TSTP Solution File: MGT041+2 by Prover9---1109a

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : MGT041+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:23:02 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.44s 0.98s
% Output   : Refutation 0.44s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : MGT041+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Jun  9 08:12:12 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.44/0.98  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.44/0.98  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.44/0.98  Process 4751 was started by sandbox on n027.cluster.edu,
% 0.44/0.98  Thu Jun  9 08:12:13 2022
% 0.44/0.98  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_4441_n027.cluster.edu".
% 0.44/0.98  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_4441_n027.cluster.edu
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.44/0.98  set(auto2).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.44/0.98      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.44/0.98      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.44/0.98  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.44/0.98  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.44/0.98  assign(order,kbo).
% 0.44/0.98  set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.44/0.98  clear(print_given).
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (5 formulas)
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.44/0.98  1 (all X all T -(number_of_routines(X,T,low) & number_of_routines(X,T,high))) # label(mp_not_high_and_low) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98  2 (all X all T (organisation_at_time(X,T) & efficient_producer(X) & founding_time(X,T) -> has_elaborated_routines(X,T))) # label(a14) # label(hypothesis) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98  3 (all X all T (organisation_at_time(X,T) & first_mover(X) & founding_time(X,T) -> number_of_routines(X,T,low))) # label(a15) # label(hypothesis) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98  4 (exists X exists T (organisation_at_time(X,T) & founding_time(X,T) & number_of_routines(X,T,high) & -has_elaborated_routines(X,T))) # label(a16) # label(hypothesis) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98  5 -(exists X exists T (organisation_at_time(X,T) & -first_mover(X) & -efficient_producer(X))) # label(prove_t10) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.44/0.98  6 -organisation_at_time(A,B) | first_mover(A) | efficient_producer(A) # label(prove_t10) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(5)].
% 0.44/0.98  7 organisation_at_time(c1,c2) # label(a16) # label(hypothesis).  [clausify(4)].
% 0.44/0.98  Derived: first_mover(c1) | efficient_producer(c1).  [resolve(6,a,7,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  8 -organisation_at_time(A,B) | -efficient_producer(A) | -founding_time(A,B) | has_elaborated_routines(A,B) # label(a14) # label(hypothesis).  [clausify(2)].
% 0.44/0.98  Derived: -efficient_producer(c1) | -founding_time(c1,c2) | has_elaborated_routines(c1,c2).  [resolve(8,a,7,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  9 -organisation_at_time(A,B) | -first_mover(A) | -founding_time(A,B) | number_of_routines(A,B,low) # label(a15) # label(hypothesis).  [clausify(3)].
% 0.44/0.98  Derived: -first_mover(c1) | -founding_time(c1,c2) | number_of_routines(c1,c2,low).  [resolve(9,a,7,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  10 -efficient_producer(c1) | -founding_time(c1,c2) | has_elaborated_routines(c1,c2).  [resolve(8,a,7,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  11 founding_time(c1,c2) # label(a16) # label(hypothesis).  [clausify(4)].
% 0.44/0.98  Derived: -efficient_producer(c1) | has_elaborated_routines(c1,c2).  [resolve(10,b,11,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  12 -first_mover(c1) | -founding_time(c1,c2) | number_of_routines(c1,c2,low).  [resolve(9,a,7,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  Derived: -first_mover(c1) | number_of_routines(c1,c2,low).  [resolve(12,b,11,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  13 -efficient_producer(c1) | has_elaborated_routines(c1,c2).  [resolve(10,b,11,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  14 -has_elaborated_routines(c1,c2) # label(a16) # label(hypothesis).  [clausify(4)].
% 0.44/0.98  Derived: -efficient_producer(c1).  [resolve(13,b,14,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  15 -first_mover(c1) | number_of_routines(c1,c2,low).  [resolve(12,b,11,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  16 first_mover(c1) | efficient_producer(c1).  [resolve(6,a,7,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  Derived: number_of_routines(c1,c2,low) | efficient_producer(c1).  [resolve(15,a,16,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  17 number_of_routines(c1,c2,low) | efficient_producer(c1).  [resolve(15,a,16,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  18 -efficient_producer(c1).  [resolve(13,b,14,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  Derived: number_of_routines(c1,c2,low).  [resolve(17,b,18,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  Auto_denials:
% 0.44/0.98    % copying label mp_not_high_and_low to answer in negative clause
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  Term ordering decisions:
% 0.44/0.98  Function symbol KB weights:  high=1. low=1. c1=1. c2=1.
