TSTP Solution File: MGT048-1 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : MGT048-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:37:14 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.52s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   20 (  10 unt;   0 nHn;  16 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   37 (   5 equ;  19 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   30 (   7 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(assumption_10_35,axiom,
    ( stock_of_knowledge(X1,X2) = stock_of_knowledge(X1,X3)
    | ~ organization(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.sTa1zV0uZ9/E---3.1_22929.p',assumption_10_35) ).

cnf(lemma_5_37,negated_conjecture,
    organization(sk1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.sTa1zV0uZ9/E---3.1_22929.p',lemma_5_37) ).

cnf(assumption_5_33,axiom,
    ( smaller(capability(X1,X2),capability(X1,X3))
    | ~ organization(X1)
    | ~ smaller_or_equal(stock_of_knowledge(X1,X2),stock_of_knowledge(X1,X3))
    | ~ greater(internal_friction(X1,X2),internal_friction(X1,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.sTa1zV0uZ9/E---3.1_22929.p',assumption_5_33) ).

cnf(definition_smaller_or_equal_3,axiom,
    ( smaller_or_equal(X1,X2)
    | X1 != X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.sTa1zV0uZ9/E---3.1_22929.p',definition_smaller_or_equal_3) ).

cnf(assumption_12_36,axiom,
    ( greater(internal_friction(X1,X2),internal_friction(X1,X3))
    | ~ organization(X1)
    | ~ greater(age(X1,X2),age(X1,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.sTa1zV0uZ9/E---3.1_22929.p',assumption_12_36) ).

cnf(lemma_5_38,negated_conjecture,
    greater(age(sk1,sk3),age(sk1,sk2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.sTa1zV0uZ9/E---3.1_22929.p',lemma_5_38) ).

cnf(lemma_5_39,negated_conjecture,
    ~ smaller(capability(sk1,sk3),capability(sk1,sk2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.sTa1zV0uZ9/E---3.1_22929.p',lemma_5_39) ).

cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
    ( stock_of_knowledge(X1,X2) = stock_of_knowledge(X1,X3)
    | ~ organization(X1) ),
    assumption_10_35 ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    organization(sk1),
    lemma_5_37 ).

cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
    ( smaller(capability(X1,X2),capability(X1,X3))
    | ~ organization(X1)
    | ~ smaller_or_equal(stock_of_knowledge(X1,X2),stock_of_knowledge(X1,X3))
    | ~ greater(internal_friction(X1,X2),internal_friction(X1,X3)) ),
    assumption_5_33 ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    stock_of_knowledge(sk1,X1) = stock_of_knowledge(sk1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
    ( smaller_or_equal(X1,X2)
    | X1 != X2 ),
    definition_smaller_or_equal_3 ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( smaller(capability(sk1,X1),capability(sk1,X2))
    | ~ greater(internal_friction(sk1,X1),internal_friction(sk1,X2))
    | ~ smaller_or_equal(stock_of_knowledge(sk1,X3),stock_of_knowledge(sk1,X2)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_8])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    smaller_or_equal(X1,X1),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
    ( greater(internal_friction(X1,X2),internal_friction(X1,X3))
    | ~ organization(X1)
    | ~ greater(age(X1,X2),age(X1,X3)) ),
    assumption_12_36 ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    greater(age(sk1,sk3),age(sk1,sk2)),
    lemma_5_38 ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ smaller(capability(sk1,sk3),capability(sk1,sk2)),
    lemma_5_39 ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( smaller(capability(sk1,X1),capability(sk1,X2))
    | ~ greater(internal_friction(sk1,X1),internal_friction(sk1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    greater(internal_friction(sk1,sk3),internal_friction(sk1,sk2)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_8])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : MGT048-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 00:43:22 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.50  Running first-order model finding
% 0.19/0.50  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.sTa1zV0uZ9/E---3.1_22929.p
% 0.19/0.52  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.19/0.52  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.52  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.52  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.52  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.52  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.52  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.52  # sh5l with pid 23032 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.52  # Result found by sh5l
% 0.19/0.52  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.52  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.52  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.52  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.52  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.52  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.52  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.19/0.52  # Search class: FGHSF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.52  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.52  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.52  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 23036 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.52  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.19/0.52  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.52  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.52  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.52  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.52  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.52  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.52  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.19/0.52  # Search class: FGHSF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.52  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.52  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.52  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.52  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.52  
% 0.19/0.52  # Proof found!
% 0.19/0.52  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.52  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.52  # Parsed axioms                        : 19
% 0.19/0.52  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.19/0.52  # Initial clauses                      : 19
% 0.19/0.52  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.19/0.52  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 19
% 0.19/0.52  # Processed clauses                    : 128
% 0.19/0.52  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.19/0.52  # ...subsumed                          : 43
% 0.19/0.52  # ...remaining for further processing  : 85
% 0.19/0.52  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 2
% 0.19/0.52  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.19/0.52  # Backward-subsumed                    : 3
% 0.19/0.52  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.19/0.52  # Generated clauses                    : 162
% 0.19/0.52  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 148
% 0.19/0.52  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.19/0.52  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
% 0.19/0.52  # Paramodulations                      : 157
% 0.19/0.52  # Factorizations                       : 2
% 0.19/0.52  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.19/0.52  # Equation resolutions                 : 3
% 0.19/0.52  # Total rewrite steps                  : 27
% 0.19/0.52  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.19/0.52  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.19/0.52  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.52  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.19/0.52  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.52  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.19/0.52  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.19/0.52  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.19/0.52  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.19/0.52  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.19/0.52  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.19/0.52  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.19/0.52  # Current number of processed clauses  : 61
% 0.19/0.52  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 5
% 0.19/0.52  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.19/0.52  #    Negative unit clauses             : 6
% 0.19/0.52  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 49
% 0.19/0.52  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 53
% 0.19/0.52  # ...number of literals in the above   : 224
% 0.19/0.52  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.19/0.52  # Current number of archived clauses   : 22
% 0.19/0.52  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1173
% 0.19/0.52  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 789
% 0.19/0.52  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 26
% 0.19/0.52  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.19/0.52  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.19/0.52  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.19/0.52  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.19/0.52  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.19/0.52  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.19/0.52  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 3018
% 0.19/0.52  
% 0.19/0.52  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.52  # User time                : 0.006 s
% 0.19/0.52  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.19/0.52  # Total time               : 0.010 s
% 0.19/0.52  # Maximum resident set size: 1616 pages
% 0.19/0.52  
% 0.19/0.52  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.52  # User time                : 0.006 s
% 0.19/0.52  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.19/0.52  # Total time               : 0.013 s
% 0.19/0.52  # Maximum resident set size: 1684 pages
% 0.19/0.52  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------