TSTP Solution File: MGT041+2 by Goeland---1.0.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Goeland---1.0.0
% Problem : MGT041+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : goeland -dmt -presko -proof %s
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 18 05:15:46 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.58s
% Output : Proof 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : MGT041+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : goeland -dmt -presko -proof %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Fri Sep 2 02:52:55 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.34 [DMT] DMT loaded with preskolemization
% 0.12/0.34 [EQ] equality loaded.
% 0.12/0.34 [0.000036s][1][MAIN] Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.34 Start search
% 0.12/0.34 nb_step : 1 - limit : 5
% 0.12/0.34 Launch Gotab with destructive = true
% 0.19/0.58 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.58 [0] ALPHA_AND : (! [X2_2, T3_3] : (~(number_of_routines(X2_2, T3_3, low) & number_of_routines(X2_2, T3_3, high))) & ! [X4_4, T5_5] : ((((organisation_at_time(X4_4, T5_5) & efficient_producer(X4_4)) & founding_time(X4_4, T5_5)) => has_elaborated_routines(X4_4, T5_5))) & ! [X6_6, T7_7] : ((((organisation_at_time(X6_6, T7_7) & first_mover(X6_6)) & founding_time(X6_6, T7_7)) => number_of_routines(X6_6, T7_7, low))) & ? [X8_8, T9_9] : ((((organisation_at_time(X8_8, T9_9) & founding_time(X8_8, T9_9)) & number_of_routines(X8_8, T9_9, high)) & ~has_elaborated_routines(X8_8, T9_9))) & ~? [X10_10, T11_11] : (((organisation_at_time(X10_10, T11_11) & ~first_mover(X10_10)) & ~efficient_producer(X10_10))))
% 0.19/0.58 -> [1] ! [X2_2, T3_3] : (~(number_of_routines(X2_2, T3_3, low) & number_of_routines(X2_2, T3_3, high))), ! [X4_4, T5_5] : ((((organisation_at_time(X4_4, T5_5) & efficient_producer(X4_4)) & founding_time(X4_4, T5_5)) => has_elaborated_routines(X4_4, T5_5))), ! [X6_6, T7_7] : ((((organisation_at_time(X6_6, T7_7) & first_mover(X6_6)) & founding_time(X6_6, T7_7)) => number_of_routines(X6_6, T7_7, low))), ? [X8_8, T9_9] : ((((organisation_at_time(X8_8, T9_9) & founding_time(X8_8, T9_9)) & number_of_routines(X8_8, T9_9, high)) & ~has_elaborated_routines(X8_8, T9_9))), ~? [X10_10, T11_11] : (((organisation_at_time(X10_10, T11_11) & ~first_mover(X10_10)) & ~efficient_producer(X10_10)))
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 [1] DELTA_EXISTS : ? [X8_8, T9_9] : ((((organisation_at_time(X8_8, T9_9) & founding_time(X8_8, T9_9)) & number_of_routines(X8_8, T9_9, high)) & ~has_elaborated_routines(X8_8, T9_9)))
% 0.19/0.58 -> [2] (((organisation_at_time(skolem_X88, skolem_T99) & founding_time(skolem_X88, skolem_T99)) & number_of_routines(skolem_X88, skolem_T99, high)) & ~has_elaborated_routines(skolem_X88, skolem_T99))
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 [2] ALPHA_AND : (((organisation_at_time(skolem_X88, skolem_T99) & founding_time(skolem_X88, skolem_T99)) & number_of_routines(skolem_X88, skolem_T99, high)) & ~has_elaborated_routines(skolem_X88, skolem_T99))
% 0.19/0.58 -> [3] ((organisation_at_time(skolem_X88, skolem_T99) & founding_time(skolem_X88, skolem_T99)) & number_of_routines(skolem_X88, skolem_T99, high)), ~has_elaborated_routines(skolem_X88, skolem_T99)
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 [3] ALPHA_AND : ((organisation_at_time(skolem_X88, skolem_T99) & founding_time(skolem_X88, skolem_T99)) & number_of_routines(skolem_X88, skolem_T99, high))
% 0.19/0.58 -> [4] (organisation_at_time(skolem_X88, skolem_T99) & founding_time(skolem_X88, skolem_T99)), number_of_routines(skolem_X88, skolem_T99, high)
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 [4] ALPHA_AND : (organisation_at_time(skolem_X88, skolem_T99) & founding_time(skolem_X88, skolem_T99))
% 0.19/0.58 -> [5] organisation_at_time(skolem_X88, skolem_T99), founding_time(skolem_X88, skolem_T99)
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 [5] GAMMA_FORALL : ! [X2_2, T3_3] : (~(number_of_routines(X2_2, T3_3, low) & number_of_routines(X2_2, T3_3, high)))
% 0.19/0.58 -> [6] ~(number_of_routines(skolem_X88, skolem_T99, low) & number_of_routines(skolem_X88, skolem_T99, high))
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 [6] BETA_NOT_AND : ~(number_of_routines(skolem_X88, skolem_T99, low) & number_of_routines(skolem_X88, skolem_T99, high))
% 0.19/0.58 -> [7] ~number_of_routines(skolem_X88, skolem_T99, low)
% 0.19/0.58 -> [8] ~number_of_routines(skolem_X88, skolem_T99, high)
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 [8] CLOSURE : ~number_of_routines(skolem_X88, skolem_T99, high)
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 [7] GAMMA_FORALL : ! [X4_4, T5_5] : ((((organisation_at_time(X4_4, T5_5) & efficient_producer(X4_4)) & founding_time(X4_4, T5_5)) => has_elaborated_routines(X4_4, T5_5)))
