TSTP Solution File: MGT042-1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : MGT042-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:25:36 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 50.07s 50.31s
% Output   : Refutation 50.07s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   19
%            Number of leaves      :   23
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   52 (  11 unt;  31 nHn;  49 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  116 (  39 equ;  30 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   40 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(definition_smaller_or_equal_1,axiom,
    ( ~ smaller_or_equal(X,Y)
    | smaller(X,Y)
    | X = Y ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT001-0.ax',definition_smaller_or_equal_1) ).

cnf(definition_smaller_or_equal_3,axiom,
    ( X != Y
    | smaller_or_equal(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT001-0.ax',definition_smaller_or_equal_3) ).

cnf(definition_greater_or_equal_4,axiom,
    ( ~ greater_or_equal(X,Y)
    | greater(X,Y)
    | X = Y ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT001-0.ax',definition_greater_or_equal_4) ).

cnf(definition_greater_or_equal_5,axiom,
    ( ~ greater(X,Y)
    | greater_or_equal(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT001-0.ax',definition_greater_or_equal_5) ).

cnf(definition_greater_or_equal_6,axiom,
    ( X != Y
    | greater_or_equal(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT001-0.ax',definition_greater_or_equal_6) ).

cnf(definition_smaller_7,axiom,
    ( ~ smaller(X,Y)
    | greater(Y,X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT001-0.ax',definition_smaller_7) ).

cnf(meaning_postulate_greater_strict_9,axiom,
    ( ~ greater(X,Y)
    | ~ greater(Y,X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT001-0.ax',meaning_postulate_greater_strict_9) ).

cnf(meaning_postulate_greater_comparable_11,axiom,
    ( smaller(X,Y)
    | X = Y
    | greater(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT001-0.ax',meaning_postulate_greater_comparable_11) ).

cnf(assumption_4_38,axiom,
    ( ~ organization(X)
    | has_immunity(X,Y)
    | has_immunity(X,Z)
    | ~ greater(capability(X,Z),capability(X,Y))
    | ~ greater_or_equal(position(X,Z),position(X,Y))
    | smaller(hazard_of_mortality(X,Z),hazard_of_mortality(X,Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_4_38) ).

cnf(assumption_4_39,axiom,
    ( ~ organization(X)
    | has_immunity(X,Y)
    | has_immunity(X,Z)
    | ~ greater_or_equal(capability(X,Z),capability(X,Y))
    | ~ greater(position(X,Z),position(X,Y))
    | smaller(hazard_of_mortality(X,Z),hazard_of_mortality(X,Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_4_39) ).

cnf(assumption_5_41,axiom,
    ( ~ organization(X)
    | ~ greater(stock_of_knowledge(X,Y),stock_of_knowledge(X,Z))
    | ~ smaller_or_equal(internal_friction(X,Y),internal_friction(X,Z))
    | greater(capability(X,Y),capability(X,Z)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_5_41) ).

cnf(assumption_5_42,axiom,
    ( ~ organization(X)
    | ~ smaller_or_equal(stock_of_knowledge(X,Y),stock_of_knowledge(X,Z))
    | ~ greater(internal_friction(X,Y),internal_friction(X,Z))
    | smaller(capability(X,Y),capability(X,Z)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_5_42) ).

cnf(assumption_5_43,axiom,
    ( ~ organization(X)
    | stock_of_knowledge(X,Y) != stock_of_knowledge(X,Z)
    | internal_friction(X,Y) != internal_friction(X,Z)
    | capability(X,Z) = capability(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_5_43) ).

cnf(assumption_6_44,axiom,
    ( ~ organization(X)
    | ~ greater(external_ties(X,Y),external_ties(X,Z))
    | greater(position(X,Y),position(X,Z)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_6_44) ).

cnf(assumption_6_45,axiom,
    ( ~ organization(X)
    | external_ties(X,Y) != external_ties(X,Z)
    | position(X,Z) = position(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',assumption_6_45) ).

cnf(lemma_1_46,negated_conjecture,
    organization(sk1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lemma_1_46) ).

cnf(lemma_1_47,negated_conjecture,
    ~ has_immunity(sk1,sk2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lemma_1_47) ).

