TSTP Solution File: MGT048-1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : MGT048-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:26:01 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.35s 1.51s
% Output   : Refutation 1.35s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : MGT048-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Jun  9 10:41:10 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.37  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.37  The process was started by sandbox2 on n019.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.37  Thu Jun  9 10:41:10 2022
% 0.13/0.37  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 9157.
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.37  set(auto).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.37  clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  list(usable).
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.13/0.37  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.13/0.37  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.13/0.37  clauses in usable.
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 21 during input processing: 0 [copy,21,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.13/0.40  
% 0.13/0.40  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.13/0.40  
% 0.13/0.40  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.13/0.40  
% 0.13/0.40  
% 0.13/0.40  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.13/0.40  
% 0.13/0.40  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.13/0.40  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.13/0.40  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.13/0.40  number of clauses in intial UL: 17
% 0.13/0.40  number of clauses initially in problem: 21
% 0.13/0.40  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 80
% 0.13/0.40  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.13/0.40  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.13/0.40  absolute distinct symbol count: 13
% 0.13/0.40     distinct predicate count: 6
% 0.13/0.40     distinct function count: 4
% 0.13/0.40     distinct constant count: 3
% 0.13/0.40  
% 0.13/0.40  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.13/0.40  
% 0.13/0.40  
% 0.13/0.40  
% 0.13/0.40  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.13/0.40  
% 0.13/0.40  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.13/0.40  
% 0.13/0.40  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.35/1.51  
% 1.35/1.51  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.35/1.51  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.35/1.51  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.35/1.51  
% 1.35/1.51  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.35/1.51  
% 1.35/1.51  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.35/1.51  
% 1.35/1.51  Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.35/1.51  
% 1.35/1.51  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.35/1.51  
% 1.35/1.51  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   1.12 sec ----> 3872 [binary,3871.1,16.1] {-} $F.
% 1.35/1.51  
% 1.35/1.51  Length of proof is 4.  Level of proof is 3.
% 1.35/1.51  
% 1.35/1.51  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.35/1.51  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.35/1.51  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.35/1.51  
% 1.35/1.51  3 [] {+} A!=B|smaller_or_equal(A,B).
% 1.35/1.51  12 [] {+} -organization(A)| -smaller_or_equal(stock_of_knowledge(A,B),stock_of_knowledge(A,C))| -greater(internal_friction(A,B),internal_friction(A,C))|smaller(capability(A,B),capability(A,C)).
% 1.35/1.51  14 [] {+} -organization(A)|stock_of_knowledge(A,B)=stock_of_knowledge(A,C).
% 1.35/1.51  15 [] {+} -organization(A)| -greater(age(A,B),age(A,C))|greater(internal_friction(A,B),internal_friction(A,C)).
% 1.35/1.51  16 [] {+} -smaller(capability(sk1,sk3),capability(sk1,sk2)).
% 1.35/1.51  19 [] {+} organization(sk1).
% 1.35/1.51  20 [] {-} greater(age(sk1,sk3),age(sk1,sk2)).
% 1.35/1.51  51 [hyper,19,14] {+} stock_of_knowledge(sk1,A)=stock_of_knowledge(sk1,B).
% 1.35/1.51  55 [hyper,20,15,19] {-} greater(internal_friction(sk1,sk3),internal_friction(sk1,sk2)).
% 1.35/1.51  2444 [hyper,51,3] {+} smaller_or_equal(stock_of_knowledge(sk1,A),stock_of_knowledge(sk1,B)).
% 1.35/1.51  3871 [hyper,2444,12,19,55] {-} smaller(capability(sk1,sk3),capability(sk1,sk2)).
% 1.35/1.51  3872 [binary,3871.1,16.1] {-} $F.
% 1.35/1.51  
% 1.35/1.51  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.35/1.51  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.35/1.51  
% 1.35/1.51  
% 1.35/1.51  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.35/1.51  
% 1.35/1.51  
% 1.35/1.51  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.35/1.51  
% 1.35/1.51  ============ end of search ============
% 1.35/1.51  
% 1.35/1.51  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.35/1.51  
% 1.35/1.52  true clauses given          40      (38.1%)
% 1.35/1.52  false clauses given         65
% 1.35/1.52  
% 1.35/1.52        FALSE     TRUE
% 1.35/1.52     8  0         5
% 1.35/1.52     9  0         3
% 1.35/1.52    12  0         228
% 1.35/1.52    13  32        143
% 1.35/1.52    14  1         5
% 1.35/1.52    15  32        81
% 1.35/1.52    16  1         25
% 1.35/1.52    17  5         10
% 1.35/1.52    18  0         2
% 1.35/1.52    19  863       435
% 1.35/1.52    20  0         45
% 1.35/1.52    21  466       240
% 1.35/1.52    22  6         44
% 1.35/1.52    23  21        45
% 1.35/1.52    24  40        83
% 1.35/1.52    25  26        34
% 1.35/1.52    26  0         11
% 1.35/1.52    27  5         17
% 1.35/1.52    28  45        71
% 1.35/1.52    29  0         16
% 1.35/1.52    30  0         8
% 1.35/1.52    31  10        57
% 1.35/1.52    32  5         98
% 1.35/1.52    33  0         4
% 1.35/1.52    34  0         6
% 1.35/1.52    36  0         7
% 1.35/1.52    37  0         41
% 1.35/1.52    39  0         173
% 1.35/1.52    40  0         13
% 1.35/1.52    44  0         50
% 1.35/1.52    45  0         14
% 1.35/1.52  tot:  1558      2014      (56.4% true)
% 1.35/1.52  
% 1.35/1.52  
% 1.35/1.52  Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.35/1.52  
% 1.35/1.52  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.35/1.52  
% 1.35/1.52  Process 9157 finished Thu Jun  9 10:41:11 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------