%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : MGT045-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:26:25 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.40s
% Output   : Refutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : MGT045-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Thu Jun  9 10:45:02 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.40  
% 0.12/0.40  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.12/0.40  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.12/0.40  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.12/0.40  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.12/0.40  SPASS derived 12 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 25 clauses.
% 0.12/0.40  SPASS allocated 75609 KBytes.
% 0.12/0.40  SPASS spent	0:00:00.06 on the problem.
% 0.12/0.40  		0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 0.12/0.40  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.12/0.40  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.12/0.40  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.12/0.40  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.12/0.40  
% 0.12/0.40  
% 0.12/0.40  Here is a proof with depth 1, length 9 :
% 0.12/0.40  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.12/0.40  1[0:Inp] organization(u) || greater(external_ties(u,v),external_ties(u,w)) -> greater(position(u,v),position(u,w))*.
% 0.12/0.40  3[0:Inp] organization(u) || greater(age(u,v),age(u,w))* -> greater(external_ties(u,v),external_ties(u,w)).
% 0.12/0.40  4[0:Inp] ||  -> organization(sk1)*.
% 0.12/0.40  5[0:Inp] ||  -> greater(age(sk1,sk3),age(sk1,sk2))*r.
% 0.12/0.40  6[0:Inp] || greater(position(sk1,sk3),position(sk1,sk2))*r -> .
% 0.12/0.40  25[0:Res:5.0,3.1] organization(sk1) ||  -> greater(external_ties(sk1,sk3),external_ties(sk1,sk2))*r.
% 0.12/0.40  29[0:Res:1.2,6.0] organization(sk1) || greater(external_ties(sk1,sk3),external_ties(sk1,sk2))*r -> .
% 0.12/0.40  30[0:MRR:25.0,4.0] ||  -> greater(external_ties(sk1,sk3),external_ties(sk1,sk2))*r.
% 0.12/0.40  31[0:MRR:29.0,29.1,4.0,30.0] ||  -> .
% 0.12/0.40  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.12/0.40  Formulae used in the proof : assumption_6_30 assumption_8_32 lemma_4_33 lemma_4_34 lemma_4_35
% 0.12/0.40  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------