TSTP Solution File: MGT050+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : MGT050+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:26:02 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 15.10s 15.28s
% Output : Refutation 15.10s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : MGT050+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jun 9 10:57:55 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.36 The process was started by sandbox on n019.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.36 Thu Jun 9 10:57:55 2022
% 0.13/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 12930.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 formula_list(usable).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=6.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.13/0.36 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.13/0.36 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.13/0.36 clauses in usable.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 30 during input processing: 0 [copy,30,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.13/0.36 30 back subsumes 26.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.40 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.40 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.40 number of clauses in intial UL: 25
% 0.19/0.40 number of clauses initially in problem: 29
% 0.19/0.40 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 86
% 0.19/0.40 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.19/0.40 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.40 absolute distinct symbol count: 18
% 0.19/0.40 distinct predicate count: 8
% 0.19/0.40 distinct function count: 7
% 0.19/0.40 distinct constant count: 3
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.68/1.92
% 1.68/1.92
% 1.68/1.92 Changing weight limit from 60 to 47.
% 1.68/1.92
% 1.68/1.92 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.68/1.92
% 1.68/1.92 Model 3 [ 4 1 981 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.68/1.92
% 1.68/1.92 Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.68/1.92
% 1.68/1.92 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.68/1.92
% 1.68/1.92 Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.68/1.92
% 1.68/1.92 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.68/1.92
% 1.68/1.92 Resetting weight limit to 47 after 125 givens.
% 1.68/1.92
% 1.80/2.01
% 1.80/2.01
% 1.80/2.01 Changing weight limit from 47 to 39.
% 1.80/2.01
% 1.80/2.01 Resetting weight limit to 39 after 130 givens.
% 1.80/2.01
% 2.22/2.42
% 2.22/2.42
% 2.22/2.42 Changing weight limit from 39 to 37.
% 2.22/2.42
% 2.22/2.42 Resetting weight limit to 37 after 150 givens.
% 2.22/2.42
% 2.74/2.95
% 2.74/2.95
% 2.74/2.95 Changing weight limit from 37 to 32.
% 2.74/2.95
% 2.74/2.95 Resetting weight limit to 32 after 175 givens.
% 2.74/2.95
% 4.11/4.33
% 4.11/4.33
% 4.11/4.33 Changing weight limit from 32 to 28.
% 4.11/4.33
% 4.11/4.33 Resetting weight limit to 28 after 180 givens.
% 4.11/4.33
% 6.24/6.49
% 6.24/6.49
% 6.24/6.49 Changing weight limit from 28 to 21.
% 6.24/6.49
% 6.24/6.49 Resetting weight limit to 21 after 195 givens.
% 6.24/6.49
% 8.29/8.54
% 8.29/8.54
% 8.29/8.54 Changing weight limit from 21 to 19.
% 8.29/8.54
% 8.29/8.54 Resetting weight limit to 19 after 220 givens.
% 8.29/8.54
% 15.10/15.28
% 15.10/15.28 -- HEY sandbox, WE HAVE A PROOF!! --
% 15.10/15.28
% 15.10/15.28 Model 6 [ 1 0 1415 ] (0.00 seconds, 38239 Inserts)
% 15.10/15.28
% 15.10/15.28 -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at 14.88 sec ----> 17760 [hyper,17756,11,165,unit_del,23,25,25] {-} $F.
% 15.10/15.28
% 15.10/15.28 Length of proof is 15. Level of proof is 7.
% 15.10/15.28
% 15.10/15.28 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 15.10/15.28 % SZS status Theorem
% 15.10/15.28 % SZS output start Refutation
% 15.10/15.28
% 15.10/15.28 3 [] {+} smaller_or_equal(A,B)|A!=B.
% 15.10/15.28 6 [] {+} greater_or_equal(A,B)|A!=B.
% 15.10/15.28 7 [] {+} -smaller(A,B)|greater(B,A).
% 15.10/15.28 9 [] {+} -greater(A,B)| -greater(B,A).
% 15.10/15.28 11 [] {+} -organization(A)|has_endowment(A)| -has_immunity(A,B).
% 15.10/15.28 12 [] {+} -organization(A)|has_immunity(A,B)|has_immunity(A,C)| -greater(capability(A,C),capability(A,B))| -greater_or_equal(position(A,C),position(A,B))|smaller(hazard_of_mortality(A,C),hazard_of_mortality(A,B)).
% 15.10/15.28 16 [] {+} -organization(A)| -smaller_or_equal(stock_of_knowledge(A,B),stock_of_knowledge(A,C))| -greater(internal_friction(A,B),internal_friction(A,C))|smaller(capability(A,B),capability(A,C)).
