TSTP Solution File: MGT044+1 by SRASS---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SRASS---0.1
% Problem  : MGT044+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s

% Computer : art02.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Dec 29 16:08:52 EST 2010

% Result   : Theorem 1.05s
% Output   : Solution 1.05s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP5797/MGT044+1.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM       ... 
% found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP5797/MGT044+1.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP5797/MGT044+1.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p 
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC  time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 5893
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.00 WC
% # Preprocessing time     : 0.013 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(3, axiom,![X1]:![X4]:![X5]:((organization(X1)&greater(age(X1,X5),age(X1,X4)))=>greater(stock_of_knowledge(X1,X5),stock_of_knowledge(X1,X4))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', assumption_7)).
% fof(4, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:(smaller_or_equal(X1,X2)<=>(smaller(X1,X2)|X1=X2)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', definition_smaller_or_equal)).
% fof(5, axiom,![X1]:![X4]:![X5]:(organization(X1)=>((((greater(stock_of_knowledge(X1,X5),stock_of_knowledge(X1,X4))&smaller_or_equal(internal_friction(X1,X5),internal_friction(X1,X4)))=>greater(capability(X1,X5),capability(X1,X4)))&((smaller_or_equal(stock_of_knowledge(X1,X5),stock_of_knowledge(X1,X4))&greater(internal_friction(X1,X5),internal_friction(X1,X4)))=>smaller(capability(X1,X5),capability(X1,X4))))&((stock_of_knowledge(X1,X5)=stock_of_knowledge(X1,X4)&internal_friction(X1,X5)=internal_friction(X1,X4))=>capability(X1,X5)=capability(X1,X4)))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', assumption_5)).
% fof(6, axiom,![X1]:![X4]:![X5]:(organization(X1)=>internal_friction(X1,X5)=internal_friction(X1,X4)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', assumption_9)).
% fof(10, conjecture,![X1]:![X4]:![X5]:((organization(X1)&greater(age(X1,X5),age(X1,X4)))=>greater(capability(X1,X5),capability(X1,X4))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', lemma_3)).
% fof(11, negated_conjecture,~(![X1]:![X4]:![X5]:((organization(X1)&greater(age(X1,X5),age(X1,X4)))=>greater(capability(X1,X5),capability(X1,X4)))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[10])).
% fof(12, plain,![X5]:![X4]:![X1]:(epred1_3(X1,X4,X5)=>((((greater(stock_of_knowledge(X1,X5),stock_of_knowledge(X1,X4))&smaller_or_equal(internal_friction(X1,X5),internal_friction(X1,X4)))=>greater(capability(X1,X5),capability(X1,X4)))&((smaller_or_equal(stock_of_knowledge(X1,X5),stock_of_knowledge(X1,X4))&greater(internal_friction(X1,X5),internal_friction(X1,X4)))=>smaller(capability(X1,X5),capability(X1,X4))))&((stock_of_knowledge(X1,X5)=stock_of_knowledge(X1,X4)&internal_friction(X1,X5)=internal_friction(X1,X4))=>capability(X1,X5)=capability(X1,X4)))),introduced(definition)).
% fof(13, plain,![X1]:![X4]:![X5]:(organization(X1)=>epred1_3(X1,X4,X5)),inference(apply_def,[status(esa)],[5,12,theory(equality)])).
% fof(20, plain,![X1]:![X4]:![X5]:((~(organization(X1))|~(greater(age(X1,X5),age(X1,X4))))|greater(stock_of_knowledge(X1,X5),stock_of_knowledge(X1,X4))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[3])).
% fof(21, plain,![X6]:![X7]:![X8]:((~(organization(X6))|~(greater(age(X6,X8),age(X6,X7))))|greater(stock_of_knowledge(X6,X8),stock_of_knowledge(X6,X7))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[20])).
% cnf(22,plain,(greater(stock_of_knowledge(X1,X2),stock_of_knowledge(X1,X3))|~greater(age(X1,X2),age(X1,X3))|~organization(X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[21])).
% fof(23, plain,![X1]:![X2]:((~(smaller_or_equal(X1,X2))|(smaller(X1,X2)|X1=X2))&((~(smaller(X1,X2))&~(X1=X2))|smaller_or_equal(X1,X2))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[4])).