cnf(lemma_1_48,negated_conjecture,
    ~ has_immunity(sk1,sk3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lemma_1_48) ).

cnf(lemma_1_49,negated_conjecture,
    ( greater(stock_of_knowledge(sk1,sk3),stock_of_knowledge(sk1,sk2))
    | greater_or_equal(stock_of_knowledge(sk1,sk3),stock_of_knowledge(sk1,sk2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lemma_1_49) ).

cnf(lemma_1_51,negated_conjecture,
    ( greater(stock_of_knowledge(sk1,sk3),stock_of_knowledge(sk1,sk2))
    | greater(external_ties(sk1,sk3),external_ties(sk1,sk2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lemma_1_51) ).

cnf(lemma_1_54,negated_conjecture,
    smaller_or_equal(internal_friction(sk1,sk3),internal_friction(sk1,sk2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lemma_1_54) ).

cnf(lemma_1_57,negated_conjecture,
    ( greater_or_equal(external_ties(sk1,sk3),external_ties(sk1,sk2))
    | greater(external_ties(sk1,sk3),external_ties(sk1,sk2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lemma_1_57) ).

cnf(lemma_1_64,negated_conjecture,
    ~ smaller(hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk3),hazard_of_mortality(sk1,sk2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lemma_1_64) ).

cnf(36,plain,
    greater_or_equal(X,X),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[definition_greater_or_equal_6,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(38,plain,
    ( smaller(internal_friction(sk1,sk3),internal_friction(sk1,sk2))
    | internal_friction(sk1,sk3) = internal_friction(sk1,sk2) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[definition_smaller_or_equal_1,lemma_1_54]) ).

cnf(39,plain,
    ( X = Y
    | greater(X,Y)
    | greater(Y,X) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[definition_smaller_7,meaning_postulate_greater_comparable_11]) ).

cnf(42,plain,
    ( greater(stock_of_knowledge(sk1,sk3),stock_of_knowledge(sk1,sk2))
    | stock_of_knowledge(sk1,sk3) = stock_of_knowledge(sk1,sk2) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[definition_greater_or_equal_4,lemma_1_49]) ).

cnf(45,plain,
    ( greater(external_ties(sk1,sk3),external_ties(sk1,sk2))
    | external_ties(sk1,sk3) = external_ties(sk1,sk2) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[definition_greater_or_equal_4,lemma_1_57]) ).

cnf(46,plain,
    ( greater(external_ties(sk1,sk3),external_ties(sk1,sk2))
    | greater(capability(sk1,sk3),capability(sk1,sk2)) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[assumption_5_41,lemma_1_46,lemma_1_51,lemma_1_54]) ).

cnf(56,plain,
    ( internal_friction(sk1,sk3) = internal_friction(sk1,sk2)
    | greater(internal_friction(sk1,sk2),internal_friction(sk1,sk3)) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[definition_smaller_7,38]) ).

cnf(61,plain,
    ( stock_of_knowledge(sk1,sk3) = stock_of_knowledge(sk1,sk2)
    | greater(capability(sk1,sk3),capability(sk1,sk2)) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[assumption_5_41,42,lemma_1_46,lemma_1_54]) ).

cnf(67,plain,
    ( external_ties(sk1,sk3) = external_ties(sk1,sk2)
    | greater(position(sk1,sk3),position(sk1,sk2)) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[assumption_6_44,45,lemma_1_46]) ).

cnf(83,plain,
    ( stock_of_knowledge(sk1,sk3) = stock_of_knowledge(sk1,sk2)
    | greater_or_equal(capability(sk1,sk3),capability(sk1,sk2)) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[definition_greater_or_equal_5,61]) ).

cnf(90,plain,
    ( external_ties(sk1,sk3) = external_ties(sk1,sk2)
    | greater_or_equal(position(sk1,sk3),position(sk1,sk2)) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[definition_greater_or_equal_5,67]) ).