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.44/0.98  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.44/0.98  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds: mp_not_high_and_low.
% 0.44/0.98  % Length of proof is 22.
% 0.44/0.98  % Level of proof is 6.
% 0.44/0.98  % Maximum clause weight is 8.000.
% 0.44/0.98  % Given clauses 2.
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  1 (all X all T -(number_of_routines(X,T,low) & number_of_routines(X,T,high))) # label(mp_not_high_and_low) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98  2 (all X all T (organisation_at_time(X,T) & efficient_producer(X) & founding_time(X,T) -> has_elaborated_routines(X,T))) # label(a14) # label(hypothesis) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98  3 (all X all T (organisation_at_time(X,T) & first_mover(X) & founding_time(X,T) -> number_of_routines(X,T,low))) # label(a15) # label(hypothesis) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98  4 (exists X exists T (organisation_at_time(X,T) & founding_time(X,T) & number_of_routines(X,T,high) & -has_elaborated_routines(X,T))) # label(a16) # label(hypothesis) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98  5 -(exists X exists T (organisation_at_time(X,T) & -first_mover(X) & -efficient_producer(X))) # label(prove_t10) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98  6 -organisation_at_time(A,B) | first_mover(A) | efficient_producer(A) # label(prove_t10) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(5)].
% 0.44/0.98  7 organisation_at_time(c1,c2) # label(a16) # label(hypothesis).  [clausify(4)].
% 0.44/0.98  8 -organisation_at_time(A,B) | -efficient_producer(A) | -founding_time(A,B) | has_elaborated_routines(A,B) # label(a14) # label(hypothesis).  [clausify(2)].
% 0.44/0.98  9 -organisation_at_time(A,B) | -first_mover(A) | -founding_time(A,B) | number_of_routines(A,B,low) # label(a15) # label(hypothesis).  [clausify(3)].
% 0.44/0.98  10 -efficient_producer(c1) | -founding_time(c1,c2) | has_elaborated_routines(c1,c2).  [resolve(8,a,7,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  11 founding_time(c1,c2) # label(a16) # label(hypothesis).  [clausify(4)].
% 0.44/0.98  12 -first_mover(c1) | -founding_time(c1,c2) | number_of_routines(c1,c2,low).  [resolve(9,a,7,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  13 -efficient_producer(c1) | has_elaborated_routines(c1,c2).  [resolve(10,b,11,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  14 -has_elaborated_routines(c1,c2) # label(a16) # label(hypothesis).  [clausify(4)].
% 0.44/0.98  15 -first_mover(c1) | number_of_routines(c1,c2,low).  [resolve(12,b,11,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  16 first_mover(c1) | efficient_producer(c1).  [resolve(6,a,7,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  17 number_of_routines(c1,c2,low) | efficient_producer(c1).  [resolve(15,a,16,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  18 -efficient_producer(c1).  [resolve(13,b,14,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  19 number_of_routines(c1,c2,high) # label(a16) # label(hypothesis).  [clausify(4)].
% 0.44/0.98  20 -number_of_routines(A,B,low) | -number_of_routines(A,B,high) # label(mp_not_high_and_low) # label(axiom) # answer(mp_not_high_and_low).  [clausify(1)].
% 0.44/0.98  21 number_of_routines(c1,c2,low).  [resolve(17,b,18,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  22 $F # answer(mp_not_high_and_low).  [resolve(20,b,19,a),unit_del(a,21)].
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.44/0.98  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  Given=2. Generated=4. Kept=3. proofs=1.
% 0.44/0.98  Usable=2. Sos=1. Demods=0. Limbo=0, Disabled=16. Hints=0.
% 0.44/0.98  Megabytes=0.03.
% 0.44/0.98  User_CPU=0.01, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  THEOREM PROVED
% 0.44/0.98  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  Process 4751 exit (max_proofs) Thu Jun  9 08:12:13 2022
% 0.44/0.98  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------