% fof(24, plain,![X3]:![X4]:((~(smaller_or_equal(X3,X4))|(smaller(X3,X4)|X3=X4))&((~(smaller(X3,X4))&~(X3=X4))|smaller_or_equal(X3,X4))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[23])).
% fof(25, plain,![X3]:![X4]:((~(smaller_or_equal(X3,X4))|(smaller(X3,X4)|X3=X4))&((~(smaller(X3,X4))|smaller_or_equal(X3,X4))&(~(X3=X4)|smaller_or_equal(X3,X4)))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[24])).
% cnf(26,plain,(smaller_or_equal(X1,X2)|X1!=X2),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[25])).
% fof(29, plain,![X1]:![X4]:![X5]:(~(organization(X1))|epred1_3(X1,X4,X5)),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[13])).
% fof(30, plain,![X6]:![X7]:![X8]:(~(organization(X6))|epred1_3(X6,X7,X8)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[29])).
% cnf(31,plain,(epred1_3(X1,X2,X3)|~organization(X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[30])).
% fof(32, plain,![X1]:![X4]:![X5]:(~(organization(X1))|internal_friction(X1,X5)=internal_friction(X1,X4)),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[6])).
% fof(33, plain,![X6]:![X7]:![X8]:(~(organization(X6))|internal_friction(X6,X8)=internal_friction(X6,X7)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[32])).
% cnf(34,plain,(internal_friction(X1,X2)=internal_friction(X1,X3)|~organization(X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[33])).
% fof(47, negated_conjecture,?[X1]:?[X4]:?[X5]:((organization(X1)&greater(age(X1,X5),age(X1,X4)))&~(greater(capability(X1,X5),capability(X1,X4)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[11])).
% fof(48, negated_conjecture,?[X6]:?[X7]:?[X8]:((organization(X6)&greater(age(X6,X8),age(X6,X7)))&~(greater(capability(X6,X8),capability(X6,X7)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[47])).
% fof(49, negated_conjecture,((organization(esk1_0)&greater(age(esk1_0,esk3_0),age(esk1_0,esk2_0)))&~(greater(capability(esk1_0,esk3_0),capability(esk1_0,esk2_0)))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[48])).
% cnf(50,negated_conjecture,(~greater(capability(esk1_0,esk3_0),capability(esk1_0,esk2_0))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[49])).
% cnf(51,negated_conjecture,(greater(age(esk1_0,esk3_0),age(esk1_0,esk2_0))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[49])).
% cnf(52,negated_conjecture,(organization(esk1_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[49])).
% fof(53, plain,![X5]:![X4]:![X1]:(~(epred1_3(X1,X4,X5))|((((~(greater(stock_of_knowledge(X1,X5),stock_of_knowledge(X1,X4)))|~(smaller_or_equal(internal_friction(X1,X5),internal_friction(X1,X4))))|greater(capability(X1,X5),capability(X1,X4)))&((~(smaller_or_equal(stock_of_knowledge(X1,X5),stock_of_knowledge(X1,X4)))|~(greater(internal_friction(X1,X5),internal_friction(X1,X4))))|smaller(capability(X1,X5),capability(X1,X4))))&((~(stock_of_knowledge(X1,X5)=stock_of_knowledge(X1,X4))|~(internal_friction(X1,X5)=internal_friction(X1,X4)))|capability(X1,X5)=capability(X1,X4)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[12])).
% fof(54, plain,![X6]:![X7]:![X8]:(~(epred1_3(X8,X7,X6))|((((~(greater(stock_of_knowledge(X8,X6),stock_of_knowledge(X8,X7)))|~(smaller_or_equal(internal_friction(X8,X6),internal_friction(X8,X7))))|greater(capability(X8,X6),capability(X8,X7)))&((~(smaller_or_equal(stock_of_knowledge(X8,X6),stock_of_knowledge(X8,X7)))|~(greater(internal_friction(X8,X6),internal_friction(X8,X7))))|smaller(capability(X8,X6),capability(X8,X7))))&((~(stock_of_knowledge(X8,X6)=stock_of_knowledge(X8,X7))|~(internal_friction(X8,X6)=internal_friction(X8,X7)))|capability(X8,X6)=capability(X8,X7)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[53])).
