TSTP Solution File: MGT049+1 by SRASS---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SRASS---0.1
% Problem  : MGT049+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s

% Computer : art01.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Dec 29 16:09:22 EST 2010

% Result   : Theorem 1.05s
% Output   : Solution 1.05s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP31214/MGT049+1.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM       ... 
% found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP31214/MGT049+1.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP31214/MGT049+1.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p 
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC  time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 31310
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.03 WC
% # Preprocessing time     : 0.012 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(3, axiom,![X1]:![X4]:![X5]:(organization(X1)=>((greater(external_ties(X1,X5),external_ties(X1,X4))=>greater(position(X1,X5),position(X1,X4)))&(external_ties(X1,X5)=external_ties(X1,X4)=>position(X1,X5)=position(X1,X4)))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', assumption_6)).
% fof(4, axiom,![X1]:![X4]:![X5]:(organization(X1)=>external_ties(X1,X5)=external_ties(X1,X4)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', assumption_11)).
% fof(9, conjecture,![X1]:![X4]:![X5]:((organization(X1)&greater(age(X1,X5),age(X1,X4)))=>position(X1,X5)=position(X1,X4)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', lemma_6)).
% fof(10, negated_conjecture,~(![X1]:![X4]:![X5]:((organization(X1)&greater(age(X1,X5),age(X1,X4)))=>position(X1,X5)=position(X1,X4))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[9])).
% fof(17, plain,![X1]:![X4]:![X5]:(~(organization(X1))|((~(greater(external_ties(X1,X5),external_ties(X1,X4)))|greater(position(X1,X5),position(X1,X4)))&(~(external_ties(X1,X5)=external_ties(X1,X4))|position(X1,X5)=position(X1,X4)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[3])).
% fof(18, plain,![X6]:![X7]:![X8]:(~(organization(X6))|((~(greater(external_ties(X6,X8),external_ties(X6,X7)))|greater(position(X6,X8),position(X6,X7)))&(~(external_ties(X6,X8)=external_ties(X6,X7))|position(X6,X8)=position(X6,X7)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[17])).
% fof(19, plain,![X6]:![X7]:![X8]:(((~(greater(external_ties(X6,X8),external_ties(X6,X7)))|greater(position(X6,X8),position(X6,X7)))|~(organization(X6)))&((~(external_ties(X6,X8)=external_ties(X6,X7))|position(X6,X8)=position(X6,X7))|~(organization(X6)))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[18])).
% cnf(20,plain,(position(X1,X2)=position(X1,X3)|~organization(X1)|external_ties(X1,X2)!=external_ties(X1,X3)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[19])).
% fof(22, plain,![X1]:![X4]:![X5]:(~(organization(X1))|external_ties(X1,X5)=external_ties(X1,X4)),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[4])).
% fof(23, plain,![X6]:![X7]:![X8]:(~(organization(X6))|external_ties(X6,X8)=external_ties(X6,X7)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[22])).
% cnf(24,plain,(external_ties(X1,X2)=external_ties(X1,X3)|~organization(X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[23])).
% fof(43, negated_conjecture,?[X1]:?[X4]:?[X5]:((organization(X1)&greater(age(X1,X5),age(X1,X4)))&~(position(X1,X5)=position(X1,X4))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[10])).
% fof(44, negated_conjecture,?[X6]:?[X7]:?[X8]:((organization(X6)&greater(age(X6,X8),age(X6,X7)))&~(position(X6,X8)=position(X6,X7))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[43])).
% fof(45, negated_conjecture,((organization(esk1_0)&greater(age(esk1_0,esk3_0),age(esk1_0,esk2_0)))&~(position(esk1_0,esk3_0)=position(esk1_0,esk2_0))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[44])).
% cnf(46,negated_conjecture,(position(esk1_0,esk3_0)!=position(esk1_0,esk2_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[45])).
% cnf(48,negated_conjecture,(organization(esk1_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[45])).
% cnf(51,plain,(position(X1,X2)=position(X1,X3)|~organization(X1)),inference(csr,[status(thm)],[20,24])).
% cnf(56,negated_conjecture,(position(esk1_0,X1)=position(esk1_0,X2)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[51,48,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(76,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(sr,[status(thm)],[46,56,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(77,negated_conjecture,($false),76,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses                  : 40
% # ...of these trivial                : 0
% # ...subsumed                        : 1
% # ...remaining for further processing: 39
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed                  : 0
% # Backward-rewritten                 : 0
% # Generated clauses                  : 26
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 10
% # Contextual simplify-reflections    : 2
% # Paramodulations                    : 23
% # Factorizations                     : 0
% # Equation resolutions               : 2
% # Current number of processed clauses: 19
% #    Positive orientable unit clauses: 4
% #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% #    Negative unit clauses           : 1
% #    Non-unit-clauses                : 13
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4
% # ...number of literals in the above : 10
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 26
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 26
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound  : 8
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts        : 6
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes       : 4
% # Backwards rewriting index:    19 leaves,   1.53+/-0.752 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index:            7 leaves,   1.43+/-0.495 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index:           16 leaves,   1.38+/-0.484 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time              : 0.011 s
% # System time            : 0.003 s
% # Total time             : 0.014 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 0.11 CPU 0.21 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.11 CPU 0.21 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP31214/MGT049+1.tptp
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------