cnf(101,plain,
    ( stock_of_knowledge(sk1,sk3) = stock_of_knowledge(sk1,sk2)
    | external_ties(sk1,sk3) = external_ties(sk1,sk2) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[assumption_4_39,83,lemma_1_46,67]),lemma_1_64,lemma_1_48,lemma_1_47]) ).

cnf(204,plain,
    ( external_ties(sk1,sk3) = external_ties(sk1,sk2)
    | smaller_or_equal(stock_of_knowledge(sk1,sk2),stock_of_knowledge(sk1,sk3)) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[definition_smaller_or_equal_3,101]) ).

cnf(223,plain,
    ( external_ties(sk1,sk3) = external_ties(sk1,sk2)
    | internal_friction(sk1,sk3) = internal_friction(sk1,sk2)
    | smaller(capability(sk1,sk2),capability(sk1,sk3)) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[assumption_5_42,204,lemma_1_46,56]) ).

cnf(2121,plain,
    ( external_ties(sk1,sk3) = external_ties(sk1,sk2)
    | internal_friction(sk1,sk3) = internal_friction(sk1,sk2)
    | greater(capability(sk1,sk3),capability(sk1,sk2)) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[definition_smaller_7,223]) ).

cnf(2604,plain,
    ( external_ties(sk1,sk3) = external_ties(sk1,sk2)
    | internal_friction(sk1,sk3) = internal_friction(sk1,sk2) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[assumption_4_38,2121,lemma_1_46,90]),lemma_1_64,lemma_1_48,lemma_1_47]) ).

cnf(2605,plain,
    ( external_ties(sk1,sk3) = external_ties(sk1,sk2)
    | capability(sk1,sk3) = capability(sk1,sk2) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[assumption_5_43,2604,lemma_1_46,101]) ).

cnf(2614,plain,
    ( capability(sk1,sk3) = capability(sk1,sk2)
    | position(sk1,sk3) = position(sk1,sk2) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[assumption_6_45,2605,lemma_1_46]) ).

cnf(2620,plain,
    ( capability(sk1,sk3) = capability(sk1,sk2)
    | greater(external_ties(sk1,sk2),external_ties(sk1,sk2))
    | greater(capability(sk1,sk3),capability(sk1,sk2)) ),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[46,2605,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(2630,plain,
    ( capability(sk1,sk3) = capability(sk1,sk2)
    | greater_or_equal(position(sk1,sk3),position(sk1,sk2)) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[definition_greater_or_equal_6,2614]) ).

cnf(2650,plain,
    ( capability(sk1,sk3) = capability(sk1,sk2)
    | greater(capability(sk1,sk2),capability(sk1,sk3)) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[assumption_4_38,2630,lemma_1_46,39]),lemma_1_64,lemma_1_48,lemma_1_47]) ).

cnf(2882,plain,
    ( capability(sk1,sk3) = capability(sk1,sk2)
    | greater(capability(sk1,sk3),capability(sk1,sk2)) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[meaning_postulate_greater_strict_9,2620,2620]) ).

cnf(2883,plain,
    capability(sk1,sk3) = capability(sk1,sk2),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[meaning_postulate_greater_strict_9,2882,2650]) ).

cnf(2885,plain,
    ( stock_of_knowledge(sk1,sk3) = stock_of_knowledge(sk1,sk2)
    | greater(capability(sk1,sk2),capability(sk1,sk2)) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[61,2883,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(3455,plain,
    stock_of_knowledge(sk1,sk3) = stock_of_knowledge(sk1,sk2),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[meaning_postulate_greater_strict_9,2885,2885]) ).

cnf(3456,plain,
    ( greater(stock_of_knowledge(sk1,sk2),stock_of_knowledge(sk1,sk2))
    | greater(external_ties(sk1,sk3),external_ties(sk1,sk2)) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[lemma_1_51,3455,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(3495,plain,
    greater(external_ties(sk1,sk3),external_ties(sk1,sk2)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[meaning_postulate_greater_strict_9,3456,3456]) ).

cnf(3496,plain,
    greater(position(sk1,sk3),position(sk1,sk2)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[assumption_6_44,3495,lemma_1_46]) ).