% fof(55, plain,![X6]:![X7]:![X8]:(((((~(greater(stock_of_knowledge(X8,X6),stock_of_knowledge(X8,X7)))|~(smaller_or_equal(internal_friction(X8,X6),internal_friction(X8,X7))))|greater(capability(X8,X6),capability(X8,X7)))|~(epred1_3(X8,X7,X6)))&(((~(smaller_or_equal(stock_of_knowledge(X8,X6),stock_of_knowledge(X8,X7)))|~(greater(internal_friction(X8,X6),internal_friction(X8,X7))))|smaller(capability(X8,X6),capability(X8,X7)))|~(epred1_3(X8,X7,X6))))&(((~(stock_of_knowledge(X8,X6)=stock_of_knowledge(X8,X7))|~(internal_friction(X8,X6)=internal_friction(X8,X7)))|capability(X8,X6)=capability(X8,X7))|~(epred1_3(X8,X7,X6)))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[54])).
% cnf(58,plain,(greater(capability(X1,X3),capability(X1,X2))|~epred1_3(X1,X2,X3)|~smaller_or_equal(internal_friction(X1,X3),internal_friction(X1,X2))|~greater(stock_of_knowledge(X1,X3),stock_of_knowledge(X1,X2))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[55])).
% cnf(59,plain,(smaller_or_equal(X1,X1)),inference(er,[status(thm)],[26,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(67,negated_conjecture,(internal_friction(esk1_0,X1)=internal_friction(esk1_0,X2)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[34,52,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(68,negated_conjecture,(greater(stock_of_knowledge(esk1_0,esk3_0),stock_of_knowledge(esk1_0,esk2_0))|~organization(esk1_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[22,51,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(69,negated_conjecture,(greater(stock_of_knowledge(esk1_0,esk3_0),stock_of_knowledge(esk1_0,esk2_0))|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[68,52,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(70,negated_conjecture,(greater(stock_of_knowledge(esk1_0,esk3_0),stock_of_knowledge(esk1_0,esk2_0))),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[69,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(84,plain,(greater(capability(esk1_0,X1),capability(esk1_0,X2))|~epred1_3(esk1_0,X2,X1)|~smaller_or_equal(internal_friction(esk1_0,X3),internal_friction(esk1_0,X2))|~greater(stock_of_knowledge(esk1_0,X1),stock_of_knowledge(esk1_0,X2))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[58,67,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(306,plain,(greater(capability(esk1_0,X1),capability(esk1_0,X2))|~epred1_3(esk1_0,X2,X1)|~greater(stock_of_knowledge(esk1_0,X1),stock_of_knowledge(esk1_0,X2))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[84,59,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(2869,negated_conjecture,(~epred1_3(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0)|~greater(stock_of_knowledge(esk1_0,esk3_0),stock_of_knowledge(esk1_0,esk2_0))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[50,306,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(2878,negated_conjecture,(~epred1_3(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0)|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[2869,70,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(2879,negated_conjecture,(~epred1_3(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0)),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[2878,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(2880,negated_conjecture,(~organization(esk1_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[2879,31,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(2881,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[2880,52,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(2882,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[2881,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(2883,negated_conjecture,($false),2882,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses                  : 244
% # ...of these trivial                : 0
% # ...subsumed                        : 97
% # ...remaining for further processing: 147
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 6
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed                  : 7
% # Backward-rewritten                 : 0
% # Generated clauses                  : 2597
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 2403
% # Contextual simplify-reflections    : 28
% # Paramodulations                    : 2522
% # Factorizations                     : 68
% # Equation resolutions               : 7
% # Current number of processed clauses: 118
% #    Positive orientable unit clauses: 5
% #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% #    Negative unit clauses           : 4
% #    Non-unit-clauses                : 108
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2121
% # ...number of literals in the above : 16622
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2272
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1690
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound  : 10
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts        : 4
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes       : 0
% # Backwards rewriting index:    72 leaves,   1.49+/-1.258 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index:           29 leaves,   1.62+/-1.472 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index:           64 leaves,   1.39+/-1.167 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time              : 0.129 s
% # System time            : 0.010 s
% # Total time             : 0.139 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 0.27 CPU 0.36 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.27 CPU 0.36 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP5797/MGT044+1.tptp
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------