sk2))), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_59, plain, (greater(age(sk1,sk3),age(sk1,sk2))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_35])).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_197, plain, (smaller(age(sk1,sk2),age(sk1,sk3))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_29])).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_260, plain, (smaller_or_equal(age(sk1,sk2),age(sk1,sk3))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_260, ...])).
% 0.18/0.38 # End printing tableau
% 0.18/0.38 # SZS output end
% 0.18/0.38 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.18/0.38 # Child (14480) has found a proof.
% 0.18/0.38
% 0.18/0.38 # Proof search is over...
% 0.18/0.38 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------