cnf(3539,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[assumption_4_39,3496,lemma_1_46,lemma_1_47,lemma_1_48,lemma_1_64]),36,2883,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.09  % Problem  : MGT042-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.05/0.10  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.08/0.28  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.28  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.28  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.28  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.28  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.28  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.28  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.08/0.28  % DateTime : Thu Jun  9 10:05:22 EDT 2022
% 0.08/0.29  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.36  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.37  * 
% 0.13/0.37  * 
% 0.13/0.37  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.13/0.37  * 
% 0.13/0.37  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.13/0.37  * 
% 0.13/0.37  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.13/0.37   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.13/0.37   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.13/0.37   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.13/0.37   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.13/0.37   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.13/0.37   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.13/0.37   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.13/0.37   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.13/0.37   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.13/0.37   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.13/0.37   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.13/0.37   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.13/0.37  * 
% 0.13/0.37  "."
% 0.13/0.37  * 
% 0.13/0.37  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-09T10:05:22
% 0.13/0.37  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n032.cluster.edu at 2022-06-09T10:05:22
% 50.07/50.31  
% 50.07/50.31  
% 50.07/50.31  #||
% 50.07/50.31  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 50.07/50.31  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 50.07/50.32  ||#
% 50.07/50.32  
% 50.07/50.32  ; Summary of computation:
% 50.07/50.32  ;     10595 formulas have been input or derived (from 251 formulas).
% 50.07/50.32  ;      3539 (33%) were retained.  Of these,
% 50.07/50.32  ;         1598 (45%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 50.07/50.32  ;         1941 (55%) are still being kept.
% 50.07/50.32  ; 
% 50.07/50.32  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 50.07/50.32  ;     0.005   0%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 50.07/50.32  ;     0.001   0%   Assert                       (38 calls)
% 50.07/50.32  ;     0.435   1%   Process new row              (10,063 calls)
% 50.07/50.32  ;     0.359   1%   Resolution                   (500 calls)
% 50.07/50.32  ;     0.010   0%   Paramodulation               (250 calls)
% 50.07/50.32  ;     0.004   0%   Factoring                    (222 calls)
% 50.07/50.32  ;     0.553   1%   Condensing                   (8,650 calls)
% 50.07/50.32  ;     2.278   5%   Forward subsumption          (8,650 calls)
% 50.07/50.32  ;     0.391   1%   Backward subsumption         (3,521 calls)
% 50.07/50.32  ;    45.191  91%   Clause clause subsumption    (318,669 calls)
% 50.07/50.32  ;     0.402   1%   Forward simplification       (9,508 calls)
% 50.07/50.32  ;     0.086   0%   Backward simplification      (3,539 calls)
% 50.07/50.32  ;     0.152   0%   Ordering                     (116,547 calls)
% 50.07/50.32  ;     0.001   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 50.07/50.32  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 50.07/50.32  ;     0.064   0%   Other
% 50.07/50.32  ;    49.932        Total
% 50.07/50.32  ;    49.943        Real time
% 50.07/50.32  ; 
% 50.07/50.32  ; Term-hash-array has 885 terms in all.
% 50.07/50.32  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1,923 entries (2,783 at peak, 3,521 added, 1,598 deleted).
% 50.07/50.32  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 3,466 nodes (5,426 at peak, 8,361 added, 4,895 deleted).
% 50.07/50.32  ;  Retrieved 478,714 possibly forward subsuming rows in 8,650 calls.