% 15.10/15.28 19 [] {+} -organization(A)|external_ties(A,B)!=external_ties(A,C)|position(A,B)=position(A,C).
% 15.10/15.28 20 [] {+} -organization(A)|stock_of_knowledge(A,B)=stock_of_knowledge(A,C).
% 15.10/15.28 21 [] {+} -organization(A)|external_ties(A,B)=external_ties(A,C).
% 15.10/15.28 22 [] {+} -organization(A)| -greater(age(A,B),age(A,C))|greater(internal_friction(A,B),internal_friction(A,C)).
% 15.10/15.28 23 [] {+} -has_endowment($c3).
% 15.10/15.28 24 [] {+} -greater(hazard_of_mortality($c3,$c1),hazard_of_mortality($c3,$c2)).
% 15.10/15.28 25 [factor,9.1.2] {+} -greater(A,A).
% 15.10/15.28 27 [] {+} smaller(A,B)|A=B|greater(A,B).
% 15.10/15.28 28 [] {+} organization($c3).
% 15.10/15.28 29 [] {-} greater(age($c3,$c1),age($c3,$c2)).
% 15.10/15.28 31 [hyper,27,7] {+} A=B|greater(A,B)|greater(B,A).
% 15.10/15.28 83 [hyper,28,21] {+} external_ties($c3,A)=external_ties($c3,B).
% 15.10/15.28 84 [hyper,28,20] {+} stock_of_knowledge($c3,A)=stock_of_knowledge($c3,B).
% 15.10/15.28 88 [hyper,29,22,28] {-} greater(internal_friction($c3,$c1),internal_friction($c3,$c2)).
% 15.10/15.28 162 [para_from,31.1.1,88.1.1.1] {-} greater(internal_friction(A,$c1),internal_friction($c3,$c2))|greater($c3,A)|greater(A,$c3).
% 15.10/15.28 165 [para_from,31.1.1,28.1.1] {+} organization(A)|greater($c3,A)|greater(A,$c3).
% 15.10/15.28 2960 [hyper,83,19,28] {+} position($c3,A)=position($c3,B).
% 15.10/15.28 3109 [hyper,84,3] {+} smaller_or_equal(stock_of_knowledge($c3,A),stock_of_knowledge($c3,B)).
% 15.10/15.28 3559 [hyper,2960,6] {+} greater_or_equal(position($c3,A),position($c3,B)).
% 15.10/15.28 4265 [hyper,3109,16,28,162,unit_del,25,25] {-} smaller(capability($c3,$c1),capability($c3,$c2)).
% 15.10/15.28 4290 [hyper,4265,7] {-} greater(capability($c3,$c2),capability($c3,$c1)).
% 15.10/15.28 4666 [hyper,3559,12,28,4290] {-} has_immunity($c3,$c1)|has_immunity($c3,$c2)|smaller(hazard_of_mortality($c3,$c2),hazard_of_mortality($c3,$c1)).
% 15.10/15.28 17754 [hyper,4666,7,unit_del,24] {-} has_immunity($c3,$c1)|has_immunity($c3,$c2).
% 15.10/15.28 17756 [hyper,17754,11,165,unit_del,23,25,25] {+} has_immunity($c3,$c2).
% 15.10/15.28 17760 [hyper,17756,11,165,unit_del,23,25,25] {-} $F.
% 15.10/15.28
% 15.10/15.28 % SZS output end Refutation
% 15.10/15.28 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 15.10/15.28
% 15.10/15.28
% 15.10/15.28 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 15.10/15.28
% 15.10/15.28
% 15.10/15.28 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 15.10/15.28
% 15.10/15.28 ============ end of search ============
% 15.10/15.28
% 15.10/15.28 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 15.10/15.28
% 15.10/15.28 true clauses given 112 (32.7%)
% 15.10/15.28 false clauses given 230
% 15.10/15.28
% 15.10/15.28 FALSE TRUE
% 15.10/15.28 3 1 0
% 15.10/15.28 10 9 0
% 15.10/15.28 12 0 406
% 15.10/15.28 13 160 482
% 15.10/15.28 14 66 302
% 15.10/15.28 15 81 127
% 15.10/15.28 16 172 774
% 15.10/15.28 17 51 191
% 15.10/15.28 18 74 57
% 15.10/15.28 19 1312 735
% 15.10/15.28 tot: 1926 3074 (61.5% true)
% 15.10/15.28
% 15.10/15.28
% 15.10/15.28 Model 6 [ 1 0 1415 ] (0.00 seconds, 38239 Inserts)
% 15.10/15.28
% 15.10/15.28 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 15.10/15.28
% 15.10/15.28 Process 12930 finished Thu Jun 9 10:58:10 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------