% 0.19/0.58 -> [9] (((organisation_at_time(skolem_X88, skolem_T99) & efficient_producer(skolem_X88)) & founding_time(skolem_X88, skolem_T99)) => has_elaborated_routines(skolem_X88, skolem_T99))
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 [9] BETA_IMPLY : (((organisation_at_time(skolem_X88, skolem_T99) & efficient_producer(skolem_X88)) & founding_time(skolem_X88, skolem_T99)) => has_elaborated_routines(skolem_X88, skolem_T99))
% 0.19/0.58 -> [10] ~((organisation_at_time(skolem_X88, skolem_T99) & efficient_producer(skolem_X88)) & founding_time(skolem_X88, skolem_T99))
% 0.19/0.58 -> [11] has_elaborated_routines(skolem_X88, skolem_T99)
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 [11] CLOSURE : has_elaborated_routines(skolem_X88, skolem_T99)
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 [10] BETA_NOT_AND : ~((organisation_at_time(skolem_X88, skolem_T99) & efficient_producer(skolem_X88)) & founding_time(skolem_X88, skolem_T99))
% 0.19/0.58 -> [80] ~(organisation_at_time(skolem_X88, skolem_T99) & efficient_producer(skolem_X88))
% 0.19/0.58 -> [81] ~founding_time(skolem_X88, skolem_T99)
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 [81] CLOSURE : ~founding_time(skolem_X88, skolem_T99)
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 [80] BETA_NOT_AND : ~(organisation_at_time(skolem_X88, skolem_T99) & efficient_producer(skolem_X88))
% 0.19/0.58 -> [82] ~organisation_at_time(skolem_X88, skolem_T99)
% 0.19/0.58 -> [83] ~efficient_producer(skolem_X88)
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 [82] CLOSURE : ~organisation_at_time(skolem_X88, skolem_T99)
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 [83] GAMMA_FORALL : ! [X6_6, T7_7] : ((((organisation_at_time(X6_6, T7_7) & first_mover(X6_6)) & founding_time(X6_6, T7_7)) => number_of_routines(X6_6, T7_7, low)))
% 0.19/0.58 -> [84] (((organisation_at_time(skolem_X88, skolem_T99) & first_mover(skolem_X88)) & founding_time(skolem_X88, skolem_T99)) => number_of_routines(skolem_X88, skolem_T99, low))
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 [84] BETA_IMPLY : (((organisation_at_time(skolem_X88, skolem_T99) & first_mover(skolem_X88)) & founding_time(skolem_X88, skolem_T99)) => number_of_routines(skolem_X88, skolem_T99, low))
% 0.19/0.58 -> [85] ~((organisation_at_time(skolem_X88, skolem_T99) & first_mover(skolem_X88)) & founding_time(skolem_X88, skolem_T99))
% 0.19/0.58 -> [86] number_of_routines(skolem_X88, skolem_T99, low)
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 [85] BETA_NOT_AND : ~((organisation_at_time(skolem_X88, skolem_T99) & first_mover(skolem_X88)) & founding_time(skolem_X88, skolem_T99))
% 0.19/0.58 -> [87] ~(organisation_at_time(skolem_X88, skolem_T99) & first_mover(skolem_X88))
% 0.19/0.58 -> [88] ~founding_time(skolem_X88, skolem_T99)
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 [88] CLOSURE : ~founding_time(skolem_X88, skolem_T99)
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 [87] BETA_NOT_AND : ~(organisation_at_time(skolem_X88, skolem_T99) & first_mover(skolem_X88))
% 0.19/0.58 -> [89] ~organisation_at_time(skolem_X88, skolem_T99)
% 0.19/0.58 -> [90] ~first_mover(skolem_X88)
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 [89] CLOSURE : ~organisation_at_time(skolem_X88, skolem_T99)
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 [91] BETA_NOT_AND : ~((organisation_at_time(skolem_X88, skolem_T99) & ~first_mover(skolem_X88)) & ~efficient_producer(skolem_X88))
% 0.19/0.58 -> [101] ~(organisation_at_time(skolem_X88, skolem_T99) & ~first_mover(skolem_X88))
% 0.19/0.58 -> [102] ~~efficient_producer(skolem_X88)
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 [102] ALPHA_NOT_NOT : ~~efficient_producer(skolem_X88)
% 0.19/0.58 -> [105] efficient_producer(skolem_X88)
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 [105] CLOSURE : efficient_producer(skolem_X88)
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 [101] BETA_NOT_AND : ~(organisation_at_time(skolem_X88, skolem_T99) & ~first_mover(skolem_X88))
% 0.19/0.58 -> [107] ~organisation_at_time(skolem_X88, skolem_T99)
% 0.19/0.58 -> [108] ~~first_mover(skolem_X88)
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 [107] CLOSURE : ~organisation_at_time(skolem_X88, skolem_T99)
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 [108] ALPHA_NOT_NOT : ~~first_mover(skolem_X88)
% 0.19/0.58 -> [109] first_mover(skolem_X88)
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 [109] CLOSURE : first_mover(skolem_X88)
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 [86] CLOSURE : number_of_routines(skolem_X88, skolem_T99, low)
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.58 [0.240127s][1][Res] 1242 goroutines created
% 0.19/0.58 ==== Result ====
% 0.19/0.58 [0.240167s][1][Res] VALID
% 0.19/0.58 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------