TSTP Solution File: MGT041-2 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem : MGT041-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 17:51:34 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.23s 0.54s
% Output : Refutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 24 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 45 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 48 ( 27 ~; 19 |; 0 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 9 ( 8 usr; 3 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 8 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f31,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f18,f25,f30]) ).
fof(f30,plain,
~ spl0_2,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f29]) ).
fof(f29,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f28,f17]) ).
fof(f17,plain,
( first_mover(sk1)
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f15]) ).
fof(f15,plain,
( spl0_2
<=> first_mover(sk1) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])]) ).
fof(f28,plain,
~ first_mover(sk1),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f27,f4]) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
organisation_at_time(sk1,sk2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a16_4) ).
fof(f27,plain,
( ~ organisation_at_time(sk1,sk2)
| ~ first_mover(sk1) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f26,f5]) ).
fof(f5,axiom,
founding_time(sk1,sk2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a16_5) ).
fof(f26,plain,
( ~ founding_time(sk1,sk2)
| ~ first_mover(sk1)
| ~ organisation_at_time(sk1,sk2) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f3,f19]) ).
fof(f19,plain,
~ number_of_routines(sk1,sk2,low),
inference(resolution,[],[f1,f6]) ).
fof(f6,axiom,
number_of_routines(sk1,sk2,high),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a16_6) ).
fof(f1,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ number_of_routines(X0,X1,high)
| ~ number_of_routines(X0,X1,low) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mp_not_high_and_low_1) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( number_of_routines(X0,X1,low)
| ~ organisation_at_time(X0,X1)
| ~ founding_time(X0,X1)
| ~ first_mover(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a15_3) ).
fof(f25,plain,
~ spl0_1,
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f22,f11]) ).
fof(f11,plain,
( spl0_1
<=> efficient_producer(sk1) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])]) ).
fof(f22,plain,
~ efficient_producer(sk1),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f21,f5]) ).
fof(f21,plain,
( ~ founding_time(sk1,sk2)
| ~ efficient_producer(sk1) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f20,f4]) ).
fof(f20,plain,
( ~ organisation_at_time(sk1,sk2)
| ~ founding_time(sk1,sk2)
| ~ efficient_producer(sk1) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f2,f7]) ).
fof(f7,axiom,
~ has_elaborated_routines(sk1,sk2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a16_7) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( has_elaborated_routines(X0,X1)
| ~ founding_time(X0,X1)
| ~ organisation_at_time(X0,X1)
| ~ efficient_producer(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a14_2) ).
fof(f18,plain,
( spl0_1
| spl0_2 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f9,f15,f11]) ).
fof(f9,plain,
( first_mover(sk1)
| efficient_producer(sk1) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f8,f4]) ).
fof(f8,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ organisation_at_time(X0,X1)
| first_mover(X0)
| efficient_producer(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_t10_8) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.14 % Problem : MGT041-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.09/0.15 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.37 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37 % DateTime : Tue Aug 30 03:22:18 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/0.53 % (2308)fmb+10_1:1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=4:skr=on:i=191324:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/191324Mi)
% 0.23/0.53 % (2324)dis+34_1:32_abs=on:add=off:bsr=on:gsp=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=99:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/99Mi)
% 0.23/0.53 % (2321)ott+10_1:5_bd=off:tgt=full:i=99:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/99Mi)
% 0.23/0.53 % (2324)First to succeed.
% 0.23/0.54 % (2324)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.23/0.54 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.23/0.54 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.23/0.54 % (2324)------------------------------
% 0.23/0.54 % (2324)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.23/0.54 % (2324)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.23/0.54 % (2324)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.23/0.54
% 0.23/0.54 % (2324)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.23/0.54 % (2324)Time elapsed: 0.116 s
% 0.23/0.54 % (2324)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.23/0.54 % (2324)------------------------------
% 0.23/0.54 % (2324)------------------------------
% 0.23/0.54 % (2305)Success in time 0.158 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------