TSTP Solution File: MGT041+2 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : MGT041+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:06:46 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 4.41s 2.21s
% Output : CNFRefutation 4.41s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 21 ( 12 unt; 3 nHn; 21 RR)
% Number of literals : 40 ( 0 equ; 21 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( efficient_producer(X1)
| first_mover(X1)
| ~ organisation_at_time(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jmuxorxw/lgb.p',i_0_8) ).
cnf(i_0_7,hypothesis,
organisation_at_time(esk1_0,esk2_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jmuxorxw/lgb.p',i_0_7) ).
cnf(i_0_4,hypothesis,
~ has_elaborated_routines(esk1_0,esk2_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jmuxorxw/lgb.p',i_0_4) ).
cnf(i_0_2,hypothesis,
( has_elaborated_routines(X1,X2)
| ~ efficient_producer(X1)
| ~ organisation_at_time(X1,X2)
| ~ founding_time(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jmuxorxw/lgb.p',i_0_2) ).
cnf(i_0_6,hypothesis,
founding_time(esk1_0,esk2_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jmuxorxw/lgb.p',i_0_6) ).
cnf(i_0_3,hypothesis,
( number_of_routines(X1,X2,low)
| ~ first_mover(X1)
| ~ organisation_at_time(X1,X2)
| ~ founding_time(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jmuxorxw/lgb.p',i_0_3) ).
cnf(i_0_1,plain,
( ~ number_of_routines(X1,X2,low)
| ~ number_of_routines(X1,X2,high) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jmuxorxw/lgb.p',i_0_1) ).
cnf(i_0_5,hypothesis,
number_of_routines(esk1_0,esk2_0,high),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jmuxorxw/lgb.p',i_0_5) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( efficient_producer(X1)
| first_mover(X1)
| ~ organisation_at_time(X1,X2) ),
i_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_18,hypothesis,
organisation_at_time(esk1_0,esk2_0),
i_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_19,hypothesis,
~ has_elaborated_routines(esk1_0,esk2_0),
i_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_20,hypothesis,
( has_elaborated_routines(X1,X2)
| ~ efficient_producer(X1)
| ~ organisation_at_time(X1,X2)
| ~ founding_time(X1,X2) ),
i_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_21,hypothesis,
founding_time(esk1_0,esk2_0),
i_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_22,hypothesis,
( efficient_producer(esk1_0)
| first_mover(esk1_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,hypothesis,
~ efficient_producer(esk1_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21]),c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,hypothesis,
( number_of_routines(X1,X2,low)
| ~ first_mover(X1)
| ~ organisation_at_time(X1,X2)
| ~ founding_time(X1,X2) ),
i_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_25,hypothesis,
first_mover(esk1_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( ~ number_of_routines(X1,X2,low)
| ~ number_of_routines(X1,X2,high) ),
i_0_1 ).
cnf(c_0_27,hypothesis,
number_of_routines(esk1_0,esk2_0,low),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_21]),c_0_18])]),c_0_25])]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,hypothesis,
number_of_routines(esk1_0,esk2_0,high),
i_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : MGT041+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 9 08:11:59 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 4.41/2.21 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 4.41/2.21 # No SInE strategy applied
% 4.41/2.21 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 4.41/2.21 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y_ni
% 4.41/2.21 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 4.41/2.21 #
% 4.41/2.21 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 4.41/2.21 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 4.41/2.21
% 4.41/2.21 # Proof found!
% 4.41/2.21 # SZS status Theorem
% 4.41/2.21 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.41/2.21 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 4.41/2.21
% 4.41/2.21 # -------------------------------------------------
% 4.41/2.21 # User time : 0.025 s
% 4.41/2.21 # System time : 0.004 s
% 4.41/2.21 # Total time : 0.029 s
% 4.41/2.21 # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 4.41/2.21
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------