% 50.07/50.32  ;  Retrieved 56,961 possibly backward subsumed rows in 3,521 calls.
% 50.07/50.32  ; Path-index has 714 entries (877 at peak, 998 added, 284 deleted).
% 50.07/50.32  ; Path-index has 417 nodes (461 at peak, 484 added, 67 deleted).
% 50.07/50.32  ; Trie-index has 714 entries (877 at peak, 998 added, 284 deleted).
% 50.07/50.32  ; Trie-index has 657 nodes (948 at peak, 1,112 added, 455 deleted).
% 50.07/50.32  ; Retrieved 1,525 generalization terms in 46,477 calls.
% 50.07/50.32  ; Retrieved 26 instance terms in 17 calls.
% 50.07/50.32  ; Retrieved 52,434 unifiable terms in 2,554 calls.
% 50.07/50.32  ; 
% 50.07/50.32  ; The agenda of rows to process has 112 entries:
% 50.07/50.32  ;     4 with value 12              1 with value 38               2 with value 47
% 50.07/50.32  ;     4 with value 21              2 with value 39               1 with value 49
% 50.07/50.32  ;     4 with value 24              9 with value 40               2 with value 51
% 50.07/50.32  ;     2 with value 30             18 with value 41               3 with value 58
% 50.07/50.32  ;     3 with value 31             12 with value 42               4 with value 60
% 50.07/50.32  ;     4 with value 32              8 with value 43               2 with value 61
% 50.07/50.32  ;     4 with value 33             12 with value 44               3 with value 63
% 50.07/50.32  ;     2 with value 35              6 with value 45
% 50.07/50.32  ; The agenda of rows to give has 1807 entries:
% 50.07/50.32  ;     3 with value (4 11)          3 with value (4 55)          44 with value (4 81)
% 50.07/50.32  ;     3 with value (4 12)        169 with value (4 56)          20 with value (4 82)
% 50.07/50.32  ;     1 with value (4 21)          8 with value (4 57)          52 with value (4 83)
% 50.07/50.32  ;     2 with value (4 22)        154 with value (4 58)          22 with value (4 84)
% 50.07/50.32  ;     2 with value (4 23)         41 with value (4 59)          18 with value (4 85)
% 50.07/50.32  ;     4 with value (4 32)         29 with value (4 60)          24 with value (4 86)
% 50.07/50.32  ;     6 with value (4 33)        108 with value (4 61)          38 with value (4 87)
% 50.07/50.32  ;     6 with value (4 34)         20 with value (4 62)           4 with value (4 88)
% 50.07/50.32  ;     4 with value (4 35)          5 with value (4 63)          64 with value (4 89)
% 50.07/50.32  ;    21 with value (4 39)         48 with value (4 64)          38 with value (4 90)
% 50.07/50.32  ;    11 with value (4 40)          3 with value (4 65)          32 with value (4 91)
% 50.07/50.32  ;    35 with value (4 41)          2 with value (4 66)          80 with value (4 92)
% 50.07/50.32  ;     4 with value (4 42)         19 with value (4 67)           8 with value (4 93)
% 50.07/50.32  ;     2 with value (4 43)          4 with value (4 68)          57 with value (4 94)
% 50.07/50.32  ;    17 with value (4 44)         17 with value (4 69)          24 with value (4 95)
% 50.07/50.32  ;    10 with value (4 45)          7 with value (4 70)          24 with value (4 96)
% 50.07/50.32  ;     4 with value (4 47)         10 with value (4 71)          30 with value (4 97)
% 50.07/50.32  ;    61 with value (4 48)         24 with value (4 72)          16 with value (4 98)
% 50.07/50.32  ;    12 with value (4 49)         22 with value (4 74)          34 with value (4 99)
% 50.07/50.32  ;    60 with value (4 50)          9 with value (4 75)           4 with value (4 100)
% 50.07/50.32  ;     7 with value (4 51)         13 with value (4 77)          24 with value (4 101)
% 50.07/50.32  ;    30 with value (4 52)         18 with value (4 78)          12 with value (4 102)
% 50.07/50.32  ;    40 with value (4 53)         10 with value (4 79)           9 with value (4 104)
% 50.07/50.32  ;     4 with value (4 54)         37 with value (4 80)
% 50.07/50.32  Evaluation took:
% 50.07/50.32    49.944 seconds of real time
% 50.07/50.32    48.86945 seconds of user run time
% 50.07/50.32    1.071891 seconds of system run time
% 50.07/50.32    [Run times include 2.883 seconds GC run time.]
% 50.07/50.32    0 calls to %EVAL
% 50.07/50.32    0 page faults and
% 50.07/50.32    11,486,762,576 bytes consed.
% 50.07/50.32  :PROOF-FOUND
% 50.07/50.32  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-09T10:06:12
% 50.07/50.32  :PROOF-FOUND
% 50.07/50.32  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------